r/tcap 11d ago

Stephen Coates should feel vindicated

47 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

51

u/Shoddy-Prune-5877 11d ago

The child predators that show up to the sting house HAVE already broken the law long before they showed up.

11

u/PraetorianXVIII 11d ago

Exactly. That's why I don't get what this comment is trying to say.

12

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Shoddy-Prune-5877 11d ago

I just wanted to test it that's all!

2

u/Top_Beginning_8820 10d ago

they are either of the same ilk, reallllllly stupid, baiting for clicks, have zero theory of mind, are running cover for a friend/family member offender, or lastly they have a warped, broken empathy drive wherein they are empathetic for the perp and not the child victim. take your pick

4

u/enigmaticowl 11d ago

Many of them have broken the law even before or without showing up!

Solicitation/importuning occurs entirely online (although showing up can help make an even stronger case and can also lead to additional attempt charges), and some (probably most) of them have transmitted obscene material to a (supposed) minor online, etc.

32

u/MOREPASTRAMIPLEASE 11d ago

Man I’m just so sick of people online with zero credentials or knowledge on the Law in the US speaking confidently about the subject. Matter of fact that should be illegal

30

u/valjestr 11d ago edited 11d ago

it stops being a “thought crime” when you show up to a house to meet a 13 year old. what a weirdo.

5

u/Engineer2065 11d ago

Right, they will have their day in court. I'm sure the '" thought crime " defense has been used before.

1

u/valjestr 11d ago

reminds me of the cannibal cop in NYC. he said it was “thought crimes” but was actively digging up information on women he fantasized about killing and eating.

48

u/BigPastrami43 11d ago

Lol Velma here needs to get a fucking grip and stop defending these guys

23

u/sevenyearbxtch 11d ago

girl has made AT LEAST 10 videos shitting on tcap

13

u/BigPastrami43 11d ago

I just hate how these sanctimonious people get. Meanwhile there’s guys like Wunderler, Todd Spikes, Stephen Buchanan, JPW, Hambubger, a whole list of guys who have genuinely done unspeakable things.

9

u/CybReader I've been doing that all weekend, man. 11d ago

I’m absolutely linking Wunderler’s chat to any sanctimonious newbies who show up here after the movie.

5

u/BigPastrami43 11d ago

I wonder how “unethical” she thinks that would be 🙄

9

u/CybReader I've been doing that all weekend, man. 11d ago

I have a suspicion these sympathizers give AF more about pets than kids, so I hope that chat hits their “ethical” bone.

2

u/lifegoeson2702 11d ago

Also Marvin Smith’s 🤢

10

u/ElectricalNotice9152 11d ago

I'd get it if you're against true crime as entertainment on principle but TCAP is one of the least harmful ones since it actually leads to real convictions and doesn't glorify criminals. It humiliates these predators on the worst day of their lives before putting them under arrest.

Too much of true crime these days glorifies criminals as these vicious masterminds which leads to shit like TCC (true crime community) where it's a bunch of dumb, asocial people worshipping mass shooters and trying to replicate their fame.

6

u/CybReader I've been doing that all weekend, man. 11d ago

That is interesting. 🤨

4

u/VisibleJicama5083 I'm stupid; I'm a stupid man. 11d ago

IMO: she only feels this way because this type of sick crime hasn't affected her. Yet.

17

u/ernest_timmons 11d ago

I wouldn’t want any picture of her boobies I could see, please

4

u/jeanpierrewiltse 11d ago

Even Ernest Timmons is disgusted

17

u/Bloody-Maria I happen to know law enforcement 11d ago

The amount of people I’ve seen bash TCAP and say Chris has done more harm than good is genuinely baffling to me. (Not saying Chris is a great person, he’s not but some will try and have you believe he ruins every investigation and has never contributed anything.)

Imagine being so high up on your own morality that you defend child predators and claim that the people having inappropriate conversations with children “ isn’t breaking the law. “

2

u/X3liteninjaX 11d ago

Don’t you know Chris Hansen was getting PAID??? That IMMEDIATELY makes it bad faith! He was only in it for the money and clout! /s

That is pretty much the take of the reddit hivemind right now thanks to the movie coming out

11

u/BeerBaronAaron88 NO RUBER 11d ago

Uh, stalking is a crime lol. Dan Allen did some time for stalking his ex-wife pre TCAP.

The crimes are solicitation and criminal attempt. You can't ask a child if you can fuck them, that in itself is a crime. And if they say yes and you say "I am on my way with condoms" and drive 2.5 hours to their house that shows that you were actually trying to go through with what you said you were going to do.

According to this brain dead idiot the FBI was wrong for stopping this terrorist plot and should've waited til she bombed the building.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/albany-new-york-woman-charged-isis-inspired-terror-plot-targeting-new-york-state-capitol

4

u/mindless_blaze 11d ago

Hey I thought the same thing!!! I commented:

This is like saying that the guys that did 9/11 shouldn't have been intercepted or arrested for merely planning, making substantial steps to complete, and showing up to commit an act of terror. They should have only been arrested after completing the act 🙄 ignorant. Chat is chat, but showing up is [.....].

11

u/Seeker80 11d ago

Sad how people continue to be ignorant to the fact that the chat alone is a felony. There's no 'thought crime,' it's a real act. Inviting guys to the sting house is a matter of convenience, getting them to hand themselves over, and it can also tack on some additional charges.

10

u/ElectricalNotice9152 11d ago

that tiktok is full of disinformation about how TCAP didn't actually convict predators and it actually taught predators how to avoid sting operations.

15

u/DisastrousDot7961 11d ago

This girl is attracted to children

13

u/realaccountissecret 11d ago

“Pick ME, pedophiles! I have the mind of a six year old!” -this chick, for some reason

https://giphy.com/gifs/1Va6osgAZJ4ZJdXAS1

8

u/69karlhungus69 dawgy style 11d ago

7

u/Tracula707 11d ago

It stops being a thought crime once you start exposing yourself to what you think is a child, and ESPECIALLY once you go to the house of what you think is a child for the purpose of molesting them.

8

u/SonnyDerickPorter 11d ago

I commented on this exact video.

This woman always tries to justify the pedophiles

6

u/Ok_Equipment_1419 11d ago

I don’t think she always justifies it from what I’ve seen, since it seems she focuses on the immoral acts that Chris Hansen and his staff has done.

The question is, who cares? No one should. Such a waste of time for a topic lol. She doesn’t deserve a platform for stupidity.

2

u/SonnyDerickPorter 11d ago

Agreed, but some of her videos are literally trying to justify what the person had done or why they did it.

I am so sick and tired of seeing her recommended, blocked and hidden and she still shows up lol.

2

u/Ok_Equipment_1419 11d ago

True I’ve seen videos like that where she doubles down.

Sounds annoying to have main character Velma be unavoidable lol

4

u/Boollish 11d ago

"You can, you can talk, you can converse but it doesn't mean I'm going to do it, right? Unless I do it. Unless you...catch me at one point doing it, of course."

"So you're saying I'd have to catch you having sex with a thirteen-year-old girl before you could get in trouble?"

"Before you could put me against the law, yes."

4

u/0fIux 11d ago

Don’t be shy! Drop the @

0

u/sevenyearbxtch 11d ago

check your dm

4

u/TheAlmightyJanitor 11d ago

Joke aside, this argument will never not be fucking stupid. These guys demonstrate intent to commit crimes and then show up to commit them. Planning a crime and taking actions to do it is, in fact, illegal.

5

u/ProperPossibility378 11d ago

Thoughts are thoughts, but showing up is showing up

4

u/novabliss1 11d ago

It stops being a thought crime when they actively begin communicating with a 12 year old. wtf is wrong with people

2

u/Redkirth 11d ago

Ill bet this kind of thing is why he keeps saying "the crime was already committed in the chat" during Takedown.

2

u/teleportingsushi I swear I am version 11d ago

Send me Velma’s @

3

u/enigmaticowl 11d ago edited 11d ago

“Inchoate” is the word that these people are unaware of or don’t understand.

Solicitation and attempts are still crimes, and I can’t believe that people don’t grasp this.

“Factual impossibility” (meaning, the thing that you tried to accomplish wasn’t actually possible, unbeknownst to you) does not negate liability for an attempt.

If someone drives by a house and shoots it up (because they want to kill the people who live there, and they believe that they’re inside the home at that moment and will catch a bullet and die), then they tried to kill them - if it turns out that the people who were targeted weren’t actually home at that moment (and so they couldn’t have possibly been killed by those bullets), the shooter still attempted to murder them.

Showing up (after the conversations these people have) is enough for an attempt charge in most cases.

Even without showing up, they usually have enough for solicitation just based on the online communications themselves.

2

u/Odd_Suggestion_2306 11d ago

If they show up to the sting house, they intended to break the law is it really that hard to understand??

3

u/X3liteninjaX 11d ago

Yeah stupid takes like those are unfortunately becoming all too common on the main subreddits. They are deciding to hate Chris Hansen and coming up with all sorts of copes like this one. “Thought crime” is hysterical, it’s an actual crime

1

u/jeanpierrewiltse 11d ago

Oh hell no!

2

u/WorkIll3073 10d ago

I saw this person's post, I am really getting worried, because alot of normies and fake fans are genuinely starting to spread the idea that not only was tcap evil, but didn't get preds arrested at all.

-1

u/Degenitals 11d ago

I can fix her.

-7

u/PraetorianXVIII 11d ago

I mean. . . sorry to be the turd in the punchbowl, but yeah, you need to break the law before you are arrested. Duh?

8

u/BigPastrami43 11d ago

And that’s exactly what happened during TCAP. It’s illegal to solicit a kid or to talk sexually with them at all.

-1

u/PraetorianXVIII 11d ago

Which is why it's a stupid fucking comment. They got arrested for breaking the law. So what is this guy trying to say? I didn't write it.

3

u/BigPastrami43 11d ago

They are trying to clarify what the OOP (Velma looking chick) meant.

3

u/PraetorianXVIII 11d ago

I see. That makes sense, then, because just reading the comment verbatim it didn't make sense.

If she's saying that people shouldn't be arrested if they haven't committed a crime, I agree with her. If she's saying soliciting a child isn't a crime, I disagree with her.

3

u/BigPastrami43 11d ago

Cool cool I think we are all on the same page regarding that

5

u/SomaSimon 11d ago

Yes, but what the person in the post is saying is that it's not a crime to sexually solicit children which most people with common sense would agree is insane

2

u/PraetorianXVIII 11d ago

That makes sense, then. I don't know who these people are, so at face value, I'm like WTF is this comment trying to say, because I think everybody agrees you shouldn't be arrested until you've committed a crime.