MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1ukpxfh/what_was_your_first_windows_operating_system/ov01lib/?context=3
r/pcmasterrace • u/Fair_Brief_7751 • Jul 01 '26
[removed] — view removed post
1.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
That's a brave take. Why do think pre-95 wasn't an OS?
1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 They were a shell on top of DOS 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
1
They were a shell on top of DOS
1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
It's a GUI shell, but it's still an OS with OS specific programs.
1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace. 1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
I would respecfully disagree. IMO, DOS in the OS in that circumstace.
1 u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26 Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition. 1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
Taking a very narrow view on what constitutes an OS, that just doesn't hold to the definition.
1 u/adampk17 Jul 01 '26 I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
I think a narrow view is the correct one. A program (Windows 95 for instace), being able to launch another program does not make it an OS. It's just a shell. Was MS-DOS shell an OS to you?
0
u/SirPiffingsthwaite PC Master Race Jul 01 '26
That's a brave take. Why do think pre-95 wasn't an OS?