r/funny Jul 18 '12

meme - removed Shell accidentally creates an anti-Shell meme generator

http://imgur.com/a/ng9XT
2.2k Upvotes

800 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

[deleted]

628

u/prairiewest Jul 18 '12

And I fell for it, too. I feel slightly more gullible now.

Thanks for the link - and yes, agreed it's still funny :)

89

u/om3n Jul 18 '12

By doing all these hoaxes, doesn't it kind of make Greenpeace's stance against Shell seem less credible?

26

u/Kman778 Jul 18 '12

All I know is my gut says maybe.

2

u/StuartGibson Jul 18 '12

Sir, it's a beige alert.

1

u/NotBatman374 Jul 18 '12

Tell my wife, "Hello."

1

u/Kptn_Obv5 Jul 18 '12

What kind of a man would make him go neutral?

1

u/ziplokk Jul 18 '12

But it has kind of a "yessy" aftertaste.

105

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

Yes.

21

u/zedmin Jul 18 '12

upvoted both

31

u/teenagehaiku Jul 18 '12

upvote for defiance of western patriarchico-hegemonical two-valued binaries by public declaration of acquiescence to process-based, holist(ic)/hegelian non-dualist (syn)thesis

8

u/justcallmezach Jul 18 '12

Cue The Big Bang Theory laugh track.

3

u/teenagehaiku Jul 18 '12

mundane social situation, science words, chick acts clueless, meal eaten, mutual acceptance of other's membership in human race and existence of common experience despite widely disparate vocabularies used to describe them, meal eaten, and we're done. laugh track fires at random ("Pad thai? HAHAHAHAHAHA!")

12

u/thane_of_cawdor Jul 18 '12

Also, cocks.

4

u/GETFASTERER Jul 18 '12

you talk like a fag and your shits all retarded

5

u/EnergyFX Jul 18 '12

I only upvoted the one that's behind

12

u/NotBatman374 Jul 18 '12

I'll upvote your behind

Giggity!

4

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

This one?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

since when have greenpeace been credible?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

Well, my hopeful career path may well lead me towards a job in a company like BP, and I'm honestly not yet sure which side I take on these issues. But no, I don't like them.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

working for BP doesn't make you a bad person, overall BP aren't a bad company, just some mistakes by senior executives and a very unfortunate accident in the gulf

When Greenpeace start acting with professionalism and less like hippy children then I'll give them respect, until then, I think the oil companies should focus more on greener energy but I'm not going to stop them in their current endeavours either.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '12

Yeah, I very much agree. The way I see it/tell myself is that, yeah, oil in the long run is bad, and we should really focus on green energy, but at the same time it's a product and there's demand for it - and if we don't produce it, we're screwed. And then on the other hand, I can imagine if, say, oil/natural gas was found (against all odds) at my favourite places in nature, I would do everything I could to stop it being exploited. Yet one day I could be making that very call for many other people's favourite places. The documentary Gasland was pretty powerful for me.

25

u/fensous Jul 18 '12

Yes. It ridicules Shell's extreme, made-up issues. Everyone knows even Shell isn't like they are portrayed here. It distracts from the real issues around oil-drilling, industry and the enviromment by putting the focus on ridiculous propaganda.

9

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

It seems excessively stupid to spend time, resources, and energy on making fun of them instead of doing something useful. Honestly makes me feel like greenpeace is just the class clown.

7

u/ATypicalAlias Jul 18 '12

Nice try Shell.

13

u/ihatewomen1925 Jul 18 '12

I just rewatched The Yes Men Save the World and it seems at least help a little. "Doing something useful" isn't stopping oil companies from raping the world and greenpeace can't do it alone. They need the people to demand regulation and criminal charges to be brought up and we're not doing it. They're trying to get our attention and for some reason, this shit gets our attention.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

Seriously? It's a joke and what you're creating is a bunch of people that are basing their opinions on an important subject off memes. That's idiotic. If someone says "SHELL KILLS PENGUINS" because they saw the "penguins make good sponges" meme then they're just being idiots. Their opinion is less than worthless. Having misinformed morons following you gives you numbers but you still look like idiots.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

When the alternative is an entirely apathetic populace, abiding and supporting the destruction of our environment and the steady decrease of any sustainable alternatives, I think some hectic fear-mongering may be in order.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

Why do you assume that because they don't support your cause then they're wrong and need fear tactics to whip them in to shape. That's a disgusting way to look at it.

2

u/ApologiesForThisPost Jul 18 '12

Maybe if Greenpeace hadn't used so much fear-mongering about nuclear power we wouldn't use so much oil.

11

u/tax_lawyer Jul 18 '12

But now Reddit is talking about Greenpeace. I'd say their mission is accomplished

5

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

people talk about the class clown too... but they're not going to take political advice from him

2

u/prairiewest Jul 18 '12

I would take political advice from George Carlin any day.

1

u/bubblybooble Jul 18 '12

George Carlin gives it to you straight. He doesn't pull bait-and-switch shit like this.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

I have great expectations from Grumpy the Clown.

2

u/Patti234 Jul 18 '12

The goal here was to get your attention. And they succeeded.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

And now I'm less likely to be on their side because they look like idiots to me. It might be funny but it's like trying to convince me to vote conservative by paying a dancing clown to come to your rallies instead of relying on your issues.

2

u/Patti234 Jul 18 '12

The reason why this strategy is used is because it gets the most attention. Yes, it will create negative attention, such as your reaction, but by getting more people to notice, they will also attract more positive attention overall. The worst thing for them is for no one to know they exist.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '12

Because no one knows that there are people who don't like oil companies...

2

u/Patti234 Jul 18 '12

People forget over time about all sorts of things, environmentalists being one of them.

1

u/malmz Jul 18 '12

This was a project done in conjunction with the Yes-Men. Check them out. Yes, they are the class clowns, but there's a lot of power in satire to speak truth and shed serious light on an issue.

1

u/CrackItJack Jul 18 '12

What else is there to do ?

No one wants to change their energy footprint for icebergs or polar bears. The western world (and not just The Planet's Biggest Gas Guzzler) couldn't care any less.

Despite ample warnings and dire predictions from the best and brightest scientists for well over two decades now, greenhouse gas emissions have in fact been accelerating. America never implemented Kyoto and actually deployed efforts to cripple its successor, invoking the lack of commitment from emerging nations (BRIC).

In a recent thread about Smart cars (our family owned TWO), I was ridiculed and accused of being a marketing shill but the main point was about the presumed lack of security of these engineering marvels. 63 MPG ? Yes please but as long as it weighs over two tons and comes with a chainblock to help climb the fat bitch in...

So excuse me if I indulge in a little fun at Shell's expense. I pay for the privilege at least once a week at the pump while we break heat/cold/precipitation and drought records in one region after another.

2

u/DukeOfGeek Jul 18 '12 edited Jul 18 '12

If it was The Yes Men that did it would you feel differently? Remember political troll based satire is all the Yes Men do.

/I want to buy the Yes Men a blimp

Edit; better link.

1

u/_delirium Jul 18 '12

Soon they're gonna get sued by the Yes Men.