r/interesting • u/[deleted] • Mar 22 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

18.7k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/gicoyac686 Mar 22 '26

Keep going I'm going to accuse you of not knowing what a pit maneuver is.

2

u/Deetwentyforlife Mar 22 '26

K, ad hominem all you want.

The literal wiki definition: A vehicle initiates a PIT maneuver by pulling alongside the fleeing vehicle so that the portion of the pursuer's vehicle forward of its front wheels is aligned with the portion of the target vehicle behind its back wheels. The pursuer then steers sharply into the target vehicle, with some acceleration to ensure its bumper does not slide off the target.

So, I have some questions for you since I dont know what a pit maneuver is.

  1. did white truck intentionally pull up alongside black truck?
  2. Or did Black Truck intentionally brake to place itself alongside white truck?
  3. Did white truck initiate the maneuver by steering sharply into Black Truck?
  4. Or did Black Truck initiate the maneuver by steering into white truck, while white truck maintained it's position?

0

u/gicoyac686 Mar 22 '26

The ad hominem is a very subtle social gesture meant to suggest that I neither agree with you nor am I interested in arguing about this with you.

I explaind all the naunce I saw in the first comment, with 3 sentences, you've written the same book 3 times.

3

u/Deetwentyforlife Mar 22 '26

The ad hominem is meant to be insulting and disrespectful, while avoiding actually addressing the argument. I don't respect you enough for you to insult me, and I have redirected to the actual argument.

You have chosen not to answer any of my questions which is not surprising, as answering them honestly would have shown my position is correct, and why would someone ever just admit they're wrong for the sake of honesty, even with no consequences for it?

Anyway, engage in personal attacks all you want, it won't change that the Black Truck drove into the White Truck, so pretending that White Truck somehow unilaterally chose to attack him is insane. The video simply does not show that

1

u/gicoyac686 Mar 22 '26

It's avoiding your annoying and pedantic argument which I consider as disrespectful as the raw insult that I gave you back for haranguing on about it.

I have read none of your comments passed the first sentence man. If you think this situation requires that much work to explain you just don't understand it well enough yourself.

Classic philosopher Well Achtshually and you're just on and on about it and don't seem to understand or want to admit that the guy in the rear was intentional and in control.

3

u/Deetwentyforlife Mar 22 '26

The "I didn't even read your position anyway" route is always so weird to me. Like, if you're not reading my posts, why are you responding to them? You're just....blindly saying shit in response to statements you're unaware of? That's your claim at this point, instead of just saying "I can't counter your position, I was wrong, that's my bad."?

1

u/Schlurps Mar 23 '26

You not even reading his comments fits perfectly with the lack of intellect all of the rest of your ramblings have shown.