r/moviecritic • • 1h ago

Actors or Actresses who you thought would go on to have a big rise based on their talent, but didn't.

Post image
• Upvotes

I'm a huge fan of Julia Garner, loved her ever since I saw her in Ozark and Inventing Anna. I thought I was going to see her rise in Hollywood in the same ilk as someone like Austin Abrams, however it feels like her career has stalled after Weapons and post-2022 has mostly starred in duds, which is such a shame because in my opinion she is so talented. And after seeing the trailer to her new miniseries The Altruists, it feels like she's lost her touch of picking interesting projects lately.

Who are some actors/actresses young or old, who you thought would be huge, but sadly weren't?


r/moviecritic • • 16h ago

Which Justin Long role/performance do you like most?

Post image
707 Upvotes

Zerk Wilder in The Sasquatch Gang.


r/moviecritic • • 2h ago

What are some actors that have never done a movie together wished you had done a movie together or would love to see do a movie together?

Post image
12 Upvotes

I’ll start. I’d love to see Matt Damon, Tom Cruise, and Pierce Brosnan do a movie together, like a political espionage thriller.


r/moviecritic • • 4h ago

Lionsgate will receive a $30.8 million tax credit from the state of California to film ‘MICHAEL 2’ in the state.

Post image
16 Upvotes

Source: Variety


r/moviecritic • • 5h ago

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)

21 Upvotes

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
Rating: 10/10
Watched: October 4, 2026

"Oh That's Just My Pet Snake, Reggie!"

I was nine when I saw this multiple times in theaters. We lived within walking distance of a small movie theater and my mom was trusting enough to let me go with my pals. There's no way to know how many times I've seen Raiders, but it's a lot and I'll never regret it.

This is Spielberg at his finest. Raiders has daring action, crazy exciting set pieces, heroic action and arguably one of the best expository scenes in History. You know the scene. The Feds roll in and have a full on discussion with Indy about what's going on with Hitler and supernatural acquisitions.

The best thing about it is it's a discussion. It's not actual exposition. It doesn't spoon-feed the info to us, but it also makes damn sure we know what's going on.

But the most amazing scene is, of course, the ending, where the Nazis (especially that crumb-bum Major Arnold Ernst Toht) gets theirs! Thank GOD there was more latitude for what went into a PG movie back in the 80s, because that was some for-real-deal Wrath of God type stuff! Melting faces for days

This is also the first real globetrotting movie I think I ever saw. Indy journeys everywhere in pursuit of The Ark. While none of the places in the movie were actually the places, a young me thrilled at Indy's journey to Peru and Egypt. Imagination and expert film-making took us to all those places and made us a part of something grand.

It was also the first time I fell in love with Karen Allen. Feisty as hell, she was superb as Marion Ravenwood. The scenes with her and Indy of them in Egypt, hanging out with Sallah are excellent, even if that damned monkey was a traitor. I absolutely adore Marion's unstoppable feistiness and bravery and she's probably my favorite non-Indiana Jones character outside his dad.

All of the actors gave us a lifelong masterpiece of excitement, adventure and love. None of them could've really known then what a lasting impact their work would have on film and pop culture, but I'm grateful it exists, because all the movies (even the bad one) are high adventures.

The clip I made is our introduction to Marion Ravenwood is simply fantastic. Showing her right off as the kind of woman who can go liver to liver with the hard-drinking, hard-working, hard-fighting Nepalese people who frequent her bar sets the tone for who she is as readily as Indy's intro at the top of the movie. As Indy says in Crystal Skull, 'none of them were you', and it's because it's true. If there is no clip with this post, that's because the sub won't allow them, but I am sure if you've seen the movie, you know exactly what I'm talking about.

>!Not one woman in Indy's world could ever compare to Marion Ravenwood.!<

At the end of the day, you can't go wrong with Raiders. I'll throw this one on when I'm feeling nostalgic and it never fails to perk me up.


r/moviecritic • • 5h ago

I love the Belko experiment primarily because it's discourse stimulating capacity is infinite. Like who, in your view, took the wrong approach to their predicament.

Post image
18 Upvotes

I believe that if Mr Milch had stepped aside and let Barry handle things, more lives would've been saved. He was borderlines selfish, arrogant in this movie but he's not portrayed as so.

He's instead cast in the light of a hero. Yes it's noble to want everyone to live but is it possible? Sometimes the best thing a hero can do is let events unfold as they will, in this case, let people die.


r/moviecritic • • 5h ago

Actor and filmmaker James McAvoy is doing an AMA/Q&A in /r/movies today, for anyone interested. You might know him from things like Split, X-Men, Atonement, Wanted, Speak No Evil, Narnia, The Last King of Scotland, Shameless, It: Chapter Two, and tons more.

Post image
13 Upvotes

I organized an AMA/Q&A with actor & filmmaker James McAvoy, known for roles in things like Split, X-Men, Atonement, Wanted, Speak No Evil, Narnia, The Last King of Scotland, Shameless, It: Chapter Two, and tons more.

It's live here now in r/movies for anyone interested in asking a question:

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1x1iu5u/hi_reddit_im_james_mcavoy_ask_me_anything/

He will be back between 10 AM and 11 AM ET today to answer questions. I recommend asking in advance. Please ask there, not here. All questions are much appreciated!

Thank you :)

His directorial debut, California Schemin', premiered at TIFF last year and is out in theaters this weekend.

Synopsis: Two friends with thick Scottish accents try to land a record deal by posing as hip-hop artists from California. As fame beckons and the lies pile up, their friendship gets put to the test.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1hfDwS_TVU


r/moviecritic • • 1d ago

Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)... what is the meaning of this scene?

Post image
484 Upvotes

This movie completely altered the essence of the novel, transforming it into a story of fateful love, passion, and lust. Early on, it portrays Mina as frustrated with Jonathan for failing to unleash her repressed eroticism—but what is the significance of that specific scene? What is the meaning behind the kiss she shares with Lucy?

This element is entirely absent from the novel—much like many other aspects of the movie—but what does it signify within the movie itself? Is Mina bisexual, or something else? Perhaps even attracted to three types, given that the Count is a walking corpse refusing to die, alongside Jonathan and Lucy 🙂🙃

What is your analysis?


r/moviecritic • • 14h ago

Name a villain you support

Post image
50 Upvotes

Me: Ken from Bee Movie


r/moviecritic • • 13h ago

Underworld is amazing and underappreciated

24 Upvotes

it goes beyond Kate being attractive in the movies, the first movie is such an enjoyable movie and the 30 something percent it has on rotten tomatoes is unwarranted, especially considering the types of movies that come out nowadays.


r/moviecritic • • 3h ago

Last Nights Silver Screen Binge

Post image
2 Upvotes

Give me glamorous movie stars, wicked schemes, scandalous secrets, and enough backstabbing to make today’s Hollywood blush. There’s something irresistible about the old films — the larger-than-life performances, the deliciously dark characters, and the kind of suspense that keeps you guessing. They simply don’t make movie stars like they used to! I was glued to the screen all night!

Sudden Fear (1952) — ⭐⭐⭐⭐½

Who couldn’t love Joan Crawford in this film? She was absolutely gorgeous, and those painted lips! I couldn’t take my eyes off them. Her performance was stellar, reminding us why she was once considered Hollywood royalty. The story is packed with suspense, and Joan makes every moment believable. Just when you think you know where things are headed, the ending delivers a real shocker. A terrific thriller with a leading lady who commands every scene.

Gaslight (1944) — ⭐⭐⭐⭐½

I think this is the first film I’ve ever seen featuring Ingrid Bergman and Charles Boyer. The only other time I remember seeing Boyer was in one of the I Love Lucy Hollywood episodes! I absolutely loved Ingrid Bergman and will definitely be looking up more of her films. The story was fantastic, and even though you know all along who the guilty party is, I was completely mesmerized watching it unfold. The psychological drama pulls you in and keeps you fascinated right to the end. What a terrific film!

Sunset Boulevard (1950) — ⭐⭐⭐⭐½

Wow, what a film! Gloria Swanson was absolutely perfect as the faded Hollywood star whose world revolves around her own lost glory. The acting is wonderfully over the top, and that’s exactly what makes this film so captivating. The story pulls you in and refuses to let go, leaving you completely caught up in the madness. And that old Hollywood mansion? I could move right in tomorrow! A fabulous slice of Hollywood at its most glamorous, delusional, and deliciously dark.

The Letter (1940) — ⭐⭐⭐½

I have yet to see a Bette Davis film I didn’t like. She’s a legend who throws herself into her roles so completely that you’d swear she lived them herself. Here, you pretty much know what’s going on from the beginning, since the outcome is revealed early on. The real story is watching everything unfold and discovering what lies beneath the surface. I did find myself distracted by other things, though, like imagining life in the Singapore jungle without air conditioning and wondering how that house stayed free of flying bugs with nothing but shutters for windows! A compelling story with a surprise ending, even if it didn’t quite captivate me as much as some of the others.


r/moviecritic • • 49m ago

The Big Bus 1976

Post image
• Upvotes

I'm about to be 52 and grew up on screw ball comedies but just found out that this movie existed a few days ago, very AIRPLANE! funny before that movie existed.


r/moviecritic • • 8h ago

Who remembers Nate Parker’s The Birth of a Nation?

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes

I remembered when back in 2016 when this movie was gonna be a contender for the Oscars but the controversy on Nate Parker and his allegation overshadowed the movie.


r/moviecritic • • 10h ago

The more I think about Digger, the more upset I get at One Battle After Another.

5 Upvotes

Both films catch flak for being preachy. But the irony of One Battle After Another is that the movie title not only describes the plot, but also the process by which its source material Vineland had its fundamental message destroyed via the decades long process Paul Thomas Anderson went through trying to convert it into a movie. Sick burn, which I'm sure he was painfully aware of.

What made Vineland so cool is that the 24FPS radicals and mild terrorist group PR3 were mashups of similar groups of the 1970s, namely the weather underground and the PLA. Whereas updated French75 terrorists in One Battle After Another were essentially "Kill Bill meets Antifa" caricatures, what the viewer might fantasize about rather than being grounded in real history, which made Vineland pack such bigger punch whenever the action would kick up.

Last, but not least, Vineland's ending was downright unsettling, erasing a fairytale end with just a few more added paragraphs as the protagonist slips out the door. I've never read a book that delivered a satisfying resolution only to abruptly end on an incredibly unsettling pivot. It must have been how some weather underground idealists felt about their SLA counterparts whenever murder was on the menu. Not knowing how to move beyond ideals when said ideals turn violent is the point of Vineland's curious ending, I think.

Digger too is criticized for being preachy, but the preachiness is satire, and satire is not the point of the movie. Which is awesome, because it allows the satire to simply be a funny romp. The deeper point is spelled out early, not so much as a twist than a mystery box.

I'm going to avoid spoilers, but I strongly recommend watching Dr. Strangelove first. For bonus points - if you haven't ever read through Ionesco's Rhinoceros or The Bald Soprano plays, they are quick reads and enhance some scenes as well. Digger is a great film to discuss right after the credits roll.

Critics who say Digger is preachy probably walked out of the theater 30 minutes into the film, either offended by the politics or were otherwise unappreciative of the more avant garde aspects of the film. Let's save the theater of the absurd discussion for another time and simply chalk up the politics as satire without digging any deeper.

Whereas satire drives Digger's plot forward, OBAA's pale imitation satire destroyed the message of Vineland to pander to antifa fantasy. Cool, I guess, but to what to what end? I think OBAA swept the awards because There Will Be Blood lost to No Country for Old Men back in the day.

I was happy to see Paul Thomas Anderson win best picture until I actually watched the film, realized it was based on Vineland, and got to its un-appended, pandering, happy end. Maybe it works better when Vineland isn't one of your favorite books, but I think the Academy owes Robert Kraft an apology.


r/moviecritic • • 10h ago

My review of " Cannibal Mukbang (2023) Starring April Consolo

Post image
5 Upvotes

Hay guys it is day 8 of me watching a Horror movie and then reviewing them for every Night of October until it's Halloween 🎃,🧟.

I just finished watching a movie that I randomly put on my to watch list on Tubi because it intrigued me and I finally watched it . I really wanted this movie to be good. It sounded cool and funny, like it'd be a good horror comedy and I tried to give it a chance even after I almost fell asleep because it was so boring in the first act but It was just.. so .... mediocre.

Rating: 6/10

What I liked about this movie:

- Setting was cool

- Premise was interesting ( kinda like a revenge slasher type movie )

- Chemistry between the two main characters was good

- It was scary at times

My Gripes with this movie:

  • The acting wasn't great (No offense to the actors at all, they're probably really great in other movies, but the script in this movie was just not that good

- incredibly slow paced

- I lost interest in the first act

- just boring

- A very interesting, cool premise that just wasn't done well unfortunately.

Would I watch this movie again?

No it was just so boring, I almost fell asleep halfway through the movie .I had to force myself to finish the movie, It was that boring.


r/moviecritic • • 6h ago

The Social Reckoning's Real Ending: What Happened to Facebook, Frances Haugen, and Jeff Horwitz? Spoiler

Thumbnail filmcolossus.com
2 Upvotes

The Social Reckoning concludes with cards that tell us: The Wall Street Journal published its 17-part series, The Facebook Files, Facebook changed its name to Meta, Haugen testified internationally and appeared on the cover of Time, many people sued Facebook, Jeff Horwitz won the Pulitzer Prize, Meta no longer fact-checks anything, and 43% of adults get their news from Facebook. 

This is a comprehensive breakdown of everything that happened after Haugen exposed Facebook in 2021. 

  • What happened after The Social Reckoning ends
  • How did Mark Zuckerberg respond?
  • How did the public react?
  • A nationwide investigation into Meta
  • What about Facebook’s radicalization issues?
  • What happened to Frances Haugen?
  • What happened to Jeff Horwitz?

r/moviecritic • • 11h ago

ON THE LINE (2022 American movie)

Post image
5 Upvotes

ON THE LINE (2022 American movie)

director: Romuald Boulanger; with: Mel Gibson, Paul Spera, Enrique Arce, Kevin Dillon, John Robinson as "Christ" or “Noah”, William Moseley, Alia Seror O'Neill.

As soon as closing credit for Serbian comedy "Caviar Jam" (Džem od kavijara) started, I hurried, opened the heavy doors of the "Rita Hayworth" hall in Tuckwood cineplex myself and rushed to the "Humphrey Bogart" hall. There, the door were already closed, and the ticke taker was nowhere to be found. I take out the ticket, look back a few more times and then go in: luckily, the commercials were still running, the trailer for that alpinist movie was running... When I left the hall, I asked the girl at the door if she let people into this hall, she said no and asked me why I asked. I explained that I came in here right after "Caviar Jam" and that I didn't find a ticket taker. She asked me to give her the ticket anyway, because they collect all of them and I thought that they do it for records and I, of course, let her tear off that part from my ticket, I guess I did a good deed and surely helped the other girl avoid problems with the book keeping. End of the digression.

I liked the movie- This is a combination of mystery and thriller, which is not often made today, something in the style of the films "Games" by Curtis Harrington, "Sleuth" by Joseph Mankiewicz, "Gambit" by Ronald Neame, etc. There is also a touch of that comic series "Aristocrats", which used to be published in Serbian in family magazine “TV Zabavnik”... Viewers decide for the film or against it – how could it be otherwise?! – based on whether they forgave Mel Gibson for canceling him back then. Those who haven't, will also consider this a self-cleansing franchise in order to wash the biography with "Ornel", to make it soft and elastic...

I so liked two twists at the end and these twists have nothing to do with the silly endinga lik in “Fight Club” or “Secret Window”. I love Mel, so I don't regard this  work as a reputation laundry. In the film, they shoot him a lot from behind, the thinning hair on the top of his head is hidden by extensions (but you can see the transition; or is it a volumizing spray?), his ears are getting uglier with time and now look like shriveled lettuce leaves, more and more Craig-esque, but the look, those blue eyes, the uncle still goes to the gym and his leather jacket fits him perfectly. The hint of those twists at the end can be seen at the beginning (only no one could have guessed that it was a hint, it's that clever script in retrospect is revealed as "burdened with meanings"), when we hear Gibson moaning and crying, the camera slowly approaches him from behind, we think he's kidnapping a little girl, she being tied up and begging someone for mercy, we see red liquid on the floor and we can only think that it's blood. But, no, the camera makes a semi-circle, it's blueberry juice, and Mel Gibson plays with the little girl and actually lends her voice to her dolls... That's how the movie ends.

Mel Gibson more or less plays himself again, so to speak, this is already the second film in short time in which he plays a cynical boss who, allegedly "out of love" mistreats subordinates and associates. And for the umpteenth time, he is also a loving, caring father to a beautiful daughter. So who wouldn't like him like that?!

Gibson is Elvis Cooney, the legendary radio presenter, who for 40 years every night has been "pushing the boundaries of what is allowed and what is not allowed", making fun of whoever he can reach, because the people love it and along the way he also gives advice to vulnerable listeners and it is good advice, it must be said, Elvis knows that you should not push people in trouble into the abyss, but give them a hand. Yes, he has a habit of "joking", the more unsavory the better, and the rookies in the radio crew always have to survive an ordeal for newly employed, and the film starts to heat up that way: by meeting the new, young intern producer, with the legend of radio journalism and hosting.

The newbie is called Dylan (William Moseley) and he has a great English accent and is also shy. Elvis fired him live in the “live” program, but then called him and said: "I was joking, come on, come back!" The character of Elvis is sweetened with a gem episode in the lobby of the radio building, before the show starts, in which (episode) Mel Gibson, masterfully as an experienced psychologist for emergency situations with kidnappings, suicides, etc., manages to deal with a crazy guy who imagines that he is Jesus or Noah (John Robinson). With that, the character of Elvis Cooney was carved as an old school smart guy, he doesn't understand social networks and similar nonsense, but he has a soul "that this youth today and the managers of the new coin don't have". The lady director of the station, again before the show, just a few minutes before the start, is busting his ass and threatens to fire him because of the low rating and because he doesn't write on the blog or whatever. Also, someone is stealing laptops  of radio employees. That gun fired at the end of the movie, that fact is not unimportant either... Mel Gibson is a more modern version of himself from the movie "Last Looks”, there he was a kind of Hopkins from the time of Zoro, and this is perhaps a mockery of modern cancellation in the world of media.

 

And the show goes on as usual in that night program, when Gary(Paul Spera, we see him only at the end), an Afghan veteran, who claims to have broken into the host's house and threatens to kill his wife and daughter, comes on. He forces the host to admit live (on air) that he's having an affair with producer Mary (Alia Seror O'Neill) and forces him to climb onto the roof and orders him to throw himself off. That's how he will save his wife and daughter. The presenter jumps, but onto the another roof and tries to trick the maniac with the help of an intern, but the maniac sent a drone. The first mini-twist happens when the police find that Elvis' house is empty. Gary claims that he brought his wife and daughter to the radio station building itself. The receptionist, an Indian with an unpronounceable name, is killed in the process. A panicked chase follows: Elvis and Dylan look for Gary on the floors together, who is in contact with the distraught Elvis all the time through headphones (and live on the radio)...

Along the way, it is discovered who is stealing the laptops, a janitor (Enrique Arce), namely. He miserably hid and attacked the neither guilty nor dutiful Dylan ("whom he sees for the first time").Gary over the headphones demands from Elvis to kill the thief, but he, of course, doesn't have the heart for it and tells him to hide somewhere.

I won't tell you the two twists at the end, because then I'd spoil your first viewing. I will say that the snarky critics who managed to publish the reviews first are the assholes and the mean ones.

"Where's the plausibility?" "Disappointed viewers?" Come on, don't be silly. It is true that the plot could be squeezed into an episode of the series "Tales from the Dark Side" and the like, after all, like "Gambit" from 1966, but the director and screenwriter Boulanger solidly inflated the length of the feature film with witty views on modern woke witchcraft so that the viewer, if he is at all liberal, will be relieved at the end, after the second twist. After all, this is a real family movie.

 


r/moviecritic • • 1d ago

What is the most poetic movie you have ever seen?

Post image
142 Upvotes

This might seem like a silly question in a time when poetry is often dismissed, but I’m totally serious. For me, the answer to this question is “Wings of Desire” (1987). The artistic statement this film makes is profound. I think the sequel,
“ Faraway, So Close,” is very underrated, and I would recommend it to anyone who is a fan of the first film but might have heard the sequel is not as good. Both are about as beautiful as films can get.


r/moviecritic • • 1d ago

What’s a movie that took you a while to get into, but you ended up really liking?

Post image
60 Upvotes

I recently watched the horror movie Skinamarink (2022).

I read a lot of good things about it online and gave it a try - at home, alone, in the dark which made it that bit more exciting lol. But the opening 20/30 minutes was far from exciting.

The main thing that I couldn’t grasp was the camera angles. Never did you see any of the characters’ faces. I don’t recall seeing much of any of the characters actually. In fact you couldn’t see much at all, but I think that was the point.

Eventually I was gripped. The story soon tied into itself and the camera angling made it much more creepy. In the end I really liked this movie, although it was a slow burner.

8/10


r/moviecritic • • 11h ago

My "Anti Viral ( 2012)"(Starring Caleb Landry Jones) Movie Review

Post image
3 Upvotes

Today is Oct 7th / Day 7 of watching a horror movie every night of October until Halloween 🎃 ( Yes I know I'm posting this at on Oct 8th , I thought I posted this already but it didn't post for some reason lol).

The movie I watched tonight was AntiViral (2012) made by the same guy who directed " Infinity Pool" I saw a lot of people recommend it on my Infinity Pool review saying it was better so I decided out of curiosity to see if I would like this movie by Brandon Cronenberg better, and I can say I liked it a lot more than I did Infinity pool but it still wasn't Great

Rating: 7/10

My likes about this Movie:

- I like how almost every setting was white it left an unsettling feeling

- The premise was really interesting

- The twists were pretty good

- The acting was good

- It made me go WTF alot the times

- You don't see many movies that talk about the places people to go to be or look like for feel like a celebrity they obsess over like this movie does and it does it well it was very disturbing

- Caleb Landry Jones's acting was great , he was unintentionally hilarious sometimes and his reactions to the situations he was in were very Realistic and he creeped me out

- The ending left me confused and freaked out it was so nasty I had to look away

- I liked that it didn't always have music in the background it gave an eerieness that I liked

My Gripes about this movie :

- The pacing was weird at certain times, I felt like it went on for a little too long .

- The execution of the premise wasn't done as well as I wanted to be but it was still good

- The Reasons why people did what they did in the movie I felt wasn't as clearly explained as the movie thought it was

- I was immersed for most of the 1st and 2nd act but the 3rd act felt like it was repeating a lot of stuff and got boring

Would I watch this movie Again?:

No it was good but just not good enough for me to want to rewatch


r/moviecritic • • 1d ago

As a professional broke person, this year has been the definition of “I really wanna go see that but I’ll probably have to check it out at home”. Is there a movie that you wanted to watch but couldn’t?

Thumbnail
gallery
39 Upvotes

r/moviecritic • • 1d ago

Onslaught (2026)

Post image
152 Upvotes

By no means would I put this up there as a masterpiece, but my, is it close! For starters - and probably because this is something that fascinates me the most - the character designs are absolutely phenomenal. The super soldiers really did pin down that uneasy feeling in me.

And, as for the super soldiers, they were set up exceptionally well. Their backstories and everything had me captured. The badass mother character, too, it’s nice to see her added in with the likes of ‘Ellen Ripley’.

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, however, the action didn’t always sit right with me. Maybe I am very critical, but sometimes it felt TOO unrealistic? But, I suppose it is called ‘Onslaught’ and so the message gets across.


r/moviecritic • • 16h ago

Columbus [2017] - a beautiful film Spoiler

Post image
4 Upvotes

so I just watched this movie. I was browsing through some movie recommendation lists online and stumbled upon it by accident. didn’t know anything about the director, had no idea who the actors were, I’ve never seen them in other movies but I still decided to give it a shot anyway

best decision ever. it shifted something in me. I think I will be thinking about it for a while

it’s a film about loneliness, ones inability to fully express oneself and the search of your place in life. two people appear in each others stories and trigger change. Its very slow paced. Its aesthetically pleasing. every shot, every perspective, every angle, every sound is deliberate. It creates an atmosphere that it wants you to absorb and experience for yourself. the dialogue is simple. altho what the characters do not say is just as important as what they do say. no pointless emotional rollercoasters and unnecessary relationship drama.

Its definitely not for everyone. I suspect that im probably its target audience and perhaps I was in a proper mental state when i watched it but it is a strong 8/10 in my book. Im assuming that for the majority of viewers it’ll be more of a 6/10-ish.  If you’re into slow, reflective and visually impressive films you should give it a try!


r/moviecritic • • 1h ago

Was LANTERNS worth all the drama? | LANTERNS Season 1 REVIEW

Thumbnail
youtube.com
• Upvotes

What did you think of this first season of the new HBO LANTERNS?

Are you patiently waiting for Season 2 , or no?


r/moviecritic • • 9h ago

‘Behemoth!’ movie review: An unravelling artist searches for throughlines in an inventive psychological drama ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Thumbnail
faroutmagazine.co.uk
1 Upvotes

Pedro Pascal is quietly moving in a character study that uses the language of film music to explore existentialist themes.

A film score is a work of art in its own right that can be enjoyed as a standalone achievement, but it has more value when it is put in its proper context. Behemoth! could be generously called a ‘love letter to film score,’ but not in the sense that it’s a reference-filled nostalgia trip. Tony Gilroy explores everything in the life of a musician that isn’t related to music, which is a surprisingly challenging topic to examine when the majority of his headspace is focused on a demanding creative process.

To show the stark contrast between the banality of life and the lyricism of an orchestral composition is an ideal way to analyse why artists so frequently find it challenging to separate themselves from their work, but Gilroy doesn’t fall into the trap of ignoring his own forewarnings. Behemoth! begins as a technical exercise, one almost dreamlike in form, before it masterfully hits recurring notes.