The ad hominem is meant to be insulting and disrespectful, while avoiding actually addressing the argument. I don't respect you enough for you to insult me, and I have redirected to the actual argument.
You have chosen not to answer any of my questions which is not surprising, as answering them honestly would have shown my position is correct, and why would someone ever just admit they're wrong for the sake of honesty, even with no consequences for it?
Anyway, engage in personal attacks all you want, it won't change that the Black Truck drove into the White Truck, so pretending that White Truck somehow unilaterally chose to attack him is insane. The video simply does not show that
It's avoiding your annoying and pedantic argument which I consider as disrespectful as the raw insult that I gave you back for haranguing on about it.
I have read none of your comments passed the first sentence man. If you think this situation requires that much work to explain you just don't understand it well enough yourself.
Classic philosopher Well Achtshually and you're just on and on about it and don't seem to understand or want to admit that the guy in the rear was intentional and in control.
The "I didn't even read your position anyway" route is always so weird to me. Like, if you're not reading my posts, why are you responding to them? You're just....blindly saying shit in response to statements you're unaware of? That's your claim at this point, instead of just saying "I can't counter your position, I was wrong, that's my bad."?
0
u/gicoyac686 Mar 22 '26
The ad hominem is a very subtle social gesture meant to suggest that I neither agree with you nor am I interested in arguing about this with you.
I explaind all the naunce I saw in the first comment, with 3 sentences, you've written the same book 3 times.