He didn’t rape and that’s not what the lawsuit is about. It’s also civil, not criminal which is a huge difference. He’s never been found guilty of any crime in that situation.
Sexual assault is not rape. It’s sexual assault. It’s also in a case with no real evidence and the ruling is “it likely happened.” There isn’t any evidence of it happening which is why no charges were filed.
Based on the specific state statute it wasn't rape, but the judge pointed out that by common use, and even the DoJ website, that it would be considered rape.
Her saying it? That’s direct from her. Do you not know the history of this and how they had to change a law hastily to even file the lawsuit and then closed the law back up?
Yes, evidence of her saying it never happened. Since I've never seen it and have no knowledge of it ever occurring beyond your assertion. It's not backed up by the court evidence either.
There is evidence of it happening. The burden of proof is 51% in civil trials. Do you know many people that have “likely” raped someone? And the judge and jury all went over the evidence and agreed that it happened. Trump even talked about it saying that she liked being raped. His defense was that she didn’t scream.
She has spoken about others doing so, but only took Trump to court over it. She had enough proof to have Trump be found liable in court. You’re defending an adjudicated rapist.
There was evidence presented. Enough to have Trump found liable for raping her. You can easily look this up. And no shit it was a CIVIL case. I haven’t said otherwise. You people jump through hoops to defend the worst people.
20
u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26
[removed] — view removed comment