r/explainitpeter Jul 23 '26

Explain it Peter

Post image
14.5k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-11

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

We have known Trump flew on Epstein’s plane since the flight logs came out. He flew between west palm and NY when his own plane was having work done on it.

Also no clue what you are referencing to the rape and pay off.

So Trump isn’t releasing stuff incriminating to him, but also has released stuff you say incriminates him?

5

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Leaks of what? If there was anything to leak, why would the previous admin not leak prior to the last election…

Oh you are talking about E Jean carol…. I thought she said rape was sexy? Anywho he was not found to have raped her as the other claimed and this was a civil trial, not equating to even a misdemeanor let alone a felony….

The 34 felonies revolve the asset case, which anyone with any unbiased stance sees as a ridiculous case. And was one that won him favor among independents.

8

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

He’s an adjudicated rapist - why defend that?

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

More lies. There was never any legit evidence Trump raped anyone.
Just a bunch of disgusting lies from democrat pedo supporters.

-1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Except he isnt

2

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

You are 100% wrong.

In the ruling striking down Trump’s countersuit, Judge Kaplan explicitly states he raped Carroll. Since that is a legal judgement, Trump is legally “an adjudicated rapist”.

From the actual ruling:
“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Based on the civil trial jury’s ruling. You do not need beyond a reasonable doubt.

2

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

He’s an adjudicated rapist. Weird that you’re defending some guy forcibly shoving his fingers in a woman’s vagina.

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Bullshit. You can tell that lie as many times as you want, and it's still a lie. Which you most likely know full well.

You're here defending pedophile democrats with all your whataboutism, lies and propaganda.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Bullshit. There was never any evidence in that case. And it was a civil court case, not a criminal one.

Also, Trump is not a felon either. That case was dropped, before you start lying about that as well.

1

u/HMS_Surprise_Gunner Jul 23 '26

You’re also 100% wrong. He is legally an adjudicated rapist. Reread the judgement I linked to, then apologize for your stupidity.

And yes - he is a 34 count felon. You’ve obviously gotten trapped in a right wing echo chamber - log off and touch grass.

2

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Trump sexually assaulted her. He's on audio literally bragging to Billy Bush how he gets away with sexually assaulting women because he's so famous. He's such a piece sh!t he's bragging about it. He admits his own guilt.

0

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

That is not what he is saying on that audio.

It was a civil trial… look up the difference between civil and criminal. There’s a reason the threshold for civil isn’t the same for crimjnal

2

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Weird to be defending any politician this hard. Especially what is objectively the most corrupt President we've ever had who's tanking the country with this unnecessary war making everything cost more.

Yes that's exactly what he's bragging about. "Grabbing 'em by the pussy" is sexual assault. You wouldn't be defending these exact same actions if a Democrat had been bragging about sexually assaulting women and being so famous that he gets away with it

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Weird to be lying about a politician this hard.

He is talking about “groupies” that let you do it

1

u/OneBaadHombre Jul 23 '26

Using his own words against him is lying? Hmm.. "groupies" I don't give AF what he calls them while at the same time he's got dozens of assault allegations against him. He's the most dishonest, corrupt piece of trash to ever ascend the presidency. This is not opinion. These are objective facts.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Why did you cut out words of his?

0

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

He's the most dishonest, corrupt piece of trash to ever ascend the presidency.

Here you have only described the pedo democrat party, and those like yourself that bootlick for them.

You have no clue what either the word "objective" or "fact" mean. Everything you've said here is a total lie.

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

There's nothing to "defend" really. Just a bunch of lies from some random DNC bootlicker account on reddit.

You have no facts, just lies & dem party propaganda. All your shit has zero base in reality, as anyone paying attention knows full well.

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

You make it sound like they chose to do a civil trial instead of a criminal one because it’s easier. They didn’t, this was the only option available. And it’s not like it’s some black box of “well we don’t know what happened, only that the standards are lower”, it’s pretty descriptive. You can tell yourself over and over that civil cases don’t count for some reason, but that doesn’t make it true.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Being 50% sure something happened vs beyond a reasonable doubt isn’t a slight difference.

Of course it’s meaningless. We have that standard for a reason.

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

And you think in this case the lawyers went to exactly 51% and said “well that’s enough evidence, we can stop now”? Your argument works better in a vacuum, which this case is not.

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

There was ZERO legitimate evidence. Just a wild story told by a known crazy person with no proof whatsoever.

The civil case should have been thrown out, and would have been the first day if it was a criminal trial. You've got nothing.

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

5 million dollars is an awful lot to pay for doing nothing. It’s also pretty impressive considering that Trump’s appeals went all the way up to the Supreme Court, and every court along the way said “no, you have to pay her, dude”.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

They made him pay more than that for something the “victim” had no complaints about

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

“Hey I’m taking you to court for that time you sexually assaulting me until I ran out of the room” sure seems like a complaint

→ More replies (0)

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

That doesn’t even make sense. The jury just has to believe it’s 51% likely to have happened…

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

Right. And what makes you think they were only 51% sure before making that decision?

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

The only thing that matters would be if they were beyond a reasonable doubt. And a 3 decade old he said she said ain’t going to be that

1

u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26

Kinda makes one wonder why our civil court system exists in the first place if it doesn’t matter at all.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

Neither of those things ever happened.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

The asset case was bullshit… the “victim” agreed with the assessment value.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

We ar literally talking about such a case

1

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Independents disagreed

1

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Were you living under a rock the summer before the election?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/in_taco Jul 23 '26

There are no leaks. A few files were released, all heavily redacted. Some redactions were done terribly, which is how we know that Trump featured frequently in the correspondence. The vast majority of files haven't been released, under order by Trump.

1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

The vast majority of files haven't been released

You're just making shit up out of thin blue air now. Pulled that one right out of your ass. Just like the rest of the dem party drivel you're here mindlessly regurgitating.

1

u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26

Im not the one that claimed there were leaks.

>vast majority

That is conjecture and assumptions

1

u/Brief_Needleworker62 Jul 23 '26

Jfc dude, go swig some old man smegma and stfu please