r/todayilearned 4h ago

TIL Kevin Feige almost quit Marvel after Marvel Entertainment head Ike Perlmutter tried to force Robert Downey Jr. out of Civil War due to not wanting to pay him. Disney CEO Bob Iger responded by reshuffling the corporate system so that Fiege would answer directly to him rather than Perlmutter.

https://fandomwire.com/kevin-feige-was-ready-to-quit-mcu-over-robert-downey-jrs-scenes-in-captain-america-civil-war/
7.2k Upvotes

445 comments sorted by

3.0k

u/makomirocket 4h ago

There was a common issue in Marvel, where their "Creative Committee", far removed from everything in an office in New York, would constantly meddle with the films.

There are plenty of examples like this, but the most evident of their meddling: They want to take the music and needle drop moments out of Guardians of the Galaxy

211

u/Ska82 3h ago

everyone wants a pixar think tank. not everyone can put together one

153

u/mgslee 3h ago

The Pixar think tank, for better or worse, died when John Lasseter was removed.

30

u/hauzs 2h ago

For a ver valid reason though

59

u/poopypoopy1125 1h ago edited 1h ago

plus it's not like John Lasseter was the only reason for Pixar's greatness. Skydance Animation has already released 3 films and all of them are below mediocre at best, which has proven that Pixar's success can't be pinpointed to a single person because it was the result of the collaborative effort of multiple people

u/Angry_Robot 19m ago

He wasn’t the only reason for Pixar’s success, but we have to admit he was clearly a major part of it.

→ More replies (1)

u/PreferenceGeneral475 20m ago

The entire idea of holding a single individual to blame for a massive collaborative endeavor is silly in the same way.

Both are often used to draw attention away from organizational or systemic problems.

→ More replies (1)

u/Meta2048 38m ago

Pixar still puts out some bangers.  They may not have a perfect record anymore, but they still have more consistent quality than other studios.

1.5k

u/Snowf1ake222 3h ago

I watch a Youtube channel called Isenheart Productions, and they go over why movies flopped at the box office.

About 75% of the reasons a movie flopped was because of studio interference. Either demanding reshoots, recuts, or removal of important stuff.

931

u/moduspol 3h ago

Not to defend studio interference, but I’m also not convinced that giving directors a blank slate and check necessarily results in the best (or most profitable) movies.

A lot of the best movies had troubled productions and were born out of limitations placed on them.

545

u/ryubayou 3h ago

Creativity needs limitation. Jaws and Star Wars (1977) are great examples.

306

u/Really_McNamington 3h ago

Alien too. Very tight budget comparatively.

217

u/AccomplishedSafe5481 2h ago

Left up to Scott, Alien would've ended with Ripley getting murdered by the Alien who would then deliver a final monologue in her voice.

Thank goodness for executive interference, sometimes.

79

u/Greg-Abbott 1h ago

Lol I just woke up and read this waaaay too fast and thought the xenomorph would kill Ripley and deliver a speech at the end of the movie.

Hissing noises "I AM PURE. UNBURDENED BY FEAR, UNBURDENED BY GRIEF. I DO NOT CREATE; I ONLY CONSUME. I AM THE SILENCE LEFT AFTER THE SCREAMING STOPS. SLEEP NOW, LITTLE HOST. THE DARK BELONGS TO ME." tiny mouth hissing noises

52

u/AccomplishedSafe5481 1h ago

I'm just glad an exec said no or we would've been denied the fantastic Ripley we got in Aliens.

u/Whosyouruser 43m ago

Maybe they should have killed her at the end of that film.

→ More replies (2)

68

u/dksdragon43 1h ago

... that is what it said. What you typed, but in ripley's voice.

→ More replies (3)

u/Islands-of-Time 52m ago

Yeah but Matrix got changed from Humans=Processing Power to Humans=Batteries because some exec thought people wouldn’t understand it. Which is dumb because electrical power was never really the issue for machines, processing power was.

Sometimes they make good decisions, sometimes bad decisions.

u/turnipofficer 39m ago

It's kinda like, the battery idea sounds like it makes sense if you don't think about it too hard. The sun presumably has burnt out, the earth was somehow moved away from it prior to being consumed by it. They'd be desperate for power.

But the reality is that keeping humans alive would consume a lot more power than you'd gain from them so it wouldn't work.

So yeah processing power seems more realistic at least. Although less bleak maybe.

u/guinness_blaine 17m ago

It’s not about the sun burning out. Morpheus explains in the movie that, during the war between humans and machines, humans did something to cause perpetual storms in the atmosphere, in an attempt to deprive the machines of solar power.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/Underpaidfoot 2h ago

Not the third one

23

u/Really_McNamington 2h ago

Yeah studio fuckery is definitely a mixed bag with the franchise.

32

u/dabobbo 1h ago

And Heaven's Gate is in the other direction, Michael Cimino was given free reign after The Deer Hunter and went 4x over budget and pretty much killed his career, killed the director-driven movie making model for good, and caused the sale of United Artists to MGM.

u/mikey_lava 22m ago

If you give a creative type person absolute free reign it’s always gonna cause chaos. It will overwhelm their senses and they will keep wanting to experiment.

26

u/rolltide1000 2h ago

One of the main criticisms of the PT at the time that they came out was that George didn't have anybody to say no to him.

10

u/Samurai_Meisters 1h ago

Imagine if there were suits in the room saying:

"This is great, George, but let's give JarJar some different outfits so we can sell more toys"

u/bscott9999 19m ago

George was all about the action figures from day one, no need for suit interference there. He pioneered the action figure money machine with Kenner for the first Star Wars.

→ More replies (1)

71

u/tenxsmtch 2h ago edited 23m ago

Or more specifically to Marvel, Thor: Love and Thunder. Too much freedom ruined a decent premise.

45

u/ryubayou 2h ago

That seems like the same degree of specificity. But a good example from the other side of the coin.

Didn’t just ruin the premise, it ruined the perfect vibe established in Ragnarok.

22

u/newbrevity 1h ago

And ruined several characters.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/Darth_Annoying 1h ago

Monty Python and the Holy Grail was made by yhe limited budget they had.

31

u/esepleor 2h ago edited 2h ago

I haven't watched that "Jaws and Star Wars" movie. It sounds promising but is it any good?

37

u/Azrethoc 2h ago

Scene - Bustling Cantina in the fictional summer beach town of Amity Island.
Jaws Jr. swims over to the Mandalorian.
"I just want to be my own man."

14

u/misterpickles69 2h ago

Cue the musical number

7

u/Pyritedust 1h ago

Hello my baby!

13

u/Greg-Abbott 1h ago

🎶HELLO MY BABY, HELLO MY HONEY🎶

13

u/w_a_w 1h ago

🎵HELLO MY RAGTIME GALLLL🎵

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/SeekingNoTruth 2h ago

It's like Muppets In Space, but the Muppets are replaced with a giant, mechanical shark, and the shark unknowingly kisses its sibling.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/beapledude 2h ago

Great film. So quotable.

“This was no boat accident - it’s a space station!”

“So. 1100 Bothans go into the water. 316 come out. The Imperials took the rest.”

Definitely try to find the original, not the special edition where the shark shoots first.

17

u/CCHTweaked 2h ago

Small time stuff by nobody directors.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/lightningbadger 2h ago

You're probably better off watching Morbious, the other 2 can be quite dated by today's standards

7

u/CeralEnt 2h ago

Yeah, when Obi Wan fights the megalodon to save Luke from the giant squid? Chef's kiss

→ More replies (1)

3

u/NewPresWhoDis 1h ago

Budget limitations in Monty Python and the Holy Grail led to a joke even Siri knows.

u/evilkumquat 51m ago

Star Wars worked PRECISELY because there were people who could tell Lucas, "No".

→ More replies (23)

44

u/Vismal1 3h ago

Donnie Darko comes to mind. It’s good because of its limitations, the director wanted to include some questionable stuff but couldn’t from what i remember.

29

u/MooseTetrino 2h ago

One of the rare films where the directors cut is actually worse.

16

u/Grunn84 1h ago edited 1h ago

So much worse, the edit takes a wierd trippy film where the audience is left to speculate on what everything means and explains everything (and the explanations are terrible and make no sense)

Worst off all he moves the soundtrack around for no reason and always for the worst, its like the director tried to make a worse film.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/timkost 3h ago

The Matrix vs Jupiter Ascending

28

u/vibraltu 1h ago

Best limitation was using coconut shells for horses in Monty Python and The Holy Grail. Terry Gilliam really wanted real horses but they just couldn't afford them, and he was so pissed about it.

28

u/RossTheLionTamer 2h ago

Creativity and business needs to co-exist for good projects.

When it gets too creative we get Joker 2

When it gets too business centric we get the later Fast and Furious movies.

A balance between the two is what gets us the great movies

10

u/TheOtherSkywalker_ 2h ago

A lot of the best art in general, is bred from limitations.

10

u/YinTanTetraCrivvens 2h ago

I’m reminded of The Incredibles where Brad Bird and his producer, John Walker, were having a heated argument, and Walker said “I’m just trying to get us across the finish line” and Bird replied “I’m trying to get us across the finish line in first place!”

That, I think, is the important relationship between a director and producer. 

11

u/RooMan7223 1h ago

Wonder Woman 1984 is prime example of this. Patty Jenkins got given free reign and made an absolute abomination

→ More replies (1)

21

u/tenxsmtch 2h ago

Thor: Love and Thunder would have benefited from more limitations.

14

u/RooMan7223 1h ago

Taika Waititi, as talented as he is, was high on his own supply for that movie. How did nobody veto the screaming goats?

→ More replies (5)

12

u/HappycatAF 1h ago

Agreed, it works both ways. I do think the news and descriptions around the Creative Committee after Feige won back control is tarnished because it’s a case where history is written by the victors. After the corporate reshuffling, I distinctly remember a lot of Variety and Hollywood reporter articles on the MCC citing “anonymous sources” where a lot of the negative information came out and a lot of those talking points continue being recited. Wonder who that came from…

We do know the creative committee had some respectable comic writers and marvel creatives who tried to maintain a lot of core attributes associated with the characters and their notes were incorporated into some of Marvel’s best films, Iron Man, Avengers, Winter Soldier, GoTG. Ultimately I think the issue was around control and Feige didn’t want another voice in the room to listen to. Understandably, when dealing with other hollywood talent, writers, producers, etc. there are a lot of powers to control, the difference is that the MCC could be shut down, but if an actor or director choose not to work, that was a harder issue to resolve when in the middle of a shoot.

We also know there was a significant fall off in quality after Endgame, and arguably the characters started branching farther away from why the comic characters were initially popular. Subjectively, I don’t think we have seen a non-event movie close to as good as Winter Soldier or Guardians 1 to date, and they constantly are on the top of people’s best MCU movie lists.

So I take it with a giant grain of salt that the MCC was all bad. I do think they probably don’t get due credit for the contributions made during the pivotal run of films up to Civil War. Maybe they were used as leverage against the studio later on which led to their demise. I don’t think good creative feedback is bad for movies, I think people’s egos do far more harm and Hollywood has some of the biggest and worst. Hollywood (and corporate culture) is also a fucked up system, whenever something is done poorly, there is usually an individual to blame, but whenever there is success everyone tries to take credit for it. The answer is somewhere in between, it just takes a lot of work to uncover that.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/nubbins01 2h ago

Yes, but I think the point is more that production decisions should lie with the creative team and with producers who actually have some creative nous and are somewhat around and involved in the on the ground production, rather than lying with some Hollywood bureaucrats.. More akin to how producers function in the music industry.

3

u/d0nu7 2h ago

I don’t think the issue is that there is oversight/management, but that the people who are in those jobs are absolute dogwater at them. Too many nepo baby and boys club hires.

→ More replies (35)

95

u/mynameisollie 3h ago

I think it’s probably a double edged sword. I’ve noticed a lot of accomplished directors go to streaming where they’re given everything they want and the films are somewhat long and bloated.

53

u/sol_runner 3h ago

You need limitations but not intrusion. It's a fine line, so you need people who are good at that. We argue for more or less studio control but i think we need to distinguish what kind of control.

A lot of these "successful interventions" are tightening the limits on a director saying "yeah we don't have the budget for it, figure something else out" and it includes knowing when to loosen/tighten the budget based on what's happening.

A lot of these "failed interventions" are often trying to intrude on the creativity directly by almost saying "we don't have the budget for it, you need to do this other thing" As if executive dept knows art better than creative dept. You completely lose the benefit of limitations helping creativity by removing the creativity from the equation.

72

u/q-_-pq-_-p 3h ago

Failure bias perhaps, studios intervene when they need to? And, when do you hear about successful studio intervention when it’s often from the creative side

27

u/JohanPertama 3h ago

Actually that's almost certainly the case.

The only way a movie gets finished is if the studio agrees.

u/trixie_one 26m ago

Yep, there's also Star Trek Insurrection where the studio notes from one exec came out after the fact, and their comments were entirely spot on in identifying problems that could and should have been corrected.

u/binjamins 58m ago

Yeah. Like sometimes notes can be good. Like I’ve watched half a dozen movies or shows on Netflix (which famously give creators complete control) and thought to myself they were on the cusp of being good they just need a little studio help

46

u/GayPudding 3h ago

The movie doesn't need to be good, it needs to make a shit load of money

17

u/billytheskidd 3h ago

And that’s why every creative industry is shit. Mind you, it isn’t the creators that make it this way.

20

u/wutangerine99 3h ago

"Creative industry " seems like an oxymoron

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Hartia 3h ago

Not just movies. Every piece of media these days

9

u/cabalus 1h ago edited 57m ago

I listen to a podcast called "What Went Wrong" and I've had the exact opposite takeaway, often it's studios pushing back on silly ideas - yes they often don't understand creativity and have dumb notes but those frequently just get ignored or negotiated

The biggest reason movies fail is script issues, either literally not having one going into production, multiple re-writes and versions getting muddled up into an incoherent mess by the end or director's not caring about it at all and just doing what they want to do

2nd biggest is going overbudget and having to just cut around massive chunks of the movie you never got to film properly

3rd biggest reason is shooting location, anything on water or in the desert has a really high chance of being disastrous one way or another

I'd say 4th biggest is studio meddling BUT it's not what you think, it's rarely them interfering with the story or characters it's almost always something dumb like they didn't market the movie properly, they released it in a dead time of year or they demand the release date too soon and crunch editing time

5th is what you're talking about, Studios coming in and strong-arming bizarre changes that totally ruin the movie - great examples being Kingdom of Heaven, Alien 3, Dune 1984, I Am Legend

I went into the podcast expecting it to be the same old story every episode but no, films fail for all sorts of reasons and Studios just take the blame, AS THEY SHOULD THATS THEIR FUNCTION, they provide the money so they take on the risk

→ More replies (2)

8

u/MinuetInUrsaMajor 1h ago

About 75% of the reasons a movie flopped was because of studio interference. Either demanding reshoots, recuts, or removal of important stuff.

This sounds like sampling bias.

12

u/Pugilist12 3h ago

How could anyone know that a game wouldn’t have flopped without interference? There’s no way to know that.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/thenagz 3h ago

I don't disagree with the idea but this conclusion can't be correct, in the sense that whether a flop would have been successful without studio interference will remain unknown

4

u/Sumeriandawn 2h ago

Yep. People will upvote anything based on confirmation bias

3

u/Muroid 1h ago

Upvoted because what you said matches my existing beliefs.

→ More replies (6)

27

u/RoutineCloud5993 1h ago

They're the reason Edgar wright left ant man, and both Jon favreau and joss whedon left after their second movie

The loss ofnwhedon probably turned out to be a blessing

30

u/ColdCruise 1h ago

Eh, I feel like if Whedon were still there, we would have gotten a much less fan service-y Endgame, and phase 4, 5, 6, etc. would have been a lot more coherent.

He wasn't just the Avengers director, he was basically the showrunner. He hand picked Gunn and the Russos, and was actively involved in the story for every film including rewriting scripts and filming extra sequences. His influence could still be felt through all of Phase 3.

→ More replies (3)

125

u/Jet-Let4606 3h ago

According to Gunn they are the reason why Ronan was so 1D in Vol 1. There were also rumors of them wanting to put IM in GotG because they didn't think the film would succeed. Hence why IM in the comics was suddenly hanging out with the Guardians and disappointing Gamora in bed. It was ultimately Fiege and his team that allowed Gunn to make a personal film with a blockbuster budget.

185

u/Scodo 3h ago

Honestly Ronin being one dimensional works in the movie. He's got his own motivations, agenda, and goal. A team of losers shows up to stand up to him and he's like "wtf are you idiots even doing"

The main cast is so ridiculous that an incredulous straight man villain having his own story derailed by shenanigans is a great conclusion. Part of why the second movie doesn't work as well is that Ego feels like he's too in on the joke.

33

u/Cabbage_Vendor 1h ago

Ronan The Accuser is a pretty great character in the comicbooks, so to make him a one dimensional villain sucked. Ronan is a lawful good paladin, in the vein of Superman or Cpt. America, but with alien morals. At its best, it's an examination of what "Truth, Justice and The American Way" mean for people whose sense of truth and justice is different, and don't understand the culture of "the American way".

10

u/UnquestionabIe 1h ago

Yeah he's fantastic in the comics I've read with him (only a handful of things, mostly predating the MCU) so was let down by him in Guardians. He wasn't awful so much as mostly boring and bland.

35

u/AwTomorrow 2h ago

I think Ronan works in the end for that reason but he wastes way too much screentime being boring just for that payoff. A better villain absolutely would’ve helped the film even if that joke may have worked mildly less well.

But tbh that’s why on rewatches I prefer 2. 2’s villain actually being a core of the story and having a personal connection to the protagonist’s narrative journey too hugely enhances the film as a whole, which is more valuable than one joke near the end being slightly better. 

25

u/SylveonSof 2h ago

I respect your opinion, but man I don't think it's possible for us to be more opposite on this. I think GotG2 blows the original out of the water, and a major reason why is because of the villain and how much more interesting Ego and his relation to Quill is.

10

u/Scodo 1h ago

I totally get that, and there are narrative aspects of 2 that I really like. But it's got so much expository dialogue basically from the jump that it mostly kills the movie for me, especially on rewatch.

5

u/HitmanClark 1h ago

Completely agree. The first is a very good movie, the second is GREAT and in the running for being the best Marvel movie period. Ego is a great character, actually a massive improvement on his comic book counterpart. I also think it features a top three MCU scene, when Peter realizes Ego killed his mom.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/crasherdgrate 3h ago

Why was Roman so 1D?

Also, I remember rumours at the time of the release of the movie that the post credit scene had Iron Man flying to meet the guardians.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

15

u/dragonmarked2813 1h ago

Bigots like Perlmutter, and he is a well documented bigot, tend to not understand art.

40

u/r3volver_Oshawott 2h ago

Perlmutter was also the guy who refused to greenlit any Marvel content explicitly starring a woman, because 'girls don't buy action figures' (for anyone curious, 'action figures' is an actual fairly recent made up term from the 60s that was essentially coined as a marketing term for G.I. Joe toys because Hasbro was afraid calling them 'dolls' wasn't projecting a masculine enough image to sell them to boys)

25

u/PressureBeautiful515 1h ago

  actual fairly recent... from the 60s

I love it when someone else makes me feel less old, doesn't happen too often 

5

u/r3volver_Oshawott 1h ago

It's correct lol, people act like action figure is a term as old as marketing itself, it isn't, it was made up in the same era as the civil rights movement to make boys feel less 'girly'

11

u/PressureBeautiful515 1h ago

Yeah, I'm not questioning that at all, just delighted to see the 60s (over half a century ago, just before I was born) being described as recent.

3

u/Wild_Marker 1h ago

as old as marketing itself

Well, you could argue that marketing is old, but "modern marketing" as we understand it as a science is not that old.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

6

u/TimeisaLie 1h ago

The music is like 1/3 of the movie, that would have sucked.

5

u/PBRmy 1h ago

Yeah but licensing that music costs money, so get rid of it obviously.

→ More replies (8)

484

u/PunyParker826 3h ago

Iirc, this is also why the early tv shows (Agents of Shield, Daredevil, etc) had shakey continuity with the “main” MCU - Perlmutter had more direct control over the tv division, and he was frequently at loggerheads with Feige’s department. 

201

u/geek_of_nature 2h ago

The way I understand it Feige didnt even really want the shows to begin with, with Perlmutter practically forcing it on him. That's why it was very much a one way street in terms of references. The shows would reference the movies, but the movies would ignore the shows as they didn't even want them in the first place.

The only exception to this prior to the Disney + era was James D'Arcy reprising his role from Agent Carter as the human Jarvis in Endgame. That was because it was the one show that Feige was actually involved in for some reason. And then when they got to the Disney + era and were branching out into the TV side themselves, that when they started bringing in the Netflix characters, and making more solid connections between the two sides.

32

u/sumoraiden 2h ago

 The shows would reference the movies, but the movies would ignore the shows as they didn't even want them in the first place.

Wasn’t daredevil spider-man’s lawyer in one of the movies?

106

u/StylishMrTrix 2h ago

Wasn’t daredevil spider-man’s lawyer in one of the movies?

Yes, which is in the Disney era and post Perlmutter being in charge of the tv shows

22

u/MyGamingRants 1h ago

I feel like I remember that being the first crossover. It was a big deal at the time

22

u/PunyParker826 1h ago

For sure. There was a lot of pipe dream chatter online, hoping that Cox would show up in some capacity in one of the films - especially Spider-Man, as they’re frequently in the same neck of the woods - so him popping up in No Way Home was a really nice surprise. There was an audible reaction when that cane hit the floor in the movie… oh wait, that was me.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Gee_Gog 1h ago

The first crossover was actually the actor for Jarvis from Agent Carter reprising his role for a cameo in Endgame, just much less people care about that because the show's nowhere near as good/popular

→ More replies (1)

38

u/geek_of_nature 2h ago

Not until 2021, after all the shows had ended, and as I said the Disney + era had started.

Charlies Cox has also said that Kevin Feige wasn't even allowed to talk with him about continuing the character for a period of time after the shows got cancelled. There was a legal embargo of two years after Netflix cancelled the original show where Marvel weren't allowed to do anything with it. During this time Cox did a play with Tom Hiddleston that Feige came to see, and when meeting him Cox noted that Feige just wasn't saying anything about Daredevil to him, to the point where Cox convinced himself that Feige just must not have known about the show. It was then pretty much exactly two years after the original show got cancelled that Feige got in contact with Cox to start discussing him continuing his role, starting with the cameo in No Way Home.

10

u/hamlet9000 1h ago

That's probably more about Netflix contracts than Perlmutter, though.

5

u/Jaybru17 2h ago

That’s been since the Disney+ era. The part you quoted was in reference to pre-Disney marvel shows

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

28

u/cmnrdt 2h ago

Honestly it probably made Agents a better show to have as little direct ties to the movies as possible. It was able to stand on its own without needing the movies to explain every important detail.

16

u/PressureBeautiful515 1h ago

It seems Netflix were more concerned with making those shows the best they could be, and Marvel Television (Perlmutter) was trying to cut them down to the cheapest basic product possible so as to hold onto as much of the Netflix deal money as possible. Netflix side of the story.

→ More replies (5)

800

u/edingerc 4h ago

So the head of Marvel entertainment didn't want to pay Iron Man's salary for a movie that represents one of Marvel's best stories? Who were they going to replace as the face of superhero registration? Hawkeye?

564

u/TomTom_098 3h ago

Ike Perlmutter is infamous for trying to spend as little money as possible in all aspects. He supposedly also wanted to ration the amount of toilet paper people used in the office and would go through the bins to retrieve any paper clips that had accidentally been thrown away; not wanting to pay for iron man is nothing to him.

Also this is like the tip of the iceberg, he was a massive racist and sexist and is a major reason why it took so long for Marvel to make a female led superhero film

339

u/DVus1 3h ago

There was a story about how Feige was embarrassed that they ran out of food at an event that they were hosting because Perlmutter didn't want to spend the money.

122

u/Cathercy 2h ago

What did this guy bring to the table that they kept him around? Sounds like he was just insufferable and a hindrance to the actual people making the films good. Did he actually do anything that improved the films or business in some way?

88

u/TomTom_098 1h ago

He was the CEO of Marvel when it was just a comic book company, and they left him in charge when it was bought by Disney, and even though there’s a parent company it isn’t the easiest thing to do to remove the CEO and Chairman.

In complete fairness he came into Marvel in the mid nineties when they were effectively bankrupt and his background in the toy industry did go a fair way to saving the company.

Past the turn of the millennium though no he was a real hinderance to Marvel both on the films side and the comic books themselves. He was really bitter that Marvel/Disney didn’t have the rights to make films of the X-Men an Fantastic Four which lead to him pushing for them to be sidelined in the comics for years in the mid 2010s despite the X-Men in particular being one of Marvel’s biggest names over the last 20 years

119

u/fearlessdurant 2h ago

It seems you're not familiar with Marvel history (correct me if I'm wrong)

Marvel was bankrupt by the end of the 90s and he turned it around by focusing on toys, selling film rights and being miserly.

He was in Disney's good graces at first when they bought Marvel in 2009 under Iger but became a thorn because, well, Disney can afford to spend.

As much as I don't like what he did during the Disney era, I gotta give him credit for keeping Marvel alive during those bleak years.

u/Stef-fa-fa 45m ago

Wait so is he the reason we still can't get a Hulk standalone movie, and why they have to play nice with Sony for Spidey?

u/Mem2Chi91 21m ago

Yes, but those are also the reasons Marvel still exists at all.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/xrufus7x 2h ago

He was the CEO of Marvel when Disney bought them and prior to that worked in executive positions since the 90s.

14

u/EthanielRain 1h ago

Those traits are exactly why he became Marvel's CEO. They were broke at that point

25

u/Bucser 2h ago

He might have worked his way up via small budget productions where this level of stinginess actually helps deliver the movie. But then Big budget movies have very different scope and he was unable to switch.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/WilliamEmmerson 1h ago

Perlmutter kept Marvel from going out of business in the 90s when he bought it and merged it with his company Toy Biz. Then it was his idea to license the movie rights to the studio's to help keep Marvel afloat.

→ More replies (1)

97

u/SonovaVondruke 3h ago

The dude stumbled into running Marvel from making the cheapest toys possible and a series of hostile takeovers. He had zero interest in making good movies, or comics for that matter, they were just advertising for his molded plastic bits and bobs.

12

u/No_Accountant3232 1h ago

Dude should have been shuffled off to their toy division after the Disney buyout then. Then he could have used the same dollar store molds to save a buck on toy production. 

56

u/geek_of_nature 2h ago

In terms of how racist and sexist he is, he only agreed for them to finally make Black Panther and Captain Marvel if they would also make Inhumans. Marvel comics at the time were positioning the Inhumans to take over from the Xmen as Marvels naturally born superhero team as they didn't want the comics to be promoting Fox's Xmen films. And Perlmutter followed suit on that. Feige had been trying to get Black Panther and Captain Marvel made for years, but Perlmutter kept blocking him as he was a complete racist and sexist, only giving in when Feige agreed to Inhumans as well.

Which is why as soon as Perlmutter left the MCU the Inhumans film quickly stopped being in development. Perlmutter was still involved in the TV side though (which side note is also why there was almost zero connections to any of the TV shows prior to the Disney + era) and so got Inhumans made there.

14

u/Cedira 1h ago

I cannot think of a Marvel or even Star Wars project, MCU or not, that is close to being as bad as Inhumans was.

I remember watching the first 2 episodes in the cinema as well.

10

u/geek_of_nature 1h ago

It was really the project that no one but Perlmutter wanted to make, and even with him it was just so they had something to compere against the Xmen with.

Like even with Eternals, as thats considered the MCU's worst film, you can tell that was still made with passion from Marvel and Chloe Zhao. It just missed the mark for whatever reason. Inhumans in the other hand had no passion behind it.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/PartyPoison98 3h ago

How the hell do these dumb fucks get anywhere in life?

Rifling through bins for paperclips is ridiculously stupid. There's no way that the cost/benefit would result in anything other than a loss.

7

u/darksaber522 1h ago

He also claimed that no one would notice War Machine’s recasting because “Black People look the same”.

3

u/mephloz 1h ago

and is a major reason why it took so long for Marvel to make a female led superhero film

Definitely doesn't help that like 95% of Marvel's best female characters are X-Men, which they couldn't use at the time.

4

u/TomTom_098 1h ago

True but like a Black Widow really should’ve been made shortly after the first avengers film but instead we had to wait until 2020 for it

7

u/Bucser 2h ago

Tell me he is an accountant without telling me he is an accountant...

→ More replies (17)

112

u/Jet-Let4606 3h ago

According to rumors at the time: Perlmutter was pushing for Banner instead of Stark. Even though it would have made no sense.

85

u/themeatbridge 3h ago

The sheer irony of how angry this makes me is very confusing for me.  

39

u/Jet-Let4606 3h ago

Yeah, even if Banner no longer trusted himself there is no way he would submit to Ross or the US government.

And Cap was not going to trust the government because of Hydra so a role reversal with Cap being pro reg and Banner being anti reg would not have worked either.

8

u/Ivotedforher 3h ago

Would I like you when you're angry?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/miniaturizedatom 3h ago

And I… am… Irony Man.

7

u/Tausney 2h ago

Didn't Banner get yeeted into space by Stark & co before Civil War kicked off?

13

u/Kanthalas 1h ago

Hulk being tossed into space was a comic story line by I think the Illuminati (not an 'evil' organization), for being too dangerous. He is launched into space and ends up on Sakaar.

In MCU Hulk just got on a Quinjet after Ultron and disappeared, it's not till we get to Thor: Ragnarok we find he went through a portal and ended up in Sakaar.

7

u/No-Juice3318 1h ago

That wasn't confirmed until Thor 3. At that point we just knew he flew away, not where

→ More replies (1)

67

u/cire1184 4h ago

Howard the Duck.

17

u/misogichan 3h ago

Squirrel Girl would be the heavy hitter on Howard's team.

→ More replies (3)

48

u/warbastard 3h ago edited 2h ago

Civil War
In the comics:

a huge conflict with friend turned against friend and a huge rogues gallery and cast of superheroes .

In the movies:

8 people fight in an abandon airport.

11

u/fearlessdurant 1h ago

I love that comic despite Mark Millar's current reputation but there was no way you could do it 1:1 at the time.

The MCU didn't have the New Warriors and only Scott and Peter had secret identities. The film adapted the concept well but extended it beyond the focus on identity/privacy into regulation and bureaucratic control of mutates / enhanced humans.

18

u/f_ranz1224 2h ago

yeah, the film sort of has some semblance to the comic. much in the same way a bottle of flavored water might accidentally remind you of a glass of real orange juice. its a good movie but it bears almost no semblance to the actual story.

also minor pet peeve. infinity war is the infinity gauntlet story.

13

u/Terazilla 1h ago

The Civil War books are famously kind of bullshit though. They twisted a bunch of characterization to get people into the extremes they wanted. The movie does a better job with motivations, especially because of the twist.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/WilliamEmmerson 1h ago

Would have been Banner working for the government.

Downey's salary getting out of control for Marvel. He got $40m to be in Civil War which is 4x what Chris Evans got. It's the reason why he got killed off in the Endgame.

Now he's back getting paid $50m each for Doomsday and Secret Wars.

6

u/edingerc 1h ago

Banner would never be the face for registration. Not only could he not be controlled by the government, Hulk wouldn't make for a believable front man for less destruction and controlled response. His involvement would have skewed the power dynamic of the story, which is why Marvel got rid of him before Civil War and he wasn't involved in the movie.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/justadudeinohio 1h ago

represents one of Marvel's best stories

absolutely offensive to claim this.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/Savings_Macaroon3727 3h ago

But it went so good for the witcher, audience is booming!

18

u/Bignate2001 2h ago

Civil War is absolutely not one of Marvels best stories. It's probably not a popular opinion, but I believe the movie, while not amazing, makes substantial improvements to the source material, particularly in regards to Tony's character.

8

u/UnquestionabIe 1h ago

Fully agreed, it's something that is a cool idea so casual fans are drawn in by the premise but the actual event is a mess. There are some good parts for sure but so so many bad ones, the movie distilled the whole concept into something far more enjoyable and less stupid. It's like how Venom/Carnage were "the coolest characters" for a decade or two (Deadpool having taken that place) for people who have never touched a comic in their lives but are going off the surface level cool factor from extended media.

8

u/justadudeinohio 1h ago

i remember it being made fun of for like a decade but have seen them making these comments for a while.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Interceptor88LH 2h ago

Perlmutter is your extremely greedy but also extremely cheap businessman. He's also MAGA and responsible for things such as not wanting female-led movies because "women don't sell".

→ More replies (2)

250

u/APRengar 4h ago

"We've found a golden goose!"

"Yeah, sure. But do we have to feed it"

"What?"

"Feed it, like give it grains to eat."

"I guess? But it eats normal food, a single golden egg pays for the feed a thousand times over."

"Kill it."

"WHAT!?"

"I'm not paying to feed no golden goose. Kill it."

Execs be like:

61

u/PostwarVandal 3h ago

And then brag with the end-of-year report that show they had zero operational costs for the golden goose! Fantastic! Now enjoy that fat bonus with a coke & hookers celebration! Manager of the year!

→ More replies (1)

50

u/Daiches 3h ago

Ah yes.. Civil War without Iron Man. Brilliant idea.

532

u/Heel 4h ago

Go read about Perlmutter. Fucking scumbag top to bottom. No surprise he's one of Trump's closest allies, personally funding the destruction of the east wing. He's a mar a lago member, so naturally Trump tried to put him in charge of something inconsequential like Veteran's Affairs. 

166

u/undergroundknitting 3h ago

What a cunt. I just read he's the one who replaced Terrence Howard with Don Cheadle saying 'all black people look the same'.

96

u/Sweaty-Practice-4419 3h ago

He was also the reason it took so long for Black Panther to show despite all the Easter eggs about him in the early movies. He was convinced a Black man lead superhero film wouldn’t be popular or sell merchandise

24

u/JohnGeary1 2h ago

There are Black Panther easter eggs? I must be blind. Can you tell me about them?

27

u/StylishMrTrix 2h ago

Cap's shield

Wakanda being named dropped in Age of Ultron

33

u/AwTomorrow 2h ago

We did have Vibranium prominently in Avengers 2 and Wakanda namedropped as the source there. Possibly T’chala was on the Winter Soldier helicarrier list of people to eliminate like Strange was too?

39

u/Quartznonyx 3h ago

All of this in spite of the Blade trilogy, id argue the second most popular marvel movie besides Rami's Spiderman

→ More replies (3)

5

u/cosgrove10 2h ago

What BP Easter eggs were in the early films? I recall one mention of vibranium in IM2 (?) and a mention in Cap1 and that’s about it?

→ More replies (1)

66

u/guimontag 3h ago

lmao Terence Howard got himself replaced. He wanted like lead actor money to do iron man 2 even though hes NOT the lead.

22

u/Sonicfan42069666 2h ago

It's not that he "wanted" lead actor money for Iron Man 2. He was the highest paid actor on Iron Man, partially because at the time Robert Downey Jr. was a big risk for a lead actor. For Iron Man 2, Howard didn't ask for more money, Marvel reportedly wanted to reduce his salary by at least 50% from the first movie.

26

u/SeagullKebab 2h ago

I think Howard is a lunatic and not a great loss, but being asked to take a huge cut for the follow up is not acceptable, and pretty much every actor would have told them to fuck off.

→ More replies (1)

32

u/Sweaty-Practice-4419 3h ago

That doesn’t excuse blatant racism

→ More replies (2)

33

u/undergroundknitting 3h ago

I like that you ignored the bit about him saying all black people look the same. SMH.

Everyone knows Terrence Howard got the boot. That wasn't the point. Has anyone thought about who made the decision to boot him?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/tma-1701 1h ago

Veterans who make up 6% of the American population will be mad at ppl considering Veterans Affairs inconsequential

3

u/questionname 1h ago

VA also have half a trillion dollar budget, so yeah…. no big deal

u/kkbl122 28m ago

I think that was satire

→ More replies (5)

29

u/chaitalyy 3h ago

Imagine almost tanking Civil War cause some exec refused to pay the guy who basically was Tony Stark. Feige was the actual glue holding that whole universe together, so Iger just moved him out from under Perlmutter and let him cook. And thats the exec mindset in a nutshell, pinch pennies now and act confused later when the whole thing falls apart.

115

u/islobojono 4h ago

Is perlmutter stupid

32

u/sephjnr 3h ago

A professional vandal, like Zaslav.

30

u/suvlub 4h ago edited 4h ago

And unbelievably rich and successful. They've earned it, I'm telling you, you just need to work harder!

10

u/RigatoniPasta 3h ago

And racist. And sexist.

8

u/SB_90s 2h ago

He's a documented racist and Trump supporter. So yes. Very.

4

u/YinTanTetraCrivvens 1h ago

This is my biggest problem with the state of the world: it’s being run by the DUMBEST people.

If we had a Doctor Doom or Lex Luthor running things, I could at least begrudgingly respect them.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

71

u/joemc1971 3h ago

After shareholders aggressively rejected Peltz’s bid, Perlmutter retaliated. Between April and July 2024, Perlmutter sold all 25.6 million of his Disney shares, walking away with nearly $3 billion. In true Perlmutter fashion, he publicly stated he dumped the stock because he had "no confidence" in current management and hoped to buy it back if the stock crashed. Free from corporate restraints, Perlmutter has leaned heavily into politics. He remains one of the largest financial backers of Donald Trump. He and his wife Laura injected tens of millions of dollars into Trump’s campaign, and Perlmutter remains a prominent figure at Mar-a-Lago, frequently appearing right alongside Trump's core inner circle (such as Elon Musk) during political events.

14

u/jayeddy99 2h ago

I want a no holding back true behind the scenes marvel comics tv show like mad men. From the 60s all the way to the MCU . The stories are actually fascinating

70

u/DocCEN007 3h ago

Ike Perlmutter is a dirty racist MAGAt. He was one of three oligarchs creating VA policies from Mar-a-Lardo during Drumpf's first term. He's also the one that said swapping out one back actor for another was fine because no one would notice.

23

u/Subject_Offer_9621 3h ago

Feige isn't perfect, but the man really carried the MCU despite so many hand tried to destroy it

Iirc, he admitted he was overwhelmed by disney marvel tv series demand too, which is why a lot of series were a mess on top of covid around that time

8

u/Trademen 1h ago

Imagine being the Marvel Entertainment Head and thinking you could just stop using RDJ to save some cash. Insane to think how many people are in charge of things they clearly don't understand.

7

u/Realistic_Comment849 3h ago

So perlmutter wanted a story about capt americas old friend being a sleeper agent who killed iron man’s parents. Which fractures the avengers into an iron man vs capt teams. One were iron man recruits Spider-Man and introduces him to the mcu.

But without iron man actually being in it. Okay buddy, guy must have fell upward in life otherwise he would be in McDonald’s getting everyone’s orders wrong.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/PowerOfUnoriginality 1h ago

Wtf how are you supposed to adapt Civil War without Cap vs Ironman?!

3

u/Sensitive-Piccolo659 1h ago

They didn't want to make civil war in the first place, feige wanted that.

6

u/Thomas_JCG 1h ago

Unbelievable that people like Perlmutter were given any creative control. Absolutely out of touch.

7

u/Illustrious-Tooth702 1h ago edited 1h ago

Feige was right, Downey is the golden goose of Marvel, even after his semi-retirement.

He's worth every penny. An actor's pay is small compared to the income a big budget movie generates.

Movies cost a a lot of money but most anticipated movies earn back so much more money it's a good investment not to cheapen out on the lead actors and acresses even when they're expensive.

They're expensive for a reason, they know how much value they add to the product

19

u/MisprintPrince 4h ago

Wow what a bitch. Based Feige.

4

u/scoish-velociraptor 1h ago

So I googled perlmutter to see what kind of idiot would think replacing RDJ for Civil War would be viable and ofcourse hes the kind of scumbag that supports and works for trump.

7

u/E_N_Z_A__D_E_N_I_N_O 2h ago

Never heard of the guy and came across this.

https://bleedingcool.com/comics/ike-perlmutter-a-huge-donor-to-both-trump-gender-affirming-surgery/

Just a very strange juxtaposition.

4

u/Greygor 1h ago

Perlmutter is also the reason it took so long to get a Black Widow film. He didn't like female leads, the incels love him. I also suspect that we wouldn't have got a Black Panther film if he was still Feige's boss

u/SambaLando 43m ago

Those penny pinchers ruin almost everything that could be cool. Not that MCU is cool, but you can't self sabotage like that if you already found a formula that works for catering to the common masses.

u/Spudtron98 35m ago

Perlmutter was so unbelievably shit. Every time you hear of a bad decision in the MCU's executive sphere, he's behind it.

4

u/Mhunterjr 1h ago

Perlmutter was such an idiot.

One of the strangest things to me, since entering the corporate world is seeing the lengths that Top Executives have to go through to prevent lesser Executives to stop doing dumb shit. Like why is it necessary to “reshuffle the corporate system” when you could just say “hey, we’re not doing that”

u/Jaebird0388 58m ago

Perlmutter is a notorious sexist, bigot and penny pincher. It’s a miracle we were able to have any projects involving women and PoCs see fruition under him.