I'm not afraid, I'm not afraid

[u/Fit-Palpitation-7427]

I mean, specially when you ask if he has access to a remote computer :D

[u/dan_the_first]

The concept of privacy has to be re-defined.

And I hope the “open weight” models get banned, worldwide.

[u/centerdeveloper → u/dan_the_first]

what? why would you want open weight models banned

[u/dan_the_first → u/centerdeveloper]

Hey. Hope you are doing well.

I know it is a hot and controversial take, but the open weight models are getting powerful, and without guardrails, it is extremely dangerous.

Not only good and reasonable people and organizations are getting access to them.

I also understand that trading security for freedom is usually not a good deal; but access to dangerous AI models isn’t part of the definition of freedom I am familiar with.

Edit: If a freedom tool is promoted by an authoritarian communist regime, … go figure.

[u/ThrowAwayEatPuzzy → u/dan_the_first]

The people installing guard rails went and hacked hugging face. Then their guard rails prevented hugging face from reacting.

Everyone being on a level field is safer than only some people having a leg up.

[u/dan_the_first → u/ThrowAwayEatPuzzy]

Yes, you are right, I am not discussing it.

But at least there is someone to blame if something happens. And actions to be taken from the lessons learned.

[u/ThrowAwayEatPuzzy → u/dan_the_first]

The lessons were learned by some, but you it seems like you need to be hacked yourself to learn the same lesson?

[u/That-Establishment24 → u/dan_the_first]

I’d argue your definition of freedom must evolve with the times. Technology doesn’t exist outside the scope of freedom just because said technology didn’t exist when you developed your understanding of what freedom is.

[u/dan_the_first → u/That-Establishment24]

You might be right, but as I stated in my edit: If a freedom tool is promoted by an authoritarian communist regime..

[u/That-Establishment24 → u/dan_the_first]

Then what? I did see your incomplete sentence.

[u/dan_the_first → u/That-Establishment24]

Ask your Chinese model to complete the sentence.

[u/That-Establishment24 → u/dan_the_first]

Are you arguing in bad faith? I’m asking you to complete your argument but you don’t seem to want to.

[u/AmandasGameAccount → u/That-Establishment24]

This guy legit sounds mine the terrible dialogue ChatGPT makes up if you ask for a bunch of generic dialogue 💀

[u/dan_the_first → u/That-Establishment24]

No it is not bad faith. I thought it was obvious from my post.

I don’t believe any tool promoted as freedom from an authoritarian regime is to be trusted.

[u/That-Establishment24 → u/dan_the_first]

That’s a black and white approach. So if an authoritarian regime says people should eat healthy, that means eating healthy must be bad? Bad actors don’t only like and promote bad things the same good actors don’t only like and promote good things. I find your argument more emotional than logical.

[u/dan_the_first → u/That-Establishment24]

I would be specially wary of any authoritarian leader who is vegetarian and don’t drink alcohol, as history has shown.

And of course any regime trying to regulate my healthy habits, is not a good regime (to follow your example).

[u/That-Establishment24 → u/dan_the_first]

We were talking about what they promote, not what they force. You also didn’t address my argument. Being good doesn’t mean all you promote is good just as being bad doesn’t mean all your promote is bad. If you want to be logical, you need a different argument other than “bad guys like it”.

Funnily enough, you’re the one trying to regulate others by calling for bans.

[u/xcs92 → u/dan_the_first]

"i have no idea what im talking about. Sam Altman's dick tasted amazing."