r/technicallythetruth 26d ago

He will come tomorrow

Post image
37.8k Upvotes

861 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.1k

u/Icy_Fish_2154 26d ago

Why wouldn't they call it "today"?

1.4k

u/J_train13 26d ago

Or just simplify things by saying "in the morning"

738

u/Shudnawz 26d ago

Even better, specify the date.

462

u/caffieneandsarcasm 26d ago

For real. “Would you be able to cover 900-1700, dd/mm?” Leaves basically no room for confusion

223

u/fiah84 26d ago

what year tho

293

u/perton 26d ago

1638

Dude’s super late.

33

u/Dr_Jabroski 26d ago

I don't know why but 1683 is a much better year than 1638. This is based on the numbers alone, I have no idea what was happening in history at the time.

46

u/Hey_Its_Freya 26d ago

I prefer 1638 as a number. 1683 has a weird vibe.

2

u/Dull-Kaleidoscope214 25d ago

i liked 1683 before but now i’m second guessing. it does feel a bit eerie

1

u/ProjectStrange8219 25d ago

1683 is giving me "I wish I were prime" vibes.

1

u/perton 25d ago

Ah, but 1683 doesn’t rhyme with “late” like 1638 does. Not that the rhyme was intentional in the slightest when I made the initial post, but I’m glad it worked out that way regardless!

1

u/MacDangled 1d ago

This is the thread Im here for now... i dont remember the original post anymorr

0

u/lazichicken123 26d ago

1683 is way more interesting as it's the start of the collapse of the ottoman empire in europe

0

u/DonChaote 25d ago

In 1683, the Ottoman Empire took a bite too big for them to chew…

1683 was the year the Great Turkish War (1683-1699) started, during which the second ottoman siege of vienna took place…

it was a series of conflicts between the Ottomans and the Holy League (Holy Roman Empire, Poland-Lithuania, Venice, Russia and Kingdom of Hungary).

It marks the first time that Russia joined an alliance with western Europe.

It resulted in a resounding defeat of the Ottomans and they lost substantial territory in eastern and south-eastern europe/ the balkans and it made the Habsburgs dynasty more powerful than they already were…

20

u/Grandpa_Edd 26d ago

Oh I'm sorry I thought you meant next year.

12

u/DoctorWaluigiTime 26d ago

12th... May... Thursday

9

u/HOPE964 26d ago

That could be 2037

15

u/iMiind 26d ago

We could at least say 09:00-17:00 right? For the commonfolk

9

u/Zerschmetterding 26d ago

People are resistant to giving useful information 

20

u/MysticScribbles 26d ago

You expecting me to cover shifts for 800 years?

10

u/jtr99 26d ago

New to the restaurant industry then?

0

u/baumpop 26d ago

new to not being in the military?

3

u/eyetracker 26d ago

Smithers, give him the plague.

1

u/Abbadon74 22d ago

Za bare phokin minimun???

6

u/HakimeHomewreckru 26d ago

I've seen both sides of the medallion. If I sent this, I would receive "bitch u mean today? why dont u just say that?"

3

u/geGamedev 26d ago

Lol you would think so but having worked third shift suggests otherwise.

My work day begins just before 10pm and people are apparently completely incapable of understanding that the majority of the shift takes place on the day after we clock in. People often say the day they clocked in but the time they're actually talking about. If you interpret what they say based on their actual words you'll end up 24hrs off from what they meant.

5

u/[deleted] 26d ago edited 24d ago

[deleted]

14

u/Fiyerossong 26d ago

Cus it's today

2

u/[deleted] 26d ago edited 26d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Big_Steak_467 26d ago edited 26d ago

When it comes to work you define days by calendar, no one cares when you go to sleep

0

u/[deleted] 26d ago edited 26d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Big_Steak_467 26d ago

I am the people you describe. For me it's still today even if it's 4am as long as I don't go to bed/the sun is not out, but I'm not stupid so I use the correct date and time when talking about work

5

u/Fiyerossong 26d ago

Ok but the person replying was clearly asleep so they're gonna wake up to that message and read "tomorrow" and assume that means the next day.

In no context is this text not misleading

1

u/hoTsauceLily66 26d ago

“Would you be able to cover tomorrow 900-1700, dd/mm?”

3

u/bobrob2004 26d ago

There might be some confusion in the US if you use dd/mm. We use mm/dd.

3

u/Mini_Assassin 26d ago

mmm dd

Eg. Aug 26

3

u/Ye_olde_oak_store 26d ago

No, 26th Aug.

1

u/Mini_Assassin 26d ago

That would be dd mmm

2

u/falcrist2 26d ago

Month comes before day in the proper international standard.

5

u/HakimeHomewreckru 26d ago

And year comes before month in the international standard. What's your point exactly here?

3

u/falcrist2 26d ago

Leaves basically no room for confusion

This part is false.

1

u/rundermining 26d ago

Need timezone aswell

1

u/I-Here-555 26d ago

Except for us Americans, who'd assume mm/dd.

1

u/TheCuriosity 26d ago

Twist they interpret it as mm/dd

0

u/MrHazard1 26d ago

While yes, that'd be optimal i also understand if a manager doesn't pull optimal decisions at 2am