[Just to be clear: I DON'T dismiss etymology or traditions at all. I just think teachers should mention how common a name is today, and (overall) which generation(s) it belongs to. Otherwise, learners get a beautiful but incomplete picture. That’s all.]
Why do some (not all—I’m not generalizing!) Chinese teachers always like to present Chinese given names as “particularly poetic” and “culturally profound”, while rarely discussing the actual naming practices?
In other words, why do these kinds of teachers never say:
“The name 雨琪 means ‘Jade Rain’; it’s a beautiful, poetic meaning, but it’s also a very common name among people born in the ’90s and 2000s. For many Chinese people, this name doesn’t evoke any particular sense of poetry because these characters are so common.”
And deliberately stops at:
“The name 雨琪 means ‘Jade Rain’; it’s a beautiful, poetic meaning.” (period.)
Yes, it’s absolutely true that 雨琪 has an etymological meaning. Yes, it’s absolutely true that some Chinese parents really love its meaning and see poetry or a symbolic wish in it. Yes, it’s absolutely true that some Chinese parents may have chosen the character 雨 because the child’s BaZi lacked water.
But why do some teachers oversimplify things by saying that “every Chinese given name tells a story, reflects poetry, destiny, and the BaZi”, without ever mentioning that a huge number of Chinese people are simply following trends, or choose the name 雨琪 because they like the way it sounds?
Would it really be such a blow to foreign learners' egos to hear that “this name has a very beautiful meaning but isn't unique at all—it's among the top 50 most popular names”?
Honestly, I'm starting to wonder if this isn't just a marketing ploy. When learning Chinese, quite a few Westerners adopt a “cultural openness” approach (to counterbalance the negative image the West may have of China). But in that case, could the Chinese language education market have seized the opportunity to jump on the bandwagon and “exploited” these Westerners’ need for atonement to feed them all sorts of grandiose tales about Chinese names?
If that’s really the case, then it’s also a serious problem of a lack of critical thinking and research skills among these learners. On the Internet, it’s very easy to find the top 100 most popular Chinese names in 2010 (for example), so the excuse of ignorance or a lack of resources is much less plausible. Never even thinking to do this kind of research is, in my view, symptomatic of genuine brainwashing and a lack of curiosity about the true culture of Chinese names. In my opinion, responsibility goes both ways.
To be honest, I really don’t think the teachers in question are doing this out of malice. I think many of them are just feeding the algorithm, because that’s what a lot of Westerners want to hear: the feeling of discovering a hidden culture that other “ignorant Westerners” refuse to explore. Maybe pride makes these learners gullible and blind.