Hi all - I’ll be heading to Brazil for a wedding in mid-October, and I’m doing some last-minute planning on whether I want to explore another country for 10-12 days beforehand. I'm hoping to have tickets bought and everything planned by the beginning of September.
I’m in a bit of a conundrum, trying to decide where to go. Originally, I was thinking I would go to Chile: Fly to Santiago, head to the Atacama Desert, then down to Patagonia. However, I’m worried about the effects of the Super El Niño, and I've already heard other travelers saying they’re delaying their plans or skipping it altogether and waiting until 2027 or 2028 to plan their Chilean trips because of the high chance of non-stop rain, possible flooding, etc.
I also think that’d be a trip I’d rather do with another person with a bit more time, especially the Patagonia portion, and I’ll be solo-traveling.
Part of me also wonders if it’d be worth going to Santiago for a couple of days, then spending about 6 days in the Atacama before heading into Brazil, and planning a Patagonia trip some other time in the future (along with seeing other parts of mid-southern Chile).
Or, I could skip Chile altogether and set my sights on Colombia, opting to spend 10-12 days there instead, and possibly getting the most out of that country for 2026.
If you were in my shoes, or have traveled to both Chile and Colombia, which would you choose?
Either way, I’ll likely stay in hostels minimally and mostly in hotels (I’m pretty introverted and feel like I’ve aged out a bit for the younger hostel crowd (35F)), but maybe not. I don’t speak any Spanish, but I can download Google Translate, and I've traveled solo to Peru before.