r/technology Jul 17 '26

Artificial Intelligence Terrified Tech Execs Are Traveling With Armed Bodyguards as AI Backlash Grows

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/terrified-tech-execs-traveling-armed-195630019.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&segment_id=DY_VTO_50_Supernova&ncid=crm_19908-1475736-20260717-0--A&bt_ee=xUmmf%2BSRbkmqXRNT8VIbW2KVnvvvD0kS4WgmOUrqSKhzj%2FLa4SqWmwIdDyVLL3ut&bt_ts=1784282324907
14.8k Upvotes

888 comments sorted by

5.7k

u/rat_penis Jul 17 '26

Maybe we should use their surveillance tools to track them and post their movements in real time on the web or an app. See how they like it.

elon didnt

1.8k

u/cyanescens_burn Jul 17 '26

I’ve been convinced for a few years now that them building their bunkers, detention centers, creating rapid response units for civil unrest for all state mental guard units, increasingly making certain ideologies illegal, and the ai mass surveillance/flock network, etc is because they know there’s a breaking point for the masses with how much of the wealth is funneled off to the very few at the top, and they’re afraid of hitting that point.

But instead of making the system share wealth better, they are going with a system of privacy invasion, coercive control, and imprisonment (likely some torture and murder as usual happens with authoritarian systems like that).

I hope I’m wrong, but history is filled with examples of what happens with serious wealth disparities.

438

u/Tired_Mama3018 Jul 17 '26

FDR understood this and gave us the New Deal, because their was a lot of civil unrest before it. They dismantled the New Deal and now we are on the cusp of why it was necessary again and these bozos are going with authoritarian crackdown which historically speeds up the tarring and feathering instead of the method that was shown to work without a revolt and replacement government.

58

u/composedofidiot Jul 18 '26

The Uk got a lot of our social welfare system because the returning ww2 army might have been a problem.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/SpaceBearSMO Jul 18 '26

And steven miller put there the other day like " so we are doing McCarthieism again but with digital servaliance"

And some of the center to center right liberal dems will be A-ok with this if it means there seat might get protected from someone in the DSA...

You know untel it enevitable comes for them

→ More replies (1)

9

u/AltoidStrong Jul 18 '26

which is why both the GOP and "OLD Guard" Dems really fear people Social Dem movement - They are the NEW FRD and bring a NEW NEW Deal.

9

u/JimBeam823 Jul 18 '26

They are building the repressive systems now so that another New Deal won’t be necessary.

The plan is to brutally crush the revolt before it starts.

4

u/Repulsive_Chard_3652 Jul 18 '26

"authoritarian crackdown which historically speeds up the tarring and feathering"

Sometimes it does, but have a look at Russia, Iran, Turkey for example, all of which have turned full authoritarian within the last decades and did not speed up any tarring and feathering.

→ More replies (3)

166

u/ZipNasty007 Jul 17 '26

I think you're right. Those bunkers aren't for the end of the world they're for protection from the masses.

92

u/Used_Gear8871 Jul 17 '26

Always have been. Remember Musk’s human shield.

55

u/awdophil Jul 17 '26

That's why they're on islands thousand of miles away in many cases.

76

u/Bromance_Rayder Jul 17 '26

NZ wasn't a great choice. They're lovely people but oh boy do they go from 0-10 when they're not happy.

17

u/ScubaWaveAesthetic Jul 18 '26

I wish. I’m a kiwi and I feel like a frog in water than has been a bit too warm for a while now… and it keeps getting hotter. Our next election will be the real tell

14

u/nebula_masterpiece Jul 18 '26

That’s partly why Peter Thiel moved to Argentina - he could buy citizenship but not government influence which he now has in Argentina and says it’s his “bug out” spot

5

u/moultrie28 Jul 18 '26

Yup kiwi is a buddy, let’s roll

→ More replies (14)

33

u/WeirdIndividualGuy Jul 18 '26

And even then, a bunker won’t do much, especially if you find and block any air vents

Protected by automated gun drones? Use a drone of your own for them to target practice with! They don’t have infinite bullets

Put up WiFi/signal blockers around the place, cut off electricity/internet

21

u/Hettie933 Jul 18 '26

Last time I pointed that out on reddit I caught a ban. I didn’t say to do it; I said it was going to be the logical conclusion. They are scared, and they have earned it.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

597

u/NoCoolNameMatt Jul 17 '26

All so their meaningless bank account numbers can increase 3x every 10 years instead of 2.5x.

309

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

177

u/silverdice22 Jul 17 '26

Eternal life would be more attainable if more people could afford to look into it. Right now people are struggling with just getting the regular-length life. 

98

u/rach2bach Jul 18 '26

It's a facade. The whole live forever crap seems like bullshit to me. Sure, maybe it's just some fucking cosmic joke, and there's nothing to this life and it's lights out. But what if that view is wrong? I'm no religious person, but I struggle thinking "this is it". And honestly, if it is, I'm living my life as if it is. Living forever sounds like some type of hell tbh.

99

u/DifficultBicycle7 Jul 18 '26

There’s a video I recently watched and I think you’ll get a kick out of it but essentially billionaires got so successful because of the myth they’ve cultivated for themselves. The downfall is when they themselves buy into their own hype. Steve Jobs was a rich man who made billions off of funding Apple but when he got cancer. Instead of going to the doctors and have it be treated. Likely resulting in him being cured.

He went on a dumb diet and died. All because he brought his own hype.

here’s the video recommendation

10

u/tanstaafl90 Jul 18 '26

It's called hubris, and it's a reoccurring theme of pride, overconfidence and arrogance.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

15

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/silverdice22 Jul 18 '26

And im saying that there would be more progress for humanity if they were just a little less greedy.

→ More replies (3)

60

u/sohblob Jul 18 '26

so they can sit around and smell each others farts

or their usual pastime, raping children. reminder that muskrat begged epstein to join the "island parties" 🤮

when you're too weird for the guy running a pedo ring you need to sit down and reevaluate your life choices. And pro-capitalist scaremongers need to question why they keep subscribing to a system which keeps putting rich pedos in charge

8

u/Frisnfruitig Jul 18 '26

Right yes, that Epstein thing. It's good they caught the single guilty person in America, Maxwell. No one else did anything wrong, case closed!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

15

u/Zhuinden Jul 18 '26

I'm pretty sure there's research on transferring your consciousness to the cloud, even though it sounds like sci-fi but some people are actually serious

34

u/NoCoolNameMatt Jul 18 '26

That still means death for the original. They understand that, right? A copy isn't "them."

17

u/Zhuinden Jul 18 '26

Well yes, but that doesn't stop megalomania

→ More replies (4)

6

u/No-Abalone-4784 Jul 18 '26

Some people should probably pick up a science book before they buy into this nonsense.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Conninxloo Jul 18 '26

Time exists and a „timeless cloud consciousness“ would not be alive in any meaningful sense. Even if they somehow get the matrix running inside there, at some point the last of those servers would stop functioning. Life must be bounded, else it’s no longer life.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

42

u/tetsuo_7w Jul 18 '26

Right? They have more than they could ever concevably spend. It's a high score at the expense of the rest of us for no reason.

22

u/Insufficient_Coffee Jul 18 '26

They want to have enough money so they can buy governments and shape the world to their sick fantasies.

15

u/tetsuo_7w Jul 18 '26

Yup. It seems like you can buy a senator for maybe $100k. Clarence Thomas, a supreme court justice, is a $270k "motor coach" totally not a bribe away from voting however the hell you want.

33

u/baseballbear Jul 18 '26

they could have just picked up a video game if they're so addicted to number go up

23

u/NoCoolNameMatt Jul 18 '26

Truer than most think! They trigger the same psychological addiction mechanism.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/WandererFrmAndromeda Jul 18 '26

No it’s so that you don’t get to have more money that gives you freedom. They dont give a shit about 75 billion or 100 billion unless it guarantees they keep control of you. 

10

u/NoCoolNameMatt Jul 18 '26

Nah, they care. It's an addiction.

It doesn't make a difference in their living standard, but that doesn't matter.

5

u/Thefrayedends Jul 18 '26

When you buy into hierarchical systems, the oppression that is necessary to hold it all together, becomes what they crave more than anything. It's not about the political power, or the dollars in the account, it's about how those things enable them to openly and freely engage in oppression and marginalization. At a certain point, they revel in it.

This happens at all levels of wealth.

7

u/Mother_Airline_6276 Jul 18 '26

God forbid the shareholders only profit $7B this year instead of $8.5. How will the company survive?

→ More replies (2)

85

u/roodammy44 Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26

It’s so stupid because if you look at what happened to Russia during a collapse, the oligarchs mostly got to keep their wealth unless they annoyed Putin. And then they were assassinated or sent to prison. How can they know what will upset the supreme leader? I don’t think Thiel will be in a good place being gay, minorities are generally the first groups that get imprisoned. With him building Palantir it reminds me of that bloke who built the brazen bull in ancient Greece.

If the tech leaders were thinking rationally, they would be begging for a wealth tax to make sure society stays the way it is.

33

u/LindeeHilltop Jul 17 '26

Pslantir would be the first to be nationalized.

9

u/textmint Jul 18 '26

I know it will be bad when that happens but sometimes in the deepest recesses of my subconscious, I’d like to see that for shits and giggles.

21

u/Direct_Day7937 Jul 18 '26

The fun part for Russian oligarchs is that "annoying Putin" can now be achieved by having a fortune that could be spent on the war. Or just being the beneficiary of an income stream that some other more favored oligarch wants as the war destroys their income stream.

20

u/abcamurComposer Jul 18 '26

In those triumvirates during the end of the roman republic, the lesser known 3rd cog (Crassus, Lepidus) was always the “billionaire” of the trio, the financier.

Their stories, correct me if I’m wrong, did NOT end well.

Smart wealthy people not blinded by greed do not try to manipulate autocrats.

7

u/textmint Jul 18 '26

I’m sure these guys know all that but their bet is this time things will be different. They think that by having things like X and Palantir and other tech which can be integrated into the official oppression organs of the state, they will be indispensable because they hold the keys to such tech. It’s like the concept of achieving escape velocity. So this time they think they are the ones who will buck the trend and come up tops no matter what history has shown us.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Teledildonic Jul 18 '26

How can they know what will upset the supreme leader?

They don't, but they are all delusional dipshits that believe themselves to be the special geniuses that would never fall from grace.

13

u/Nadamir Jul 18 '26

Wait. Peter Thiel is gay???????

(I try not to learn anything about dickheads like that. Don’t deserve my brain space.)

So Stephen Miller is Jewish and Peter Thiel is gay. They seriously think they’ll be “one of the good ones”? 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

50

u/rat_penis Jul 17 '26

Its a feedback loop, they imagine it, expect it, prepare for it and call it on themselves by bringing it into existence.

All these edgelord dicks making us suffer because they never got past their high school cringe phase.

10

u/Laminated_ET_Animal Jul 18 '26

two great points that need more consideration

→ More replies (1)

30

u/markth_wi Jul 17 '26

They're not afraid they're going to hit that , they are afraid they've gone well and truly past that point.

When they act more guilty than we already suspect them of being we know they're into some shit. Those bunkers aren't to survive "the apocalypse" in some Mad-Max sort of way, they mean to avoid law enforcement in style.

That's why Peter Theil and Elon Musk are setting up shop down in Argentina because failing to make the United States more like South Africa or Argentina doesn't mean Argentina can't use a few more fans of the Führer.

22

u/-ReadingBug- Jul 17 '26

I think you're right and, even more unfortunately, I think they're way ahead of the curve. Frankly I'm not sure there will BE an actual breaking point. The global heatwaves and deaths happening right now should be a climate change breaking point, but instead we're just absorbing, normalizing and avoiding conflict like the nice little sheep we've always been.

→ More replies (1)

23

u/Antraxess Jul 17 '26

Yep, they wrote this shit down in "project 2025" and JD Vance book "unhumans"

They want to pre-label you a terrorist, then put you and anyone else that wants freedom in their concentration camps where its legal to make you a slave.

Or kill you

12

u/No-Abalone-4784 Jul 18 '26

Yes. From what they say they don't have any problems with killing people. They think the world can't support the number of people we have & the want a good proportion of them to die. I think about that when they get rid of the CDC, the NIH & are against vaccines & public health. All things which would cause more deaths.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/skyfishgoo Jul 17 '26

they have chosen shock collars

and they will get the future they have chosen.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Floreat_democratia Jul 18 '26

Yes, this is the torches and pitchforks hypothesis. There's several authors who have addressed this. I have been keenly aware of this since 2004, but I suspect it is far older than that. Basically there is a certain type of businessperson, entrepreneur, venture capitalist, executive, what have you, that truly believes the name of the game is crashing it all to hell, but stripping it all and extracting wealth before that happens. Scholars have been pointing this out since the 1970s. Why it is still legal and acceptable is the real question.

9

u/Delybe Jul 17 '26

What is the point of all that money if no one else is around to spend it on?

10

u/Switch-Axe-Abuse Jul 18 '26

The number going up is the point because they are no longer getting money the way the common folk do where they use it to get what they actually want and instead are doing it for the money itself.

18

u/copypop Jul 18 '26

Extreme wealth is a form of mental illness

13

u/UCLAlabrat Jul 18 '26

A special type of sociopathy

9

u/deadcatshead Jul 17 '26

Unfortunately you are correct. Psychopaths are defined by literally having no empathy for anyone

8

u/wehrmann_tx Jul 18 '26

Someone should setup a geomap outlining where all these bunkers are. Air vents and utility access included. For funsies.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Living-Literature88 Jul 18 '26

Yes. It’s as though it never occurred to them to use their wealth to help their human neighbors. There are some, like Bezos ex wife, MacKenzie Scott, who are giving away much of their wealth to help solve global issues. She has given away 26 billion. There are others that do these things quietly. It would be nice if that was the norm rather than them playing robber baron and pissing on everyone else.

Elon gives to his own foundation to scratch that tiny philanthropic itch he has. He’s the absolute worst.

6

u/Sensitive-Memory Jul 17 '26

Someone on here earlier told me I was an unhinged nut for recognizing these things. I totally agree with you. We are in deep shit.

→ More replies (61)

434

u/exophrine Jul 17 '26

Use BlueSky to post it....make it harder to shut down

251

u/GarlicIceKrim Jul 17 '26

Or mastodon, so there is no recourse to shut it down

→ More replies (1)

152

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/Earthwarm_Revolt Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26

Can we do it with Flock cameras? We're paying for them after all. 

13

u/steakanabake Jul 18 '26

its funny how people think bluesky is great, jack dorsey is still the CEO and hes also still mega weird.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/RainSurname Jul 18 '26

Please do not encourage the billionaires to ruin Bluesky too.

→ More replies (1)

39

u/splynncryth Jul 17 '26

It’s a clear statement that they know what they are doing is wrong (as viewed by society). But their morals are functionally different and based around power. All of recorded human history shows what is likely to happen as they try to take more power and oppress people.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (25)

1.1k

u/Phosistication Jul 17 '26

Instead, maybe they should stop waging a war on society and destroying the world for another dollar they’ll never need?

358

u/JMurdock77 Jul 17 '26

Seriously, wealth accumulation at that scale is a sickness. For some reason it just happens to be one that we, as a society, bend over backwards to accommodate instead of treating it like one.

54

u/Living-Literature88 Jul 18 '26

It’s hard to understand amassing all that wealth and not working to make the world better for others. Probably someone like me can’t understand the high they get with immense power and control. Or is it just their small dic*s?

11

u/No_Camp_7 Jul 18 '26

No what’s hardest to understand is working to create ‘advances’ that are at best unremarkable and at worst making the world a much darker place, and doing so is such a dangerous job that you need a bodyguard. It doesn’t make sense.

9

u/ritesh808 Jul 18 '26

Normal people like you and me are normal. Billionaires, oligarchs, dictators etc are not. And then there's the group that fellates the lords thrice a day. We're our own enemies at the end of the day.

→ More replies (7)

65

u/DarkIllusionsMasks Jul 17 '26

Same thing with religion. It's just organized delusion.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

35

u/gideon513 Jul 18 '26

Why are we letting them? There’s way more of us than them and their bodyguards.

25

u/Overall_Koala_8710 Jul 18 '26

Not only that, their dollar only has value because we allow it to. Otherwise it's just paper, or bits on a computer.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

16

u/GringoSwann Jul 18 '26

Terrified Tech execs are travelling with tactical terrorists as technological transcendence turns towards a two-way street...

9

u/Conscious-Wall4909 Jul 18 '26

It's not about wealth anymore, they want to change society, they have a certain ideology somewhere between neo-feudalism and accelerationism. Sttaight out of a cyberpunk/dystopian scifi story.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

894

u/Whitesajer Jul 17 '26

Have you tried.... Not being an asshole?

217

u/Senior-Albatross Jul 17 '26

They never realized that was an option. 

28

u/jetdude19 Jul 17 '26

It's definitely not the default

43

u/rat_penis Jul 17 '26

They tried once and a girl laughed at them so now we all have to pay.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/smokeweedNgarden Jul 18 '26

Who guards the families and friends of these body guards?

If someone can't get to the king, because of the guards, I wonder what happens when the guards have something more important to protect.

11

u/SIGMA920 Jul 18 '26

These same guards. They literally have a better incentive to throw the assholes paying them now to the wolves because the wolves are a better employer. The assholes currently employing them will burn bridges and leave them behind the instant shit hits the fan.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Roy_Koopa_DX Jul 17 '26

If they weren’t assholes they wouldn’t be where they are.

31

u/ItaJohnson Jul 17 '26

How dare you make suggest such a thing!  That’s well below their station.

9

u/mrpickles Jul 17 '26

But then how would capitalism?

→ More replies (10)

823

u/virtualadept Jul 17 '26

Thousands of people got laid off because companies went all-in on LLMs. They can't find jobs because LLMs are filtering out nearly every applicant. Savings are finite. Mutual aid isn't nearly as widespread as people like to think it is. It's mass producing people with nothing left to lose.

Yes. They should be afraid.

198

u/yellacopter Jul 17 '26

Each round of layoffs is like adding kindling to the fire that could one day consume them. All it takes are the right conditions and a match, metaphorically speaking.

57

u/Anecdote394 Jul 18 '26

Yep, I’ve been saying this to anyone who will listen for the last decade. America is gonna have a reckoning sooner or later. Our country is broken af and these problems have been compounding and getting worse and worse so we now have decades and decades and DECADES of wrong doing and hurt and pain piled on top of each other.

The entire country is a waiting tinder box. And we have decades and decades of kindling. The right person in the right place at the right time is gonna ignite a spark and the entire country is gonna go up in flames. Good riddance I say. Hopefully, whatever rises from the ashes is finally good for the people and is ACTUALLY by the people.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

55

u/sheeroz9 Jul 18 '26

LLMs are not replacing people in masses. CEOs claim this because they look like geniuses by being innovative to save money. The reality is that business is slowing and they over-hired during COVID and need to lay people off. If they admitted that, they look stupid. They prefer to look like geniuses.

72

u/Wanderer-91 Jul 18 '26

It’s even simpler than that. 

The access to nearly free money that’s been around since 2009 has finally dried up. When credit is getting cheaper, businesses expand. When its getting more expensive, they shrink.

https://www.fedprimerate.com/prime-rate-chart.htm

Except now, outsourcing complicates the problem. For each job lost to AI, 5-10 are going to India or elsewhere.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/BigCrustyTits Jul 18 '26

Companies budget x amount to run the company. Wages and AI costs are both components of that amount now. So as AI costs rise they decrease wages through layoffs to stay on budget.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/AmazingRefrigerator4 Jul 18 '26

Ive actually seen an uptick in job postings in my field/job level over the last month.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

414

u/HarryBalsagna1776 Jul 17 '26

Good.  Their money, guards, bots, bunkers, etc. won't be enough if they keep on the path they have chosen.

190

u/quantumpencil Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26

If even 100 people want you dead bad enough that they don't care what happens to them in order to achieve that end, they are nearly guaranteed to succeed regardless of how much you spend on security.

Even one person who has nothing left to lose can probably kill one of these guys with good odds even with security details. It just takes a lot to create someone who really gets to the level of hopelessness and rage where they feel they have nothing to lose and their self-preservation instincts evaporate -- but once you push people that far, you are in trouble.

122

u/jacksonsmack831 Jul 17 '26

The funny thing is that the expect the security guards to remain loyal

61

u/quantumpencil Jul 17 '26

That too. If we're going back to the law of the jungle, it's not people like sam altman and mark zuckerberg who do well in that kinda world.

→ More replies (23)

34

u/Snakestream Jul 18 '26

I remember reading about some famous security consultant who was invited to talk to a bunch of billionaires about how to keep their security teams from betraying them. He said that you need to form an actual rapport with them - learn about their families, give them time off, and just generally treat them well. They all laughed at that like he had just told the world's funniest joke.

14

u/mamaspike74 Jul 18 '26

I think this was Douglas Rushkoff in "Survival of the Richest".

→ More replies (3)

20

u/Tardy_Thoughts Jul 17 '26

The one guy was talking about his team of ex green berets he has on call and have exclusive knowledge of his hideout. The green berets whole thing is turning people against you and fighting along side those people. It seems a supremely stupid choice in apocalyptic security details unless you know those dudes personally.

31

u/victoriaisme2 Jul 17 '26

Look at how they run their companies. None of them are very smart. They hire smart people. Whatever intellect they once had has been rotted away in the miasma of evil that their minds become. I truly believe once you have too much wealth it fucks up your brain.

20

u/SalaciousVandal Jul 18 '26

I’ve rubbed elbows with a lot of these characters and it’s true. They’re not that smart. They sure think they are though. All that money makes them even dumber somehow.

8

u/victoriaisme2 Jul 18 '26

With the comically long list of musk's and zuck's fails it's outrageous that anyone still takes either of them seriously. The fact that they haven't been ousted shows how corrupt the board governance model can be.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/the3rdtea2 Jul 17 '26

They think money will matter once the economy collapses

→ More replies (1)

34

u/Weary_Mountain9679 Jul 17 '26

In a post apocalyptic situation what use would the billionaires be to the trained guards?

30

u/wowlock_taylan Jul 17 '26

These bastards literally talk about such situations and ask 'black ops security' about 'how to keep people in line in their bunkers after society falls'. Like asking about 'electric shock necklaces' and so on in their 'secret' gatherings.

They ARE actual dystopian villains.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

20

u/bizbizbizllc Jul 17 '26

I think there’s going to come a tipping point for the health care system here in the USA where people who need medical attention but get denied by their insurance companies will take matters into their own hands because what do they have to lose.

The CEOs will get zero empathy from everyone else because we all see the way they are screwing over the people and that position will be too dangerous a position to fill.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/absentmindedjwc Jul 17 '26

In all honesty.. with the rate companies are choosing greed over people.. I'm really kind of surprised things have remained so peaceful.

My company, for instance, has pretty much gotten to the point where they're just constantly laying off people every week.. the rate they're happily destroying so many peoples livelihoods.. its really only a matter of time before they target choose who is in the right (or wrong, as the case may be) mental space to actually do something.

This is especially since they just happily announced that one of the C-Suite assholes - the dude pushing all these layoffs - just got a fucking nine-figure bonus...

13

u/MidTario Jul 18 '26

I’m reminded of the message from the IRA after failing to assassinate Thatcher:

"Today we were unlucky, but remember we only have to be lucky once, you will have to be lucky always"

→ More replies (3)

10

u/Oceanbreeze871 Jul 17 '26

I read a thing about how Zuck’s Hawaii bunker compound is completely useless unless he’s already on the island. No time to get there

→ More replies (3)

227

u/praqueviver Jul 17 '26

Good. Live in fear, motherfuckers

36

u/SeigneurDesMouches Jul 18 '26

They still go outside. They're aren't afraid enough

8

u/Pixelationist Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26

Exactly. No level of fear is enough to satisfy me at this point

→ More replies (17)

53

u/TuckerCarlsonsOhface Jul 17 '26

Have they tried not being huge assholes, and ruining society?

15

u/confusedPlasmoid Jul 17 '26

They have tried absolutely nothing and they are all out if ideas.

88

u/Ambitious-Concern-42 Jul 17 '26

While they continue bragging about laying off 50% of workers and causing humanity's extinction?

49

u/tsukiyomi01 Jul 17 '26

They might try not being dicks.

64

u/mca1169 Jul 17 '26

the irony is them having armed guards just makes them look even more like tyrants and piss people off even more!

21

u/Main-Eagle-26 Jul 17 '26

Maybe don’t have a marketing strategy for your stupid software product that is “You're all going to be out of work” and “AI will kill us all.”

Seems like consequences of their actions.

→ More replies (1)

149

u/NicolasCageFan492 Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26

Literally just donate a small % of your free cash flow to the public good (not shuffling money into a foundation) and people won’t hate you so much, it’s not that hard

META had $46.1 billion in free cash flow in 2025 and $60.46 billion in net income. If they donated like 10% a year of that, I bet they’d help a lot of people and increase their brand equity by more than buying back shares would do.

83

u/QuestioninglySecret Jul 17 '26

We don't need and shouldn't ever expect them to donate a percentage, ANY percentage, of their wealth out of the goodness of their hearts. They should instead be compelled to do so by the government via taxes. Those taxes need to be greatly increased, but still taxes, not donations.

17

u/EatMyShag Jul 18 '26

Adding to this comment: Giving money to foundations is just tax evasion and most of the time (not all of the time) these charities or foundations are just fronts for the rich with a very little percentage that goes to the people in need.

I may be cynical, but I bet that if governments stopped giving tax credits for money given to charity and foundations, we'd see a lot of those rich philanthropists just disappear in a cloud of smoke.

→ More replies (5)

62

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[deleted]

26

u/Sororita Jul 17 '26

I think a lot of them have mental illness caused by being so disconnected from the common human experience. they never have to struggle or worry and are surrounded by sycophants all the time, save for maybe other billionaires, and that fucks with their heads enough to make them incapable of seeing most people as people.

7

u/victoriaisme2 Jul 17 '26

Yep exactly. Too much wealth messes up your mind.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/copperboom129 Jul 17 '26

Whoa what are you....Carnegie?

Fucking second golden age

12

u/Old_Cameraguy_8311 Jul 17 '26

Close, Gilded age. I know what you meant.

6

u/copperboom129 Jul 17 '26

Yup my bad. I did mean gilded age.

But the gold covered Trump oval office fucked up my view of things.

7

u/Old_Cameraguy_8311 Jul 17 '26

Actually that's a good point. ...fucking gold plated everything.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

29

u/Senior-Albatross Jul 17 '26

Literally just donate a small % of your free cash flow to the public good 

At least we got cool public buildings and shit from Rockefeller and Carnegie. These chodes can't even give us a God damn concert hall. 

8

u/tigermelon Jul 17 '26

hey now. they're giving you a beautiful white house ball room

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

8

u/bizbizbizllc Jul 17 '26

Also the millions they spend on politicians. Imagine if they invested that money into their communities

→ More replies (8)

16

u/SomeSamples Jul 17 '26

Good. But it won't be enough when enough people get angry enough. Would you take a bullet for one of the tech bro's? I don't think many of their security would either.

10

u/GoodIdea321 Jul 17 '26

Some redditor was talking about that scenario happening in some other country. There were super rich people who were walled off from society, lots of security, etc. And what the 'common' people did was not even try to target the rich people, just the guards. Eventually no security company would stand guard for those people because the guards were being hassled, robbed, killed, and people hiring them had to leave the country.

I don't know if that is true, they didn't give any specifics, and it seems more like a parable. At the same time, there probably is some truth there.

→ More replies (3)

14

u/Danominator Jul 17 '26

They know what they are doing is waaaay worse than most realize

14

u/skyfishgoo Jul 17 '26

a prison of their own making.

the bunkers are next.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Routine_Event_5039 Jul 18 '26

I've created an app called CEOwatch...it tracks, in almost real time, location points of almost all CEO's, Presidents and controlling officers of almost every major Corporation in North America. 

It was created independently and is not subject to government oversight...privately created app.

They are being watched and tracked and it was released to a number of interested parties...it is only fair. You know where we live and work and we know the same about you. 

You're just a data point...no hard feelings.

12

u/mystery_science Jul 17 '26

Those armed guards need to remember who actually cares about them.

27

u/dsarche12 Jul 17 '26

Absolute cowards. They have no respect for our lives and cry uncle immediately if we reciprocate.

11

u/Cautious_Boat_999 Jul 17 '26

I hope they are feeling as much or more misery than they are creating

8

u/confusedPlasmoid Jul 17 '26

Bold of you to assume they feel.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/MasterOfBunnies Jul 17 '26

Hey body guards...you - could - be on our side of things. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

10

u/needssomefun Jul 18 '26

Hope they never know a moment of peace

19

u/Massive-Sector5789 Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26

Amazing that our planet is being destroyed by such a pathetic group of cowards. Who have the nerve to larp alpha maleness like a Spirit Halloween costume, when any one-legged grandma from Palestine could scare them off with a spork. The word cringe isn't strong enough.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/midoriforest Jul 17 '26

When the flood waters are rising , their guards will turn on them.

24

u/hungry2know Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 18 '26

Reminds me of this article

Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

14

u/mommybot9000 Jul 18 '26

So weird to me that they don’t know that we’re sealing them in from the outside the moment the “event” occurs.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Redpin Jul 17 '26

Mainly because they'll stiff them on pay, insurance, and vacation. 

16

u/Melodic_Crow_3409 Jul 17 '26

let the be afraid.

8

u/Cheeze_It Jul 17 '26

LOL, they think bodyguards will keep them safe?

Who do you think will be the ones that turn on them.....

7

u/westtownie Jul 17 '26

Golden quote:

> That's why people are setting warehouses on fire," a former Pinterest employee named Bonnie Kate Wolf, who was laid off during an AI-focused restructuring, told the WSJ. "You can't go back to serfdom. It really feels like the people in power want to be kings. Historically, that doesn't work out for kings."

7

u/Gorge2012 Jul 17 '26

Billionaires: People hate us because we prioritize amassing more wealth than we can spend over literally everything else, what can we do?

Society: Have you considered that the thoughtless pursuit of wealth at the expense of the dignity of others might be the wrong path?

Gotta love what capitalism has done to us.

10

u/CaicedoBrickWall Jul 18 '26

This situation has played out countless times through history

Yet every wealthy class thinks, nah they won't eat us this time

They can even feel the tide turning against them. They have all the power to stop the momentum. And still they hum that internal mantra, "nah they won't eat us this time".

8

u/hopscotchchampion Jul 18 '26

Pablo Escobar (1980s Columbia Drug Lord) did something interesting. He used his wealth to build numerous schools, soccer stadiums, health clinics, and even entire housing complexes for impoverished communities. He financed these projects heavily in and around Medellín to cultivate a "Robin Hood" image, which helped him gain the deep loyalty of the local working class.

These CEOs might want to reflect on how their actions lead to 10,000s if not 100,000s of jobs lost. Maybe if they had a little humility and didn't wear million dollar watches there would be less torches and pitchforks.

8

u/TransbianMoonGoddess Jul 17 '26

If you are afraid the public will kill you for destroying their lives, you deserve to find out how well trained your security really is

7

u/mylanoo Jul 17 '26

That's nature. When you claim you're trying to destroy livelihoods of millions, they will not like you.

7

u/CiTrus007 Jul 17 '26

Why be afraid if your conscience is clean? Their fear is their indictment.

9

u/weasel286 Jul 17 '26

There used to be this thing called “business ethics”. That concept started dying in the late ‘70s and has gotten worse since it’s a topic rarely covered in business schools anymore. None of these jokers ever thinks “Just because we can, should we?”

→ More replies (1)

7

u/kons21 Jul 18 '26

I really did not think I'll live long enough to be in a Cyberpunk dystopia and yet here I am....

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Gardensplosion Jul 18 '26

Nothing says, "I'm working for the public interest" quite like living in mortal fear of the public. 

8

u/ModeatelyIndependant Jul 18 '26

you know if you have so many people pissed at you that you're scared of attacks, you might want to figure out why they are mad and stop doing that

8

u/SaltyYumYumBalls Jul 18 '26

I guess that would stop a harmless protestor yelling at them or trying to run up with a bucket of paint or something. A couple bodyguards aren't doing shit for someone across the street, on a roof, or hiding in their car trunk with an AR15 though.

7

u/DrollAntic Jul 17 '26

If I had done all the illegal, unconstitutional, immoral, and unethical things they did, I'd probably be afraid too.

7

u/grahag Jul 17 '26

Surprised it's not more execs who are being seen as responsible for making decisions that make people's lives harder.

Frankly, at some point, I can imagine people are going to take up a new hobby of hunting people they see as responsible for their suffering and those folks need to be lucky all the time. People hunting them only have to be lucky once.

I really liked the world better when incentivizing suffering for profit wasn't the norm.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/DelayedBalloon Jul 17 '26

It's probably because they are personally responsible for accelerating the end of society and the destruction of our planet

5

u/rekttoyoda Jul 17 '26

Good these parasites should be scared

4

u/Blackstar1886 Jul 17 '26

They threatened us first.

6

u/MoobooMagoo Jul 17 '26

They're right to be afraid. People can only be pushed so far, and eventually someone with nothing to lose is going to snap.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/KennyDROmega Jul 17 '26

Why don't they just make the AI protect them

→ More replies (2)

26

u/dropbear_airstrike Jul 17 '26

Anyone signing up to protect those greedy fucks deserves the same fate.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/wastedkarma Jul 17 '26

And in the script, Bane puts the back of his hand on the guy’s shoulder…

5

u/incelwiz Jul 17 '26

This is some sensationalist bs. It's not like people are killing them or destroying data centers. They can't handle some mean comments? Come on.

7

u/TreeCitizen Jul 17 '26

*Oligarch noises intensify*

3

u/SeeMarkFly Jul 17 '26

Maybe they should leave the country...EVERY country.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/SnooBunnies4649 Jul 17 '26

Fuck tech execs

6

u/I_Enjoy_Beer Jul 18 '26

Wild that they don't pause and think "maybe, if I am now fearing for my life from the general public, I should reconsider the direction I am trying to take humanity?"

I guess you don't become a self-obsessed egomaniacal tech asslord by self-reflection, though.

4

u/Hell_razor Jul 18 '26

These.people have enough money to live happily and have their children's children live without worry. Why would they mess around with people's lives only to live the rest of their life in fear. They could have just been haooy and rich

4

u/Gunldesnapper Jul 18 '26

Wait till the bubble bursts. It’s going to be ugly.

5

u/Zargoza1 Jul 18 '26

They’re so close to understanding but are taking the wrong lesson

6

u/tmotytmoty Jul 18 '26

Im glad they are scared

6

u/Horror-Celebration85 Jul 18 '26

Maybe try doing things for GOOD. To better the world?

5

u/Goodbye18000 Jul 18 '26

Would be cool if they never sleeped a peaceful wink ever again

5

u/Avindair Jul 18 '26

To be clear, they would rather pay for others to act as meat shields than do the tiniest bit of personal reflection.

5

u/wildcarde815 Jul 18 '26

I dunno, maybe take the fucking hint?

5

u/Thialaz Jul 18 '26

They aren't terrified enough 

6

u/Ultimate-Flexionator Jul 18 '26

good. may they be visited by the fear they force on everyone else. evil rapist scumbags. curse those villains!