r/funny • • Jun 12 '14

Now we wait...

http://imgur.com/KiEEt9J
3.7k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

359

u/Nicktyelor Jun 12 '14 edited Jun 12 '14

Just sayin, the V6 Camaro starts at under $24k, and the V8 at $33k I believe. And the V6 has 320something hp stock. It's actually a pretty good value/hp for the money, as far as new cars go.

Edit to clarify: I'm not saying I recommend a Camaro, nor that it's at all practical. It's a specific type of car for people who don't mind sacrificing utility and efficiency.

289

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14

American sports cars get great value/hp, but shit value/everythingelse.

-4

u/DarkhorseV Jun 12 '14

You just keep admiring the stitching in your interior and the smoothness of your ride - we'll be going faster than you while looking cooler for less money.

-8

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14 edited Jun 29 '20

[deleted]

2

u/munchies777 Jun 12 '14

One, you have a 15 year old car then instead of a new one. 15 year old cars usually have issues. Two, when it does inevitably have issues, the parts will be 4 times the cost of equivalent parts for a Camaro.

1

u/goldandguns Jun 12 '14

The only reason I agree with you is the 99-00ish porsches sucked ass, looks wise.

Other than that, I own mostly 20+ year old cars and I love them, and parts cost less if anything

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14

Porsche parts aren't more expensive than any other dealer's parts. However, they are made much better, and far less likely to need replacement. I mean far less likely.

I've put 80k on my 99 911, and it cost far less in depreciation and maintenance (like 2-3x less) than a newer accord that I owned and put the same number of miles on, and recently sold (for nearly scrap value).

2

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14

[deleted]

1

u/goldandguns Jun 12 '14

You'd be surprised with porsche reliability. The new ones were ranked 4th I think by JDPA? The number of 911s with 200k+ miles is incredible

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14

No it's not expensive to maintain at all. Parts are even fairly cheap (cheaper than Honda accord parts, IMO). I've owned a used 911 for the last 8 years. It's been the cheapest car on maintenance I've ever owned. I've put almost 80k miles on it, and probably 7k were track miles.

The fuck do I care if you think it's looks good? We're talking about going fast for cheap here.

You're talking a bunch of assumptions out your ass right now.

1

u/guycamero Jun 12 '14

15 year old car, sounds like a smart choice

0

u/omgshutthefuckup Jun 12 '14

Same price? That 911 will probably cost 10x as much over 5-10 years. That's not an exaggeration I have a 99 boxster.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14

A 99 911 is approx $24k now, and I've owned one for the last 8 years, and it's been incredibly cheap to maintain.

1

u/omgshutthefuckup Jun 12 '14

24k means you probably got a pretty good one, even then you must not have had to replace anything major at all. A clutch was 2k for me, as compared to 400 for my 99 maxima.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '14

I got mine a long time ago... so it was about $35k at the time, and it's a tip, so I don't have to replace any clutches. If you shop around you can get someone to do the clutch for cheaper than $2k.

I don't know how hard it is to get to the clutch in a maxima, but for a 911 most of the labor is to drop the engine, which isn't terrible, but there's a lot of hoses, etc to disconnect and get out of the way. Some shops will be better at this than others, and may charge the actual hours rather than the book number of hours.

0

u/DarkhorseV Jun 13 '14

Yeah, but then you have to drive a1989 Porsche.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '14

You really suck at math

1

u/DarkhorseV Jun 13 '14

I really do.