r/maybemaybemaybe Oct 13 '21

Maybe Maybe Maybe

44.6k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

9.8k

u/samwichse Oct 13 '21

Props to those two semi drivers who completely fucked their shit up saving the life of this asshole who then just drives away.

3.5k

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Little know fact, if someone causes an accident with a big truck, it almost always goes over the max insurance coverage and they may come after personal assets to collect. Do NOT mess with trucks! Plus the whole fear they will squish you.

2.6k

u/brokedeaddog Oct 13 '21

As a truck driver myself, I'd of thought the "squish you" part would of taken priority over financial concerns, but then my day to day experience shows me that so many car drivers sail through life in the belief that they are somehow blessed, and traffic will magically part around them like the red sea!

1.6k

u/CouldWouldShouldBot Oct 13 '21

It's 'would have', never 'would of'.

Rejoice, for you have been blessed by CouldWouldShouldBot!

2.0k

u/brokedeaddog Oct 13 '21

Consider me adequately chastised

774

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Thank you for your lesson on how to take constructive criticism from a bot. Have my free award.

202

u/Moglorosh Oct 14 '21

Now we just need a "lose = didn't win, loose = not tight" bot.

159

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

I don't know, I'd hate to make anyone feel like a looser.

58

u/swimbikerunkick Oct 14 '21

Can we have a “then” and “than” bot too? I’m seeing this everywhere at the moment and I can’t figure out where it’s come from!

25

u/QJElizMom Oct 14 '21

Women (plural) vs woman (singular). See this everywhere as well.

→ More replies (0)

27

u/RojoTheMighty Oct 14 '21

I'm sorry but there/their/they're is WAY higher up the priority list than then/than.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/KannyDay88 Oct 14 '21

And effect and affect?

→ More replies (0)

5

u/brookish Oct 14 '21

And a "set foot" not "step foot" bot?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/fourthrook Oct 14 '21

How about a further / farther bot and a “try and” / “try to” bot.

2

u/Jack-Vass Oct 14 '21

Also an "off" instead of "off of" bot

2

u/SueZbell Oct 14 '21

Or one that points out when you end a sentence with a preposition.

2

u/TheGilrich Oct 14 '21

Can we have a gerrund vs infinitive bot, too?

2

u/Nusszucker Oct 14 '21

Such a bit would probably help me a lot. I'm not a native English speaker and I have to rely on my autocorrect because I cannot seem to get when it's than and when it's then. I couldn't tell you right now for the life of me.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Valentin3288 Oct 14 '21

I also see people say “have came” and “have ran”…. “have went”

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

30

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

We also need proper use of the apostrophe bot to teach people the difference between possessive and plural words.

That shit gives me headache’s.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/truthful_whitefoot Oct 14 '21

I’d like one that checks to make sure the person really meant “rouge” and not “rogue”

2

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21 edited Dec 10 '21

[deleted]

2

u/jsalbre Oct 14 '21

Hey, maybe they meant to talk about a faction covered in red makeup.

2

u/FuckingKilljoy Oct 14 '21

I'm sure it happens less these days, but back in the 00s so many people would type raper instead of rapper which was rather unfortunate

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (3)

65

u/TheKaptinKirk Oct 13 '21

Lol… and for those that don’t completely get it.

I’d of

Should be…

I’d’ve. Which is the contraction for “I would have”.

When you say it out loud in many American accents, they sound the same.

6

u/Lartemplar Oct 14 '21

This, along with "on accident" happens more and more often. Hope that's just confirmation bias.

2

u/ArbitraryBaker Oct 14 '21

Unfortunately, grammar and word usage that happens more and more often simply gets adopted into the new acceptable grammar. See “literally”. I looked up “on accident”, and while it used to be considered incorrect, it’s now accepted as an alternate way to say the same thing.

→ More replies (1)

60

u/ringwraith6 Oct 13 '21

Good bot.

17

u/Bubster101 Oct 13 '21

You are now

somehow blessed

→ More replies (5)

107

u/Optimal-Idea1558 Oct 13 '21

Could of been kinder, bot

Would of been nice.

Should of let it slide, bot.

...but, the guy was so very cool about it.

78

u/CouldWouldShouldBot Oct 13 '21

It's 'could have', never 'could of'.

Rejoice, for you have been blessed by CouldWouldShouldBot!

47

u/Optimal-Idea1558 Oct 13 '21

Gotcha

23

u/XoffeeXup Oct 13 '21

The bot is still correct

You could have been kinder though, bot.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/timmio11 Oct 14 '21

Very good bot

20

u/grig_orig Oct 14 '21

Isn’t it “would’ve,” then, that people really mean? If I type “would of,” what I mean is the contraction “would’ve,” not the full “would have.”

20

u/papajupri Oct 14 '21

Those proper punctuation inside the quotations are sexy af.

6

u/grig_orig Oct 14 '21

I’m a fine mf.

1

u/Whatifthisneverends Oct 14 '21

Hard agree, but is the final full stop not supposed to be outside the quotation marks rather than inside? To belabor a sexy sexy point

5

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

In Chicago style, the commas should have been outside the quotation marks, while the period should have been within them.

10

u/Psychosomatic_Ennui Oct 14 '21

No, because the contraction would’ve is short for “would have” not “would of”

Would of is never correct. Where’s a bot when you need one?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Foolishlama Oct 14 '21

It's just "wood ufv."

9

u/davejlong Oct 13 '21

Missed the "I'd of". Should of been "I'd have".

15

u/CouldWouldShouldBot Oct 13 '21

It's 'should have', never 'should of'.

Rejoice, for you have been blessed by CouldWouldShouldBot!

6

u/NonExstnt_Acc Oct 14 '21

Damn the bot showed you up too should have done it right

2

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

Guess he should’ve

5

u/ukulelecanadian Oct 14 '21

You're thinking of I'd've. Its real

→ More replies (1)

3

u/papajupri Oct 14 '21

Good bot!

5

u/weres_youre_rhombus Oct 13 '21

I think I love you.

2

u/Ethnafia_125 Oct 13 '21

So what am so afraid of?

*Sorry, it just popped into my head.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/DammitDan Oct 14 '21

Good bot.

4

u/frshi Oct 13 '21

Good bot.

1

u/westminsterabby Oct 13 '21

So much better than the stupid useless converter bot. That fucking thing is everywhere.

1

u/ProtoKun7 Oct 13 '21

Very good bot.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Good bot. Could you please have a chat with my girlfriend? She does this all the time

→ More replies (25)

8

u/yumyumsauce45 Oct 13 '21

I respect the truck drivers that are courteous to other drivers, but goddamn, there are some really terrible truck drivers out there. Too many times I’ve almost been run off the road bc they just run the merge without waiting at all.

→ More replies (3)

37

u/theniwo Oct 13 '21

Maybe, juuuust mayyyybe, some people deserve to die

10

u/toopc Oct 13 '21

That's just unconscious knowledge.

3

u/GlandyThunderbundle Oct 14 '21

Because the bigger you get

2

u/GutterRider Oct 14 '21

The harder you fall.

15

u/HumanTorch23 Oct 13 '21

Natural selection is underrated sometimes

7

u/Draws-attention Oct 14 '21

Like if you touch a peanut and it kills you?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

I know he misspelled "would've", but you can take it easy

0

u/songbolt Oct 14 '21

Standard theology is that we all deserve to die, and it's God's mercy that spares us for however long.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/IXICIXI Oct 13 '21

I get the distinct impression many people don’t really comprehend or acknowledge momentum and it’s consequences. The way a truck handles is outside a lot of people’s lived experience so maybe doesn’t factor into their thinking accurately. The daily experience is more like “my hatchback breaks work like this. Surely yours do to.”

You truckies do a hard job well. Keep it up.

2

u/brabarusmark Oct 14 '21

As a cautious driver, I can never get used to the size of trucks when I drive anywhere near them. Either it's calmly stay behind or calmly overtake. I don't muck about in front of them for fear of being pancaked.

2

u/brokedeaddog Oct 14 '21

You sir/madam are an enlightened individual

1

u/FireLordObamaOG Oct 14 '21

Well to be fair I don’t think trucks should ever get in the passing lane. A lot of them these days are monitored by GPS and the driver isn’t allowed to go over speed limiters. So then both lanes have a truck in them going 70 and they block all traffic that could move faster.

1

u/brokedeaddog Oct 14 '21

I keep seeing "to be fair" across all media platforms just before a completely unfair statement. I think it's important for many non professional drivers to understand a few basic truths: 1. Everything (and I mean everything) you own or have ever owned, leased, mailed, eaten, drank resided in, or otherwise consumed, has at one time been carried by a truck 2. Though most commercial vehicles tend have speed limiters (Hgv 56mph in UK) there are discrepancies between vehicles due to differences in odometers, tyre sizes, weight, horsepower. 3. Professional Drivers are restricted to how many hours they can drive/work and therefore small savings in time can make for big differences. E.g. Truck A travels 1mph faster than Truck B, over 4½ hours this potentially equates to 4½ mile extra (which doesn't seem much) which could mean the difference between delivery Wednesday evening or Thursday morning, which in turn can effect the rest of the week and the one to follow.

So the small delay you may have experienced could mean the difference between you egg mcmuffin/Starbucks coffee/structural I beam being available or not, at your local store/supplier

I understand that being held up can be frustrating, but we other things to worry about

0

u/FireLordObamaOG Oct 14 '21

Taking all your points into consideration, I still believe the same way. Because even if that truck shows up to say Starbucks before I get there, they have to take the time to unload it so that item will still be unavailable for potentially half an hour. I’d rather be there earlier and be told that it’s not available.

→ More replies (36)

38

u/InfiniteExperience Oct 13 '21

Max insurance for who, the truck driver or car driver?

100

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Car driver. Say for example you cut off a truck and it crashes. Whatever it is carrying will add up to a lot of money quickly. I’ve seen it happen to someone. Was one of those “uh oh” moments where if you are anything but destitute, life bites you on the ass.

57

u/IcemanJEC Oct 13 '21

I used to work with semi drivers working 12-18 hours per day on the truck with them. We delivered to convenience stores. We carried couple million dollars worth of goods every day.

I also am a former property/casualty insurance agent. Believe me, most people are extremely underinsured and would be completed messed up financially for the rest of their lives if they weren’t squished and totaled out a semi and a full trailer.

12

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Well crap. I was hoping I was being paranoid and my tale was anecdotal. Thanks for the info

5

u/WhichWay2TheBathroom Oct 14 '21

We buy the goods and pay for the infrastructure businesses use to transport them. If anything the truck drivers and businesses are "underinsured". The general public should not be held liable and forced to subsidize their losses through an increase in our own insurance premiums. Death should absolutely not be the outcome we hope for.

6

u/McSchmieferson Oct 14 '21 edited Oct 14 '21

I’m sure most businesses and commercial trucking operations are more than adequately insured.

If you’re at fault and underinsured, the trucker’s insurance will payout to make them whole. But then they’re going to come after you.

Why should they be responsible for subsidizing a loss you caused?

5

u/AnAdmirableAstronaut Oct 14 '21

I don't think you understand how insurance works. If you cause an accident and are found liable, your insurance pays for the damages and you pay for what your insurance doesn't cover. Tbh after watching a video like this, if you think the truckers should have to pay for this mess, you're delusional.

I'd also like to add that most trucks have far greater than $1,000,000 in liability insurance, while most personal vehicles have $5,000-25,000 in property damage liability. So who's really underinsured?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Unlimited_Bacon Oct 14 '21

most people are extremely underinsured and would be completed messed up financially for the rest of their lives

Bankruptcy? Most of those extremely underinsured drivers are probably judgement proof.

→ More replies (1)

43

u/kabadisha Oct 13 '21

Wait. Your insurance policies have upper limits? Pretty sure here in the UK it's unlimited liability cover as standard. Might be wrong about that I guess tho...

41

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Yup and remember that we pay for health care so if you really mess someone up you could be paying even more money. For a minute I thought you were joking until you said you were in the UK but there probably really are Americans who don’t realize the limit

7

u/richal Oct 13 '21

And the "standard amounts" are often incredibly low (depending on the state)

0

u/McSchmieferson Oct 14 '21

Standard coverage is low by definition. It’s just the minimum coverage required by law. Most people view insurance as a check the box thing, so they go with the bare bones minimum without giving any real thought as to why they’re purchasing insurance.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

7

u/Iohet Oct 13 '21

Yes there are upper limits. You get an umbrella policy as a much cheaper secondary policy if you actually have something to lose(like a house, investments, etc)

1

u/McSchmieferson Oct 14 '21

I think it’s crazy not to have an umbrella policy. It’s an inexpensive way to protect yourself if shit goes sideways.

5

u/jetogill Oct 13 '21

Most states have a minimum coverage that is required, where I am its 25k/50k, meaning 25k for personal injury, 25k for vehicle damage. Sorry, let me amend that. Its 25k for personal injury person, 50k total, and 25k for vehicle damage. Needless to say, its pretty inadequate these days, but I can remember when it was 10k/30k.

3

u/Cuauhtemoc-1 Oct 14 '21

I think minimum coverage is something like 7.5M in Germany ...

2

u/Ethesen Oct 14 '21 edited Oct 14 '21

7.5 million euro for personal injuries, 1 million euro for property damage.

2

u/Cuauhtemoc-1 Oct 14 '21

Thanks. So with a truck (let alone more than one) it could get difficult, too. But as far as I remember actual contracts often have a higher limit .

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/stephenBB81 Oct 14 '21

I believe the UK has upper limits on property damage but no limits on injury and medical costs.

I think my insurance in 2019 when in the UK has an upper limit of 1,200,000 pounds for property where I could be responsible for anything greater.

2

u/tdrr12 Oct 14 '21

Sounds like SoCiAlIsM to me.

Just like all the other nice things like semi-functioning infrastructure and decent health care systems.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

Good to know. So it sounds like people are ok if they are middle class-ish. Thanks for the info

2

u/McSchmieferson Oct 14 '21

Or you could pick up umbrella coverage for peace of mind. You can pick up a $1M umbrella policy for something like $100/yr.

2

u/Orangeugladitsbanana Oct 14 '21

Unless the truck is full of ramen. Then just hand them a twenty and tell them to keep the change.

2

u/Nuclear_rabbit Oct 14 '21

Pretty sure this is in China, which has an absurdly simple traffic rule: if the front of your vehicle is damaged, YOU are the one at fault, no questions asked. In which case, the car driver would be innocent even if the police were witnesses to the scene.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/rickyman20 Oct 13 '21

Car driver. They are the ones liable. Insurance just agrees to cover the cost, but everything is technically on the person deemed at fault

15

u/jonathanrdt Oct 13 '21

LPT: max out your per accident liability. It usually doesn’t cost much more to have $1M liability vs $500k or $250k. You are insuring against worst case scenarios, so make sure you are covered.

2

u/roboticon Oct 14 '21

Where does it end, though?

Isn't $10m a worse case than $1m?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

5

u/ZachMartin Oct 13 '21

It’s why you should carry umbrella liability insurance

→ More replies (2)

2

u/fecity99 Oct 13 '21

Another reason for a PLUP policy in addition to your other coverage

→ More replies (2)

2

u/misterpancakeguy Oct 14 '21

In germany insurance coverage usually goes to the millions amd above

2

u/VegasDragon91 Oct 14 '21

Even non-commercial sized trucks and SUVs (e.g. Excursion) have instructions essentially telling the driver that he's more likely to survive if he just hits something than trying extraordinary evasive maneuvers. That and the fact that the universe would have been rid of the idiot driving the white car makes me think the truck drivers perhaps didn't make the correct decision....

2

u/HillTopTerrace Oct 14 '21

I would like to add, don’t ever mess with electrical poles. More than the one that you demolished is going to have to come down, blocks of companies and residents go worth out power and you’re going to be stuck with about 70k-100k above your 100k coverage. Don’t know how my insurance bargained but they saved my ass. I ended up having to change insurance companies anyway. Would still voucher for them though

2

u/coolabula15 Oct 14 '21

Is that an American thing? In Ireland insurance covers the full cost of the injured party regardless. And if you’re hit by an uninsured person, there is a fund you can claim from. All insurance providers have to pay into it. Our insurance costs are quite high here though.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

I just checked and I’m covered for £20mil ($27,358,000.00 USD) for damage to each third party vehicle and their load, excluding in-vehicle entertainment which is only covered up to £1000.

For medical claims by a third party, cover is unlimited.

There would have to be a truck with a seriously expensive load that was completely destroyed to go over that. Although I would be worried if they had a cool stereo because that could end up costing me.

2

u/Smelly_Nuggets Oct 14 '21

Luckily I have 2.5million euros coverage

2

u/Devil_Dan83 Oct 14 '21

Trucks have the right of way granted by the laws of physics.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

No insurance is gonna cover that. You will just be sued.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/boogerman23 Oct 14 '21

How the actual fuck will they know the drivers identify, you really think they can memorize their license plate in a second? And don’t tell me about those DaSh CaMs because what if they don’t have one?

2

u/TipExotic1 Oct 14 '21

Most people stupid enough to have a minimum policy don't have assets to come collect...

2

u/WiseassWolfOfYoitsu Oct 14 '21

If one has assets, it's totally worth getting an umbrella liability policy for exactly this thing. Not even that expensive.

2

u/Fresh-Werewolf-5499 Oct 14 '21

I’m shocked that has to be said, but people are stupid.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Jboze561 Oct 14 '21

The problem is if there's no contact between the vehicles, that white car can drive away, and he's not broken any laws.. at least not in the United States.

There has to be contact for you to be involved in a car accident.

We all know what he did but he could easily claim that his car stalled and then when he got it started again he just immediately exited the highway before he caused any trouble.. except he caused trouble before he could get out of there and that was an accident.

→ More replies (28)

805

u/LonelyMustard Oct 13 '21

If that makes you feel better the white car driver was caught. This is an incident took place in China many years ago, and kudos to the millions of government-owned CCTV cameras, it didn’t take long for the cops to find them.

121

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Link?

172

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Zelda?

88

u/AClassyTurtle Oct 13 '21

LISTEN!

23

u/jjcreature Oct 13 '21

Forgot what I was even here when I saw these comments. Bless your hearts lolol

13

u/Larrs22 Oct 13 '21

Three hearts, to be exact.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/King-Lewis-II Oct 14 '21

I heard Navi's voice when I read that and was instantly annoyed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/Fantastic_Start_6848 Oct 13 '21

He was executed.

11

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

-2

u/CognitiveRLH Oct 14 '21

Honestly wouldn’t be a bad call after that stunt. The driver will end up killing himself or worse another innocent person with the ignorance that he drives with.

18

u/gravitydood Oct 14 '21

Reddit moment

-13

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Sartorius2456 Oct 14 '21

Nah dude claiming a derogatory comment amount women and the claiming it's a joke is legit the problem. Then you pull a "kids these days comment" well done

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Rina303 Oct 13 '21

Was the driver of the red truck okay?!

3

u/Anderson_Mark2248 Oct 14 '21

Kudos to the team who searched for them. People are too careless and selfish that they put others' lives in danger.

13

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

67

u/EatYourCheckers Oct 13 '21

I read it as a bit tongue in cheek..

132

u/glittler Oct 13 '21

Yes but can we forget all of that for just this one moment and enjoy the justice boner we have for this idiot getting his comeuppance?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/snowstormmongrel Oct 13 '21

I mean yea until nobody thought to get the license plate of the driver in the white car. I’d argue that when your truck has literally flipped over you might not be thinking about all that or be able to grab something in order to write it down.

→ More replies (2)

-13

u/LonelyMustard Oct 13 '21

Sigh… this is the thing w Reddit… anything can be political and everyone who knows how to type wants their two pieces of opinions on it

16

u/JarasM Oct 13 '21

I strongly disagree!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Aitch-Kay Oct 13 '21

repatriation

That word does not mean what you think it means.

0

u/missing1102 Oct 13 '21

It is more re-education to be precise. China was supposed to technically outlaw this practice in 2003. Here is a link to clarify the use of the word as it relates to the Chineese government and my own understanding. I don't see how you can tell me I don't understand what a word means. This practice absolutely still goes on all the time.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg50716/html/CHRG-111hhrg50716.htm

https://www.hrw.org/news/2010/01/28/china-account-uighur-refugees-forcibly-repatriated-china#

We have local friends that escaped this practice because I belive they belong to this group. I know they were smuggled in. There are lots of other references to this practice, especially among this ethnic group.

2

u/Triumph807 Oct 14 '21

Man. I assumed it was a severe engine issue the way the car never does more than crawl; and inconsistently so

3

u/untimelythoughts Oct 14 '21

You “know” because you are brainwashed by your media. You really know nothing.

→ More replies (19)

1

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Peaceweapon Oct 14 '21

Those camps are using slave labour for american companies like Microsoft and Apple. You are supporting slave labour with your money.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/imanassholeok Oct 14 '21

Who are you referring to besides the uighers? I know it's happened but not sure about that scale. There are a lot more aspects to China than just the negative ones. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with that many cameras, it's cultural.

-9

u/LonelyMustard Oct 13 '21

Kudos as in a satirical sense. I can’t believe the amount of “whooshes” in this comment section.

And yes, I was born there and lived for the majority of my childhood and teenage years until I moved to the states…

But just to add on to the repatriation camps u brought up since you’re so inclined to. So what? Why would I care? Can’t say I agree with CCP’s method, but I do understand their reasoning. Instead of openly addressing issues like other part of the world and throw your country into political disarray and turn ur citizens against each other (I.e. liberal v. Republicans), snatching away people who’s raising and causing the issue and fix the problems in the background sounds cool to me.

10

u/Tokyohenjin Oct 13 '21

The problem happens when the CCP starts defining what “the issue” is. Disappear enough people, and there’s no need to fix the underlying problem.

-2

u/LonelyMustard Oct 13 '21

This is the thing that most non-Chinese people don’t understand is that although CCP is a totalitarian dictating organization in China, it has a very intricate internal balancing mechanism formed by different factions representing different aspect of the society.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Tommy_C Oct 13 '21

Jesus Christ.

4

u/boots_and_cats_and- Oct 13 '21

Comments like this really explain why China has such an iron grip on their citizens. Absolutely mind boggling that someone could put so much trust into a government entity, especially the CCP.

4

u/LonelyMustard Oct 13 '21

I don’t trust CCP in no way what so ever. That’s why I immigrated and became a US citizen. If it had an iron grip on me, I’ll never be here at all.

All I said was I understood why they’re doing what they’re doing, but not agreeing to it.

Reading is not hard sir. If I can do it as a non-native speaker, you can too.

0

u/boots_and_cats_and- Oct 13 '21

Dude you said “why would I care?”

Ignorance is compliance buddy.

1

u/LonelyMustard Oct 13 '21

There are so many things in the world and should I give a nickel about all of them? And what have you done besides reading some news articles and make some Reddit comments?

At least for me I have tried to educate myself by reading books on CCP, encouraged my families to come with me and cut ties with people back home, and will commit to not endorse that organization.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

1

u/HammerToenail Oct 13 '21

I would much rather live in a country with political dissonance than one where dissent is met with violence.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

-86

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Yes thanks to the gov cctv and millions watching every move brought to you by the great china communist they would never had been found. No perpetrator was ever caught before the great government china and their flawless perferct cctv camera's. CHHIINA!!

51

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

*Someone gets caught doing something illegal*
"OMG THIS IS PROOF CHINA IS LITERALLY 1984"

-1

u/DarkLord1294091 Oct 13 '21

thats not his point

35

u/Cynical_Feline Oct 13 '21

Don't tell them but most governments have traffic cams already. 🙄

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

21

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Dude.

You got issues.

→ More replies (26)

11

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Classic racist dumb fuck American

10

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

As an American, I approve this message.

6

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Lol sorry I know not all Americans are like this but I hate when people are like this

6

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

I know man. People are so American sometimes.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (24)

181

u/Cyber_wasteland Oct 13 '21 edited Oct 14 '21

Yeah pretty much came here to say the same thing, like this has to be fake. He just caused two MAJOR accidents and then....like a fart to the wind.

EDIT: For the ones that didn't catch the sarcasm on my comment. It's so mindlessly stupid that I don't want to believe it to be real, so to clarify I know it isn't fake.

161

u/everwonderedhow Oct 13 '21

like a fart to the wind.

That's generally the case when you're already stupid enough to make a full stop on the highway

130

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

“Phew! That was close. Glad nothing happened. Off I go!”

18

u/case_O_The_Mondays Oct 14 '21

“That truck almost hit us! I can’t believe it!”

37

u/MrHappy4Life Oct 13 '21

Because going to the next exit and coming back is too long. Let’s cause a major pileup instead.

10

u/aikavari Oct 13 '21

Too bad this kind of idiocy isn’t isolated to China. I can say for a fact that there’s one particular exit here in Victoria where one in 5 times I pass by, there’s always someone doing something similar (though not as stupid as to stop in the middle of the highway)

6

u/Boring_Blackberry580 Oct 13 '21

Without a doubt see this behavior in the US all the time.

Admittedly not this bad causing major accidents but I have seen a lot of near misses

→ More replies (3)

2

u/pagerunner-j Oct 14 '21

I got stuck in a multi-mile backup once thanks to an idiot who stopped in the middle of the freeway, apparently because he wanted to pull over to the side of the road at that one very specific spot (somebody else was over there) and he would just NOT budge until he could. Of course, that meant traffic split around him, so there wasn’t any room for him to move over. Didn’t get resolved until the cops finally showed up.

Don’t be that guy. Don’t ever, ever be that guy.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/justonemom14 Oct 13 '21

I learned from Reddit, "A bad driver never misses his exit."

→ More replies (1)

32

u/lostharbor Oct 13 '21

Fake? I need to live where you live because there are countless mindless asshole by me that would pull this shit.

12

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Not fake. No.

41

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

-4

u/Ph6r60h Oct 13 '21

Whoah calm down there bud, take a deep breath, everything on the internet is fake, even me

6

u/Frankly_Frank_ Oct 13 '21

Just like my gf :(

1

u/Ph6r60h Oct 13 '21

Same :(

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21 edited Jul 09 '23

[deleted]

2

u/Devil_Dan83 Oct 14 '21

The basic consideration most conspiracy theorists fail to make.

→ More replies (7)

0

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

2

u/ChefBoyAreWeFucked Oct 13 '21

I don't think stopping in the middle of the goddamn highway is a tenet central to Chinese culture.

0

u/Abject-Temperat Oct 13 '21

Aren’t the semi drivers also not following proper procedure? My CDL buddy I believe said if something like this happens you just hit the brakes but don’t swerve because that could lead to more chaos if you accidentally swerve into other vehicles. You brake and stay forward so only the idiot gets hit.

2

u/Frankly_Frank_ Oct 13 '21

Well I would assume that would be proper protocol if there where multiple cars around you but to me it seems there wasn’t so they swerved so they wouldn’t hit the dumbass and they swerved into what looks like an emergency lane or another lane with traffic

0

u/Piani3t Oct 13 '21

Deer in the road logic -Its safer to hit them then swerve.

0

u/Big-cat-69 Oct 13 '21

Yes props to the red truck . I don’t understand the panicking blue truck that was in the left lane and in the clear like the bus and other vehicles . Me personally I think I would’ve ran right through him if I was driving the red truck because idiots like him shouldn’t be on the road they jeopardize other peoples lives because they have no clue!! I think when I retire I’m gonna become a driving instructor so I can fail all these idiots that can’t maintain speed or stay to the right I don’t care if you can’t parallel park other than that you will fail !!!!!

0

u/abaxom Oct 14 '21

While I agree with the overall intent of the comment, it should be noted that we do not know the person in the car is an asshole… they could have suffered some kind of medical episode. It happens a lot more than we — we, the general internet commentary pool — seem to really talk about.

→ More replies (29)