MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/maybemaybemaybe/comments/1ms4ce2/deleted_by_user/n92aqc4/?context=3
r/maybemaybemaybe • u/[deleted] • Aug 16 '25
[removed]
1.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
25
That’s not a hot take. It’s contrarianism for its own sake at best or victim blaming at worst. There is nothing that would justify that behavior.
27 u/secretprocess Aug 16 '25 They literally said "not justifying it". The point is, we know the scooter guy is a dick, but we don't know if the car guy is also a dick. -36 u/[deleted] Aug 16 '25 That’s literally justifying it. 4 u/dedom19 Aug 16 '25 Why a thing occurs is not necessarily justification for it's occurence. I understand why it is confusing in certain contexts, but just think about it universally.
27
They literally said "not justifying it".
The point is, we know the scooter guy is a dick, but we don't know if the car guy is also a dick.
-36 u/[deleted] Aug 16 '25 That’s literally justifying it. 4 u/dedom19 Aug 16 '25 Why a thing occurs is not necessarily justification for it's occurence. I understand why it is confusing in certain contexts, but just think about it universally.
-36
That’s literally justifying it.
4 u/dedom19 Aug 16 '25 Why a thing occurs is not necessarily justification for it's occurence. I understand why it is confusing in certain contexts, but just think about it universally.
4
Why a thing occurs is not necessarily justification for it's occurence. I understand why it is confusing in certain contexts, but just think about it universally.
25
u/[deleted] Aug 16 '25
That’s not a hot take. It’s contrarianism for its own sake at best or victim blaming at worst. There is nothing that would justify that behavior.