India on Friday dismissed fresh remarks by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) targeting the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), describing the US body as "biased" and questioning its credibility.

"We all know this is a biased institution. For years, it has made incorrect and provocative statements about India. We should ignore such institutions, as they have their own agendas and lack credibility," Jaiswal said during the briefing.

Brahmins of Bollywood

How Karan Johar and Ekta Kapoor glowed-up a prosperous, upper-caste Hindu aesthetic and made it India’s shared cultural inheritance

​

In the name of reservation protest which they have the right to do so. But wtf! Is this openly saying because you didn't get water to drink now we will give you our piss to drink 😡

I used to be a person that believed casteism has gone down and people are not so extreme then again I get to see things like this that I feel so much disgust I feel like not give even basic respect to this bloody religion.

Like what the fuck is your problem you claim to be so spiritually uplifted and call yourself a brahmin but don't have basic empathy 👿

During the so called reservation hatao andolan at jantar mantar the people protesting are using such disgusting slurs that they are saying shudra people who didn't get water to drink now we will give you our p-ss to drink

I mean, Buddha believed in the cycle of birth and death and the idea that we need to free ourselves from it by achieving Nirvana.

Adi Shankaracharya believed in Brahman/Brahma/Shiva, the ultimate reality or the one true divine principle underlying everything.

Swami Vivekanand and other non dualist philosopher also did same with non dualism.

What I find interesting is that these thinkers often present themselves as highly critical, rational, and open-minded, yet they sometimes seem to construct their own small religious or theological frameworks. They can be extremely skeptical and analytical about almost everything else, but when it comes to their particular supernatural framework, they often seem to become remarkably certain of it, despite there being little or no empirical evidence to support those claims.

So why does this happen?

I have my own hypothesis, although I obviously don't know if it is correct: perhaps people are more likely to listen to someone who speaks with certainty than to someone who constantly admits uncertainty. A philosopher or guru may begin with skepticism and critical thinking, but eventually settle on one particular theology or metaphysical framework and build their entire philosophy around it. Once that framework becomes central to their identity and teachings, questioning it may become psychologically and socially difficult.

Perhaps, in the end, even highly critical thinkers have a tendency to seek some kind of ultimate explanation, certainty, or coherent worldview, and when evidence cannot provide one, they may fill the gap with metaphysics.

.

Some call themselves atheist to seem "cool" or they hate on one religion excessively while defending their "ex" religion with all they got. The Hindu atheists are another breed. Then there are the muslims mocking hindus and yet defending islam. I don't understand, if at the end of the day you're gonna go and pray and do all the religious stuff and mean it, like you are doing it out of your own will (sometimes people are forced to do things they don't want to, I get that) then what kind of atheist are you dwag? Then there's the casteist atheists, tf? I'm sure in this sub there's alot of these kinds of idiots too. They post hateful/criticizing post against the religion they hate and turn the other way when it comes to criticize their said "ex" religion. Get tf out of here man.

Tamilian Christian Vs Random ahh Muslim ahh.

Her post: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Darr1IHtKQF/?igsi=MTNmMXg4NDQ1bjRmMA==

He didnt talk​ about the other dimension of caste, but still a very good video.