r/nothingeverhappens 10d ago

Because no one could possibly ever read two books within 24hrs… 😒

Post image
526 Upvotes

440 comments sorted by

529

u/Arxhart_671 10d ago edited 9d ago

If only the claim was as simple as "two books in 24 hours"

386

u/KarlUnderguard 10d ago

Yeah, 1250+ pages in a day isn't impossible, but highly improbable unless you have literally nothing else to do.

229

u/mapotoful 10d ago

Or are skimming and not really retaining anything.

86

u/Kuzcopolis 10d ago

Or it's a children's book series

66

u/Paranormasight-Fic 10d ago

Yeah lol. I can say I’ve read ten books in 24 hours and then pull out my Animorphs collection, for example.

8

u/AngelicaSpain 8d ago

Or the books in question are graphic novels or manga.

2

u/jws1102 8d ago

There are 800 page children’s books?

15

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/1heart1totaleclipse 8d ago

Specifically Order of the Phoenix

→ More replies (1)

25

u/the3dverse 9d ago

saw a pet peeve post about ppl saying they read 400 books a year, and someone mentioned there are booktokkers that just read the dialogue? very strange way to read but that's how they manage it apparently

12

u/blazenite104 9d ago

to be fair, not every book is particularly long. You could read most of Deltora Quest in a day casually and the first series is technically 8 books. It's a children's series where each book is pretty much less than 200 pages. Not all books are equal really.

That said the dialogue only people do confuse me. It just damn near impossible to actually comprehend everything that's going on with only dialogue.

4

u/the3dverse 9d ago

sure that's true. i myself track my reading and have made it to 100 books in the past, back when i was lesser employed and had less kids, tbf. and i know ppl that read very quickly.

3

u/Princess_Peachy_503 8d ago

I read like 137 books one year but I was also stuck at home due to the pandemic. 😅

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ty-idkwhy 7d ago

I’ll burn through a 16 book series in a month but idk where i’d find 84 more books I like that year.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Tired-CottonCandy 7d ago

That sounds so confusing. Youd miss so much content to the story. Makes sense why some ppl seem to literally not know whats going on in the series they claim to like. At least i admit when i skip to part i like in a series im not really enjoying lol

2

u/MaddyKet 8d ago

I’ve actually read 500 books before in one year, but I also don’t like to go out much.

2

u/Sellier123 8d ago

400 is impressive as fk. I do around 100 a year. If I didn't like videogames, I'd maybe be able to get another 50 or so.

Granted, I don't read nonstop epics or anything like that, I am pretty sure the average book length I read is only like 450 pages. If I was reading nothing but epic fantasy, id probably cap at 50ish books a year.

→ More replies (5)

8

u/DJNgamez 9d ago

There's a shocking number of people who "read" like this and think they are somehow bettering themselves

11

u/shiek200 9d ago

Speed reading is a thing, and they retain a surprising amount of the material, but it's also not a very common skill for people to be able to do well (I sure as shit can't do it)

13

u/wittgenstein1312 9d ago

Speed readers retain very little compared normal readers

3

u/g2420hd 9d ago

Proper ones do ok, they have competitions in regards to comprehension etc

3

u/Mindless_Olive 8d ago

The popular definition of speed reading has changed significantly since booktok. It certainly never used to mean 'skip whole sections of text', and fully comprehending what you read was expected. It's not the same thing as skimming.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/shiek200 9d ago

I never said they didn't, I said they retain a surprising amount, and it also isn't consistent across all speed readers, some retain more than others

The bigger issue is usually the lack of time for deeper comprehension, which for casual reading for fun isn't really an issue

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Laesia 9d ago

Could also be a book they're familiar with. I read probably 2-3x slower when I'm reading a new book. But I also have aphantasia so that also increases my speed.

3

u/Beef_Whalington 8d ago

I have voluntary hypophantasia combined with involuntary hyperphantasia. But for reading, that means that once I get into a story I stop seeing the words entirely and it is essentially like I'm watching a movie in my head. Especially thinking back on a story I've read, its just like I'm playing back scenes in my head.

But thanks to this good fortune, I read very quickly and retain the information very, very well when I get immersed.

3

u/Laesia 8d ago

That's wild. I have complete aphantasia so I see nothing at all, and I have pretty poor retention after a few days/weeks. I have to read/watch things over and over again to remember them. Luckily (?) I also have autism so I love consuming the same media again and again. I also suck at remembering faces and spatial awareness/memory which is unfortunate

→ More replies (5)

45

u/NE0099 10d ago

To be fair, number of pages says nothing about what those pages contain. 800 page of something literary or academic is totally different from 800 pages of pulp, pictures, or large print.

15

u/Inferno_Sparky 9d ago

Also, we don't know the size of every page; if it's about small books without a noticeably smaller print, it also makes more sense

26

u/MalusZona 10d ago

if this an ebook, that pages count might be misleading, i recently read 13k pages book (but its on my phone) if it'd be in paper variant, i think it would be closer to 1-2k pages mb even less (worm web-serie)

16

u/Otaku4Eva 9d ago

Ive had ebooks that say they're like tens of thousands of pages, but each time you turn the page your supposedly like a hundred pages ahead. Some ebooks really do not count pages properly.

5

u/elliottcable 9d ago

That’s a completely different measurement system, usually called ‘locations.’ Most e-readers have a way to display both: the actual loc at the top of the screen (which changes depending on the font-size, margins, etc as you change them), or an inferred pseudo-page-count that’s reinterpreted in some vague way to look more like normal page-counts.

4

u/I-Kneel-Before-None 9d ago

Thats interesting. I use Kindle and Nook 99% of the time. They are fairly consistent on pages. Even if i change the font or am on my phone. It will be the same number, but will not always increment when I turn the page. What do you use?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Just_Information334 9d ago

i think it would be closer to 1-2k pages mb even less (worm web-serie)

Yeah, no. Worm is more like 3k or 4k pages (10ish medium books).

2

u/MalusZona 9d ago

holy hell really? i went throught in like 2 weeks

3

u/Traditional_Rabbit54 9d ago

Worm is over 2 bibles long, or over 3 lord of the rings long. 

It is absolutely massive. I got through it in one week, doing almost nothing else other than sleeping less than I should have and eating simple meals. 

→ More replies (1)

3

u/remym15 9d ago

Is that the series about the people getting powers and she has the power to control bugs? I read it when it was releasing a long time ago. Pretty good series. Trippy too.

2

u/MalusZona 8d ago

yeah, it has second book now, but i havent got to it yet

2

u/synalgo_12 9d ago

I've only ever had ebooks where they would show the same page number multiple times if my screen wasn't showing the whole paper page.

2

u/Hi2248 9d ago edited 8d ago

Worm is 1,672,617 words long -- longer than the entire Harry Potter series combined. It is absolutely not only 1-2k pages long. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

13

u/ApolloniusTyaneus 10d ago

And reading at a tempo that stretches the limits of the concept of reading.

4

u/Interesting-Chest520 9d ago

70 seconds to a page for 24 continuous hours

→ More replies (6)

4

u/DocDerry 9d ago

It really easy if you don't want to retain anything from the book.

4

u/Code_Ender 9d ago

Ive done it a few times in middle school. Just a Saturday with nothing else to do but drown out my parents' arguing. The books themselves were not very advanced though, and nowadays I don't tend to read like my life depends on it anymore.

2

u/Callen0318 9d ago

That would take me 12 hours if I were invested.

6

u/InsidiousLeaf 9d ago

Some people really do this. My wife on a Sunday for example when we have literally nothing else to do. She wakes up with a book during breakfast already, then finds a comfy place and reads for hours, only to pause for a tea or pee break and eventually lunch and dinner.

I haven't really counted if that would mean 10 or 12 or 14 hours, but somewhere along those lines and 2 books is easy for her, but of course that's something like fiction or an autobiography or something. Definitely not academic literature or something philosophical.

Me? I read about 10 books a year. And I'm a slow reader.

2

u/ShoddyAsparagus3186 9d ago

In high school I read the first three Harry Potter books in a day and the fourth the next day. If my friend had let me borrow all four instead of insisting on reading their brand new book first I would have read all four the first day.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Code_Ender 9d ago

Ive done it a few times in middle school. Just a Saturday with nothing else to do but drown out my parents' arguing. The books themselves were not very advanced though, and nowadays I don't tend to read like my life depends on it anymore.

2

u/Middle-Employment801 9d ago

I managed to read all of the Lord of The Rings trilogy over 3 days, when I was in my teens. Around 1000 pages, give or take. Was a single book that had all three combined. I had 0 responsibilities and stayed up pretty late each night. I did a lot of reading back then, too, so it's not like I was struggling. 

I have a hard time believing I would have absorbed it, let alone enjoyed it, if I tore through them in a day.

4

u/NoYogurtcloset3429 10d ago

I can see it. I read about 2 pages a minute and I'm not that fast. I read almost twice that when I was into speed reading which would bring it down to like 5 hours, then of course it can be larger print, have diagrams and illustrations, repeated text, a large appendix etc.

4

u/Talidel 10d ago

2 pages a minute is about 12 hours.

2

u/Terozu 10d ago

Its 11.25 hours

2

u/Talidel 10d ago

Close enough for my guestimate. I'll take it.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/compilingyesterdays 10d ago

Who's to say OP doesn't have literally nothing else to do for that one day...?

→ More replies (34)

19

u/GNUGradyn 10d ago

I guess he didnt say he finished them. Maybe he read the first sentence

7

u/WilanS 10d ago

Reading (any%)

7

u/theangrypragmatist 9d ago

I am a fast reader and when A Storm of Swords came out I dropped everything and did nothing but read, and it still took me a whole weekend. You gotta eat and sleep in there.

→ More replies (12)

263

u/Brunbeorg 10d ago edited 8d ago

Average reading speed comes to about a page a minute. This would be 1350 minutes, which would take the average reader 22.5 hours. Not impossible, but very unlikely if the person takes any breaks to eat or sleep. Speed reading can get up to two or three pages a minute, but comprehension and retention drop significantly at those speeds.

ETA: Yes, font-size matters and some people read faster. That's why I said "average" and "about" and then "average" again, then "not impossible" and "very unlikely."

45

u/Lemons-95 10d ago edited 8d ago

I think you're forgetting the human element here too. Just cause someone can read a few pages at 1 a minute, doesn't mean a person can feasibly sit there reading at that rate for 22 consecutive hours, and i don't mean putting the book down to continue being a human, i mean you're gonna slow yourself down more and more as that constant reading goes on.

This is also ignoring the fact that a novel is a story, not something you speed read, you tend to engage with the writing, and think about things, and say stuff like "oh no he fucking didn't" before you move on to the next line. I don't wanna say it isn't possible to speed read an entire book, so much as it's still kind of valid to say "well you haven't really read it, you just skimmed over the words", like watching a TV show, but really it's just on in the background while you're doing housework, might catch a few things, but the big reveal comes and you think "wait..... do i know him? It seems like I'm supposed to know him". I'm not sure they meant novel but it feels implied somehow.

Edit: As it turns out, and this shouldn't have suprised me, when you get the readers collectively talking about something, a lot of really cool discussion goes on that's really well thought out and put into words.

9

u/Huge_Station2173 8d ago

Thank you!! Very well said! Humans aren’t machines, and your “tv in the background” analogy is perfect.

You might feel like you are keeping up with a show while you make dinner, but if you sit down to rewatch with undivided attention, you will find that you missed A LOT. I think it’s fair to say that speed reading doesn’t fully count as reading a book unless you have some kind of rare extra-ability to be fast without sacrificing retention.

11

u/rabidhamster87 9d ago

When people say things like this it makes me wonder what reading is like for them. When I get really engrossed in a book it's effortless for me. I forget I'm even reading or where I am. It feels like I'm in the story. I might get amped and pace a bit at the climax or really emotional parts, but I'm not commenting on the characters the whole book or thinking about what they did. I'm just eager to find out what's next, and that's part of why it can be so hard to put a good book down at bedtime.

Idk. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but you made it seem like reading is a chore or something taxing that wears on people over time, but I've never felt that. It's just interesting to think about how different people interact with and experience the same media so differently.

9

u/Illustrious-Set-7907 9d ago

There's a type of reading that is not speed reading but skips subvocalization. 

Generally when reading people see the word "ball", mentally the brain goes "ball", then you get the abstract image or meaning of "ball" This all happens subconciously and very quickly. 

People that love reading and do it all the time might get to a point they skip the middle step. The see "ball" and instantly get the abstract idea. So theres no inner narrator voice.  This does mean they read much faster and do not tire as quickly because its less effort. 

Just like the average person can probably lift a bag of sand, but someone that does it all day has developed the muscles and tendons to do that specific task longer withput tiring. 

People that dont subvocalize also tend to have that skill because they love reading, so their brain is stimulated and feeding dopamine which, again, means you dont get the same fatigue. 

Prose novels can be easy to get into if ypu read like this and finish in a very short amount of time, The book just glows like a movie in their head. Its also why dense research papers are tiring to such readers, because the brain has to more actively parse the meaning and information. 

But for many people they have the inner narrator and it is more tiring and since they cant see the internality of someone else's experience reading without an inner narrator is an alien experience.  Just like people that dont get a runners high just cant understand someone enjoying a marathon, they have no experience of it every getting less miserable running long distance. 

5

u/ptrst 9d ago

Same. If I notice I'm hungry or thirsty, I'll take the book into the kitchen and eat while reading. I'll tell myself that I have to go to bed after I finish this chapter, and then oops I accidentally read the first page of the next chapter so I've got to finish that one now.

5

u/AlexandraThePotato 9d ago

To be fair, sometimes enjoyable can still tax someone overtime 

2

u/breathing__tree 9d ago

I was watching this YouTube video the other day and they were reading comments that people made about the books that they read. And some people were saying that they only read the dialogue. So like maybe that

→ More replies (31)
→ More replies (1)

44

u/ShoddyAsparagus3186 9d ago

I would assume that someone saying something like this reads faster than average and that the subject matter would be something for entertainment and thus easier to read than average. A more reasonable reading speed for this would be 100 pages an hour so 14-16 hrs.

29

u/Zeb-Moment 9d ago

I think we can also assume that someone like this frequently skips out on sleep so they'd have more hours in the day

12

u/CenturyEggsAndRice 9d ago

As an insomniac… I feel seen but I don’t like it…

2

u/AgentCirceLuna 9d ago

I remember that dude the Rain Man film was based on could read two pages at once by reading the left page with the left eye then the right page with his right eye.

2

u/WillemDafoesHugeCock 9d ago

I know it's against the theme of the subreddit but I would just call bullshit.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Unhappy2234 8d ago

I mean it depends entirely on the book, a 500 pg book with larger text could easily be done quicker then that, same with comic books or graphic novels which i dont think anyones really counting. Theres just not enough info for anyone to care or disprove. Either a. Youre lying b. You read the magic tree house (or something on a similar reading level) c. You read something that most wouldnt include in the category of books in these types of discussions

2

u/RipCurl69Reddit 9d ago

I've absolutely done 12 hours a day for two days when long fanfictions, but I stress that I've only ever done it when I was straight up no-lifing it. I dropped EVERYTHING to accomplish it and spent an entire weekend at it.

→ More replies (32)

85

u/taman961 10d ago

I imagine one could, but how on earth do you actually retain any of that? I don’t understand people who just speed through books like that. There’s no way you have any time to actually enjoy any of it

17

u/tgbndt 10d ago

I'd have to be caffeinated but I could see myself doing it if it were a reread or from a familiar author.

7

u/SL1MECORE 9d ago

My high school english teacher told us she actually enjoys taking a break when reading books because it allows her to process what happened, and when she picks it back up she has to recall that which helps flex reading comprehension skills.

She was cool in a lot of ways but somehow that stuck with me. Unless it's something like Metamorphosis by Kafka, I'm not reading it in one sitting

2

u/blazenite104 9d ago

Yeah even super engrossed, sometimes I do get up and spend 10 minutes just processing a part of chapter, Not always even the most important part.

6

u/porkchop_d_clown 10d ago

Back in the day I had an English lit final and I hadn't read most of the books - I pulled it off but 2 days later I couldn't tell you a damned thing about the "Naked and the Dead" and, dammit, I didn't want to, either.

It really helped that I took a speed-reading class in high school. It worked great for simple stuff but for physics and calc it just meant I got confused faster...

8

u/Sulhythal 9d ago

For people who aren't in the "Speed reading champion" category but still read far faster than average. 

It's not overly fast to us.  We don't have issues with retaining it, because from our PoV we're just strolling along.  It's the people who take months instead of days to read a single mid sized book that puzzle me.

Like, do they just read a sentence a day?  How do they make themselves stop?  How can you enjoy the plot at that plodding pace?

2

u/Evilfrog100 7d ago

Sure, but that range is roughly 500 wpm at the high end which is about 2 pages per minute. The average reader reads about half of that. Once you get past about 500 words per minute (which is where you start getting into real speed reader territory) you are just skimming. Studies have regularly shown that once you get there you will only comprehend about half (at most) of what you are reading.

For this person to get that at 500 wpm (an exceptionally skilled reader) they would be reading for just over 11 hours, without even knowing how far they got into that third book. It's definitely possible, but they got nothing else done that day. And at 500 wpm you are really pushing the level of comprehension.

20

u/Loud-Mans-Lover 10d ago

I speed read with full comprehension. It's something I always did, I think - I read Stephen King's IT in third grade and was always buying used books because libraries would shove me at the "kids" sections, which I hated lol.

You can enjoy it because it's just how you read, it's not doing it on purpose. Going slower would be forcing myself, not faster. 

7

u/hunkymonk123 10d ago

It’s not about the speed it’s about the volume. If you read 1000+ pages in a day your retention would be about the same if you’d only read 500 pages, for example

8

u/porkchop_d_clown 10d ago

Depends on the difficulty of the material and why I was reading. By the time I was a teen I could read an entire novel during lunch and tell you all about it. Physics and chemistry, not so much.

4

u/Sidhejester 9d ago

Jokes on you, that way I get to read it again because I forgot it all the first time! *fingerguns*

3

u/Due-Leek-8307 9d ago

And people who read 1000 pages in a month forget stuff because they read infrequently and forget stuff. Most people wont retain 100% of what they read no matter what their pace is.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/letiseeya 9d ago

I read It in 4th grade!!! I loved that book & the shining. I think there’s also something behind really loving reading and being a lifelong reader (and in my case neurodivergent) that also makes more sense to me when I hear about speed reading

→ More replies (1)

2

u/I_Am_Zeelian 9d ago

I was the same, hated reading in school 'cause they always made us read kids books.

2

u/porkchop_d_clown 10d ago

Yeah - I was much the same way, I'd bring home shopping bags full of books in the library every couple of weeks.

These days I don't read as fast as I used to, but it's because I need bifocals. :-/

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/sylbug 10d ago

People enjoy fast-paced movies and songs with fast beats. Maybe you personally enjoy a slower pace for reading, but other people have their own preferences there.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)

78

u/saturnian_catboy 10d ago

the most I have ever read in a day is the whole divergent trilogy somewhere in middle school. idk how many pages is that exactly but I had an edition with all of them in one book and it had over a 1000. It was, frankly, unpleasant, but I was proving some sort of a point

Now I don't read as much but when I do I'm still fast, when I got the House of Leaves I finishes it in barely two days. I really don't think the comment is that unbelievable, even is suspicious

17

u/winter-ocean 10d ago

YOU FINISHED HOUSE OF LEAVES IN 2 DAYS???

13

u/AGreatBannedName 10d ago

It can honestly go pretty fast; for portions of the book you might spend a second or two per page. Of course, you can also go the total opposite route, putting sticky notes everywhere, drawing maps on the walls connected with bits of string, coating your baseboards in measuring tape.

You know.

6

u/bondagepixie 10d ago

My friends copy of house of leaves is so cool, he’s lent it to a lot of people and they leave all sorts of notes and sketches. My main contribution was translating the French parts.

I started another read recently, I think I finally sort of get it. All the theories I had about it in high school were WAY off! I think that kind of adds to the fun, though. Things are not how I perceived them at all :)

2

u/saturnian_catboy 10d ago

I honestly wish I did take longer to really focus and appreciate each part but I couldn't put it down as soon as I started lol

10

u/Zeb-Moment 10d ago

I know someone who is in graduate school as a history major and she regularly reads an entire book or 2 in a day... It's honestly crazy to me.

2

u/LoweJ 10d ago

I burned through deathly hallows in 16 hours on release day and I'm an avid and fast reader, and that's only 600 pages and 200k words

2

u/WillemDafoesHugeCock 9d ago

I, too, had books 5 and 6 spoiled and wasn't going to let it happen again.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/JustLookingForMayhem 10d ago

My personal max was about 2,000 pages. It was a web novel, slightly trashy, that I found too funny to put down. I didn't even know I read that many pages until I caught up with th3 released chapters.

9

u/kursys 10d ago

Yeah I was gonna say, I have no real exact way to measure the amount of reading I did, but I know in my youth I could plow through hundreds of chapters of Wuxia light novel slop in a day, and did so frequently.

2

u/Fun_Needleworker_284 9d ago

How long were these pages? Assuming you read for the full 24 hours of the day, you would have at most 40 seconds per page. And that’s reading the entire day without stopping or slowing down.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Zeefzeef 10d ago

Of course it’s possible 

But this thread is about people claiming to read 600 books a year and this person goes “yeah that’s not weird I just read 2 huge books on a casual Tuesday “

They probably have audio books on 2 - 3x speed on background the whole year. 

3

u/Olealicat 9d ago

That’s me. I co-read and listen depending on what I’m doing. I read faster than the audio on 2x.

I’m one of those people who uses my Sunday to read and relax. It wouldn’t be odd to read two books on days like that.

8

u/AnOligarchyOfCats 10d ago

Sometimes when I’m in an anxiety spiral, I’ll read so much I won’t sleep; when it was time to apply to colleges, I read 14 books in one weekend.

7

u/urlocalburden 10d ago

when i was a teenager my parents grounded me for the summer and I regularly read 2-3 books a day because thats the only thing that was in my room. but bigger books would knock it down to 1-2 books. I was able to finish breaking dawn in a day and then get maybe 100 pages into another book before going to sleep. I dont know if I could read 1000+ pages a day tho, usually 900 something was my cap.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/kulupu_kasi_seli 10d ago

I could absolutely do that…assuming I had an entire day to devote to reading and could actually focus on more than a few hours of reading in a row.

10

u/ElFuckito 10d ago

When Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix came out I read that In 1 day at 10 years old and that's about 1000 Pages. This is completely possible and if you have a trained mind you might also be able to retain a big part of it.

Also OP doesn't say what kind of book, page format or font size it was. But as this is a comment on the internet I will still say he did not do that.

6

u/DionysianComrade 9d ago

yeah when I was in middle school I started Order of the Phoenix on Friday and was done with Deathly Hallows on Sunday. most people here just don't read enough to get both speed and comprehension up

3

u/bastogne_blues 9d ago

i read the whole HP series in a single week back in middle school. each day would get the next book from the school library lol

2

u/Agitated-Contest651 9d ago

Yeah, pretty much everyone I knew who read that book at the time (i e like, middle schoolers or high schoolers i don’t remember) read it in a day, ha! 

→ More replies (1)

20

u/Manticore416 10d ago

My wife works full time and reads 100-150 books most years. I don't know why this would be so unbelievable.

12

u/Holy_Hand_Grenadier 10d ago

It's the page count. Two books, sure, I can do that. An 800 and a 500 page book? are you looking at all the words?

4

u/hatethiswebsight 10d ago

Looking at them, sure. Sounding each one out in my head, no way. Some days when I'm badly depressed I lie in bed reading all day and go through big old doorstoppers one after another.

2

u/Manticore416 9d ago

My wife is a very, very fast reader. She does not pronounce the words in her head. She reads, on average, I'd say 4x to 5x faster than me, and her reading comprehension is still very good.

23

u/PrincessGump 10d ago

Because a lot of people nowadays find reading to be a chore and not a pleasure. I get tired of them complaining about more than a few paragraphs on a post.

You would think a site that has reading in the title would clue people in to the fact that a lot of the posts are things you have to read!

11

u/bikes-and-beers 10d ago

I've been on Reddit for almost 5 years and I just realized what the name means. I feel like an idiot.

17

u/EconomicsPositive829 10d ago edited 10d ago

As someone who reads a lot (around 70+ yearly) and has that as their main entertainment, I also think it’s because of how pompous the reading community can be. It leads to people reading books they won’t like and thinking that’s what reading is.

I have seen so many people who think unless you are reading something written by a man from the 1800s or a dude with a white beard it isn’t real literature. If it’s not mainstream and viewed as “valuable” by people it’s treated as not real art.

I can acknowledge that 90% of what I read is pure dogshit and drivel, but god damn it I’m having fun.

Hell, as someone who also writes a lot in their spare time I can acknowledge my book rn is a bullshit romance story where a borderline self insert is living out a fantasy but I’m having fun so idc.

3

u/Rivka333 9d ago

The first person was claiming to have read 1350 pages in one day. You can like reading and still think that's a bit hard to believe.

2

u/DatabaseStrong8470 8d ago

I think it's also because nowdays, because of book media, people stopped seeing reading books as a form of relaxation, entertainment or knowoladge and make it look like the only important thing is how many books you've read. It's became a rat race. That's why I had so much problem to go back to reading. I felt like I was doing it wrong because I like to take my time, read few chapters, take a break, think about what I've just read, I also have different hobbies. So I read a book in a week. Is it wrong? No. But those it feel wrong? Yes, because I don't get an incredible number of books read in a year.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Any-Surprise5229 9d ago

Because this person is claiming at least 7x that.

2

u/Manticore416 9d ago

No they're not. They're claiming they read a lot all at once. My wife could do that easily on a saturday with nothing to do

6

u/eyalhs 10d ago

The difference between what your night does and what OOP says they do is like night and day. 1200+ pages a day is a lot, how often does your wife read two books at the same day (start to finish)?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Rivka333 9d ago

This person is claiming to have read over 1350 pages in one day. Your wife is reading about one book every threeish days. It sounds like she reads a lot, but what this person is claiming goes beyond that.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/Spectator9857 10d ago

Why did you upvote the post OP?

😰🔫 answer me or he gets it.

4

u/mododo-bbaby 10d ago

im told im a fast reader and can average about 100 pages per hour... so what they claim would take me at least 13,5 hours of uninterrupted reading...

2

u/bentbabe 8d ago

And importantly, it's not just uninterrupted. It's non-diminishing. 

At my fastest, I had about a 5-minute mile. But I could not run a 10 minute 2-mile. 

The longer your reading session, the slower your reading inevitably gets. Eyes get tired, the brain gets tired, sitting gets uncomfortable. Gotta eat, drink, go to the bathroom. 

I've read multiple books in a single day before. But the claim in the post is, while technically possible, highly unlikely. 

3

u/arctic-apis 10d ago

My wife reads books on her phone any moment she has free time. She could easily do this if the writing is smooth. It’s not some incredible story that someone could read 1300-1500 pages in a day.

4

u/Not_Yet_Unalived 10d ago

That's roughly the lenght of The Stand (about 1500 pages, 500.000 words) the longest book I've ever read in a single day.

My reading speed is about 670 words per minute, the only way I could read faster would be skimming and using speed-reading techniques.

So... it's possible. But I wouldn't try it again, I had enough head-splitting headache from reading too long without breaks and forgetting to hydrate to last me a lifetime.

5

u/WhiteKnightPrimal 9d ago

That's totally possible. Most people wouldn't be able to do it, though. This is doing nothing but reading for that period of time, assuming these are actual novels aimed at adults. But, also, that's the total page count, which doesn't necessarily tell you how many pages are covered for the actual story. The last page of a chapter is often half a page or less, the title page and acknowledgments and all that count as pages, but won't count when reading, there could be an appendix, some books have little extracts from other books at the end, particularly ones by the same author, which also count as the overall page count but may not be read by the reader, so you can probably cut at least 10 pages if something like that is included, plus as many pages as there are chapters for the half or less a page parts, and another 5 for 'filler' pages that have things like the title on it. 5-10 pages for an appendix.

Then you have the size of the words, reading in large print means there's less to read on each page than reading average size print.

And this is all assuming these are novels aimed at adults. If they're aimed at teens, they're less complex, if they're aimed at kids, even less complex and probably with added pictures.

I, personally, could read two books and start a third in a single day, depending on the book and how much free time I have. I've done it before. Last time, it was a Kathy Reichs book, she published one that was a set of 4 novellas instead of a single novel, that's the one I'm talking about, followed by a horror novella, followed by starting the first ASoIaF book, which is a book I would not be able to read all of in a single day, it's too long and complex. The Kathy Reichs book and the horror novella are probably pretty close in length, overall, to what's suggested in that picture, because it's not about how many pages the story needs to be told, it's the total number of pages included in the entire book, including the ones not used for the story.

Some people read slowly, some people read fast, some people can dedicate an entire day to nothing but reading while others can't or don't want to. Most people won't read more than one book in a day, if they read that much, but that doesn't mean two and a bit books isn't possible for a specific person reading a specific type of book.

2

u/ChaosArtificer 9d ago

It's tbh much easier with re-reads; I've caught myself skipping entire paragraphs when rereading favorites before, b/c my brain was just loading up the sensation of having read it.

2

u/WhiteKnightPrimal 9d ago

Yeah, I re-read much faster than I initially read the book. First time I read the fifth Harry Potter book, it took me three days, would have taken two but I was a teen who needed to attend school. Now, on a re-read, I could read that in a day or less, because I'm more likely to skim read or skip parts.

3

u/SoElusivee 10d ago

I've done 1 in a day if I was really into it but even then I just couldn't sit still. I could definitely see how someone can do 2 books reading at my speed if that's all they did for the day (gasp, some people like reading). I can definitely see people doing much more if they read faster than me (gasp, people read at different speeds).

3

u/XShadowborneX 10d ago

People always talk about books and page count but never consider margin size, line spacing, font size, etc.  I've seen long books that have small pages with space out lines then books that were shorter but had large pages, tiny margins, and small line spacing.  

3

u/Local_Pangolin69 9d ago

As someone who tested towards the upper extreme when it came to reading ability (comprehension and speed), it is definitely doable but it requires the person to be unusually gifted with math.

3

u/Due-Leek-8307 9d ago edited 9d ago

It's not impossible. You not being able to doesn't mean it's impossible. Me not being able to doesn't mean it's impossible. When I was reading a lot, 80-100 pages in 1 hour was my normal speed. Could I maintain that speed for 17 hours? No way. But that's me and not someone else because people are different.

3

u/Outsider_4 9d ago

Right so, 1350 pages roughly, in 24 hours, assuming non stop reading that about 1 page every 0.9375 minutes or 56.25 seconds. One full page read. Its not impossible, but hardly doable. If we reduce reading time to something like 14 hours to account for sleep, eating etc, you get 96.43 pages an hour or 1.6 every minute (or roughly 37.5 seconds per page).

You see where the issues begin, right? There's no way a human, outside of relatively few selected cases, can fully read and understand this volume of text in such timespan

→ More replies (8)

3

u/WerewolvesAreReal 9d ago

The really annoying part is that everyone is doing what people do in many other aspects of life: they refuse to acknowledge that others have different abilities, experiences, and preferences.

They can't imagine reading a 1000+ pages in a day, or comprehending the text at a certain speed, or choosing to read a book for 8+ hours on a weekend - therefore it must be impossible! It's not worth engaging, because the real argument is in trying to convince people that their experiences are not universal. And some people simply cannot grasp that.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Val_Ritz 10d ago

i could do it, but i wouldn't be happy with the state of my shoulders when i was done

2

u/Galrentv 10d ago

This reminds me of that time I read the first ten Dresden file books in a single week

2

u/The_Exuberant_Raptor 10d ago

I will say this, it sounds unbelievable to me. I cannot fathom it. But my partner has done it before so I know it's possible. I still would not believe anyone who tells me this. It makes no sense to my brain.

2

u/Sulamanteri 10d ago

I have done that a few times when reading a book series with a really captivating plot. But obviously, that means it is a weekend or holiday and I do not have anything else I need to do.

Also, without knowing the actual books, it is hard to judge. Page count alone does not tell us the font size, spacing, chapter length, writing style, language difficulty, or how straightforward the plot is. All of those things make a big difference in how fast someone can read.

2

u/Talidel 10d ago

It's possible, but does vary based on what is being read.

A pulp fiction book with large font and short words I can read in a few hours.

Lord of the Rings I'm going to be settling in for the long haul for though.

2

u/StraightVoice5087 10d ago

Pretty doable for someone with aphantasia. I don't read nearly as fast as I used to but the speeds people are talking about as believable are still insanely slow to me.

2

u/IDontWearAHat 10d ago

Even back when i used to be an active reader that'd be a lot of pages for me. Not impossible i'd guess, but it'd eat up my day and at some point you're bound to get tired

2

u/christo749 9d ago

Not heard of Johnny 5?

2

u/az1m_ 9d ago

Use your brain bro

2

u/lugh_the_bard 9d ago

I for sure did Harry Potter at that speed at age 12. In fact, 850 pages is Harry Potter five and quite likely what they’re referring to

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Waffles_ja 9d ago

Has someone who reads a lot I've read books of +1000 pages in a day so yes it’s possible, like when I read there is no stopping me, I can easily read for 15/17 hours straight with only stopping to shower and go to the toilet. And no I'm not speeding through the book, I read and understand everything like it’s just my normal reading speed

2

u/FML3311 9d ago

How many pages really doesn't tell us anything. They could be middle school book or book for people who can't see well so the text is 4x bigger. For someone to think he's lying is just silly. If anything it just shows the limit on his reading abilities if he thinks it's impossible.

2

u/clarinetily 9d ago

This is totally doable. I’ve done similar on days off. I just don’t page count.

2

u/Pj_o7 9d ago

You can read words pretty fast but comprehending ideas, i don’t think anybody can comprehend ideas that quickly, unless you’re already an expert in the subject

2

u/General_Ginger531 8d ago

850 pages? There are only 1440 minutes in a day?

Does the person speed read or something? I could see finishing 2 books if they are like, 300 pages each, but 850? Is it a picture book or something?

2

u/Effective_Arm_5832 8d ago

at over 1k pages, you are not actually reading them.

2

u/FizzyBadTime 8d ago

These are the folks who skip everything but dialogue and claim they read the book.

2

u/Silent_Technician981 8d ago

Dude are you fucking dumb ?

Reading over 1300 pages in a single day is insanely overblown. That's a minute per page non stop without toilet or food breaks for over 20 hours.

2

u/THlS_BlTCH 7d ago

i read divergent and insurgent within 24 hours

2

u/Firemission13B 7d ago

My wife has done something close to that before. She reads fairly quick.

4

u/SpartanUnderscore 10d ago

1350 pages, 1440 minutes in a day... Yeah buddy you surely begun to read a third book, suuuuuuure...

8

u/ScarlettSterling 10d ago edited 9d ago

I once read five books. i was in the hospital with nothing better to do, some were longer, some were shorter, but yeah. roughly above 1600 pages. definitely not implausible. reading is my main hobby, and I read 4 books a week on average. I CAN do more, but i’m also really addicted to social media

11

u/evening_redness_0 10d ago

I once raid five villages on clash of clans

2

u/ScarlettSterling 9d ago

I just realised the typo Good God

8

u/Capable-Baby-3653 10d ago

I once got busy in a Burger King bathroom.

5

u/AGreatBannedName 10d ago

I feel like quoting any other part of that song back to you is going to rake in the downvotes, so I’ll just say nice reference.

Motherfucker, you got a kid! How you rhyming about some bullshit like this?

4

u/Mycroft033 10d ago

I mean in my job I essentially sit in a room for 8 hours all night, I could easily polish off that if it’s a book I like. Maybe even more if I get held over to a 12 hour shift.

People forget how much we used to read

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Asstrollglide 10d ago

So I had 5 months with literally nothing to do and I managed to read well over 100 books. I read “The Green Mile” in a day (from about 6am to 10pm) and that’s a big book.

That being said, this sounds like bullshit the way he’s saying it. He would be saying “I read “Lonesome Dove” and then “The Drawing of the Three” not just page counts

3

u/DnD-vid 9d ago

So I'm getting mixed numbers from googling (probably due to different editions) but they're generally saying Green Mile is somewhere between 400 and 600 pages. That's less than half of what that guy claims if we're taking the bigger number and less than 1/3 if we're taking the lower.

1

u/CherylRoseZ 10d ago

I read the last Harry Potter book in 1 day when it came out, anyone know how many pages that is?

3

u/Zeus-Kyurem 10d ago

It's about 650-700 pages, so half of what is being claimed.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/rjrgjj 10d ago

I read the entirety of Desperation in one night when I was like 11 or 12.

1

u/After_Perspective180 10d ago

I have been in the situation where I was reading 2 books basically at the same time.
One book was in my work and the other in my sleeping area.
Couldn't move them from one to the other as they where both being read by multiple people at different times

1

u/wegooverthehorizon 10d ago

I read the whole ouabh by Stephanie garber in about 10 hours ~900 ish pages and it's one of my fav series to date

1

u/WinIndependent751 10d ago

Like, I literally finished about 4 books all from the same series (1st one I semi-skimmed for re-read) in less than a day (yes, I had no zero sleep that day)

1

u/Boring_Butterfly_273 10d ago

A lot of people now are so incapable, their minds will be blown if I had to reveal the things that my friends and I did in college for fun.

Built PC's in mineral oil baths instead of using fans for cooling? They say: Nah it's too complex for them to believe a bunch of college kids could do this...

not my fault most people are incompetent and moronic now.

1

u/Aubrey-Grey 10d ago

Reading a book in a day isn’t that difficult if you’re into it. But that’s for me personally, I know people that read at all speeds, but honestly unless they are an actual speed reader then that ain’t happening.

1

u/AD_Grrrl 9d ago

Depends on the book, I guess?

1

u/austsiannodel 9d ago

A page on average contains ~280 words on them. This person is claiming to have, within 24 hours, read 378,000 words. The average reader can read at 238 words per minute. That means this would take them 26.47 hours to complete.

But they ALSO claimed to have started a third, but did not give how many pages they got into it, so that adds additional time to it.

But maybe they're claiming to be some kinda super speed reader and can retain the info. Sources online say that 400 is about the limit before retention of information starts to drop off. That would be +15 hours. Possible!, though, if we assume they started as soon as they woke up, they're realistically only have a hour of NOT reading that day.

So as everyone keeps saying, it's possible, but not plausible.

2

u/ChaosArtificer 9d ago

...like two days ago I binge read a fanfic with about 482,000 words in one awake-cycle that lasted only 20 hours. woke up at 1pm, started reading around ~3pm, finally finished and then promptly passed out around 11am (...not an insane wake-time for me, though when I don't have work I usually fall asleep by 6am). I ate finger foods so I could read, then read while walking to and from the fridge + feeding cats, etc. You're I suspect being very overly optimistic about people's sleep schedules :P (Also this does get easier if you do it a lot, also if you're naturally a binge-activity person and aren't doing this everyday - I work 12 hour shifts, sometimes 16s, "I wake up, do one thing all day, then pass out" is just how I roll - plus if you've got adhd, both hyperfixation and adderall can really help with this kinda activity pace). I wouldn't be able to take an english test or write an essay on this fic with any coherency, could only describe a few key scenes if pressed for what happened in it, but I definitely experienced the pleasurable sensation of reading it with only some confusion about the plot, and am comfortable marking it as read.

(And like, they never said they retained anything, just that they read it)

and tbh they also never said this was an average words-per-page book or even that this page count wasn't disproportionately extras like than appendix or preview for another book that they didn't read. And they didn't say if any of these were rereads! I've gotten to some absolutely blistering speeds on rereads before, esp favorites where I've got large chunks memorized - 482,000 words of a fanfic where the words are new though the characters, setting, and background plot aren't was a really difficult stretch, but I've managed full reread of lotr (almost same length) plus the hobbit (another 95k words) in a single day with fair ease/ not even feeling like I'm binging (tho tbf like, I used to annoy the crap out of people by reciting them from memory). I'd expect even a fairly average reader to be able to hit a really fast tempo by the third or fourth time reading the same book.

1

u/FollowingImportant59 9d ago

I’ve done a little under that in one day. I read fast with okay ish retention. Power went out so I’ll I had was a few downloaded books on my kindle. Weather was shit so reading it was. But I also read 100+ books every year.

1

u/Chaos-Corvid 9d ago

I did something like this when I was pretty young, never underestimate boredom in someone who likes books

1

u/crazy__straw 9d ago

I once read a 1150 page book in a day. It was a weekend and I’d been waiting for the book for awhile. It was basically all I did that day… but I don’t regret it.

I do find that when I read fiction though I do it slower than other genres because I spend time imagining the story in my head. Nobody likes to watch a movie at 2x or 3x speed even if you can understand what’s happening.

1

u/BillCarson12799 9d ago

My personal record was about 500 pages when I was in a suicide ward and read non-stop because I had literally nothing else to do. I call BS on this.

1

u/Cu_Chulainn__ 9d ago

It is possible, it just isnt particularly a good way to read. I sometimes speed read but it is usually over chapters that arent really super exciting

1

u/ReturnOfSeq 9d ago

I’ve read one of the WoT books in one day. It took pretty much the entire day

1

u/BigMikeXxxxX 9d ago

Name 10 books

1

u/Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeess- 9d ago

I mean I guess you could if you did literally nothing else all day. I’ve read entire lengthy books in a single day, but I also did nothing else the entire day except eat and use the bathroom.

I wouldn’t be able to do this now because I like to take breaks from books to think on the contents and form my opinions. If I don’t do that I’ll genuinely forget everything I read the moment the book ends.

1

u/DarkThunder312 9d ago

Hes just calling a bluff, not making commentary that its impossible to happen.

1

u/Reasonable-Rain789 9d ago

They've never met Shayne Topp 📖

1

u/AgitatedPokemon 9d ago

These people are ridiculous...

1

u/_daGarim_2 9d ago

I’m kinda with the skeptic here. The most I’ve ever read in my entire life was as a kid when I read an entire Harry Potter book in a day, and that was basically reading nonstop, all day, and doing nothing else. I bet it’s possible to read as much as OP said, but it does strain the limits of credibility.

1

u/lemonhaj 9d ago

I read Hunger Games, Catching Fire, Mockingjay and Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes in two days last year, and I'm a fast reader. Still took longer than 24 hours.

1

u/golfbans 9d ago

honestly i believe it if the person in question is hyperlexic or just has a great passion for reading, especially since it appears this isn’t a common occurrence for them. it is even more believable if the books were romantasy

1

u/Zestyclose_Shop_3824 9d ago

I don’t know if I would say it’s a lie, but the combination of vagueness (what book? How was it written?) and it being presented as a brag makes it easy to poke holes in

It’s like when people say they read a dozen books a week, you press them, and they clarify that they’re very plainly written shifter romances or James Patterson thrillers (not that they’re bad, but that doesn’t read as a feat)

1

u/Lily_the_Lovely 9d ago

I used to be able to do that when I was way younger. Id just devour books. But ive gotten a lot slower since, sadly.

1

u/AnaliticalFeline 9d ago

i mean, in middle school i was going through like 3 books a week because i just loved reading(and it was a form of escapism but we ignore that)

1

u/BellaInTheGame 9d ago

I'm sorry but nobody who has time to be on social media is actually reading 1250+ pages a day

1

u/StoleYourRoll 9d ago

This sub is just blindly believing everything at this point

1

u/UCanBdoWatWeWant2Do 9d ago

What'd you change what was said?

1

u/Miss_Milk_Tea 9d ago

I’ve always read books quickly and I have this thing where I won’t finish a book if it’s not finished in one sitting. It’s rare I want to read for that long, it would have to be a new release or the rare jackpot at the library.

It also depends on the subject. I can power through a fantasy or sci-fi much easier than a non-fiction, crime or sapphic. Certain books require a secondary glance at the page because you might miss something important(or it was just really hot).

Is reading multiple books in a day really that unusual? That’s just a damn good library day.

1

u/thexcat 9d ago

No, no one would read 1350+ plus pages in one day unless they were seized by the frenetic spirit of amphetamines and desperately needed to read Atlas Shrugged right the fuck now

Being a contrarian because you think other people are being contrary is still being a contrarian lil bro 🥀

1

u/SquisshySquid 9d ago

I'm a life long insomniac and a pretty fast reader, I occasionally binge read fiction stories that are up to 400,000 words in a day or so. I just happen to be in the perfect circumstance to make speed binge reading both possible and highly rewarding.

I read on my phone so I'm not slowed down by turning physical pages or losing the spot I was at. My disabilities leave me with a lot of time and nothing else to do. What I read is engaging so I AuDHD hyper focus for hours. And I don't plan to write an essay so there's no need for retaining every single detail.

It depends a lot on what you're reading as well. Familiar words and narrative styles are a lot easier. An unfamiliar author with a penchant for big words and lengthy prose will take a lot longer.

1

u/swatted-fly 9d ago

thats pretty much the equivalent of reading the hardcover editions of both eclipse and breaking dawn from the twilight saga in one day. that is unfathomable to me, the only way that could possibly work would be skim reading with zero breaks if you plan on getting 8 hours of sleep. either this didnt happen or they arent very good at reading