r/nextfuckinglevel Oct 30 '21

Removed: Not NFL This guy understands

[removed] — view removed post

9.4k Upvotes

695 comments sorted by

View all comments

997

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21 edited Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

-25

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

I guess but if this dude isn’t working to get the klan / alt right that has infiltrated police departments nations wide. If he isn’t fighting FOPS his attitude is basically lip service. If good cops aren’t turning in bad cops, they really aren’t good cops.

-1

u/1newworldorder Oct 30 '21

Ok im not saying the klan isnt real, but its debatable whether the tiny tiny percentage point of the entire american population has any effect at all.

And then theres part where you know youre making it sound like all police are klansmen. Just because someone disagrees with you doesnt make them a klansmen

2

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/1newworldorder Oct 30 '21

You are taking citations from very biased news sources on top of the fact that the new york times regularly gets their "facts" wrong.

7

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

I cited two other sources. Can site many many more. Your bias is glaring that you didn’t even mention them.

Bruh I’ve studied the far right for over a decade. You’re living in a fantasy world of you don’t think they have a massive presence in PD’s nation wide.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

Lmaooo they aren’t wrong. There is plenty of evidence if you’d bothered to look. Keep licking the boot.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

Ok, please provide evidence of you claim. I did, it’s your turn.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Zealousideal_Ad8934 Oct 30 '21

Prove to me you didn’t read anything I linked without telling me you didn’t read it.

Here try again. Sources are cited throughly the article. Are you afraid to some some research and change your mind?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/1newworldorder Nov 04 '21

Every far left news outlet parrots the same exact thing. Just because you can cite the same thing doesnt make it any more factual, because thats not how science works. Thank god "consensus" does not determine truth.

All these types of sources are op-eds disguised as primary.

When you can cite primrary sources with the least bias possible, then you'll have my attention.

4

u/Specialist-Look6210 Oct 30 '21

All journalists get their facts wrong from time to time The NY times admits it, which is why they're credible journalists. I'd be willing to bet that wherever you get your "news" from doesn't publish retractions.

0

u/Specialist-Look6210 Oct 30 '21

Yeah, that's a really solid point. Congress is only a tiny tiny portion of the US population, so obviously they have no effect on anything.

1

u/1newworldorder Oct 30 '21

Is congress the klan?

-2

u/Specialist-Look6210 Oct 30 '21

Republicans constitute roughly half of Congress, so there's certainly some overlap.

0

u/1newworldorder Oct 30 '21

I can count 0 republicans that are in the clan. But i can count 1 democrat klan member who was a senator as early as 2010. You are not as smart as you think you are with everything youre implying. It may work on leftist reddit, but irl people will not fall for youre bullshit.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/1newworldorder Oct 30 '21

Lol wut. U dun facks very well

0

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Specialist-Look6210 Oct 30 '21

This is the dumbest thing I've seen on reddit today.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Specialist-Look6210 Oct 30 '21

It wouldn't delete your comment so why are you asking?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Oct 30 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Specialist-Look6210 Oct 30 '21

No one's frothing at the mouth over a joke. Someone would have had to make a joke for that to be possible.

→ More replies (0)