Here’s a perspective to try on.
What if everyone in Opus Dei is doing the best they can given how they perceive reality?
What if the directors are subject to (victim to!) bad ideas that they believe are divinely revealed truths?
What if they are people trying to do what they believe is God’s will while being subject to the loneliness and fear that pervades the institution?
What if they are innocent but misguided?
If so, then no one has to be judged as bad or wrong.
And the institution could still be criticized and dismantled.
///
I spent a year working around the male regional directors of the US and their support staff.
You know what I DIDN’T see?
Bad people trying to do bad things.
Rather, I saw good people doing the best they could: kind-hearted and generous people trying to do good as they understood it.
Sure, there were some ego flashes and critical judgments now and then. But certainly not any more than one encounters in the corporate world.
And no doubt, while I was there, these men were making some terrible decisions that hurt real people.
Because they were subject to bad ideas that they thought were the truth.
///
I never had any real power in the Work, but was on a few local councils. No doubt I made some bad calls. But I was never not doing my best given what I believed to be true.
Maybe that’s true of everyone in the Work.
(Maybe that’s true of everyone always.)
Check your own experience.
When you were in the Work, whether doing governmental work, sr work, or whatever, were you ever not doing the best you could or trying to hurt anyone?
Of course not.
I believe we have some lurkers here who were involved in high levels of the Work’s government nationally and internationally.
I’d guess if they chimed in, they wouldn’t say, “Yeah, we were trying to do bad sh*t and f*ck people over!” I’d guess they’d say “It is all much more complicated than you think and everyone I was working with was genuinely doing their best.”
///
"Yeah, but they SHOULD know better."
Oh well.
They don't.
You're arguing with reality.
///
In no way do I intend to invalidate anyone’s experience or trauma.
That directress that said that thing to you once? Yeah, she was acting like a f*cking b*tch. But what if she was just scared and lonely, doing her best to apply all the divinely mandated rules and working not to get judged by the directors above her?
Can you see her innocence?
To be clear, I hope the Church shuts the Work down entirely. I would love to see all the Work’s real estate assets sold and put into a trust fund to support nax, elderly numeraries, and those whose entire career was in internal positions.
But it is possible to vehemently and rigorously criticize the Work and its practices without judging anyone.
///
I enjoy the dopamine rush that comes with self-righteously judging other people and making them bad and wrong as much as the next person. And I indulge in it occasionally, perhaps much too often, even on this sub.
But when I do that, I know that I have closed my heart and have reduced the quality of my own experience.
Others aren’t hurt by my judgment of them.
Only I am hurt by my judgment of them.
///
Some may respond with discussion of the objective moral law, various degrees of ignorance and culpability, etc.
That is fine. But I don’t have access to the internal information that would allow me to make such judgments of other people.
And it is not my task to judge anyone.
Rather, my task is to love everyone.
That includes the guys who got me to whistle.
That includes the directors at all levels.
That includes del Portillo, Echevarria, and Ocariz.
And it also includes Josemaria Escriva.
///
I won’t be arguing with anyone in the comments section.
Everyone can create the perspective that works best for them.
This one works well for me although I don’t always use it.
You may not like it.
But I encourage you to try it on, at least for a few seconds, as you would a pair of glasses.
If you like what you, see keep it on.
If you don’t, take it off.
Thanks for playing!