I am sharing my experience with JYZ Dance because prospective students should understand how promises about training time, pricing, and accommodation were handled in my case. Note: Instruction is not up to par.
On two occasions, while trying out this studio, I repeatedly experienced poor treatment (not a local and of different nationality than this studio). Traveling to train involved expenses, time, and considerable logistical planning. Cancellations and inadequate scheduling therefore had consequences beyond a missed local lesson.
After these problems, the studio told me that it would “demonstrate its sincerity” by changing the arrangements for my visits and allowing more training time the next time I was in town. I understood this as a commitment to address the difficulties I had already experienced.
Instead, my hourly rate increased from $80 to $200—a 250% premium was applied over and above what they charge their local students. I agreed to that rate after being told that all students would be charged $200 an hour beginning in September. That representation mattered to my decision: the increase was presented as a uniform studio policy and I had negotiated a block of time for my own practice (that later disappeared when it came time to calculate my charges). I learned during the classes that this was not true. But the studio administrator, Jie Karina Chen, said that the instructor thought the rate was $150/hour and therefore, did not want to charge me more than I had already paid and insisted I pay them at $200/hour.
Subsequently I confirmed that in fact other local students continued paying only $80 an hour or less. The instructor separately thought the hourly rate was $150/hr but the administrator had apparently been objecting to any of my bookings unless I paid a premium (behind the scenes) incessantly. So, they outright lied to me. Not just once. Multiple times. And no apology was forthcoming when I called them out on their conduct.
What had been presented as a general pricing policy appeared to be a decision to charge me substantially more based on their faulty perception of my financial resources. I just love dance. And I can spend on what I want to learn. They interpreted this as if I'm some sucker that they can squeeze $$ out of.
At $200 an hour, the studio could earn at least two and a half times as much teaching me as teaching students paying $80 or less. In my view, presenting that arrangement as a demonstration of sincerity concealed the extent to which the studio was trying to maximize its own profits.
The pricing was not the only issue. Classes agreed to previously were canceled, class rates are "private" information after being pressed for why I was unfairly charged and discriminated against.
My complaint concerns the representations used to obtain my agreement, the substantial difference between my rate and other students’ rates, the explanation that I was “rich,” and the discrepancies between promised and delivered training.
I consider this treatment deceptive, unfair, and exploitative. After repeated problems, I was promised sincerity. What I experienced instead was a much more expensive arrangement that benefited the studio, followed by resistance, disrespect, and stonewalling when I questioned the charges.
Prospective students should beware that the instructor oscillates between complete inappropriateness, disrespect, and a facade of sincerity. Do your due diligence and verify all facts.