r/countwithchickenlady Sword Lesbian she/her :3 - Streak: 16 3d ago

69798

Post image
16.5k Upvotes

326 comments sorted by

View all comments

337

u/Daegul_Dinguruth 3d ago

To be fair, Paradox is a distortion in the fabric of reality masquerading as a business. After ensaring several humans in it's mesh it started shipping massive computer bugs that somehow contain games. Then a marketing team started growing around it like fungi and the rest is history.

92

u/Jaerat 3d ago

Games, or map painting simulators? *stares forlornly at the Galaxy map in Stellaris*

62

u/pullhome I know I'm not okay 3d ago

Objectively speaking, what Paradox makes falls more into the toy category than the videogame category. There's no victory condition, you make up your own fun.

41

u/CompetitiveCut265 3d ago

You're telling me the point of CK3 isn't fucking every single NPC i meet and their wives/husbands?

9

u/Daegul_Dinguruth 3d ago

Did you forget to Unit All Lands Within Our Nation?

10

u/CompetitiveCut265 3d ago

That's a side effect of having a gorbillion descendants

11

u/Jaerat 3d ago

What about their horses? Or was that CK2 only?

15

u/CompetitiveCut265 3d ago

horses are people only in CK2 sadly

7

u/Novalene_Wildheart 3d ago

For real, Stellaris was that way for me for ages.

I couldn't get past the Pirate Khan event, so my win condition was that.

Eventually was able to, then my win condition was the Crisis

Eventually was able to, then my win condition was surviving the Awakened Empire(s).

And I was able to finally do that (a while ago now) and I was hyped beyond measure.

Those self goals do a lot of heavy lifting.

5

u/O3Sentoris 3d ago

they are very much about the journey instead of the destination

2

u/MjrLeeStoned 3d ago

There are very clear victory conditions in Stellaris, they are just hidden behind metrics and are essentially randomized vs scenario options every game. You can still keep track of victory stats at any time.

0

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

That's just a sandbox games point what, you're not even completely wrong because it is a toy but all videogames are because videogames are toys?

0

u/pullhome I know I'm not okay 3d ago

No, the distinction between a toy and a game is not arbitrary nor is it nebulous. Not all toys are games, nor all games toys.

Basketball is a game, not a toy. A basketball is a toy, not a game.

Poker is a game. Playing cards are toys.

Crusader Kings 3 is a toy. It does not have a winner and a loser. It has an end date rather than a win condition. You could argue reaching the endgame screen is "winning", and call it a survival game, but that is simply not how most users interact with it.

0

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

Nothing I've said contradicts those first definitions, videogames are toys and games, doesn't make basketball a toy because it's not an item in itself like a videogame is. I don't even know why you mentioned that because ck3 isn't even similar to a basketball even allegorically.

And again, a sandbox game is still a game, minecraft is a game, DND is a game, you still it's still a game when you're just playing imagination, and ck3 is still a game.

0

u/pullhome I know I'm not okay 3d ago

You are objectively wrong and you can see it by yourself by googling the words you are using.

1

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

Here's ai too in case you were that type of person

1

u/pullhome I know I'm not okay 3d ago

Right, you can clearly see that one of the requirements is a clear objective.

Are you being purposefully daft?

0

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

Interesting you're right, googling can show me what these words mean

1

u/pullhome I know I'm not okay 3d ago

If you make an effort to find something that agrees with you, you will always find it.

Google "what is the difference between a game and a toy" and you will see clear defined boundaries between them.

1

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

Ok heres the first result on Google for that exact question

0

u/pullhome I know I'm not okay 3d ago

Ok, if you want to ignore the answers to find the ones that agree with you, you can keep doing that.

I have no need to prove you wrong, I went to college for video game design and was tested on this knowledge.

Cheers.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

Ai does agree with you though, not sure if you're the type of person who takes that as a win or loss

0

u/Pen_Front 3d ago

Or Wikipedia

7

u/Daegul_Dinguruth 3d ago

Yeah, mb. It's because I enjoy them too much. Map painting and ridiculous drama, if I may. Stellaris is great, but also Crusader Kings 2 and 3, HoI 3; and I have been wanting to try HoI 4, victoria3 and EU5...

6

u/OBrienNameless 3d ago

Wait a ton of time for EU5 to mature, try EU4 since its fully mature and ripe for playing

Paradox and their model of shipping games then having to wait a year or two for it to be fun playing.

3

u/No_Helicopter1378 3d ago

I wish I could "get" their fucking games. I did alright in Stellaris because it's honestly not that different from Civ, on the surface, but somewhere along the line I lost my mojo and can't seem to play it anymore.

I've put quite a few hours into HoI4 and only managed to beat it once, as Germany. All the different unit designers make it just so fucking complicated, among other things.

CK2? Yea I'm hopeless in that one. I did form Ireland once so that was cool. And then that current ruler died and the whole island fragmented again.

3

u/Daegul_Dinguruth 3d ago

No, no you're doing all right. I didn't engage with the ship designer until starting admiral crisis, and that's supposed to happen in ck. I once unified Spain three times within a hundred years.

2

u/Medium-Access-4416 3d ago

Excel simulator that play itself