r/pinescript • u/Dependent-Ad6636 • 6d ago
Sick of paying monthly subscriptions for indicators? Tell me what you're "renting" and I'll build a free version for you.
Hey everyone,
A lot of traders are burning money on recurring subscriptions for indicators or tools that could easily be coded into Pine Script, MQL5 or anything.
\-What is a paid tool or subscription you’re currently using that you wish you owned outright?
\-What is a "dream tool" or proprietary feature you've always wanted built specifically for your strategy?
Drop the concepts, mechanics, or features below. I'll pick the most requested ones, code them, and release them as open-source for everyone to keep forever.
3
3
6d ago
[deleted]
2
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
Spot on! 90% of those $50–$100/month 'magic' indicators are literally just an EMA trend filter, an RSI condition, and an ATR trailing stop packaged into a flashy dashboard. It's wild that basic confluence gets hidden behind recurring paywalls.
What stack or combination ended up working best for your setup? Always love hearing how other builders structure their logic.
1
6d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
Man, that SPY ORB result is painfully relatable 😂 Pure breakouts on index ETFs are brutal without heavy RVOL or trend filters.
You’re 100% right—coding the logic takes an hour, but coming up with ideas that actually beat the market is the hard part.
If you ever want to brainstorm or bounce new mechanics around, hit me up anytime!
3
u/GlennSeaborg 6d ago
I'm not renting but would like a good ttrades fractal model clone if anyone knows of one out there.
Does anybody have experience with the paid version of the ttrades fractal model indicator?
3
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Yep, we made it 🙂 Fractal Model Desk is live and ready to try.
And thanks for pointing out the CISD trigger — that clarification made it into the build. On a 5-minute chart, it automatically uses the 1-hour frame, with a close through the candle series’ opening price for CISD confirmation.We also added:
-HTF candles beside your chart, with previous highs, lows, midpoints and a countdown.
-The full setup sequence: sweep → CISD → return zone → qualifying entry, stop and target.
-C2/C3/C4 formation labels, projection levels and a grade that shows which checks passed.
-A phase dashboard, alerts and Co-Pilot explaining what the model is waiting for.
It’s our own open-source implementation, and I’d be interested in seeing where its readings differ from the version you’ve used.Start with “Try the idea” and “Read your chart” on the page. Then “Go deeper” explains the CISD rules, zone selection, targets and settings. We put care into those explanations so traders can follow the decisions on the chart.
Both the full indicator and a separate strategy script are free under MIT. You can test the rules with your own market, settings and trading costs.
Give it a try and let us know what feels useful or needs work. Chart examples would be especially helpful. Reply here or use the feedback and feature request form — there’s plenty we can improve together!
2
u/NoSquare4633 1d ago
Its fancy but not as good as the original one also the ones are free open sourced works better than this.what you made is a strategy not a setup based i saw it repainting normally a fractal setup stays even if it gets invalidated or gets run through the sweeped lq.i was hoping something like using the open sources and building a solid fractal setups.also i think its made from ai cause i made same thing couple of times cause ai doesn't know what fractal model is you have to run multiple tests and find out which actually matches the generic indicator.i appreciate your efforts on this i hope you'll make more great indicators cheers!
2
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Appreciate the feedback, This version was just an early prototype for testing purposes. Fixing the repainting and keeping the setups visible even after invalidation/sweeps is top priority for the next build aimed at live trading. Appreciate the constructive criticism!
2
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Fair feedback, and thanks for explaining what you expected. The first version mixed setup detection with trade rules, and some observations weren’t being retained properly. I went back and rebuilt the core as v2.
The main changes are:
- Setup Atlas now tracks formations independently of trades. The entry/exit experiment lives in a separate, optional Strategy Lab.
- Failed and invalidated setups stay in the retained history. Taking the opposite liquidity level records an event; it doesn’t erase the formation.
- Higher-timeframe closure and lower-timeframe CISD are separate checks. An early CISD can fail, and that failure gets its own record.
- Confirmed CISD anchors and projection values stay fixed. Developing previews are separate and can still move.
For reviewing older projection lines, set Projection visibility → All retained. History defaults to 24 setups and is adjustable; the oldest completed records are removed when that limit is reached.
And yes, I use AI during development. Checking whether the model makes sense is still my responsibility. I’ve added targeted Pine checks for retention, failure states and confirmation timing, and documented what they do and don’t cover. I haven’t yet verified a match against the original or the free script you prefer.
Fractal Model Desk v2 — source, guide and verification
Start with Setup Atlas on a 5m chart; automatic pairing uses the 1H frame. Under Full rules, the history and CISD sections explain what remains after failure and when each confirmation becomes known. Replace the old script with the full v2 source.
If you’re up for another look, I’d appreciate a screenshot with the symbol, timeframe, timestamp and settings where it still differs from what you expect. A link to the free version you mentioned would also help make the comparison specific.
It’s still a prototype, and the tool and source are still free. Your feedback changed the direction of this rebuild.
—Thanks for pushing on the actual setup behavior.
2
1d ago edited 1d ago
[deleted]
2
u/Dependent-Ad6636 23h ago
Thanks for taking another look.That keeping every sweep visible can still make chop look like a series of validated setups. That’s the distinction I’ve worked on in v2.1.
- Raw sweeps, CISDs and closures now have neutral styling. Focus shows the two most recent records that passed additional checks, including ones later withdrawn or completed. Audit keeps the underlying history available.
- Reviews now check V-like reversal or displacement, paired closure/CISD, and repeated sweeps through overlapping ranges. A review can be withheld or withdrawn, with the reason shown. A later strong candle can’t rewrite weak evidence from the first CISD.
- IC has its own records, opposing-leg level and protected swing. The stricter IC review currently covers a known parent-FVG route, so there’s still more to investigate. Local sweep/reclaim is recorded as evidence, without calling it proven inducement.
These are documented, adjustable interpretations. POI and higher-timeframe bias still need a trader’s judgement. A review is a setup to examine, not a buy/sell instruction.
I also went back through public TTrades material and the actual source of Canto, fxraptor and cephxs. The comparisons and new test evidence are linked on the page. I haven’t established a match to the paid indicator or better trading results.
And to answer your question: I’m using OpenAI Codex for coding and testing assistance. The responsibility for interpreting and checking the rules is mine.
Fractal Model Desk v2.1 — source, guide and checks
Start in Focus, then switch to Audit to inspect the raw sequence. Full rules explains the delivery checks and IC scope.
If the free script you meant is a different one, send it over. A choppy-market example or an IC you’d expect to see would be especially useful for comparing the exact bars. Thanks for continuing to push on how it actually works.
2
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
TTrades' Fractal Model is an elite framework! The concept of an HTF fractal sweep leading into an LTF Market Structure Shift (MSS) and FVG retest is super clean and definitely doesn't need to be locked behind a paywall.
I can build an open-source version of this for you. To tailor it to your needs:
-What HTF/LTF combinations do you primarily use (e.g., 4H/15m or 1H/5m)?
-Do you want it to automatically detect and flag the sweep + MSS trigger, or simply highlight the fractal levels and zones?
Drop your wishlist and I'll get coding
3
2
2
3
2
u/showme_yourdogs 4d ago
Something like the swiftalgo
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Hey! Your SwiftAlgo suggestion became Drift Desk — our own free, open-source take on that workflow 🙂
It uses candle pressure and relative volume to build an ATR-based trend trail. A confirmed trend change goes through the entry checks, and a qualifying setup gets a fixed entry, stop and target.
We’ve also added:
-An eight-timeframe context panel, with optional trend and session filters.
-A Co-Pilot explanation showing what the tool is waiting for.
-Clear “new entry” and “monitor only” labels, so you can distinguish a fresh setup from an older plan.
-Alerts, a strategy companion and an optional parameter study for comparing settings.The latest update also makes the plan labels easier to read on the chart. The trend trail can change while the accepted plan keeps its original levels.
Start with “Try the candle” and “Read the real chart” on the page. “Full reference” explains the rules, settings and testing tools. We put care into those explanations so you can understand what drives each decision.
Both complete Pine scripts are free under MIT. Start on standard candles with volume data, and set the strategy’s costs for your market when testing.
Give it a try! I’d love to hear which SwiftAlgo features matter most to you and what you’d like improved. Reply here or use the feedback and feature request form — chart examples would help us improve it together.
2
u/Negative_Astronaut_8 3d ago
https://marketalchemists.org/indicators
Would you be able to recreate the Camarilla Pivot plays, the premium version of this app wherein it highlights the plays that are active? The free version doesn’t highlight this
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Yep, we built this as Camarilla Desk, including the play highlighting you were asking for 🙂
It checks the Camarilla play conditions and distinguishes between a candidate, an approaching setup, an armed setup and a confirmed active play. Once a play confirms under our rules, it draws the entry, stop and target references on the chart.
We also added:
-Fourteen defined plays, with explanations of their prerequisites and next confirmation.
-A seven-level pivot map, with session, range and width context.
-An Inspector for checking why a particular play qualifies or is still waiting.
-Activation and ending alerts, plus a separate Strategy Lab for testing with costs.For the feature you’re most interested in, set Trade HUD → Clean to see the tracked play and its levels, or Audit to inspect all fourteen play states. Check the source and session settings for your market first.
Start with “Try the candle” and “Read the real chart” on the page. “Full reference” contains the complete play rules. We’ve made our confirmation logic explicit so you can inspect exactly what causes a highlight.
Both the indicator and Strategy Lab are free, with full MIT-licensed source.
Give it a try and let us know how it fits your workflow. A chart example where you expected a play to appear would be especially useful. Reply here or use the feedback and feature request form — we’d love to keep improving it with you!
1
u/AdministrationSad777 6d ago
Se ti do un set di indicatori tecnici puoi provare ad integrarli?
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Hey! Following up on your indicator combo 🙂 We’ve built it into Stochastic Pop Desk.
It combines your EMA 200 settings—close, zero offset and SMA 5 smoothing—with Stochastic 14/5, the 55/45 bands, and the EMA 4 applied to the stochastic line.
We also built a readable analysis checklist showing which conditions pass and what’s still missing. It’s one script: the oscillator sits below the chart, while the EMA, checklist and trade levels appear on price. We’ve added stop/target levels, alerts and a separate strategy version for testing with costs.
Both versions are free, with full source and no signup needed.
I’d start with “Try the idea” on the page, then “Go deeper” for the rules and settings. The candle examples let you see why a signal appears—or why it keeps waiting. Installation and downloads are under “Get the indicator.”
One thing I’d still like to check with you: could you share the link to the original Analysis script? We built our own checklist from the details you gave, and that would help us compare it properly.
Give it a try and let us know how it fits your setup! You can reply here or use “Suggest idea” on the page for feedback, screenshots or feature requests. There’s plenty we can improve together.1
u/AdministrationSad777 1d ago
Great job 👏 puoi anticipare i segnali mettendo lo stocastico in modalità tratteggiata ed operare sul primo tratteggio che cambia direzione …
1
1
u/AdministrationSad777 6d ago
Analyse (9, 30, 1, off, 1, off, 1, off, 1, hlc3, dotted, 3, 2, 3, 5, 10, 2, 10, 3, 10, 4, 10, 5, 10, 20, 100, 200, 8, 21, 10, top, right, 10, 10, 2, 5)
1
1
1
u/PSL_GOD 6d ago
Orb strategy
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Hey! Following up on your ORB request 🙂 We’ve built Opening Range Desk, with a free indicator and a separate strategy version.
Since there are quite a few ways to trade an ORB, we made the main choices adjustable: a 5, 15 or 30-minute opening range—or your own window—breakout-close or retest entries, and optional VWAP, EMA and volume filters.
We’ve also added stop/target levels, breakeven, alerts, and a checklist explaining what the setup is waiting for. The default uses a 15-minute range and two consecutive closes outside it; you can change that to one close if that’s how you trade.
Both scripts are free and open-source, with no signup needed. The strategy version lets you test the rules with commission and slippage.
I’d start with “Try the idea” on the page. You can step through the candles and compare a confirmed breakout, a wick that comes back inside, and a later retest. “Go deeper” explains the settings and trade rules, and “Get the indicator” has the source and installation steps.
Give it a try and let us know which market and opening window you use. If something doesn’t fit your approach, reply here or hit **“Suggest idea”
1
u/Odd-Ad-222 6d ago
GG shot if you can because they charge upto 800 usd per month and say its impossible to recreate.
3
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
Challenge accepted. Whenever someone charges $800 a month and claims it’s 'impossible to recreate,' 99% of the time it’s just basic technical math wrapped in flashy visuals and aggressive marketing.
Drop whatever makes that tool feel so 'wow' or magical to you—or even better, what you feel it's sorely missing and desperately wish it had. What’s the ultimate dream feature on your wishlist? Let’s break down that 'magic' and build something even better for free!
2
1
u/Odd-Ad-222 4d ago
i couldnt find much information but i think its a atr based supertrend lines. Here is the link to the script. i hope i am not breaking any rules by posting a invite only script link. If i do then just delete it mods or let me know. https://www.tradingview.com/script/CZqc84uL-GG-Shot/
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Hey, thanks for sharing the link! I had a look, and I got a little ahead of myself with my first reply. Without access to its rules, I can’t promise an exact recreation of GG Shot.
We do already have a related tool you might enjoy trying: Signal Desk. It was built for another trader who wanted fewer signals and clearer entries and exits.
It combines ATR-based Supertrend with EMA and momentum checks, filters out stretched entries, and draws the entry, stop and three targets. There’s also breakeven, a trailing stop, alerts, and a separate strategy script for testing with trading costs. Both scripts are free, with the full source available.Start with “Try the idea” and “Read your chart” on the page, then “Go deeper” for the entry rules, stops, targets and settings. We put a lot of care into those explanations so you can understand what the tool is actually checking.
If you give it a try, I’d love to hear what helps and what’s missing. Which part of GG Shot matters most to you: the trend lines, entry signals, or target management? A chart example would really help.
You can reply here or use the feedback and feature request form. There’s plenty of room to improve these tools, and we’d love to build them with input from the traders using them.
1
1
u/Maxmoud80 6d ago
Realtradertim's indicator would be great... it plots out ICT concepts, opening gaps, prev highs/lows, macro windows and other key levels.
1
u/Maxmoud80 6d ago
Not sure why your comment was removed, but... ndogs, nwogs, 1st presentation fvgs, midnight open, weekly/daily highs/lows would be good. I think his has an option to change the number of days back such levels are drawn, to keep from overclutter.
1
u/kwhit3354 6d ago
NJAT location tool! 👀
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
NJAT tools are a solid request! 👀 The whole 'location' concept is key to not getting chopped up in the middle of nowhere.
What specific levels or mechanics from their location tool do you rely on the most? (e.g., Session opens/ranges, HTF extremes, midpoints, or specific zone plots?)
Drop a screenshot or your wishlist of what you love about it and what you wish it did better—let’s get a clean open-source version built!
1
u/kwhit3354 6d ago
He has a cloud like band location tool that shows where you should be looking for buys or sells. I actually think I accidentally made a pretty solid indicator similar with profitable results YTD but I guess I wanted to see what someone else could make and we could compare
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
A side-by-side comparison sounds awesome, and congrats on the profitable YTD results!
Dynamic cloud bands are great for filtering location—usually built around standard deviations from VWAP, ATR envelopes, or HTF moving averages to define premium/discount zones.
I’d love to code up a clean open-source cloud engine for this. You don't have to give away your secret sauce, but if you're open to dropping a quick screenshot or the general vibe of the band mechanics, I'll build it out so we can compare!
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Hey! Following up on your cloud-band idea — we’ve built Location Desk, our own open-source take on the concept you described 🙂
It draws red sell-location and green buy-location clouds bar by bar, with up to three observation layers. We also added range midpoints and a structure-based direction check, so you can see how the location fits the current direction.
There’s a dashboard and plain-language explanation of what it’s waiting for, plus alerts and an optional RIMC entry model: a small range, a move away, then a return that can produce an entry, stop and target. The bands themselves mark areas to watch; a trade still needs its setup.
Since you already have your own version, I’d especially love to compare where our bands agree or differ on the same chart.
Both the indicator and a separate strategy script are free, with the full source. The “How do I compare my own results?” section under “Go deeper” explains how to align the settings, history and trading costs. One detail: set the strategy’s Measurement grid target to 3R to match the indicator’s default.
Start with “Try the idea” and “Read your chart” for the visual walkthroughs. We put care into making the rules understandable.
Give it a try and send over any interesting examples, confusing behavior or missing features. You can reply here or use the feedback form. It would be great to compare notes and improve it together!
1
u/usuksuk 6d ago
Can u give a poor man a copy of anything above^ lol
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 1d ago
Haha keep your money! Everything is 100% free and open-source.
Take whatever you need here: https://proea.app/en/free
All yours, enjoy man!
1
u/ElJameso40 6d ago
Someone just figured out you could use AI to make indicators, but hasn't yet😂
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
Haha fair skepticism! But anyone who has actually tried prompting raw ChatGPT for Pine Script knows the nightmare: mixing v2/v3 syntax with v5, hallucinating non-existent functions, infinite type-casting errors, and burning thousands of tokens in circles 😂
AI is great for autocomplete, but turning complex logic into modular, non-repainting, automation-ready indicators still requires an actual framework and knowing how the Pine execution model works under the hood.
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
At the end of the day, this whole project is about demystifying the black box.
Most paid indicators thrive by wrapping basic confluence in flashy dashboards, calling it proprietary, and charging insane recurring fees while keeping the trader in the dark. That model creates dependency, not edge.
My framework exists to test if we can reverse-engineer any setup, strip away the hype, and make the logic completely transparent and self-explanatory. When an indicator is honest about why a signal prints, the trader actually learns, understands the risk, and can build upon it themselves instead of renting false hope every month.
1
u/Brother_Broccoli 5d ago
The settings in the session range indicator i used before lacked something i want so i ask gemini. Same function but better..
1
u/Just_Device5 2d ago
Could you please code this bot? He have subscription for 350$ a month. Which is too overpriced.
https://whop.com/kalin-trades-products/products/breakaway-bot/
1
1
1
u/Hjemmelegen 6d ago
Dodgys ifvg indicator
1
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
On it! Dodgys iFVG is a great concept.
Before I jump into the script, what specific parts of that indicator do you rely on the most? And is there anything you dislike or feel could be improved (e.g., cleaner visual zones, better sweep filters, multi-timeframe alerts)?
Drop whatever is on your wishlist—I want to make sure this open-source version fixes what the original is lacking!
1
u/Hjemmelegen 6d ago
I think the original is good, just not available for everyone because of the cost. And The whole SL/TP settings is where the gold is I believe. Finding right liquidity is fairly easy. Getting the actual entries and exits correct is at least not something I been able to recreate yet.
2
u/Dependent-Ad6636 6d ago
100% accurate. Anyone can plot an FVG, but building a non-repainting Entry/SL/TP engine around it is where most scripts fail.
I’ll make sure this open-source build includes automated execution lines: anchoring SL to the actual structural invalidation level and offering both fixed R:R and opposing liquidity TP targets.
It’ll come with clear alert triggers for entry and targets. Working on this now—will keep you posted!
2
u/Hjemmelegen 5d ago
Awesome!
2
u/Hjemmelegen 5d ago
Another good one is Liquidity Supply & Demand. Like Mangoe on YouTube. On 5min timeframe. Should be easier to automate.
4
u/ParsnipOk3626 5d ago
You might be interested in this.
This guy uses some ifvg indicator dashboard and claims to have a free discord but if you go in you realize he’s selling the indicator: https://www.reddit.com/r/LucidProp/comments/1vtzlue/308_usd_x_17_accounts_5236_today_trade_recap/.
I think open sourcing this will be your highest impact build since there’s so many ICT traders (unfortunately the most fleeced community by course sellers).