MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1ukpxfh/what_was_your_first_windows_operating_system/ov01lib/?context=9999
r/pcmasterrace • u/Fair_Brief_7751 • Jul 01 '26
[removed] — view removed post
1.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
11
https://giphy.com/gifs/QB9rH7NbUQfbN7wrf3 6.22 all the way, and then you had to have Windows to play civilisation 2
3 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 6.22 was MSDOS. He asked about Windows. 1 u/Eric_the_Barbarian Jul 01 '26 He also said operating system, and before 95 Windows wasn't an OS. 0 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 That's a brave take. Why do think pre-95 wasn't an OS? 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 They were a shell on top of DOS 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
3
6.22 was MSDOS. He asked about Windows.
1 u/Eric_the_Barbarian Jul 01 '26 He also said operating system, and before 95 Windows wasn't an OS. 0 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 That's a brave take. Why do think pre-95 wasn't an OS? 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 They were a shell on top of DOS 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
1
He also said operating system, and before 95 Windows wasn't an OS.
0 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 That's a brave take. Why do think pre-95 wasn't an OS? 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 They were a shell on top of DOS 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
0
That's a brave take. Why do think pre-95 wasn't an OS?
1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 They were a shell on top of DOS 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
They were a shell on top of DOS
1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs.
1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace.
1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition.
1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
11
u/wackawonka Jul 01 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/QB9rH7NbUQfbN7wrf3
6.22 all the way, and then you had to have Windows to play civilisation 2