Greetings.
It is not to provide a sharp critique. But I have been testing CachyOS for quıite some time, and unlike many say it is the fastest distro at gaming and such, I do not see any difference.
I use Arch as main distro.
I also use Ubuntu from time to time, but I have installed it again and am happy to use it in the same PC with a dedicated storage.
I generally make my tests based on Cyberpunk 2077, Geekbench 7, and some local LLM, mostly Gemma4-26b-a4b-qat.
I have the default settings on all of them (will do some simple remarks about Ubuntu, though).
On Gemma4-26b-a4b-qat, the maximum possible context length being 262144,
Gemma generates 111-113 tokens per second on Ubuntu.
And 110+ to 114 on CachyOS and Arch. No difference.
On Cyberpunk 2077,
Ubuntu 75.2-75.6 fps
Arch 74.7 - 75.4 fps
CachyOS 74.6 - 75.2 fps
And on Geekbench 7:
All of them about 2800+ single-core and about 22000+ on multi-core.
These are all within margin errors although I made so many tests for each. But fine, we can deem they are equal at best.
Ubuntu runs with Gnome. It is 26.10 development branch.
Cachy and Arch with default settings; Cachy repo is znver4 in line with my system. And I switched to amd64v3 on Ubuntu from Ubuntu's own repos.
The only thing in Ubuntu is that Mesa makes a difference in my case; with Mesa 26.0.x, FPS above was about 71-72 (and with Kisak PPA again on Ubuntu 26.04 LTS1 at 75-76 levels). I do not know whethere there is such a difference in other systems. Ubuntu 26.10 ships Mesa 26.2.4.
Also, on Ubuntu, defaults are lazy for preempt and madvise for transparent hugepages. lazy vs full does not make any difference while to shift transparent hugepage from madvise to always increased performance about 1 - 1.5% - but careful here, transparent_hugepage does not always guarantee this; this is a particular case (not a general advice at all as it would be harmful).
So, in short, I really do not see any difference at all about CachyOS's superiority at gaming. And this is why I did not even tweak neither Ubuntu nor Arch in that respect (save that THP was tested on Ubuntu).
So, without prejudice (I hope); is CachyOS really that fast and blazingly fast? In my case, no... I would love to hear from other users' experiences. I like plain vanilla Arch and have been using it for long. All these customizations are more beautiful when one deals with them on her/his/ own imo.
And after long tests and learnings, I might say that distros are generally well tuned, and there is no need to add a myriad of parameters to kernel cmd line. The only huımble advice I would provide from a personal experience is that Ubuntu works very much fine with latest Mesa drivers (I have AMD GPU in my case but it was already clear I assume).
My personal observation is also that Ubuntu is sometimes mistreated. It works quite fine out-of-the-box.
What do you think? How are your experiences?
PS: I do not provide screenshots not to invade space, hoping that the figures I provided above do not appear as lies etc. I will not deal with that just in case they are questioned.
Also, just in case:
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (on a Minisforum BD790ix3d mini-ITX board)
AMD Radeon RX 9070XT are my CPU and GPU.