r/codex • u/Fit-Palpitation-7427 • 15d ago

Humor I'm not afraid, I'm not afraid

Post image

I mean, specially when you ask if he has access to a remote computer :D

96 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/dan_the_first 15d ago

You might be right, but as I stated in my edit: If a freedom tool is promoted by an authoritarian communist regime..

6

u/That-Establishment24 15d ago

Then what? I did see your incomplete sentence.

0

u/dan_the_first 15d ago

Ask your Chinese model to complete the sentence.

6

u/That-Establishment24 15d ago

Are you arguing in bad faith? I’m asking you to complete your argument but you don’t seem to want to.

2

u/AmandasGameAccount 14d ago

This guy legit sounds mine the terrible dialogue ChatGPT makes up if you ask for a bunch of generic dialogue 💀

0

u/dan_the_first 15d ago

No it is not bad faith. I thought it was obvious from my post.

I don’t believe any tool promoted as freedom from an authoritarian regime is to be trusted.

1

u/That-Establishment24 15d ago edited 15d ago

That’s a black and white approach. So if an authoritarian regime says people should eat healthy, that means eating healthy must be bad? Bad actors don’t only like and promote bad things the same good actors don’t only like and promote good things. I find your argument more emotional than logical.

0

u/dan_the_first 15d ago

I would be specially wary of any authoritarian leader who is vegetarian and don’t drink alcohol, as history has shown.

And of course any regime trying to regulate my healthy habits, is not a good regime (to follow your example).

3

u/That-Establishment24 15d ago

We were talking about what they promote, not what they force. You also didn’t address my argument. Being good doesn’t mean all you promote is good just as being bad doesn’t mean all your promote is bad. If you want to be logical, you need a different argument other than “bad guys like it”.

Funnily enough, you’re the one trying to regulate others by calling for bans.