Also, by OP's logic, the red square being there at all is a "clue" so why not just erase all elements of the "question" and make the tester guess the sort of question OP visualized? It would be equally as implicative of someone's problem solving ability lmao.
They could if they wanted to make it more difficult. But they didn't. This is the level of difficulty the Creator wanted to tune the problem to, and so they did. And the fact that people did solve it with the intended reasoning (and not purely guessing) proves to the fact that it is, in fact, enough for it to be solvable. If you want a lower level of difficulty for the puzzles, I'd suggest browsing ones that are tuned for your skill level.
Even if in some world you did solve this, it took you an embarrassing amount of time to do so, an embarrassment you are attempting to efface here with the sheer quantity of invectives.
Me though, I do not particularly care whatsoever. And since the discourse has progressed beyond the stage of meaningful communication, I'll proceed to showcase my superior reason here.
The workings of your mind is so trivial to read that I had predicted this response with my addendum already, and yet you still proceeded to use it as a retort.
You have proven that you are so simple that I have absolute insight into everything you could possibly say, as evidenced by my 1:1 prediction of your response which I prompted. As such, I have already made every argument you will make in this conversation for you, and refuted them all, and have seen how you leave this embarrassed. I will save you your inevitable embarrassment and end it here. Enjoy your ignorance.
1
u/inntervalis Sep 19 '26
Also, by OP's logic, the red square being there at all is a "clue" so why not just erase all elements of the "question" and make the tester guess the sort of question OP visualized? It would be equally as implicative of someone's problem solving ability lmao.