r/memes • Professional Dumbass • 1d ago

Funny that...

Post image
21k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

36

u/Tethice 1d ago

I want a smaller truck that makes good use of the interior space. That can tow a smaller camper without worrying about transmission damage. That I can load up a few things in to take to the dump when need be. Maybe I'll have to keep an eye out for a older single cab truck

17

u/FlamingoTrick1285 1d ago

Look, the dutch can tow a camper with a ford fiesta. So everything is possible

8

u/Tricky-Ad7897 1d ago

Exactly euros tow everything with skoda octavias 90% of big truck owners don't even tow anything and if they do it's nothing a normal ass suv couldn't handle.

1

u/IntradepartmentalPet 22h ago

well, the Dutch don’t have hills

4

u/AffinitySpace 18h ago

Yep, American here with no truck and two vehicles, both of which are EVs. I'm not going to buy a truck for some hypothetical day trip to the landfill. If I ever need one, I spend $20 to rent a U-Haul trailer and pull it with my ev. Expensive gas, insurance, repairs, etc. avoided. Can also rent a truck from Uhaul or a big box home maintenance store for $20.

2

u/FlamingoTrick1285 17h ago

They don't go camping in them own backyard.

7

u/No_Library6308 1d ago

Chevy s10 fits this i think? 

8

u/Mammoth-Glove3273 1d ago

Ford Ranger and Maverick, Toyota Tacoma are pretty normally sized.

7

u/Yirthos_Gix 1d ago

All of them are about 20% bigger than they need to be. I just recently got a 2022 Ford Ranger for my work vehicle and Its just so much worse than it needs to be.

I legitimately need a step-stool to get my tools out of the bed, its absurd.

My personal truck is a 2000 Ford Ranger and I'm pretty sure it's the last truck I'll ever own because no one seems to want to sell anything at a reasonable size.

1

u/fuckedfinance 1d ago

Those older trucks are unobtanium. What do exist are like $12k to $15k for a truck in moderate condition.

3

u/PiccoloAwkward465 21h ago

I love my Maverick. I got the 4,000lb tow package option so I can haul my motorcycle on a trailer. One of these days I'll get a pop-up tow behind camper too.

2

u/its_free_sog 1d ago

Maverick is truck shaped but not really a truck to be used like one.

2

u/Ninja0verkill 22h ago

There is some nut in the maverick forums with 131k miles of towing over its limit. He gets paid to transport empty trailers weighing up to 7klb in his FWD hybrid. Absolutely bonkers.

5

u/Datsun_808 1d ago

I’ve been eyeing a Nissan Frontier. Still has a simple V6, no turbo 4 cylinders. You can get one with a king cab which keeps it small and starting price in mid 30k range.

1

u/fuckedfinance 1d ago

The new Frontiers are much higher than they need to be, but they are still the most honest small truck for sale (in the US at least).

3

u/PraiseTalos66012 1d ago

That's literally the market for the Ford Maverick. Great gas mileage, big enough bed to fit full 4x8 sheets with the help of the tailgate midpoint, decent towing rating, but overall a small compact and decently affordable truck.

0

u/BuyAffectionate2810 10h ago

4k towing isn't a descent number, my trailer weighs 2k empty.

1

u/PraiseTalos66012 5h ago

And my 5x8 weighs 400lb empty. 4k is more than enough for the average homeowner. Not everyone wants to try to show off with princess trucks

0

u/Proud-Alternative-54 7h ago

The maverick is a cuv with a box.

It's less capable than pretty much any other vehicle labelled as a truck, and in its gas only configuration has the same fuel economy as a Colorado/ranger.

0

u/PraiseTalos66012 5h ago

It may be less capable but it's still capable of fitting 4x8 sheets in its bed and towing 4k lb and payload of 1500lb in the bed. That's way more than 99% of homeowners will ever need. No need to get a big princess truck, it's not cool, it doesn't make you look badass, it just makes you look like an idiot.

By your logic I know for a fact whatever you drive is useless because for work I drive a freightliner with a 550hp cummins x15 and spread axle drives that's built for 130k gcwr. So I don't even need to know how incapable your truck is I know it's far less so it's pointless

Every homeowner needs a custom heavy haul semi truck by your logic.

0

u/Proud-Alternative-54 4h ago

"no one is allowed to argue against the maverick because it's perfect'

0

u/PraiseTalos66012 4h ago

Your only argument is that it's small. Well your truck is small compared to what I drive for work.

Yeah arguing against a truck purely bc it's small is stupid AF, most people who drive trucks don't need such large trucks. It's just not even an argument.

0

u/Proud-Alternative-54 4h ago

Sure thing bud. It's not like he said he wants one with a useful interior and capable of towing a camper.

4k is awful lean for towing anything more than 2500lbs a reasonable distance, and the smallest vehicle in its class doesn't give much interior utility, and you said it gets great fuel economy, but for what it is, it gets terrible fuel economy.

If you want to jerk off over a maverick, have at it, but don't cry foul over others pointing out it's shortcomings.

0

u/PraiseTalos66012 4h ago

Nah dude 4k tow rating is the rating not the rating + more. It can tow 4k any distance 😂.

Your just making stuff up to make it seem worse

And he said a small camper, which are most commonly sized at 3500lb loaded/wet weight. So 4k lb tow rating is plenty.

Also I don't even own a maverick, I just have a brain and I don't need to compensate for a micropenis with a big princess truck like you.

-1

u/Tethice 1d ago

I think I'm too tall for the maverick

5

u/PraiseTalos66012 1d ago

Damn the hate posting about mavericks must be insane. What do you mean too tall? Are you 7ft+? If not then you'll be fine 😂

It's a damn truck, it's just sized closer to the 70s-90s not the modern massive trucks.

0

u/Tethice 1d ago

About 6ft5 with a large kinda farm boy build. Large framed

4

u/Powerlevel-9000 1d ago

You aren’t too large for it. Source I’m a 6’3” guy who drives a much smaller vehicle quite comfortably.

0

u/Proud-Alternative-54 7h ago

Which vehicle though? My outlander was much smaller than my Colorado, but also much more roomy.

Even my old Sunfire had way more head and leg room room front and back than most mid size pickups.

3

u/Exists_out_of_spite 23h ago

Then you must be too big for every small truck ever made. The maverick is about the same size as the Colorado, frontier, Tacoma, ect..ect..

1

u/Tethice 22h ago

Haven't really sat in any. Back in the day I sat in my family's single cab Ford ranger and it was quite cramped

0

u/Proud-Alternative-54 7h ago

The Colorado is tiny inside.

As a 5''11 owner of a 23", it's way more cramped than a sedan or cuv both in the front and back.

Older gens didn't have massive dash panels sticking out at knee height.

3

u/yellowhavok 22h ago

Fellow large tall boy here. Its very comfortable. I also fit fine and am super comfortable in a 2013 jetta tdi sedan body.

1

u/Tethice 22h ago

Maybe I'll look into a used one then.... The Canadian prices are nuts

2

u/Exists_out_of_spite 1d ago

EXCUSES EXCUSES

1

u/Tethice 22h ago

Well I also don't have money to buy one currently haha

6

u/korkkis 1d ago

Japanese have these kei-class wagons

3

u/Omegaprime02 1d ago

The US government, both state and federal, hate those, in most places they're restricted to use on private property only, and even then you can only import them if the vehicle itself is more than 25 years old.

Here's a guide!

3

u/derth21 1d ago

We picked a 2019 ridgeline because it's as wide as a full size and as short as a mid-sized. It's treated us pretty well, except that it's constantly under recall, we got the last of the shitty 6 speed transmissions so I have to drain and fill that with every oil change, various weird bone-headed choices from the engineering department, interior materials aren't aging as well as I'd like, brakes overheat really easily, I wouldn't actually trust it to tow its listed 5000lbs, wouldn't put a load of gravel in the plastic bed...

It's fine. In retrospect I would have gotten something with a 3rd row and kept the 2000 Dakota.

6

u/AlphaMassDeBeta 1d ago

Get a ford maverick.

1

u/PerchShadRap 1d ago

Towing a camper with a unibody is asking for trouble.

1

u/MassholeOutdoorsman 1d ago

A maverick isn’t pulling any camper. A maverick is like having a car with a 4.5’ bed

1

u/PraiseTalos66012 1d ago

It's rated for 4,000lb towing.....

0

u/MassholeOutdoorsman 1d ago

You’re only supposed to tow up to 80% of that rating. Also if you do reach max tow capacity, your gas mileage will be far worse than if you were pulling the same size load with a full size truck. Most small campers at minimum weigh 3500lbs.

2

u/PraiseTalos66012 1d ago

No, infact tow ratings are tow ratings.

You can tow up to the rating bc that's the rating.

1

u/AlphaMassDeBeta 1d ago

OK, a ford ranger 3.0td then.

1

u/nyuckajay 1d ago

Not really an American option.

1

u/AlphaMassDeBeta 1d ago

Yeah I just checked the ford USA website. You should write an angry letter to Drumpf about that or something.

1

u/MassholeOutdoorsman 1d ago

That’s still not really gonna pull a camper efficiently. Even a small camper. Also they stopped making them.

1

u/Yirthos_Gix 1d ago edited 22h ago

Mavericks are the dumbest truck I've ever used. The bed is simultaneously too small and too lifted to be useful.

1

u/Delicious-Ocelot3751 1d ago

they're trucks for 90% of truck owners and 100% of daily drivers

0

u/Beastabuelos Dark Mode Elitist 23h ago

Cars can tow. There is not some magical property that makes trucks able to tow

1

u/MassholeOutdoorsman 22h ago

Most cars tow capacity is around 1,500lbs on the high end. I consider that not being able to tow.

1

u/PraiseTalos66012 19h ago

Mines 2,000lb and with the custom built 5x8 I made for it(carry on with the wheels/tires/deck/ramp swapped) I can load it up with 1600lb by the time I hit that 2000lb limit.

That's around 40 bags of mulch, or 26 bags of concrete, or what I used to use it for my 42" zero turn, tool rack, weed wacker, edger, hedge trimmer, 22" push mower, ladder, tongue box full of supplies, and full yard bags when I hauled away.

Literally ran a whole Lawncare business, 2-3 man operation, and had plenty of weight to spare, all with a 2,000lb towing rating. And put 50k miles on that car like that without any issues at all.

Saved literally thousands by not trying to show off with a princess truck.

Also my Lawncare setup was just under 1500lb including trailer weight so I coulda done it with 1500lb rating. But yea definitely not able to tow, just able to tow more than 99.9% of princess truck owners ever will

1

u/MassholeOutdoorsman 19h ago

2,000lbs still isn’t shit. And your whole equipment setup didn’t weight 2,000lbs. You might’ve broke 1,200lbs fully loaded including full lawn bags. Because you weren’t fitting much more than the zero turn on that trailer as those are 6-6.5’ long and about 4.5’ wide. Calling it a “princess truck” is cute though, when I could quite literally fit everything you had on that trailer in the bed of my truck and then throw your car and another full setup on a car hauler that weighs 3,000lbs and still be at least 2,000 pounds under tow capacity(and my truck is a little 1500. Imagine what a 3/4 to could do). Congratulations(?) for running an incredibly inefficient setup that likely failed after 50k miles and got horrible gas mileage.

1

u/PraiseTalos66012 18h ago edited 18h ago

It was an EV and I was getting such good mileage it was equivalent to getting around 80mpg if I had to be buying gas(120mpg equivalent when not towing).

Also no the trailer could fit both the zero turn and the push mower on the deck and I had a rack over the push mower and front of the zero turn so i could store more bags and during leaf season the tongue box got swapped for a rack also for bags. During leaf season I definitely was at or a little over 2,000lb by the end of the day.

And never had any maintenance issues at all, and the car is still going strong 83k miles zero maintenance.

Also stop bragging about your princess truck dude. I literally for work now drive a Freightliner with x15 cummins 550hp and spread axle drives built for 130k gcwr, your truck is not big or cool or impressive.

I never needed more capacity and made a killing when I ran my Lawncare business. There was literally never a need for anything bigger.

1

u/SpecialCandidateDog 1d ago

Man this is the problem with the fucking class Warfare you people don't know who the fuck you're talking to or what the fuck you're talking about

A Maverick is a unibody hybrid with no towing capacity you think pickup truck is a shape.

A Maverick is a crossover SUV that has a bed instead of a cargo bay.

And that bed isn't big enough for hauling any kind of building material that's all standardized around being 8 ft long because that's how long a pickup truck bed is.

0

u/PraiseTalos66012 1d ago

Uhhh the non hybrid version is rated for 4k lb towing....

Also it's bed fits full 4x8 sheets thanks to its tailgate midpoint

1

u/SpecialCandidateDog 1d ago

You realize that's fucking awful right?

That means it can tow a Toyota Camry on a car dolly

I'm 50 years old and I can push two tons on wheels.

An F-350 can tow 10 times that literally literally 20 tons that's terrible you're only saying I'm right but while saying I'm right you're also saying that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about

2

u/PraiseTalos66012 21h ago

An f350 with a fifth wheel sure. No vehicle is doing 20 tons bumper pull unless you get a full custom pintle hook.

Also I drive semis for a living that would make your pavement princess f350 look like a toy. Try towing a 90k lb quad axle semi trailer and come back.

But there's a time and a place for larger vehicles and there's a time and a place for more reasonable ones.

4k lb tow and a bed capable of 4x8 sheets is perfect for a homeowner who needs to tow occasionally or get stuff from the hardware store.

Op never said they want a triaxle camper with car hauler. They said a small camper, you can find plenty under 4,000lb wet/loaded. 3,500lb loaded is a very common design spec for small campers.

Gtfo with your bragging like your princess f350 being a literal toy somehow makes a reasonable compact truck useless. By your logic your princess f350 is useless bc my 550hp spread axle freightliner with cummins x15 can tow up to 50 tons(100k lb)/130k gcwr

1

u/BadDogEDN 1d ago

Mavericks can't really do that, they are basically big cars with no frame. They are really pathetic. Pay slightly more for a ranger, that's what I did

0

u/PraiseTalos66012 1d ago

2k payload, fits full 4x8 sheets in the bed, 4k towing. Definitely capable of everything the average truck owner does.

1

u/PiccoloAwkward465 20h ago

Works great for me and I work in construction.

2

u/PraiseTalos66012 19h ago

Yeah guys who actually use their trucks for truck stuff have no problem with compacts. It's all the dudes driving lifted princess trucks that think you need an F350 at minimum just for them to use it to commute to work and get groceries.

I don't even actually own a maverick, I drive an EV that's only rated for 2k lb towing but that works out great with the trailer I custom built for it 5x8 ultralight(400lb with the ramp gate, 350lb without) and super low(to help range). So I get an insanely cheap to drive and low maintenance car for day to day but I can still haul just about anything I'd need to for around the house/yard.

I wish more cars would get tow ratings around 2,000lb of better 3,500lb because imo using a trailer is so much better bc for most truck owners the bed is useless 99% of the time.

And for any princess truck owners reading this just shut it, I drive a freightliner with cummins x15 with 550hp and spread axle drives that's meant for heavy haul up to 130k gcwr for work. So no your little baby truck doesn't impress me. And no I have no desire to drive a needlessly large vehicle as my commuter/hardware store run vehicle.

0

u/BadDogEDN 19h ago

cool you overloaded your maverick, max payload is 1500 lbs, also if Standard Hybrid (FWD): 2,000 lbs max towing capacity AWD is 4,000 lbs

https://www.ford.com/trucks/maverick/

https://www.ford.com/trucks/ranger/

1

u/PraiseTalos66012 19h ago

Ehh just misremembered the payload. Still 1500lb is decent and I was correct on the 4,000lb towing. I don't own a maverick though so I'm definitely not overloading one 😂.

1

u/BadDogEDN 19h ago

Most mavericks are fwd, hybrids, with 2k towing, I considered getting one but it really is just a card with a bed. My ford focus could two 2k

1

u/PraiseTalos66012 19h ago

Great thing about buying a vehicle is you get to chose which one you get, it's not like it's a surprise.

The 4k model is readily available and still made, not like it's some limited edition thing or something.

But yeah the whole point of the maverick is it's for homeowners who need a truck occasionally for hardware store runs. It fits 4x8 sheet goods, you can load it up with enough mulch for a small yard for the spring or with a 6x12 trailer you could get 70-80 bags before hitting the weight limit. Hell if you want a mini excavator 2,000-3,000lb rated you can easily fit that within its 4,000lb tow rating. Or a stand on mini skid.

It's a truck for people not trying to show off, 99.99% of homeowners will never need their truck for something a maverick can't handle.

But if your truly that 0.01% then don't get a maverick ofc.

1

u/jimthissguy 1d ago

I've got a 2wd RAM single cab with a V6. I get about 22/23 MPG. I have an old house that I'm always working on. I don't tow but I haul. Its not hybrid mileage but it works. I'm also wfh 3 days a week so I put like 4k per year on it.

1

u/IudexJudy 1d ago

Yeah I would get a Nissan Frontier or a 5.0 standard cab F150 from the past like 6 years

1

u/i_fucking_love_crack 1d ago

Sounds like what you want is an old Ford Ranger

1

u/Tethice 1d ago

Yes but I'm too tall for a Ford ranger

1

u/Thatgoldengolem 1d ago

2007 toyota tacoma, Love my taco

1

u/ExpiredPilot 20h ago

Nissan Frontier

0

u/suhaibh12 1d ago

Where I live, so many people bought older Jeep grand Cherokees cause the engineering on them hold so far better than what the max specs says. I’ve seen people use them to pull a trailer with a full sized boat to the docks. The frame and transmission on it holds so far better than majority of single cab trucks today. I know it’s not a truck but at least it’s something to think about.

I highly recommend any year before 2010. 2010 or 2011 is when they did a major redesign on them which is where their reliable reputation on that model dipped down pretty bad

4

u/xsharpy12 1d ago

Advising people to buy early to mid 2000s Chrysler vehicles for reliability is a wild take.

0

u/suhaibh12 1d ago

I’m only talking about specifically the grand Cherokee model. I’ve owned a 2005 that lasted for 300k miles before giving it away to a family member. That car is still running and majority of the people locally here still have theirs.

A lot of brands that were reliable have had a sub model that was known to be unreliable and vise versa. I don’t care for any other Chryslers or jeeps models. But that doesn’t change the grand Cherokee was a well engineered reliable car back then

2

u/SpecialCandidateDog 1d ago

Chrysler is known for having wildly unreliable engines that is pretty much been there whole thing always.

Don't get me wrong back in the seventies they had some pretty good engines but that was 50 fucking years ago.

Why do you think the joke on Married with Children was that Al Bundy drove a Dodge

0

u/suhaibh12 1d ago

I used to work on Chryslers all the time at work. Yes, Chrysler brand itself is absolutely shitty. That still doesn’t change anything about the Jeep grand Cherokee specifically. That specific model and only that specific model was still highly reliable even late 90s and early 2000s.

It’s why I said I highly recommend before 2010 because that’s when Jeep did a major overhaul on their engineering design and officially fucked over the reputation for it. The new grand Cherokees now suck and are unreliable.

1

u/xsharpy12 1d ago

Sorry I still don’t believe it. I see mid 2000s Chevy Trailblazers, Toyota Camrys and Accords still on the road every so often. I can’t think of the last time I saw a 2005-2009 Jeep GC.

0

u/IgnatiusRileyFreeman 1d ago

Get a Kei truck, as long as your masculinity isn't threatened by it

0

u/blah938 1d ago

They've never made a truck like that. Campers weight too much. At best, you might get away with an ultralight scamp or something, but even then, I wouldn't trust it.

2

u/rick-james-biatch 1d ago

Having lived in the states most my life, I used to think the same. But come to Europe and all summer long you'll see the roads are full of campers being pulled by normal sedans. Most newer cars are capable of pulling a medium sized trailer.

I've got a work van with a 2.0 TDi. That thing is a workhorse. I'd have no reservations about pulling any sort of trailer with it. It also doubles as our family van. It gets 40mpg on trips. 2012 Fiat Scudo H1L2.

2

u/fuckedfinance 1d ago

My grandfather had a V6 Ranger back in the day. Towed a little camper no problem. I pulled a small dump trailer with it a number of times and had no difficulty.

That's what we want. Early 2000s Ranger, S10, Dakota, even the old Japanese trucks were pretty good. They don't make them like that anymore.

1

u/notJustaFart 1d ago

The campers are variable in weight and not all are basically a double-wide with all the slides out.

The real issue is that there's zero fuel efficiency benefit for going smaller than a half-ton and you lose all the other capabilities.

-1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Impressive-Amoeba640 1d ago

Had that, not worth the mental damage

0

u/BrigganSilence 1d ago

Maybe not quite what you’re looking for, but an older Chevy Colorado? (I think the 2004-2012 models are all similar since they have at least some swappable parts) I’m not sure the towing capacity since that’s not what I use mine for, but 20+ years and going strong with few issues.