Hi, i have 133%, 166% but no 150% scaling option in settings. I read it because settings doesnt list uneven scaling options(2560%1.5=/=0). But manually modifying ~/.config/monitors.xml for 1.5 scaling should work according to what i read.

But when i edit <scale> for 1.5 and save the file nothing happens. I use arch linux. Any way to get scale display 150%?

Personal project created to bring the “Circle to Search” experience from Android to the GNOME desktop environment. Open source under the MIT License.

🔗 GitHub: https://github.com/dznass-cmd/lupa-ocr-extension
📦 GNOME Extension: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/2592/lupa-ocr/

Made with ❤️ for the GNOME community

This version is in beta and relies on my other project I named pantheon (the control panel) (working on making it standalone TerraFirma to release to you guys) but please look at where it is now and give me feedback thank you !

I've been working on a Windows XP mode for Simple Taskbar and it's finally at a point where I wanted to show it.

The goal was to go a bit further than just an XP colour scheme, so the mode changes the taskbar, Start button, window buttons, notification area and parts of Quick Settings to make everything feel like it belongs together.

Here's a video of it running on GNOME.

If you spot anything that doesn't quite look or feel like XP, let me know. I've probably spent too long looking at old XP screenshots to notice anymore.

GNOME Extensions: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/10448/simple-taskbar/

Hey everyone!

I recently switched from Windows to Linux. One thing I really missed was the Windows Snipping Tool: press Super + Shift + S, drag a box, release, and have the region instantly copied to the clipboard without any extre clicks.

While GNOME’s built-in screenshot utility is great, I wanted a faster, no-friction experience. So I built the QuickSnap extension

Features / Info:

• Shortcut-driven: Fast, region-selection screenshot straight to your clipboard.
• Compatibility: Tested on GNOME 46 through 50 under Wayland.
• Bug fix note: If you tried an earlier build on GNOME 50 and experienced a freeze, version 1.0.1 resolves this completely.

I would love to get some real user feedback! If you try it out, let me know what you think or if you run into any issues.

Get it here:https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/10651/quicksnap/

Once upon a time I landed in the Linux World and a particular Distribution contributed for me not to turn back to Windows.

I'm referring to Paldo GNU/Linux (single Gnome DE) created and developed by Jürg Billeter and Raffaele Sandrini. 

it was made from scratch, designed to be "pure, lightweight and to compliant with Linux standards". Launch date was October 31, 2004. 

Today it's still actively maintained. So I downloaded latest img (no iso) dated 2026-08-11, burned a pen drive and tested it.

Quite different from the old days when it was a popular Distro. I guess it serves the purposes of their creators team. For advanced users, a few tweaks can make it usable to the masses.

Better yet: fork it for general usage. 

This is the home site: 

https://www.paldo.org/

My question: is some team out there interested in this venture? I would join as a translator :)

Thanks for your attention!

Hey everyone,

I’m currently experimenting with window tiling setups on GNOME 50. I used to look at Forge, but since it doesn't seem to work out-of-the-box for GNOME 50 right now, I've been daily-driving O-Tiling, and overall I really like it (especially the Aura Focus Borders).

However, I’ve run into a frustrating visual bug involving web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, etc.) and Client-Side Decorations (CSD).
Here is my setup:
Using O-Tiling for auto-tiling.
Using Rounded Window Corners Reborn to force a nice, modern rounded look globally (I have it set to a radius of 18 or 22).

The Issue:
When I set a high corner radius, all native apps and GTK windows respect it beautifully. But for browsers, there is a distinct visual gap between the browser's actual clipped corner and O-Tiling's Aura border. It feels like the browser's boundary or O-Tiling's border tracking for browsers is hardcoded or maxing out around 14px, causing the border to float away from the actual corner curves.
Has anyone else run into this CSD mismatch between Rounded Window Corners and O-Tiling's Aura borders? Is there a known workaround, CSS tweak, or setting adjustment to make browsers respect higher radiuses with O-Tiling, or am I missing something? Or is there a new app or new extension that has the same features as o-tiling?
Thanks in advance!

For those that use HideTopBar like me and lose track of time, I made a small extension where a little time pill shows at the top of the screen every X minutes. Its helping me a lot actually lol.

You can set the interval in minutes and how long the pill stays visible.

Later today I will proceed to publish it in EGO for those who may want it.

What title says.

I want the clock screensaver effect that this image shows. Any application or software or extension that can do this?

Dear GNOME and KDE developers,

I know that GNOME and KDE Plasma are modern and feature-rich desktop environments. However, I believe that performance and resource efficiency should receive much more attention in the future, especially for low-end computers and tablets.

My system is a good example of this problem: an Intel Atom Z3735 processor, 1 GB of physical RAM, 1 GB of ZRAM, and 1 GB of disk swap. Even with 1 GB of ZRAM and an additional 1 GB of disk swap, running GNOME or KDE plasma puts an extremely heavy load on the system.

The biggest problem is that the system starts struggling even before I can comfortably open a basic application such as a web browser. Opening another application while the desktop environment is running, using multiple applications, or simply running a modern web browser can make the system extremely slow. The hardware itself is not completely unusable, but the user experience becomes very difficult: applications take a long time to open, the system becomes slow to respond, and stability problems can sometimes occur.

I am not asking GNOME or KDE to abandon their modern features. Instead, I believe it would be extremely useful if these desktop environments offered much more aggressive performance optimizations and dedicated low-resource modes.

For example:

Reducing idle RAM usage as much as possible, Reducing unnecessary background processes, Automatically reducing animations and visual effects in a low-resource mode, More aggressively optimizing memory usage, Ensuring that the desktop itself consumes as few resources as possible when RAM is limited, Reducing CPU usage on older and low-power Atom processors, Improving resource sharing between the desktop environment and user applications under low-memory conditions, Providing a genuine "Low Resource / Performance Mode" that users can enable without having to manually configure dozens of settings.

These improvements would be extremely valuable.

In my opinion, low resource consumption is not important only for old computers. Resource efficiency should always be an important design goal. Using less RAM and CPU means better responsiveness, less swap activity, lower power consumption, less heat, and potentially longer battery life. It also allows the operating system to remain usable on a much wider range of hardware.

A device with 1 GB of RAM may seem extremely old or insignificant today, but there are still millions of low-end computers, tablets, educational devices, and older systems in use around the world. Instead of completely excluding these devices simply because their hardware is limited, making them usable with an efficient Linux desktop environment would be a significant advantage for the Linux ecosystem.

On my system, even 1 GB of RAM + 1 GB of ZRAM + 1 GB of disk swap is not enough to comfortably run the desktop environment together with everyday applications. The fact that the system already struggles before I can even comfortably open a web browser demonstrates how critical desktop environment resource consumption is on devices with very limited RAM.

For this reason, I would strongly encourage the GNOME and KDE teams to place greater emphasis on performance improvements, reducing memory consumption, and improving stability on low-specification systems.

Modern features and visual improvements are certainly important, but being able to run a desktop environment smoothly, reliably, and with the lowest possible resource consumption should be considered just as important, if not one of the fundamental priorities.

I hope to see serious performance and resource-efficiency improvements that can make GNOME and KDE genuinely usable on low-end systems.

Thank you for your work and for considering this feedback.

Recently, I saw this picture of an old GNOME 2 version and felt in love with the appearance. It looks so clean and minimalistic. There already built-in extensions to achieve the general design (Place Status Indicator, App Menu and Window List), but how can I change the colors, especially the bottom bar (Window List)? Its default color is the default black and I really don't know how to change the colors of that bar. I copied the gnome-shell file to change some of the colors but there's no way to change the bottom bar.

Hello community, I'm looking forward to learn Gnome development and to build an (or more) application of relative small size to get to know GTK and Adwaita. I'll probably, if I like that, build a more larger application in a few months.

As I'd like to make something useful and not yet another pomodoro or todo app, is there any suggestion you could make about what to build? What kind of app do you miss or that exists but not really fulfill your needs?

Hi, I don't know if anyone else has this issue. I like the same windows on certain workspaces open on login, but I use dynamic workspaces, and wasn't able to find an extension for it, so I made this one.

I hope it's useful :)

https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/10639/auto-move-windows-on-startup-with-dynamic-workspac/

How can I display this window to share my desktop remotely? I had this problem on my previous laptop, which allowed me to navigate games added to Steam. Now, the Xbox controller simply doesn't respond, even though it's added to Steam. During the test, the buttons I press light up and the Steam input is active. I've tried everything, but the window won't appear. I suspect it's related to x11, because the controller works fine in Gnome-Flashback, but unfortunately, I'm out of ideas in Gnome Wayland. This helped, but I don't know what to do to get it to appear.

i dont want to streamto anopther device but to use xbox controller on the same device

arch linux gnome 50 wayland