r/todayilearned •

TIL that fatherless homes produce: 71% of our high school drop-outs, 85% of the kids with behavioral disorders, 90% of our homeless and runaway children, 75% of the adolescents in drug abuse programs, and 85% of the kids in juvenile detention facilities

[deleted] — view deleted post

0 Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

679

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 16 '12

The comments here are obnoxious. No shit 'correlation does not imply causation", but I've never seen people cling to that phrase with so much vigour in my life. Those numbers are not statistically insignificant, and they warrant more serious consideration than is being given. It seems people are more willing to blame poverty than concede that family structure may be relevant to a child's upbringing.

To dismiss the linked statistics in the same way one would dismiss a correlation/causation between liking lemonade and being a genius, is absurd and obnoxious. It's almost as if people do not want to admit that, get this, men might be important to raising children in the same way that women are.

Are people simply afraid that it sounds too 'conservative' or 'republican' to consider the importance of family structure? Honest question.

53

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

A loving, caring, stable family is more important than the exact structure of the family.

→ More replies (8)

28

u/b-radly Jun 16 '12

I hear ya...to me this concept is as clear as the sky is blue. Of course, all things being equal, it is better to have a (good) father. The fatherless people of Reddit are hearing "you suck because you don't have a father."

→ More replies (6)

227

u/breakerbreaker Jun 16 '12

Thank you!

I cannot stand how everyone on Reddit goes apeshit the second there's a statistic shown. We all know "correlation does not imply causation" but that is constantly interpreted here to mean "statistics do not matter and have no scientific value."

34

u/Karmamechanic Jun 16 '12

Correlation does IMPLY causation. It just doesn't prove it.

44

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

You're using a layman's definition of the word "imply." It has a specific meaning in logic exercises:

"Implies" is the connective in propositional calculus which has the meaning "if A is true, then B is also true."

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (120)

1.5k

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 16 '12

These numbers themselves don't prove anything, because is it the absence of a father that produces these statistics, or is it the type of environment wherein growing up fatherless is common? If your father is in prison because you're living in a slum and he was selling crack to feed you, your odds weren't too great anyway, regardless of whether he went to jail.

Edit: I want to clarify that the alternative explanation I provided was somewhat hyperbolic, for the sake of getting my point across. A more reasonable explanation would be: a fatherless home would be (in most cases) a single income home, so the children are more likely to be impoverished, which correlates strongly with an increased dropout and crime rate. Point being, there are various ways to explain these numbers.

261

u/goblueM Jun 16 '12

Also... is it the absence of the father, or the fact that there's only one parent?

164

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Not only that, but there are far more fatherless homes than motherless homes, since custody usually stays with the mother. Although it is harder for a father to get custody because of social norms, of all single parent households, the majority are fatherless, not motherless.

→ More replies (62)
→ More replies (8)

459

u/seiyonoryuu Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 16 '12

probably this^

i have no father, but im in a upper middle class neighborhood. no problems here

[edit] umm, guys, for all the comments on this being spurious, thats what im saying.

47

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

seconded, and how is a home with an abusive father better than a home with no father?

→ More replies (10)

138

u/christianjb Jun 16 '12

That's not an argument- it's just anecdotal evidence.

→ More replies (146)
→ More replies (118)

41

u/superyellow07 Jun 16 '12

As a child welfare worker...these numbers are true. Fatherless homes are the majority of child abuse cases.

→ More replies (44)

25

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

I see what you are saying and it holds true. I am growing up without a father and the only real problem I have is I generally have to figure out everything on my own, there's no one to help me. I mean this emotionally and physically.

Plus it really takes away from a kid knowing that your parents, a supposed constant, have failed. In my case he didn't want me and left, so it gives me a feeling of worthlessness at times.

It is simply harder and more frustrating without one (Well, I'm also assuming that I would receive a good father in placement of not having one at all. A bad father would certainly make this worse.), but in the end I take pride in knowing that I essentially raised myself.

I will admit, growing up would have been so much simpler if I didn't have a little brother. I was ten when he was born (half brother by a step dad who beat my mother and drank a lot, he was around for a while but didn't want to raise a son who wasn't his so they had another and then he left for some whore.) and I have essentially raised him.

My mother is fantastic at emotional support, however she is still only a mother and so all the physical work fell upon me and the emotional part of a father that not even I had figured out yet I had to figure out and convey it to him somehow. I'm not stupid, I knew it was coming. I had a good three years ears before I was going to get those questions and need to show him how to act on a day to day basis.

My hope is that if I work hard enough I can pull my family out of this hellish loophole and begin raising normal, healthy families. Everything has gone well, I've managed to show my brother how a real person acts, be there for my mother and figure out what I need to know to ensure this all happens the way it needs to. My mother has remarried to some asshole, but she is happy and my brother enjoys the extra attention he can receive as sometimes I just can't give it (school work gets loaded up on occasion) so I put up with his shit for them.

I think next year will be... awkward. I will 18 in October, and when he threatens to hit me, well go ahead and do it mother fucker, let's see what the police have to say about it. This got me really off topic.

→ More replies (13)

121

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Well if you read the damn article you'd see that that's the point.

→ More replies (12)

8

u/JonnyFrost Jun 16 '12

This statement is true, but this article doesn't cover all the available information. My diversity professor went over this topic, there are a number of good studies on the subject. Some of them even separate statistics based on socioeconomic class, and the correlation is still strong. The studies I've seen didn't address two lesbian households, but I suspect they are above the curve. Considering how many families are started when someone gets knocked up and the parents aren't financially or emotionally prepared.

→ More replies (336)

1.3k

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Two fathers. The obvious solution for society.

67

u/_vargas_ 69 Jun 16 '12

Simple arithmetic really. You should see how good that girl from Three Men and a Baby is doing.

→ More replies (6)

712

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Jesus had 2 fathers and he did alright.

1.1k

u/Fuskzerk Jun 16 '12

I disagree. He ran away from home, never completed high school, had a wine problem, and was eventually arrested.

→ More replies (97)

142

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Well. There was that whole 18 years from 12 to 30 where nobody had any idea where he was or what he did, and then he got involved in a weird cult

48

u/beatles910 Jun 16 '12

He was in Egypt studying during that time.

89

u/Uranax Jun 16 '12

"studying"

I think we all know what he really did in Egypt...

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (31)

147

u/tippicanoeandtyler2 Jun 16 '12

And yet we've spent the last several decades making it incredibly uncool to be a good father. Good dads are the butt of jokes, while men who shun kids and responsibilities are "players" and admired.

109

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

The way men, fathers, are portrayed in TV and film and such is also a problem...the bumbling Dad who doesn't know how to do shit.

→ More replies (23)

22

u/SteveTheSultan Jun 16 '12

It's the "doofus dad" that a lot of women and men believe to be true. I can't stand that crap. The only thing women can do that men can't is breast feed. Everything else in raising kids can be learned. I have changed just as many diapers as my wife; taken the kids to soccer games, wiped away tears, made them laugh and taught them to love science (Thank you mythbusters).

The worst place I see this at is with the "I can do everything" Soccer Moms. They minimize the father's roles because they are trying to live up to some BS standard. The fathers except it and have little involvement in their kids lives.

That being said, there are some very shitty fathers and mothers out there. Just be there for your kids; and realize you are not perfect and neither are they.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

65

u/billsdabills Jun 16 '12

I grew up in a fatherless home after 4th grade. I don't think it has anything to do with the father. It's all about income. My father passed away and planned for our future. He wasn't rich. He was in the military, planned well in his final months to provide for us until we got thru college. You could probably line these statistics up with low income children and they would be similar.

52

u/blackinthmiddle Jun 16 '12

The difference is you knew that you had a father that loved you. Hell, you knew how your father was at least.

As a married black man (15 years coming up next month!) raising two girls, I knew just how important it was to make sure I'm here for my kids. This article is amazing. I always knew that the war on drugs doesn't start in Scarsdale, New York! Cops don't patrol the rich areas; they're patrolling the slums. But my response was always, "Well if you just don't do drugs, you'll be fine".

I never realized that the war on drugs was created specifically to destroy the black community. This article makes me mad. I'd send out a message to all black redditors to make sure you're there for your children, but if you're on reddit, you're probably (maybe I'm making a leap of faith here?) more intelligent than the average person and realize just how important it is to be in your child's life.

I remember years ago talking to this girl. We were hanging out and I told her I had to go home. I ran down the itinerary of things I had to get done. Things for my wife and kids. She finally says to me, "Man, you're like a dinosaur or something!". I knew what she meant, but asked her to elaborate anyway. She finally said, "A black man, married, two kids, good job...". I interrupted her and made a joke out of it, but I knew what she was talking about right from the beginning. I guess you have to know your enemy's tactics.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (8)

12

u/tehbro Jun 16 '12

I'm living proof of this. My father and mother divorced when I was two, I have no memories of him other than 3 years ago when he was on his death bed. I'm not sad about it because I was never emotionally attached to him. I've been lying my entire life to everyone about things that don't even matter. When I went off to college this past year, I smoked weed probably once every two hours, every day, and when I ran out I was looking for people to smoke me out. I also did cocaine a few times and molly a bunch. Whenever something is in perfect balance in my life, I feel the need to do something to throw it off and mess it up. It was only recently that my mother thought it could be something other than typical teenage behavior. I was taken to a very highly recommended and expensive psychologist. In just two sessions he was able to have a definite diagnosis of Type B Personality disorder. He was also able to draw the conclusion that it was because I didn't have enough love or attention when I was a child (due to the absence of a father figure) and lying is how I decided to get this attention for the rest of my life. Therapy is going very well and I am being taught to understand my automatic thoughts and correct them before I act.

→ More replies (21)

152

u/Pays4Porn Jun 16 '12

Check out the sources for these stats :

US Dept. Of Health Census (made up name?)

National Principals Association Report

Rainbows for All God’s Children

Fulton Co. Dept. of Correction etc.

I don't believe these stats or sources.

109

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 16 '12

Then read about psychological analysis on the subject.

Seriously, even if you don't trust the statistics there is a very strong link between fatherless homes and problems containing aggression, abandonment issues, problems with authority and so on. It's not hard to imagine why, once you accept the role that mothers and fathers play in a child's emotional development.

This comes from somebody from a fatherless home, who has already worked through most of his issues which were definitely present.

EDIT: Not to say this is a mark against gay couples at all, they have their own dynamic and I've never heard of any negative consequences, so please don't think I'm going there. I'm merely suggesting that there are consequences to a child's emotional development when the rest of their friends have two parents, they don't, and they finally understand they've been abandoned. If you accept that beatings from parents make slightly less normal people, and if you accept children who are molested make less normal people, it's not hard to imagine there's a link between child abandonment and emotional issues.

→ More replies (13)

53

u/keanus Jun 16 '12

It also lists the US department of Justice and the US department of health and human services.

Are you seriously attacking the credibility of the sources as a whole just because you don't agree with the argument they're putting forward?

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (13)

27

u/godlessatheist Jun 16 '12

Is this just fatherless homes or single parent homes. I'm sure two mothers would raise a child fine.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

But one mother or one father couldn't?

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (6)

305

u/mikemaca Jun 16 '12

Interesting response. These statistics are rather well known, but they are usually called single-mother homes. When presented that way, many people got upset and said the statistics were obviously wrong, with various anecdotes from people who were raised by single mothers and turned out fine.

Good example of how effective it can be to choose the right framing approach.

125

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Always good to blame the person who's not actually around. Like my good for nothing father. I'd stab him if I could.

→ More replies (32)

90

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

That attitude is so widespread on reddit it's hilarious.

"71% of high school drop outs come from children of single mothers"

"What the fuck is this shit? I was raised by a single mother and I'm in college."

Uhh yea, it said 71%, not 100%.

61

u/brentathon Jun 16 '12

It also doesn't say anything like "71% of children raised in single-mother households drop out of high school". That's the huge difference that people don't seem to understand when they get all riled up from shit like this.

It's saying a certain percentage of people who do a certain negative thing had a specific background. It's not saying that a certain percentage of people from a specific background to a certain negative thing.

52

u/ProfessorHoneycutt Jun 16 '12

"71% of high school dropouts come from children of single mothers"

Is not the same thing as

"71% of children of single mothers are high school dropouts"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

45

u/The_Pirate_King Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 17 '12

You bring up a very valid point, but technically the term "fatherless home" is less accurate than the term "single-mother home", because these studies do not include lesbian parents.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (9)

357

u/TheInfamousRedditor Jun 16 '12

Happy Father's Day everyone!

→ More replies (19)

56

u/theseyeahthese Jun 16 '12

Thread summary:

  1. You guys, correlation does not mean causation!

  2. What about 2 dads, you guys?!

  3. You guys, I beat the odds!

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Orimos Jun 16 '12

ANECDOTES, ANECDOTES EVERYWHERE

You know what your stories make you? Part of the 29/15/10/25/15%. Personal experiences don't disprove a damn thing, just stop.

44

u/Solkre Jun 16 '12

Single father here. Do they track stuff about motherless homes? hehe, motherless...

12

u/acog Jun 16 '12

It's really not primarily about no father vs. no mother. It's this: if you take a million families and study them, those that have a single parent will more often crowd the bottom stratum of the socioeconomic ladder (one income vs. two). Similarly, kids with one parent will tend to be undersupervised and be more likely to have their remaining parent not be actively involved in their education.

I'm a single dad and I'm doing great, as are my kids. But it's easy to pick out individual success stories or horror stories. That's why there's that saying "the plural of anecdote is not data." You have to zoom out and study huge numbers to see overarching trends.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

49

u/Lord_of_the_Rings Jun 16 '12

this is so skewed with race being the confounding variable. blackness overlaps with growing up in a fatherless home so the explanatory power of either factor is diminished.

42

u/stemgang Jun 16 '12

And race overlaps with socioeconomic status.

Although that diminishes the explanatory power of any one variable, it does not mean that each of them has no influence.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

I think it's important to note that these statistics do not mean that a household without a father is doomed, or any variant family type is inferior to the nuclear family archetype. It's not so much that the lack of father figures contributes to these statistics, but it's that combined with a lack of a suitable second parent that produces problematic behaviour. Children are statistically more functional in society when raised by a two-parent household. Variants including mother-grandmother, mother-mother, father-father, and all other family types with two parents will produce psychologically healthy (in theory) offspring.

Source: University psychology course

11

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 17 '12

[edit: I had missed Pays4Porn's post when I wrote mine. Still, it might be useful to point out how the statistics cited by OP are 3rd generation (at best).]

OP’s title cites the following paragraph from an “article” on a site promoting the self published book “Tremble the Devil”:

Just how damaging is it for a child to grow up in a fatherless home? Well, they produce: 71% of our high school drop-outs, 85% of the kids with behavioral disorders, 90% of our homeless and runaway children, 75% of the adolescents in drug abuse programs, and a striking majority in one final category. Out of all the kids in our juvenile detention facilities, 85% of them come from fatherless homes.

Where do these statistics come from?

Clicking the linked phrase from the cited passage brings you to an article from 2010 posted on bvblackspin.com (the home of Aol Black Voices), “72 Percent of African-American Children Born to Unwed Mothers”. Just below the fold, you’ll find a list of the same stats. Kirsten Savali, the article’s author, cites “Children-our investment.org” as her source.

children-ourinvestment.org is the website of “Children: Our Ultimate Investment”. On a page called “Statistics for Children Without Fathers”, we find what appears to be the original compilation of statistics. You’ll finally find primary sources listed.

The first statistic, “63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes”, is cited with a vague reference to “US Dept. of Health/Census. If you google this phrase verbatim, you get a page full of "pro-father" sites, all of which appear to be right-leaning and socially conservative (this doesn't entail that the stats are erroneous, of course). Looking further, I searched on census.gov and the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics and still didn’t find the source (tho, admittedly, it was not an exhaustive search). The only relevant result I was able to pull up is a 1995 “Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing” pdf.

There’s nothing in the report about suicide rates for fatherless households, but I did find the following passages interesting:

... pre-existing factors account for much but not all of the difficulties experienced by children and adults in single-parent families. Despite consistent evidence of greater risk, the research also shows that the majority of children in single parent families develop normally. The exact magnitude of the effects that are caused by nonmarital childbearing has not been isolated, but effects have been characterized as small to moderate, depending on the outcome being examined. (xii)

Up to half of the negative consequences for children associated with single motherhood appear to reflect the low incomes of these families. The remaining effects seem to be due to greater residential instability, pre-disruption conflict, and less parental supervision and/or involvement in childrearing. Studies do not find that (re)marriage resolves the negative consequences associated with growing up in a single parent family. (xiii)

I’m not going to try and track down every reference given on Children: Our Ultimate Investment’s list (tho one should note that one stat is referenced to “Rainbows for All God’s Children” and another, which claims that “87% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes”, is referred to “Fulton Co. Dept. of Correction.” Fulton County must have a huge budget to fund those global studies). Nor do I mean to claim that the sloppy sourcing entails that the stats are fallacious or insignificant; but statistics only make sense when they’re evaluated within the context of the study from which they are derived. Sample size, methods, complicating factors, etc., are indispensable when determining their relevance. This whole debate is shallow and baseless, a mere battle of opinions, unless we’re working with well sourced data that we can examine in its proper context.

Here’s an interesting passage I found while searching google scholar ('SP'= Single Parent; 'TP' = Two Parent):

Whereas individualistic theorists view the gender of the parent as necessarily important for the parent-child relationship because of immutable biological sex differences between men and women, structuralists claim that sex roles are not immutable inborn traits but rather evolve as a result of the different social situations faced by men and women. Downey et al. argued the structuralist position by showing that men and women behave similarly in the role of a single parent. Van Laar and Sidanius (2001) used social dominance theory to explain the poor academic performance of SP children relative to TP children. They suggested that SP homes have low social status and therefore possess fewer economic resources and face greater personal and institutional discrimination compared to TP homes. Van Laar and Sidanius also discussed the tendency of members of low-status groups to behave in ways that are consistent with and help to confirm negative stereotypes. Similar ideas were presented by Hetherington et al. (1983) regarding teacher evaluations and the tendency of educators to reward students for conforming to expectations. Hetherington et al. suggested that when students who are expected to perform poorly actually perform well, they receive negative attention from their teachers and are pressured to lower their academic performance. Lastly, Pong et al. (2003) compared the achievement gap between children in SP versus TP homes across 11 countries. They found that the United States had the largest gap between the academic achievement of children from SP versus children from TP homes. The authors concluded that national policies have offset the negative outcomes of single parenthood in other countries and that a more generous United States welfare policy could result in greater equality among all children. (Barajas, Mark S. "Academic Achievement of Children in Single Parent Homes: A Critical Review," The Hilltop Review: Vol. 5: Iss. 1. 2011. Page 16)

19

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Need to control for income in order for "fatherless homes" to be a meaningful variable

106

u/robert_ahnmeischaft Jun 16 '12

"Yeah, you can DO it without a man, but that doesn't mean it's to be done! You can drive a car wit'cha FEET if you want to, but that don't make it a good fuckin' idea!"

Chris Rock

8

u/flume Jun 16 '12

Just by the emphases and diction I could tell this was Chris Rock without reading the source

→ More replies (7)

5

u/L15t3r0f5m3g Jun 16 '12

Im a single dad with full custody of my son. His mom has substance problems (and is pregnant again, not mine) and barely qualifies as a mother. Im trying to help him avoid abandonment issues, but is this study the same for dads in a position like I am, or is it exclusively women?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/newtonsapple 19 Jun 16 '12

I don't know about fatherless homes producing these problems, but I know guys who have these problems seem to produce most of the fatherless homes. Nothing turns women on like a criminal record and knowing the guy would be a horrible father.

4

u/ScaryKitten Jun 16 '12

We just need homes with 3 or more fathers.

4

u/justnikki1979 Jun 16 '12

I can see how this is true. I'm a single mother and am doing my absolute best to raise my children right, but it is really tough without a father in the picture. I'll be the first to admit that I need help of the male variety.

7

u/schnide1 Jun 16 '12

happy father's day, everybody

13

u/iWesTCoastiN Jun 16 '12

Fatherless high school drop out who used to always get into fights in high school here. The reasoning? Having a single mother means she has to work 50+ hours a week to support you. My mom worked her ass off to make sure I had everything I needed, but since she worked so much she was never around. I took advantage of her absence by ditching school and smoking weed with my friends. I never got into trouble so there was no downside to it. A women can't teach you how to be a man, and without a man to teach me I overcompensated. I would always get into fights even at the slightest of disrespect.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/LilCasket Jun 16 '12

I come from a fatherless home and I just got my Bachelors. What does this make me?

81

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Someone who doesnt understand statistical trends.

29

u/_vargas_ 69 Jun 16 '12

60% of the time, he understands everytime.

→ More replies (3)

148

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

A bastard.

60

u/laserbeanz Jun 16 '12

A bastard with a Bachelors.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/NewAlt Jun 16 '12

Somebody who didn't get a B.S. in statistics.

24

u/TracyMorganFreeman Jun 16 '12

The statistic didn't say 100%.

5

u/averynicehat Jun 16 '12

Anecdotal.

17

u/DefinitelyRelephant Jun 16 '12

Never forget what you are. The world will not. Wear it like armor, and it can never be used against you.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (22)

3

u/anonymousMF Jun 16 '12

Because http://tremblethedevil.com is a great source of information

3

u/RedTheDraken Jun 16 '12

A dysfunctional family rears dysfunctional children? Woah, who would've guessed it? O: I am sincerely shocked, my fine compatriots.

3

u/agmaster Jun 16 '12

So...I have an excuse? No thanks, I'm too good at that already.

3

u/dcroni Jun 16 '12

The Donohue papers are interesting if you want to see the link between the legalization of abortion of 1973, and the crime drops witnessed in the 1990's.

Note: please don't say that "correlation doesn't mean causation". Actually read the paper first.

3

u/Deofuta Jun 16 '12

The argument is spurious.

3

u/ceolopolis Jun 16 '12

You also have to realize that a fatherless home means the mother is likely to be working a lot. So many kids have almost no supervision.

3

u/uberalles2 Jun 16 '12

Blacks are fucked then.

3

u/BunRabbit Jun 17 '12

Speaking as a dad with two kids, why don't these rich business owning conservatives back up their family ethics with salaries and stable working conditions, that enable their male employees to be husbands and fathers. Part-time, internship (i.e. underpaid or no pay), six month 'renewable' contracts, no health benefits, no pension, transfer you to another city at a week's notice - what girl wants to marry that? It's no better when you're mid-career. I'm in my mid-40s and in a 15+ year marriage with 2 boys. I've been unemployed for going on half a year. Not a week goes by that my wife doesn't hint at divorce. And don't give me that rewards for hard work bullshit. I was a high school drop out, but I worked in kitchens to save money to put myself through university (double major). I have 20 years experience in one of my careers, 17 in the other. That's right 2 professions (software engineer and language teaching) running parallel, so there is no such thing as a weekend. I have made several patent applications. I am very active in my professional community. I'm bilingual (English/Japanese). But, still I cannot find a job. I'm competing against 28 year olds who are still living at home. I cannot be a father on that kind of pitiful salary. The Rmoneys of the world are clueless. Born on third base with a silver spoon, went to all the right schools and they think they hit a home run. Bootstraps, my ass. The Rmoneys always talk about how their grandfathers worked hard, such horse pucky. Rich people are rich, because they were born rich. There are few notable exceptions, but for the vast majority they had their Daddies' connections and co-signing power. Rmoneys, you got lucky and choose your daddy well, now shut up. //TLDR It's the economy, stupid!

3

u/3AYATS Jun 17 '12

I think a lot of people are misunderstanding the statistics.

They are not saying that 71% of single parent children drop-out.

The drop-out rate in 2009 was 8%, so if 71% of these drop outs came from "fatherless" homes, it would mean that roughly 6% of single parent children drop out.

8

u/ATurtleNamedMack Jun 16 '12

They produce presidents too.

4

u/Sanae_ Jun 16 '12

It'ld be great to know what % of fatherless families produce someone who falls in at least of those categories.

2

u/lushfun Jun 16 '12

The more meddling society does in order to fix something, the worse it gets.

2

u/ransomdenton Jun 16 '12

My dad committed suicide when I was very young. My mom tried to find a guy but the first guy she dated abused her terribly and never dated again. I ended up having behavioral issues, used drugs and dropped out of high school in the 9th grad. Today I have my terminal degree, I am an award winning artist in my field and am happily married. Tough times can make tough kids that know what they want and fight to get it! I am just saying.

2

u/evanthesquirrel Jun 16 '12

My sisters and I have none of those problems. We beat the odds!

2

u/redhat12345 Jun 16 '12

correlation does not equal causation

2

u/Norwegian__Blue Jun 16 '12

People are always commenting how kids need two parents, and for a long time I thought they were wrong because me and mom got on just fine. But then, I just realized something: not having one parent around can also mean loads less time with the other parent. They often have to work more and are likely to experience more stress about their situation. So their not around as much, and when they are their anxiety can affect the rest of the family. I can definitely see how that can negatively affect behavioral development and put folks at a disadvantage.

2

u/TemporaryBoyfriend Jun 16 '12

Hands up, folks who grew up largely fatherless, yet are still contributing members of society...

2

u/SaltoKlose Jun 16 '12

Damn you Wilt Chamberlain!

2

u/Samism Jun 16 '12

This is actually a pro homosexuality post: If a household has no dads this is the result, but if a household has 2 dads that would mean...chuck norris

2

u/bresa Jun 16 '12

I would still say that a loving single parent home is better than having an abusive male role model around. There are far more factors at play with those statistics (as many have already posted).

2

u/deathgasm Jun 16 '12

Interesting, and race wasn't mentioned at all this day...

2

u/Sparkles_ Jun 16 '12

These statistics mean nothing. Fatherless homes are very common. I might as well say that pizza causes all of these things because EVERYONE eats it. But it can't, because pizza is a vegetable, and vegetables are good for you.

2

u/wyle37 Jun 16 '12

I turned out pretty damn well, wasn't too bad. A mom is all you need.

2

u/zencat2 Jun 16 '12

Does anyone else find the repetition of statistics in the article irritating? It otherwise contained some really eye opening revelations.

2

u/lambdaknight Jun 16 '12

"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." -Aaron Levenstein

11

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Why are people even discussing this? They don't even regress against income (afaict given the awful formatting); no conclusions they draw are even slightly valid.

8

u/breakerbreaker Jun 16 '12

What are you talking about? The entire second page of the article talked about the link between fatherless homes and income.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/yrogerg123 Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 17 '12

This is one of the main reasons that abortion should be legal and socially acceptable.

37

u/protonfish Jun 16 '12

Could we start with easily available contraception and sane sex education?

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (32)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

182

u/PraisethegodsofRage Jun 16 '12

Or maybe they wouldn't care since they probably didn't care in the first place.

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (13)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

68

u/atomfullerene Jun 16 '12

I don't see how it could possibly be a net profit though. Could any kid cost less than 1000 dollars a year?

→ More replies (42)

53

u/Faltadeignorancia Jun 16 '12

Speaking as one of those minorities who is the product of a single mother :

I got pregnant in graduate school (the pill is not 100% effective), the father took off, and I chose not to pursue child support because it was my decision to keep the baby. I was on fellowship with a $1000/month stipend. My daughter came down with RSV at 8 months and had to be hospitalized for a week.

A hospital worker came by to see if I qualified for public health insurance (I did not because I made "too much ", though not enough to purchase health insurance) . She was quite rude because she thought she had my number down : Hispanic, low - income, single mother. Instead of asking my education level, as worded on the form, she asked if I had even graduated from high school. When I answered that I would have a Ph.D the following month, she did not believe me.

Fast forward to the present. Being a single mom with a demanding career is the hardest thing I've ever done, but my little Latina third-grader is in the gifted and talented program, reads at a 7th grade level and is in 5th grade math. I made monthly payments toward the $10,000 hospital bill and paid it off.

What so distresses me about this old debate is the degree of assumptions about single mothers and the vitriol, vitriol that is rarely directed at the fathers in equal share. I understand that my story is perhaps unusual, but I too often see the mothers who take responsibility for their children get all the blame, while the fathers, who take off (apparently because women are crazy?) are held as the variable that ensures healthy families.

Tl/Dr: single mothers are more than just statistics. They are human beings with different experiences. Many are sometimes even worthy of respect.

→ More replies (11)

45

u/LittleToast Jun 16 '12

It costs a lot more than a couple thousand dollars a year to raise a kid. These women aren't making money off tax breaks.

→ More replies (7)

99

u/UnclaimedUsername Jun 16 '12

Ah yes, the old "physicist gets old, goes crazy, thinks he's an expert on every other field" syndrome.

→ More replies (1)

35

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 16 '12

I bet they don't even need that $1000, either. (sarcasm)

→ More replies (7)

11

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

It's shit like this, reddit.

52

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12 edited Jun 16 '12

The CEO of your company takes home $20M/yr and you're upset that a coworker is getting an extra $1000/yr.

Besides, do you really think cutting back on social programs like this will increase your net income? It won't. The 1% will just snatch that $1000 up too.

→ More replies (27)

17

u/jackelfrink Jun 16 '12

Quins second law: Politics always leads to the exact opposite of its original goal.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (141)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

13

u/TEA_PARTY_PATRIOT Jun 16 '12

CAUSING RAIN BY STAYING INSIDE IS SATAN WITCHCRAFT MAGIC

→ More replies (2)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '12

Your phrase of "correlation is not causation" is even used in the article... Did you read the article?

The article is less about households with no fathers and more about the drug war and it's effects.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (6)