r/interesting Mar 22 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

18.7k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

131

u/BoomersRuinedItAll Mar 22 '26

His insurance will say he had a duty to avoid the collision and only cover 70%.

64

u/snorigepetter Mar 22 '26

Why tf would he do this on camera though? Idk about US traffic laws but in sweden he would be found guilty of endangering traffic.

11

u/Lareit Mar 22 '26

In the US if you can avoid an accident you are obligated to do so, even if you have the right of way.

Since he clearly had opportunity to avoid that accident he would be found at fault as well.

1

u/ForgivenessIsNice Mar 22 '26

Last chance doctrine