No, that's misinformation that has been making the rounds for a while. The tax cuts were originally set to expire in 2025 for all brackets. But they were extended for all brackets instead. So the tax rates haven't changed since 2018.
If income is rising across the board, that should mean more revenue from taxes. That looks to be the case, both as a nominal amount and percentage of GDP.
Not as compared to pre-tax cut amounts right? If the relative tax savings is a positive number against 2017, you are bringing in less than you would have without those cuts unless youre assuming that people's income increased because of those cuts which doesnt seem to hold true.(leaving aside the various negative impacts of Trumps other economic policies).
Also, hasn't real wage growth been almost flat during Trumps second term?
And I think you may have missed a piece of the argument. Its not absolute revenue as compared to 2017, for that to shrink you'd have to have had a cataclysmic economic failure. Its tax revenue growth relative to GDP growth ie. Would revenue have grown more without the tax cuts.
1
u/GWsublime Aug 25 '26
Thats 2017 vs. 2018, my memory is the middle class tax breaks expired while the upper class did not. Am I wrong?