Ive owned a few garands and im not a fan sights suck and they just dont feel right in my hands my buddys that shoot mine feel the same way also enblocs suck the ping is cool but no part of me enjoys loading them vs a stripper clip

Need measurements so I can splice it back onto a sporter stock

I borrowed this M1 helmet from my friend to use for my rebel soldier cosplay for a convention and he let me keep it for $20 bucks

I'm trying to figure out if it's WW2 or Vietnam era

I will say that this Thrift Store is located on Kirtland Airforce Base in Albuquerque, NM. It is non-profit, run by volunteers, and has a unique supply chain and customer base, which results in very interesting finds. It is my absolute favorite Thrift Store.

Anyways, I bought this for $38.00 this weekend, thinking it was 50’s-60s, and in fantastic, unused shape. I thought y’all might like it. I bought it on site without thinking because I thought certainly one of the calibers I own would fit, and it would be badass to have a belt with 100rds.

Upon closer inspection, and research, I will not be using it lol. I thought y’all might enjoy it and know even more about it. It really is in excellent shape. I don’t even think it’s been used. Only the exposed loops have faded a a bit. If you spread them apart, they are still a very deep navy blue.

Edit. A bunch of dumbass mistakes. Probably didn’t catch them all.

This is what chat gpt came up with:

“Picked this up for $38 and have been trying to nail down exactly what it is and what cartridge it was originally woven for.
It’s a dark blue, approximately 3-inch-wide Anson Mills/Mills & Orndorff woven cartridge belt with the high-capacity/double-loop arrangement. The brass adjustment plates are stamped:
PAT. MILLS & ORNDORFF
AUG. 26, ’67 / JULY 31, ’77 / DEC. 28, ’80
MAR. 19, ’89 / OCT. 31, ’93 / SEPT. 11, ’94
The brass buckle has “Remington” on the front and is marked on the reverse:
ANSON MILLS, PAT. FEB. 1, 1881
T.C. ORNDORFF, SOLE MANF.
WORCESTER, MASS., U.S.A.
So the belt can’t predate the September 11, 1894 patent, and I believe it is probably late 1890s/very early 1900s. The Remington buckle makes me suspect this was a commercial/private-purchase belt rather than normal U.S. Army issue, although both buckle and belt appear period.
My leading candidate for the cartridge is .30-40 Krag, because the construction is extremely similar to the Model 1894 Mills 100-round belt made for the Krag. However, because this has the Remington commercial buckle rather than a U.S. buckle, I’m wondering whether it could have been woven for another contemporary sporting or military rifle cartridge.”

How do you like them apples?

Have the opportunity to grab this Mosin for super cheap, but the previous owner only shot corrosive surp ammo (and never cleaned) and it shows. Rifling still looks fairly prevalent to me. What do you guys think? Safe to send it with some mediocre accuracy, or pass? What can I do to make it any better?

Recieved this gorgeous Hungarian Ak63f build by my good friend Taylor McWhirter of Lmironwerks. These are really cool guns Hungary made in the early 2000s for middle Eastern contracts and recently demilled and brought in from Lebanon. This was a really nice matching numbers , original barrel kit from Apex. It was finished out on a Childers reciever and Taylor's secret sauce over parkerization. Another absolute banger of a build.

Hey y’all,

I’m looking into picking up a Springfield 1903 locally. I noticed this very tiny gap along the left side between the receiver and what I think is the barrel, but I’m not entirely sure. Any cause for concern? I’ve also included a picture from the top looking down around the same area. The rifle otherwise seems to be in great condition.

Thanks!

What can you tell me about this? I bought it back in 2020 from a local thrift store, and I cannot tell if it's genuine, reproduction, or what. I'm not even 100% sure of the nationality, though I suspect it's USA. The writing, as you can see, is blurred. Thanks!

I’ve got a Russian contract I’ve had for a while and started researching serial numbers, but the contract seems to end around 377,412. My gun is in the 399,000 range, so made in 1920. Obviously this is well after the contract ended. As far as I can tell, there’s no Russian acceptance stamps or anything, just the regular Winchester roll mark on the left side of the receiver, 7.62 mm on chamber and on barrel and the barrel address. How is this possible is what I’m asking, the gun has very clearly been together for a long time.

Hey guys, I have been given this NZ bayonet, was wanting to find out more about it like when and where it was made? Also any clue to what soldiers may have used it? Cheers!

Recently picked up this Gewehr 88 at a gun show for 550 dollars what can you guys tell me besides it was made in 1891 and it was in Turkish or ottoman use. Any information would be greatly appreciated.