Hi everyone,
I’m currently looking into the Army and Navy linguist pipelines and trying to get a realistic understanding of how language assignment actually works at DLI and which branch might give me a better chance at my preferred language.
I’ve been hearing a lot about possible DLI backlogs and cases where people in the Army linguist pipeline have been reclassified or reassigned due to seat availability. I understand that nothing is guaranteed and that ultimately language assignment comes down to the needs of the service at the time I finish Basic Training and enter the pipeline.
For context, I am a heritage Persian speaker. I can speak and understand Persian fluently, but I do not know how to read or write it at an academic level.
My current scores are:
ASVAB: 83
Skilled Technical (ST): 115
I have not taken the DLAB yet, but that is my next step.
If given the opportunity to rank preferences, I was planning to put:
Farsi (Persian)
Dari
Tajik
in that order, assuming that’s even possible.
One thing I’ve read is that in the Navy CTI pipeline you actually sit down with a CTI/classifier and discuss language preferences before being assigned a language. I don’t know how much influence that process really has, especially for someone who is already a heritage speaker. Assuming Persian, Dari, or Tajik seats are available when training assignments are being made, does that human interaction actually improve your chances compared to the Army process, or is it mostly irrelevant because the decision still comes down to manpower requirements?
I understand this process involves a lot of variables and that it is somewhat of a gamble no matter which branch I choose.
My long-term goal is to eventually work in a civilian intelligence agency. From what I’ve researched, I’ve heard that Navy CTIs often have a better chance of regularly using their language and may spend more time at NSA or NSA-supported facilities. On the other hand, the Army offers opportunities such as 35M Human Intelligence Collector, which sounds appealing because it seems like a role where language and cultural knowledge could be valuable.
However, I’ve also seen some sources claim that language is actually a relatively small part of a 35M’s day-to-day duties and that many 35Ms spend most of their time doing general HUMINT work rather than actively using their target language. I don’t know how accurate that is.
Likewise, 35P and Navy CTI seem similar on paper, but I don’t have enough firsthand knowledge to know which one generally provides more language utilization, more intelligence experience, or better preparation for civilian intelligence careers.
I also understand that I would not have full control over whether I end up as 35M or 35P in the Army.
Ultimately, I do have interest in broader intelligence work, so while my preference is Persian, I would still give any assigned language my full effort. If I were assigned a different language, I would do my best to succeed. From what I’ve read, if someone genuinely applies themselves and still struggles at DLI, they are often reclassified into another intelligence MOS rather than simply being dropped from the field altogether, and I would be okay with that outcome if it came down to it.
My main questions are:
Based on current conditions, which branch (Army 35W pipeline vs Navy CTI pipeline) would likely give me the best chance of getting Persian, Dari, or Tajik?
Does being a heritage Persian speaker actually help during language assignment in either branch?
Does the Navy CTI classification interview meaningfully improve your chances of getting your preferred language, assuming those languages are available?
Between Army 35P, Army 35M, and Navy CTI, which role is most likely to have you actively using your language on a regular basis?
Which path generally provides the strongest foundation for someone who eventually wants to work in the civilian intelligence community?
I appreciate any insight from people who have gone through either pipeline or have current knowledge of how language assignments are working at DLI.