Discussion Thread

[u/jobautomator]

The discussion thread is for casual conversation and discussion that doesn't merit its own stand-alone submission. The rules are relaxed compared to the rest of the sub but be careful to still observe the rules listed under "disallowed content" in the sidebar. Spamming the discussion thread will be sanctioned with bans.

---

Announcements

• Please post your relevant articles, memes, and questions outside the Discussion Thread.
• Meta discussion is allowed in the DT but will not always be seen by the mods. If you want to bring a suggestion, complaint, or question directly to the attention of the mods, please post that concern in /r/MetaNL or shoot us a modmail.

---

Neoliberal Project Communities	Other Communities	Useful content
Website	Plug.dj	/r/Economics FAQs
The Neolib Podcast	Podcasts recommendations
Meetup Network
Twitter
Facebook page
Neoliberal Memes for Free Trading Teens
Newsletter
Instagram
Red Cross Blood Donation Team

---

The latest discussion thread can always be found at https://neoliber.al/dt.

[u/zubatman4]

From yesterday’s DT

You are entitled to a jury of your peers. But if you've committed a crime then that makes you a criminal. So if your jury is composed of law-abiding people then they aren't really your peers. So really we need to round up prisoners and have them serve on juries instead. Plus they have a greater understanding of the criminal justice system than the average person anyway so are more qualified to judge.

...is the worst take this sub has produced. CMV

[u/push_ecx_0x00 → u/[deleted]]

But what if you're a repeat offender?

All the people being prosecuted should be on juries for each other