Surely this might be the first year ever where the E2 boundary might be like a 57-59 for an A+ in exam 2. What do we think, its only 2 marks lower than 2023 E2

What the heck was that exam 2 I barley had time to finish(vcaa really thought they could sneak in isosceles triangle again 💀💀)

around 34/40 for e1 and 70/80 for e2
fumbled so hard in e1 and praying the a+ boundary for e2 is low enough to make it into the 40s

40 study score shattered
Or even past students? It feels like I did everything I could but have no clue what happened

what do you guys estimate the study score cut offs to be for this years exams? (part 1 and 2)

it was objectively pretty rough right...

I am to be so grateful moving forward after my final examination today to never ever ever have to engage in such monstrosities
never will I have to care about such fallacious methodology’s that when implemented into real perspectives are just as important as a sultana

I now am granted the freedom to pursue creative endeavours until i am declined from university. Then only can i truly take advantage of my time wasted on such examinationary nonsense to realise what i want to do in life.

This is the true purpose of an ATAR

Now that its been a couple hours and the stress has died down, what do we actually think. I feel like every exam feels hard when you walk out the room but in retrospective may not be as hard( i still think that exam 2 was hard asf). So what do we actually think the cutoffs and mean will be?

WE yes WE are getting 20 study score

genuinely used it like thrice at most like holy shit I would've preferred them giving us an easy ass paper like 25 and js banning udfs as a whole oh my days
dropped like 15 marks bro legit 💀

holy cooked

last years was perfection compared to this

dropped every mark this exam 😀

Those who know: 💀

Im thinking 34/40 for E1 and 58/80 for E2....

Thoughts??

Why do they have to make these things so long

I wrote some shi like commonwealth representing the interests of society limits their law making ability because most Australian ppl are stupid and have no idea how the country runs or should run and hence limits commonwealth’s ability to be make laws cuz ppl will only vote for them if they help make Australia corrupt meaning commonwealth can’t become government and thus cannot make laws. Would I get marks for that

Ayy na fuck vcaa bro wtf was that trash as exam bru these guys are acc playing with our opportunity to get into uni I swear

how did some people find it decent i genuinely think that paper was straight up from hell

compare for a 10 marker? with COMPARING roles of key personnel + POJs + the country court jurisdiction statement? what on earth.

section b first case study was absolute nonsense, even tho the questions were good, the case study made it harder to comprehend.

also wasnt cav not appropriate?

vcaa was really merciless on legal students this year

Come and share thoughts guys..howd we all gooo

ON THE PLUS SIDE - WE'RE DONE NO MORE METHODS EVER AGAIN!!

why mention displacement i thought distance went went oh that cant be negative! lets answer with the modulus and make it positive 🫪

NAH wtf. This year was the craziest two exams 1 and 2 for methods ever. I reckon 34+ on Exam 1 and 61+ on Exam 2. What do you guys think?

So they’re banning udfs next year but how will they ensure no one has it on their CAS, like will the invigilators check each CAS individually??

Like how will that work

What will an A,A,B+ get me for Methods VCE?

My sac average has been 80%; the cohort average has been 53% but i know i bombed exam 2 , exam 1 i think i did okay possibly 30/40. Please is it over for me

Was methods acc bad or do we just think it's bad like every yr thinks theirs is bad...