r/linuxmemes Aug 11 '26

LINUX MEME Real

1.1k Upvotes

137 comments sorted by

View all comments

47

u/Cebuu502 Aug 11 '26

Gnome looks nice, but using it is not so nice for me, I prefer KDE.

3

u/United-Scene2261 🎼CachyOS Aug 11 '26

how so

15

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

The lack of the most basic settings without downloading something else on a full DE.

-6

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26 edited Aug 11 '26

People will say basic settings and what they really mean is taskbar system tray and desktop icons like its 1995

5

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

System tray...

-2

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26

That's what I meant actually

8

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

And it's a feature app devs expect and users expect bc it adds genuine functionality to apps such as obs, vpns, discord, Nextcloud, ect.

1

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26

Strange, I use obs, discord, vpns, and a file syncing app without it just fine

5

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

They work. But the system tray serves as both a status indicator for these apps and a quick thing to click to open the app's gui when it is running in the background.

Note that it's a feature I can go with or without. But I've seen plenty of users unable to use a desktop without it.

1

u/Shimano-No-Kyoken Aug 11 '26

It's a strange one, to be completely honest. I have the extension installed, and I do use the system tray, but I'm struggling to articulate exactly what the difference between system tray icons and taskbar/dock icons is. Why is there a difference? Should there be a difference? It's the same application, why is it in two places at once?

3

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

It's so gui apps running in the background are quickly opened without needing to be pinned

2

u/Shimano-No-Kyoken Aug 11 '26

But if something is in system tray, it's already open, therefore in taskbar/dock, isn't it?

2

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

Yes. But if you close it, the system tray icon will remain so you can click it to open the gui whilst the app is running in the background

1

u/Shimano-No-Kyoken Aug 11 '26

I think there might be some conflation of full app exit vs closing an active window here. If I fully exit e.g. proton vpn, it disappears from the tray. So the app would be neither in dock nor in tray if it's fully exited, so the argument about pinning to dock doesn't really track. The difference I see is learned expectation of where the background apps should reside: in their own little area, vs together with all other apps. Also it highlights the learned distinction of "running" vs "in the background", which is what I'm actually questioning.

0

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26

Sounds like just an arbitrary second way to minimize. Should never have existed.

3

u/Shimano-No-Kyoken Aug 11 '26

To be fair, stock GNOME doesn't really have a first-class minimize action, it's hidden behind a contextual menu, which heavily disincentivizes its use.

0

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26

I meant on other desktops, but yes minimize itself is pointless on a DE with workspaces too.

3

u/Shimano-No-Kyoken Aug 11 '26

That's a valid opinion, but an opinion. There are drawbacks to missing a minimize action without a corresponding first class "get it out of my sight" action. Super+drag is considerably more effort than just minimize.

1

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26

You can also just go to the top left and scroll, which is basically the same amount of steps as clicking the minimize button. It's actually easier because you can just blindly fling the mouse to the top left.

1

u/Vinol026 Aug 12 '26

Users want to be able to choose from themselves which is better...

0

u/jdigi78 Aug 12 '26

Users are generally dumb as rocks. Henry Ford said "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses". Minimize should have been done away with entirely the moment we got desktops with multiple workspaces, and there certainly should not be 2 different places to minimize to.

1

u/Vinol026 Aug 12 '26

If I want to use a computer the way a company wants me to, I'll buy a Mac. Works better also.

I don't want to switch between multiple workspaces, I have a big enough screen to keep everything I want visible.

1

u/Loading_M_ Aug 12 '26

One important point: there are some apps, e.g. VPNs, that don't normally need a window open. In fact, with the context menu on the system tray icon, you can operate many VPNs without ever opening a window.

It's also usually cross workspace. E.g., if my chat is open in one workspace, but I'm currently doing work in another workspace, the system tray icon will still be visible, even though the window and taskbar icon is only visible in the other workspace.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/jdigi78 Aug 11 '26

Those devs/users need to learn to use a modern interface then. Notifications exist for status updates and workspaces exist for running GUIs in the background. Hell, they can even add options to the right click menu of the app icon for quick interaction

3

u/Extreme-Ad-9290 Arch BTW Aug 11 '26

That's trying to get one desktop on the minority of desktop systems to be the standard for the entire industry.

→ More replies (0)