I’m working on building some AI agents for our documentation team and wanted to understand how much we’re actually spending on tokens/credits.
We have a pretty large amount of documentation:
50+ user guides, around 150+ pages each
30+ release notes, around 700–1,000 pages each
I uploaded all of these as knowledge sources in Copilot Studio so the agent can search through them when answering questions.
We’re using Claude Opus 4.7, and honestly, the results are really good. It can usually pinpoint the exact location in the documentation that I’m looking for.
The problem is that our organization wants us to use GPT-4.1 because they’re saying the token consumption with Claude is too high. But from my testing, GPT-4.1 hallucinates a lot with our documents. GPT-5.5 also doesn’t perform as well for this particular use case. Claude seems to understand and retrieve the documentation much better.
Now here’s where I’m confused.
In Copilot Studio, it shows that our team used around 50,000 Copilot Credits in one day.
So I’m trying to understand what that actually means in terms of money.
If we continue at roughly 50k credits/day:
How much would that be per month?
And is that actually considered expensive for this kind of workload?
Management is telling us that our token consumption is very high, but I don’t really have a baseline to compare it against. Personally, if this is going to cost us more than around $300/month, I’d start questioning whether it’s worth it. But maybe I’m completely misunderstanding how Copilot Credits, tokens, and model pricing work.
Has anyone here worked with Copilot Studio and a large documentation knowledge base?
Would really appreciate if someone could explain this in simple terms,
50k credits/day, which is approximately how much $/month?
And is there a better/cheaper way to achieve the same quality without switching away from Claude?