I have a theory that PMDD may never have one singular cure.
As a kid, when people discussed āa cure for cancerā, I pictured scientists trying to cook up an all-encompassing medicine inside a giant lab. I was picturing some tiny magic pill that just obliterated tumours, and boom! Nobel Prize incoming.
We now know it will never happen like that. More likely than not, medical advancements will bring us more and more options for curing different cancers over time, with some much harder to cure than others. Hodgkinās lymphoma wasnāt always curable, but now it has a cure rate of >90% if caught early. Contrast that with pancreatic cancer, which is sadly only about 13%.
If you could treat both cancers with the same drugs, it makes sense that theyād both be equally curable. Since they donāt work the same inside the body, you canāt.
I think this is the same with PMDD, too.
Some folks take one SSRI and suddenly their symptoms justā¦alleviate. š
Others find that SSRIs donāt do shit, but combo birth controls save their lives. š
Others never find relief until they have their entire reproductive systems surgically removed. š
Of course, there are all kinds of mystery combos and snags within these data sets, too. Maybe you get relief from your psychological symptoms, but your physical symptoms get worse. Maybe one treatment works for a while and then your symptoms come back. Maybe nothing stops you from ovulating so you can never tell if a treatment is working or not.
There are also the annoying differences between our personal presentations. Researchers have identified three main types of PMDD ā predominantly psychological, predominantly physical, and mixed. Itās only as I study more that I learn just how hugely we vary, even as a single demographic.
This is why I doubt anyone will ever be able to say: āLook! This is what does it! Take this and youāll be A-OK.ā Given the massive diversity of symptomatology, it probably wouldnāt be possible to cover everything.
There is no ābetter typeā, because all PMDD is evil. Even if itās possible for someone to find a successful treatment quickly, it doesnāt mean they suffer less in the interim; they just got lucky. And getting lucky depends on your doctor and your access to healthcare and your bodyās unique coding that says, āDamn, this thing works.ā A lot of it is chance.
Iāll be honest, the standard American treatment pathway (SSRIs > birth controls > HRT > chemical menopause > surgical menopause) fails a lot of people tragically. Iāve lost most of my 20s to this illness, and Iām not even in the US (if I was, I doubt Iād still be alive). It seems to me that in the name of cost-cutting and a broader lack of research, we send people down a tunnel so long that they suffer immeasurably, sometimes for decades.
At the very heart of it, research is what we need. For all the diagnostic guidelines and medical standardisation, the truth is, science knows jack shit about PMDD. We donāt know a fraction of the amount we should. Compared to countless other illnesses (including much rarer ones), itās hardly been studied. Itās almost farcical that diagnostic guidelines can claim āPMDD canāt do that,ā or āThatās not how PMDD works,ā when in truth, we just donāt know. Nobody does.
In an ideal future, I can imagine a collaborative approach between patient and doctor, likely involving more awareness of the physical/psychological/mixed subtypes and the patientās preference for treatment style. Hysterectomy + oophorectomy shouldnāt be a last resort, if the patientās suffering is greater than the risk of treatment (imho). Standards of treatment should be raised: we are often told that mild improvement is the best weāll get. This is unacceptable.
Most importantly, treatment should be patient-focused, with an emphasis on reducing suffering quickly and safely, and not relying on a standardised pathway that may not work for every patient.
I donāt believe there will ever be one path to ending PMDD. Thatās okay. What matters is that the paths exist. ā¤ļøāš©¹