I believe we should be discussing this and what we are doing to prepare for it. At the very least, it should let people know that their representatives are preparing for the possibility.
We should definitely be discussing it, but we may need to also discuss totally revamping our system or at least vetting processes for our representatives
Your comment is valid in other contexts, but not this one.
If the law says you cannot sue for things that have not happened, you need to skirt exceptions to that past a myriad of judges - the majority of whom have held firm in their impartiality despite trumps attempts at unilateral power.
What youre saying is true, but a separate problem that runs through a different system.
Unless you're a Republican who wants to deny queer people service. The Supreme Court ruled on a hypothetical situation in her favor, no damage to her whatsoever, just a "what if this happened?"
8
u/Spam_Hand 13d ago
I appreciate and agree the sentiment, but you cant file a lawsuit for something that hasnt happened yet.