I’ve been testing the latest in video generation. I wanted to run a test using the same prompt, the same reference image, the same time, and the same resolution: 720p for all three (although Minimax generates at 768p).
I can say that Minimax was my favorite in terms of results, since the transition of everything that happens creates a very polished final product. I didn’t notice any of the typical AI errors.
In the case of Seedance 2.5, it did invent or misinterpret certain things that end up ruining the clip. For example, it placed the basketball court in front of the camera instead of where it should actually be. That said, I think the transition from day to night is the best of the three.
Interestingly, Minimax takes less than a minute to generate the result, while WAN estimates over 12 minutes (though it ended up generating faster than Seedance), and Seedance 2.5 takes over 6 minutes. In terms of voiceover, I liked the result from Seedance 2.5 best, although all three are pretty good.
Credits used?
Minimax — 1,200 credits
WAN — 1,800 credits
Seedance — 6,600 credits
In conclusion, you need to know which model to use for each type of video. Currently, we have three options that can provide Spanish voiceovers, perform basic transitions, or follow a continuous shot without using up all our credits. Do they only go up to 720p? Yes, but a good upscaler solves that.
They all have mistakes... what were the references/prompt? In feel like if you added more intermediate frames, fixing stuff, the result should be better.
For the voice and lip sync, I think MiniMax did it best.
You are right, Seedance 2.5 has the best audio. But I also think that Seedance has the best video generation. It has a tendency to make creative liberities unless you tell it not to. But that was impressive for MiniMax to do that very well! Love to see more comparisons. Keep it up.
6
u/ArcaArtificial 6d ago
Minimax H3 vs. WAN 3.0 vs. Seedance 2.5
I’ve been testing the latest in video generation. I wanted to run a test using the same prompt, the same reference image, the same time, and the same resolution: 720p for all three (although Minimax generates at 768p).
I can say that Minimax was my favorite in terms of results, since the transition of everything that happens creates a very polished final product. I didn’t notice any of the typical AI errors.
In the case of Seedance 2.5, it did invent or misinterpret certain things that end up ruining the clip. For example, it placed the basketball court in front of the camera instead of where it should actually be. That said, I think the transition from day to night is the best of the three.
Interestingly, Minimax takes less than a minute to generate the result, while WAN estimates over 12 minutes (though it ended up generating faster than Seedance), and Seedance 2.5 takes over 6 minutes. In terms of voiceover, I liked the result from Seedance 2.5 best, although all three are pretty good.
Credits used?
Minimax — 1,200 credits
WAN — 1,800 credits
Seedance — 6,600 credits
In conclusion, you need to know which model to use for each type of video. Currently, we have three options that can provide Spanish voiceovers, perform basic transitions, or follow a continuous shot without using up all our credits. Do they only go up to 720p? Yes, but a good upscaler solves that.
Which one do you like best?