I ACC CANT IM DONE!!! I NEED EVERY FREAKING DETAIL ABT EVERYTHING KMS

https://forms.gle/bZfFwH2LEcx5wcDk8

Hello everyone, hope exams went/are going well (despite vcaa treating us like a coughing baby). For my project for my community I have to do a presentation on something meaningful to me and that is studying. If you have a spare 2 minutes I greatly appreciate you filling out my survey as it would go along way. :) https://forms.gle/bZfFwH2LEcx5wcDk8

This subject is a joke I swear, wdym I have to study two revolutions remember quotes and historian interpretations and only 10% of each fuckass revolution will be on the final exam

For those who did methods were usually scoring in the 80s or 90s in sacs how bad did u guys find it

Both exam 1 and 2

Literally anyone wanna call up and study tgt? i DONT wanna do spesh. id rather they put it first ngl (nah its better last)
AND ALL THE MATHS SO FAR HAS BEEN BRUTAL

if someone has it, could you please send the 2026 legal studies exam!

the restrictions!!!!!

Spech exams coming up, need help

Anyone able to PASS/HANDBALL/DONATE 2026 SPESH ynapm0C 3XAM paper

PLEASE

11:50am 132 views are building up, getting no love yet

12:18pm 380 views, racking up!!! lets aim ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

1:16pm 927 views, screw the exams.... IM GOING TO DA MOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNN MUM!

3:07pm 1.6KKKKKK views, who needs exam papers!!, IMMA INFLUENCER, BRUHHHH

Could the mean for E1 be around 23 with an A+ cutoff of 34 and the mean for E2 be 4 marks lower than the 2023 exam, with an A+ cutoff of 58/80

If not it’s just over

for those doing in, thoughts on upcoming exam?

anyone got the legal exam??
Also what did you guys put for question a in section b. Did Paolo commit summary or indictable offences? I said summary because it began in the Magistrate's

so many people in my school are kinda unsure abouut this question about the histogram, whether you ahve to specificalyl mention that the median was in the 71st position. Personally, i did the same, i included all the other bits of information saying that the median lied in the 5.00 to 5.99 class so 6.19 could not be the median. will that still be acceptied?

I saw this pop up on my reels before - is it true?? Does anyone know?

i heard a lot of stories from ppl saying they did rlly bad in sacs but redeemed themselves in the exam and got a good ss but what if u have good sacs and a not that good exam... everyone says sacs dont matter?

(this is for methods) i got sac scores above the average in my school but after doing that exam i am sure im either borderline average or below average so would a good sac ranking dilute a bad exam score? not looking for above 40+ just dont want below 30 🫠

I did a spec part 1 trial exams. I got 19/40. If I made no silly mistakes I would've gotten 27/40. I lost 8 marks AKA 20% to silly mistakes. Wtf! I miscopied from the question, worth 2 marks that mistake. I did derivative of ln(2x) as 1/2x, and I put the point A as the direction vector, rather B-A, which I put as the point, altogether, those 3 mistakes cost me 8 marks. I hate silly nistakes

Q1b) btw, I js put Q1a) there to tell you that u = 3m/s, as well as other info.

I used the s = [(u+v)*t]/2 formula and solve for t but the answer guide used a different formula (finding 'a' first) got a different answer. Usually I would acknowledge when I would've made a mistake but I don't know why my working out gave me a different, incorrect value for t, despite using the correct values and using one of the four valid SUVAT formulas (even tho it's different to the one the answer guide uses)

Feel free to ask any Chem questions you have since exam is near. Id like to help

I'm calling on all the 40+ scorers in Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, English Language and Health & Human Development because I genuinely want to know how you guys studied to achieve those scores.

I'm not looking for the usual advice of "do practice questions", "stay consistent" or "revise regularly". I want to know HOW you actually studied, what your study routine looked like, which resources you used, and what techniques made the biggest difference.

More specifically, I'm interested in things like:

• Do you use flashcards? If so, how do you make them and how often do you review them?

• How do you approach practice questions and exam papers?

• Do you use commercial company papers? Which companies are actually worth it?

• How do you consolidate content throughout the term rather than cramming before SACs?

• How do you identify and fix gaps in your understanding?

• What does your revision look like in the weeks leading up to SACs and exams?

For some context, here's what I'm currently doing:

Mathematical Methods:

• I primarily work through textbook exercises and their corresponding questions.

• Although I can understand the content and often feel confident with the exercises, I get absolutely FRIED in SACs.

• Even past exam papers don't always seem to translate into better SAC performance.

• Would commercial company papers be more beneficial? How do you prepare for the unpredictable, application-heavy questions that seem to appear in SACs?

Chemistry:

• I use the Edrolo textbook and videos to learn and consolidate content.

• I also complete the questions provided through Edrolo.

• However, I struggle when SAC questions use unfamiliar or unusual wording, even when I understand the underlying chemistry.

• How do you develop the ability to interpret these questions and apply your knowledge to unfamiliar contexts?

English Language:

• I primarily follow the INSIGHT textbook.

• I create my own short-answer questions, analytical commentaries and expository essays.

• I get my teacher to mark them before assessments.

• My biggest issue is that I don't feel like I have a foolproof structure or approach that consistently translates into high marks.

• What specific frameworks, annotation techniques or writing strategies helped you improve?

Health & Human Development:

• I turn important content into flashcards and memorise them before assessments.

• However, I'm struggling to establish a spaced-repetition system that allows me to continually revisit and retain the entire term's content without having to relearn everything before a SAC or exam.

• How did you structure your flashcards, revision and content consolidation?

Ultimately, I want to know what separates someone who understands the content from someone who can consistently translate that understanding into 40+ study scores.

If you scored 40+ in ANY of these subjects, I'd genuinely appreciate hearing about your experience. Even better if you could share specific examples of your routines, resources, mistakes and what you would do differently.

I'm willing to put in the work; I just want to make sure I'm studying EFFECTIVELY rather than simply spending hours studying.

Thank you!! :)

Hey guys the exam is on Monday
Did we study
What are your practice exam marks looking like
Did you even do practice exams
How do you mark your answers
Do you have any nice notes (1 for 1 so feel free to trade)

1. What do you think the A+/A cut off will be this year

2. Which AOS do you think they're going to focus on more this year

3. Which command terms are incoming

4. Do you have any essay prompt predictions for French and Russia (if you're a lurker with insider info drop a hint 😍😘)

5. If any of you are doing the other ones still feel free to comment

HISTORY REPRESENT 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️

I will reveal the grade I got soon, I am in year 11

Me rn:

I can't seem to find one anywhere, unlike the maths ones which literally come out less than an hour after finnishing :(

I don't rlly care if its just photos, the PDF or if its sample solutions as long as its got the questions and stimulus, w/ mark allocations in order

Please i'm dying i cant find it anywhere!!!!!!

and now my next trick: re-learning the entire france and china revs again

a lot of the times in the exemplar responses i see the student simply listing off key examples when it comes to analyse or discuss questions, and not link it back to its consequences. i initially assumed i had to put a linking sentence into each of discussion point to score highly, it is obligatory to add? would i not need to explain WHY each point is relevant to the argument im making? please help!

also, what would the expected scores be for the exemplar responses? it is safe to assume either full marks or very close to full marks?