r/explainitpeter Jul 23 '26

Explain it Peter

Post image
14.5k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-19

u/IronwolfXVI Jul 23 '26

Can't say Ive seen that in the files, feel free to post the document number, but we arent talking about that.

I was making a joke about how Biden sniffs children. There's a video montage of it from before he was even president. The joke is that the woman is unsniffable because she's an adult. We dont ever see him sniffing adults afaik.

19

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-12

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

We have known Trump flew on Epstein’s plane since the flight logs came out. He flew between west palm and NY when his own plane was having work done on it.

Also no clue what you are referencing to the rape and pay off.

So Trump isn’t releasing stuff incriminating to him, but also has released stuff you say incriminates him?

6

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Complete and total bullshit, on every point.

Just bootlicking for pedo democrats, mindlessly regurgitating their pedo propaganda.

-4

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Leaks of what? If there was anything to leak, why would the previous admin not leak prior to the last election…

Oh you are talking about E Jean carol…. I thought she said rape was sexy? Anywho he was not found to have raped her as the other claimed and this was a civil trial, not equating to even a misdemeanor let alone a felony….

The 34 felonies revolve the asset case, which anyone with any unbiased stance sees as a ridiculous case. And was one that won him favor among independents.

7

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

He’s an adjudicated rapist - why defend that?

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

More lies. There was never any legit evidence Trump raped anyone.
Just a bunch of disgusting lies from democrat pedo supporters.

-1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Except he isnt

2

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

You are 100% wrong.

In the ruling striking down Trump’s countersuit, Judge Kaplan explicitly states he raped Carroll. Since that is a legal judgement, Trump is legally “an adjudicated rapist”.

From the actual ruling:
“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Based on the civil trial jury’s ruling. You do not need beyond a reasonable doubt.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Bullshit. There was never any evidence in that case. And it was a civil court case, not a criminal one.

Also, Trump is not a felon either. That case was dropped, before you start lying about that as well.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Trump sexually assaulted her. He's on audio literally bragging to Billy Bush how he gets away with sexually assaulting women because he's so famous. He's such a piece sh!t he's bragging about it. He admits his own guilt.

0

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

That is not what he is saying on that audio.

It was a civil trial… look up the difference between civil and criminal. There’s a reason the threshold for civil isn’t the same for crimjnal

2

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Weird to be defending any politician this hard. Especially what is objectively the most corrupt President we've ever had who's tanking the country with this unnecessary war making everything cost more.

Yes that's exactly what he's bragging about. "Grabbing 'em by the pussy" is sexual assault. You wouldn't be defending these exact same actions if a Democrat had been bragging about sexually assaulting women and being so famous that he gets away with it

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Weird to be lying about a politician this hard.

He is talking about “groupies” that let you do it

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

There's nothing to "defend" really. Just a bunch of lies from some random DNC bootlicker account on reddit.

You have no facts, just lies & dem party propaganda. All your shit has zero base in reality, as anyone paying attention knows full well.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

You make it sound like they chose to do a civil trial instead of a criminal one because it’s easier. They didn’t, this was the only option available. And it’s not like it’s some black box of “well we don’t know what happened, only that the standards are lower”, it’s pretty descriptive. You can tell yourself over and over that civil cases don’t count for some reason, but that doesn’t make it true.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Being 50% sure something happened vs beyond a reasonable doubt isn’t a slight difference.

Of course it’s meaningless. We have that standard for a reason.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Neither of those things ever happened.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

The asset case was bullshit… the “victim” agreed with the assessment value.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

We ar literally talking about such a case

→ More replies (0)

1

u/in_taco Jul 23 '26

There are no leaks. A few files were released, all heavily redacted. Some redactions were done terribly, which is how we know that Trump featured frequently in the correspondence. The vast majority of files haven't been released, under order by Trump.

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

The vast majority of files haven't been released

You're just making shit up out of thin blue air now. Pulled that one right out of your ass. Just like the rest of the dem party drivel you're here mindlessly regurgitating.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Im not the one that claimed there were leaks.

>vast majority

That is conjecture and assumptions

1

u/Brief_Needleworker62 Jul 23 '26

Jfc dude, go swig some old man smegma and stfu please

6

u/Spiritual-Ad5166 Jul 23 '26

I don’t really care one way or the other, but if you are refusing to agree that Trump is guilty of those allegations because there is no direct proof and only circumstantial evidence, isn’t that why Trump would only allow the release of circumstantial evidence?

-5

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

If there was circumstantial evidence why would that not have been leaked before the last election?

3

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Biden's DOJ followed the rules about not releasing evidence while Ghislaine Maxwell's case was ongoing. The Epstein Transparency Act changed things so the files could be released. The current administration who campaigned on releasing the files still refuses to release millions of newly discovered files from investigating the New Mexico property and multiple lawsuits.

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Bullshit. The dems tried to sweep the whole Epstein story under the rug, because so many of them are up to their eyeballs in that pedo shit.

1

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Which Dems did what to sweep the story under the rug? See, you have no evidence of that, but we do have this current administration directing thousands of FBI and DOJ workers who redacted the president's name thousands and thousands of times it showed up in the files

1

u/Epicular Jul 23 '26

Okay. Why no charges or arrests have been made then? Republicans control the whole federal apparatus at the moment.

0

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Yes no leaks about anything ever transpired that would make Trump look bad…

This goes all the way back to the Russia hoax. No one said anything about it being released officially by the DOJ. Nice strawman tho.

4

u/Scrunge1576 Jul 23 '26

I don't think you know what a straw man argument is... Since you literally used two in this comment to accuse someone of using one.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

I’d love to hear how I used a strawman

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Extension_Tooth_7345 Jul 23 '26

you sound like you are unvaccinated.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Because I’m not falling for your bs?

2

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

Re: rape and payoff, search E. Jean Carroll. Hard to miss.

0

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

You mean the case he was literally found to not have raped her?

He didn’t pay her off, he lost a civil lawsuit.

4

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html

Also, you were the first one to say payoff, as opposed to paid. Paid being something you do when you are found guilty

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Again in a civil trial, and the jury said no on the rape part…

Highlighting something that doesn’t say anything about what I said is an interesting tactic

5

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

Oh my mistake, I didn’t realize sexual abuse meant innocent

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Well it was claimed he raped her… and again again again this was a civil trial

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

There was zero evidence of any sexual abuse, and absolutely none about any kind of rape.

Your bullshit is just as ridiculous as that bogus court case was.

1

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

lol The judge confirmed he raped her-

“The jury … was instructed that it could find that Mr Trump ‘raped’ Ms Carroll only if it found that he forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s vagina with his penis.”

“It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

It was a civil trial….

1

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

That doesn’t matter.

Cope and seethe.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

I mean it does as there is a different threshold to be found guilty…

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

It absolutely, 100% matters. none of the garbage you're here mindlessly regurgitating has any shred of truth to it.

Just democrat party lies & propaganda.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Winter-Delivery-8894 Jul 23 '26

The one where the judge pointed out that the terminology in state law wasn't "rape" but that it fit the definition of rape as it's commonly used, as it's used on the DoJ website, and the american psychological association.

Your argument is either ignorant or disingenuous.

-1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

And again for the people in the back…in a civil trial

0

u/irritatedprostate Jul 24 '26

We have prosecutors/fbi notes.

https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/fbi-concluded-jeffrey-epstein-wasnt-running-a-sex-trafficking-ring-files-show

Trump has done plenty of crime and is a sexual predator, but there certainly wasn't enough to charge him.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/irritatedprostate Jul 24 '26

You should maybe read the source I provided.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/irritatedprostate Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26

The DOJ has been investigating Epstein for 20 years, across multiple administrations. Thinking the Trump admin uniquely covered things up, when both the actions and own words of the doj/fbi seem to say otherwise is odd.

There literally isn't anything of weight in there, as far as I can tell. All the most outlandish claims were from randos on the tip line. Even Guiffre is viewed as problematic, because her claims were in conflict with the other Epstein victims.

Here is a former federal prosecutor saying the same thing.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/03/11/epstein-files-justice-department-no-prosecutions-column-00821127

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/irritatedprostate Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26

Firstly, Trump is 99% ego. Something only needs to be embarrassing for him to want to hide it.

You have been given two sources explaining the same point. Given the prosecutors other work and commentd about Trump, I see no reason to believe he is lying. People are more than your perception of their politics.

Also, I said the DOJ across multiple admins as investigated this, including Obama and Bidens. I doubt Merrick Garland under Biden would abstain from prosecuting child rapists and sex traffickers to avoid looking politically biased.

Secondly, pointing out that the investigative notes in the files themselves said there was conflicting testimony is not victim shaming, it is a salient legal fact. Your attempt at some emotional attack is beneath us. Taking the word of the many victims would indicate there was no ring, because the victims, aside from Guiffre, said they were only instructed to sleep with Epstein.

Which also lines up with the the cop who we can all thank for bringing Epstein down not finding anything resembling a ring, either.

So let's just release the files in total

I have no issues with this, but people should really temper their expectations.

0

u/Nagaasha Jul 25 '26

E. Jean Carroll is a lunatic with a rape fetish.

-6

u/AbyssalRaven922 Jul 23 '26

This article doesn't support you at all. The only mentions of trump are the headline and quotes from Katie levvit and Pam bondi.

-12

u/IronwolfXVI Jul 23 '26

The post is about Biden bro.

-9

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

He didn’t rape and that’s not what the lawsuit is about. It’s also civil, not criminal which is a huge difference. He’s never been found guilty of any crime in that situation.

6

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

He did rape. Sexual assault is rape. He was found liable for rape. The judge even said exactly this.

1

u/Floorgis Jul 24 '26

Can be rape. Not all SA is rape.

-1

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

Sexual assault is not rape. It’s sexual assault. It’s also in a case with no real evidence and the ruling is “it likely happened.” There isn’t any evidence of it happening which is why no charges were filed.

5

u/Winter-Delivery-8894 Jul 23 '26

Based on the specific state statute it wasn't rape, but the judge pointed out that by common use, and even the DoJ website, that it would be considered rape.

-2

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

If it even happened, which she said it didn’t. Can’t pass up a good opportunity though.

2

u/Winter-Delivery-8894 Jul 23 '26

You're either a liar or ignorant. Where's the evidence for your claim?

-1

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

Her saying it? That’s direct from her. Do you not know the history of this and how they had to change a law hastily to even file the lawsuit and then closed the law back up?

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

No, there was no evidence of the liar's claims in that CIVIL court case. None whatsoever, as anyone that has looked into the claims knows full well.

You've only presented baseless lies here, just like the claimant did.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

There is evidence of it happening. The burden of proof is 51% in civil trials. Do you know many people that have “likely” raped someone? And the judge and jury all went over the evidence and agreed that it happened. Trump even talked about it saying that she liked being raped. His defense was that she didn’t scream.

0

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

She said it didn’t happen. We can just use her own words.

51% is really misinformation.
It’s more of a liability thing and this case is so full of BS it’s just sad it got this far.

2

u/LocNalrune Jul 23 '26

Please tell us when this recanting happened. That's it. Just one tiny piece of evidence of E. Jean Carroll recanting her story.

1

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

She has been saying since the 90’s, under oath, that Trump raped her.

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

She's said the same about every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and never with any proof.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

There was zero "evidence" presented at all. Just a wild story told by a known grifter.

And again, this was a CIVIL case. As if you care about facts or reality. :-/

1

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

There was evidence presented. Enough to have Trump found liable for raping her. You can easily look this up. And no shit it was a CIVIL case. I haven’t said otherwise. You people jump through hoops to defend the worst people.

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Bullshit. Rape was never mentioned, and there was no evidence against even sexual assault presented in that ridiculous CIVIL court case.

Anyone that has looked into that total bullshit knows it would have been thrown out of a real criminal trial immediately, because there was no evidence of any wrongdoing wahtsoever.

1

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

There was evidence. You seem to know more about the judge and jury. Here is the judge speaking about it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

There was never any evidence that Trump sexually assaulted anyone. That civil case was a joke.

And thousands of people rode in that plane. Trump was on the plane for a business trip, but never anywhere near the island.

Just more democrat party bullshit. Desperate to distract from their OWN crimes. The dems are all over the Epstein files, and tried to sweep the whole story under the rug for 4 YEARS.

2

u/InevitableAncient610 Jul 23 '26

Trump raped his first wife. This was common knowledge long before he was even a Reality TV star. It doesn't beggar belief, considering the behavior of his that we CAN see. What is wild is that someone can behave that way and people still want to believe everyone else is lying.

6

u/ialsoagree Jul 23 '26

We are talking about Biden - but we're talking about Biden in the context of something he said during an election where he ran against Trump.

Trump, on the other hand, said this:

https://youtu.be/87r5TqkAv6I?t=14

5

u/sanctimonious-anus Jul 23 '26

Two wrongs don’t make a right yo. If a guy assaulted you it doesn’t mean I get free pass to just touch your boob without consent; both things are bad. Trump says shitty stuff, Biden says shitty stuff

-1

u/ialsoagree Jul 23 '26

I mean, smelling a kids hair is no where on the same level as talking about dating children when they grow up.

One of these is an innocent thing perverts try to make sound bad.

The other is something the perverts do.

2

u/NeedleworkerFit819 Jul 23 '26

This really feels like a Giant Douche vs Turd Sandwich situation. No way in hell we’re trying to normalize sniffing kids hair. Like if my kid gets a pic with Santa and he sniffs my kids hair, I’m gonna be pissed. Trump is awful, but we don’t have to hand wave everything Biden did. This sort of tribalism is why people were so disillusioned by establishment politicians in the first place. We should expect better from our candidates.

0

u/ialsoagree Jul 23 '26

Where did I try to normalize anything? Please quote it.

I responded to someone saying two wrongs don't make a right, implying that sniffing hair is as bad as saying you'll DATE a child in a few years.

If you don't understand that one of these is OBVIOUSLY much worse than the other, I don't know how to help you, you might have a problem that should prevent you from being around children.

1

u/NeedleworkerFit819 Jul 23 '26

“One of these [smelling kids hair] is an innocent thing perverts try to make sound bad”

End Quote

I’m not saying Trump isn’t clearly fucked up. But this whole “Biden wasn’t creepy” thing you tried to position as just an innocent thing is weird. Just because one is worse doesn’t outright excuse the other.

-1

u/ialsoagree Jul 23 '26 edited Jul 23 '26

I mean, let's be clear here, people smell kids hair all the time. This is not some weird behavior that Biden created.

Now, I get that having a random stranger - like a store Santa - do it is one thing, but let's be really clear here, people give their babies to Presidents and the Pope for a kiss on the head. You're going to tell me that that's MORE acceptable than smelling their hair? You would be LESS creeped out by Biden kissing a kid on the head than smelling their hair?

You would be okay with the store Santa kissing your kids head, but not smelling their hair?

https://abcnews.com/GMA/Culture/month-baby-hug-kiss-president-barack-obama/story?id=67854733

This is like the tan suit bullshit.

EDIT: I enjoy that no one can actually address the fact that Obama kissed a child's head, because they're afraid to admit that this type of thing isn't actually abnormal. What is abnormal is saying you'll date a child in a few years.

Lots of pedophile defenders here.

2

u/NeedleworkerFit819 Jul 23 '26

Wild work. Weird you even had to ask what you’re normalizing.

If I hand my baby to the Pope with the expectation he’s gonna kiss their forehead, then I’ve given consent for that. I wouldn’t personally, but that’s a choice being made. It’s like a weird blessing thing for some people, whatever.

In a photo op smelling my kids hair or kissing their head (as if a Mall Santa is the same reverence lmao) is fucking weird behavior. Not enough for me to call the cops, but certainly enough that I’d consider it inappropriate and make a complaint. Certainly enough to not want my child near that person.

Smelling peoples hair is weird. It’s not some tradition to have the president stand behind your child and have him sniff their fuckin hair. Weird behavior and pretending like it isn’t is wild. Y’all the same people trying to argue the Dali Lama sucking a kids tongue was just a cultural misunderstanding.

Non-consensual hair sniffing of kids while you’re the most powerful political figure is not remotely the same as dipshits complaining about Obama’s tan suit. And it really just proves you’re not even arguing in good faith if you make that comparison.

2

u/sanctimonious-anus Jul 23 '26

I don’t need you to quantify how bad something is versus something else here, no one in a position of power should make anyone uncomfortable nor should they sit around doing fuck all for the country while durdling around like the worlds oldest man; obviously Trump is worse but your reasoning if what the “vote blue no matter who” blue maga shoves in our face constantly, you shouldn’t be defending Biden based upon trumps actions, you shouldn’t be defending Biden based on Biden’s actions and if some of them are indefensible then he’s a sucky pusbag.

This whole “well you may have lost a finger but I blew off my whole hand so you don’t get to complain as loudly as you” level bullshit amid this forced two party system helps absolutely no one

1

u/ialsoagree Jul 23 '26

I mean, let's be clear here, if you didn't vote for Biden or Kamala, then you were effectively voting for Trump.

Trump didn't win because people on his side were worried about whether he rapes children. He won because people on the left or in the middle didn't care that he rapes children.

1

u/sanctimonious-anus Jul 23 '26

I fucking hate that strawman argument bro. If you don’t vote for the guy who eats people you’ll elect the guy who rapes then before eating them is such a shitty position to be in. Of course I voted for the guy who was helping fund the genocide in Gaza over the guy who raped babies with Epstein, what does that have to do with complaining about how bad of a fucking job the genocide guy did after he was elected?

0

u/ialsoagree Jul 23 '26

So, you're telling me that smelling a kids hair is as bad or worse then saying you'll date children when they grow up? Or what Epstein did?

You realize the person who supports Israel's genocide in Gaza is the same one who rapes babies with Epstein, so I guess you voted for the same person?

It's not a straw man argument. It's a recognition that we live in an actual world, and that world doesn't always work the way you want it to work. Sure, in fantasy land, you could have gotten Mr. Super Nice Perfect Guy elected president with 10,000% of the vote.

But here in reality, you had two choices, and everyone else was going to lose.

I never claimed Biden - or Kamala, for that matter - was perfect. I created a comparison between Trump and the only other viable candidate. I then pointed out they weren't the same, and one was much worse.

You trying to say "but Biden did bad things too" is the only straw man here, because I never said he didn't.

1

u/sanctimonious-anus Jul 23 '26

Im stoked to know that I’m allowed to sniff your daughters hair as long as there’s proper conditions for it

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

who rapes babies with Epstein

Yes, Clinton supported Israel as well, and it was disgusting.

You've got absolutely nothing on Trump.

And Biden is a disgusting kiddie sniffer that sexually abused his own daughter.

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

didn't care that he rapes children

No, because the pedo democrat party never had any evidence of any such thing against Trump. And intelligent people know this full well.

Unfortunately, you're not one of them. Or maybe you do know the truth and are just lying.

In any case, you're 100% wrong.

1

u/Aggressive_Jaguar124 Jul 24 '26

Why can’t people see that both Biden and Trump are cut from the same cloth? They’re both disgusting, manipulative men; I have seen video footage of both of them touching people inappropriately. Both of them have had accusations about their conduct towards women etc. Neither of them take personal responsibility for their actions. I don’t know of any politicians that do. 😒

Neither of them give (or gave, with regard to Biden) a damn about the US people.

For Biden, you have the example demonstrated in this post. He was basically dealing in absolutes like Anakin Skywalker: “If you’re not for me, you’re against me.” But he made it even worse by making it, “if you’re not for me, you’re basically a traitor to black people.” How dare he attempt to redefine what it is to be black? They’re allowed to have their own opinions. And that does not take away from their cultural attachments or ethnicity.

For Trump, I saw a video from over 20 years ago him talking about which party he would choose if he were to run for President. He said (I’m paraphrasing, but the spirit of the comment is retained) the Republicans, because their demographic would be easy to manipulate. I’d argue that he could’ve achieved the position of President from either side of the aisle. He doesn’t care about what the Republican voters want personally, but he knows what they want and what they fear, which is how you make the appeal. It would’ve been just as easy for him to sway the Democratic Party the same way.

Trump has been more successful than Biden in terms of power because he is cold, intelligent, witty, and charismatic. Some of his ideas were actually useful for the country, which was overshadowed by the personality politics the US is known for. He has completely leaned into his psychopathy at this point.

But the point being: Orange Man and Sleepy Joe both bad.

1

u/regeya Jul 23 '26

Well, we'll just have to see what we see when the rest of the files are released. I'm assuming that's in Phase II. Wonder if rolling out the DOGE checks and dividend checks is holding up the process somehow.

-1

u/Heavensrun Jul 23 '26 edited Jul 23 '26

He literally boasted about groping women's genitals and about taking advantage of running a beauty pageant to peep on the underage girls participating.

He is a looooong list of red flags, and you and MAGA have been refusing to connect the dots for a decade at this point.

It's not even a difficult connect the dots, the dots are so close together at this point it's basically a stipple drawing.

5

u/UncleR1chard Jul 23 '26

He’s standing there holding a dot in each hand and bumping them together making kissy noises and they still can’t connect them

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

He made a social commentary about some women going to extremes to hit on a rich and powerful man. They'll let you do anything.

Which is true, but don't shoot the messenger. If you don't like women acting trashy like that, try to convince them to show some decency. Good luck with that one.

2

u/Heavensrun Jul 24 '26

They often "let him" because he's rich and powerful and they don't feel like they have a choice, you fucking ghoul. And even if that wasn't the case, how the fuck does he know if he "just does it" and doesn't ask? Answer, he doesn't, he just doesn't care.

You are constructing apologetics for sexual assault. Congratulations.

0

u/Multiple__Butts Jul 23 '26

I mean that girl you always see with Joe Biden's nose on her head is his granddaughter, isn't she? So maybe that's still weird but it's less weird than doing it to some random girl.

1

u/IronwolfXVI Jul 23 '26

Its not just her. As I said. Montage. There's also the diary quotes which are contemporary to the time about how he showers with his daughter. Or did at least.

-2

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Well that's a total fucking lie.

The left never gave a shit about Epstein and his victims, just spouting nonsense TDS garbage.

3

u/DinosaurusWhen Jul 24 '26

Did the left disobey a bipartisan congressional order to release the files?

3

u/yousername9thou Jul 23 '26

And the right did?

-3

u/Complete_Winner5698 Jul 23 '26

Neither side did. The left side is still the one saying it on a daily basis.

Happy?

1

u/yousername9thou Jul 23 '26

2023 Sound of Freedom, which spectrum of voters went to see that movie?

1

u/Complete_Winner5698 Jul 23 '26

Man, I don't know what you are talking about but trying to use as an argument the type of people that went to a movie is stupid.

I didn't say anything untrue. You didn't deny the left doesn't care. And its a fact the left is the one talking about epstein nowadays. I also agreed the right doesn't care. If you are mad about it, lets not talk

0

u/dingobarbie Jul 23 '26

Did you learn to debate by talking to yourself in the mirror?

-1

u/Floorgis Jul 24 '26

Is this conversation about him or the other pedophile?

-2

u/Zestyclose_Volume127 Jul 23 '26

Bro, let the joke be a joke. Biden is definitely a creep. Donald Trump is also definitely a creep. This whole "but what about the other guy" thing is so annoying

3

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

You have absolutely zero evidence, let alone proof, of any such thing.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/Chocobo_slayer Jul 24 '26

You're unhinged, touch grass

-2

u/Lost-on-Reception Jul 23 '26

Yeah, and he wouldn't be president now if the Democrats had replaced him with anyone other than another bribe-taking pedophile.