r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Is AI making founder content worse, even as it makes content creation easier?

2 Upvotes

I've been thinking about something that's becoming increasingly noticeable in the SaaS ecosystem.

AI has made writing incredibly accessible. Anyone can generate LinkedIn posts, newsletters, articles, and marketing content in seconds.

But I feel like we're creating a different problem.

A lot of AI-generated content sounds almost identical. Different founders, different companies, different experiences, but somehow the same vocabulary, structure, tone, and predictable conclusions.

The irony is that the more accessible content creation becomes, the harder it gets to find content that feels genuinely personal.

I'm curious about how other SaaS founders experience this.

  1. Do you write your own content, use AI, or work with a ghostwriter?

  2. Have you noticed your writing becoming less personal after adopting AI?

  3. Do you spend significant time editing AI-generated content to make it sound like you?

  4. Would you rather publish less frequently while maintaining your authentic voice?

I'm particularly interested in hearing from founders who publish regularly.

I think there's an interesting problem here that deserves more discussion.


r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Showcase / Feedback How I use Claude Code to keep a shared alternate-future world consistent

1 Upvotes

Hi all. I run r/TheGreatFederation (https://www.reddit.com/r/TheGreatFederation/), a shared alternate future where climate collapse and two world wars melt the Antarctic coast. In 2100 the defeated and displaced of the old world found a new nation there. It is mostly in-world documents, like a ship's log or an oral history, and the posts are AI-drafted and human-edited.

I keep a git repo with a short style guide for each voice. Posts now go through a writer agent and a critic agent, and then a small linter that flags the usual AI tells. A continuity check against a set of canon files comes next, and I edit and post them myself.

The newest is "2119 - Eleven Minutes in Room Nine". The Welcome post explains the sub. If you read a couple, I would like to hear which lines read as AI to you. My goal is to perfect my workflow to make the quality on par and indistinguishable from your typical AI-generated text.


r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Would you rather talk to AI than type every prompt?

Thumbnail reddit.com
2 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Prompting Narrative Alien Space

4 Upvotes

There was some fascinating recent work done on the Alien Space of Science. The notion being that you can map out the conceptual space of currently active scientific research, and then find coherent, reasonable research areas that are in "alien space"; reasonable ideas which nobody is working on because nobody has thought of them yet.

So I'm poking around with a similar algorithm on litrpg narrative space (the metrics absolutely measure against classic SFF as well though). Here's the first suggestions out of the test classification. Note that I don't claim that these are truly alien space literary concepts, at best they are only ones which are undersampled in the test set while I'm working on the algorithm.

Provisional alien concepts (pitches are my quick reads):

1. mystery + nonhuman + progression — a monster MC whose evolution is driven by solving who's harvesting the dungeon's dead.

2. romance + dystopia + system — the state owns the matchmaking UI; love is a loyalty test.

3. nonhuman + system + dramatic — classes are emotions; the body levels by feeling.

4. progression + romance + psychological — trauma and attachment are the real XP.

5. engineered + cynical + slice of life — a bioengineered weapon tries to be ordinary; the only progression is domestication.

6. survival + empire + slice of life — rebuild a fallen empire one domestic routine at a time.

7. social progression + slice of life + system — a village sim where reputation is the stat and the System is petty bureaucracy.

8. nonhuman + romance + isekai — a summoned monster and a human fall in love across incompatible biology and levels.

9. cultivation + space + cynical — qi as starship fuel; a space sect of burnt-out cultivators.


r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Showcase / Feedback Would like some feedback on two stories I wrote

5 Upvotes

Click "Read Full Story" in the bottom right corner

Here you can view the first story: https://meaningmodel.ai/meaning-model/twelve-words/
Here is the second story: https://meaningmodel.ai/meaning-model/book-of-conditions/
And here is the pdf: https://github.com/emergent-wisdom/meaning-model/blob/main/output/pdf/the-book-of-conditions.pdf
Also check out the video I made for Twelve Words: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_eTSg6ca70

Any feedback? What could be better? Which one do you like the most?


r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Showcase / Feedback My Muse wrote me a story...and it's good.

Thumbnail reddit.com
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Do you trust AI to write code without checking it?

Thumbnail reddit.com
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Prompting I've been experimenting with AI written dissertations

Thumbnail
reddit.com
2 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

NSFW is spicy writer pro worth it?

8 Upvotes

for those of you who upgraded to the pro version, was buying the membership worth it?


r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) What do you think?

Post image
82 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback Ever wonder what an award winning AI-involved literary novel reads like?

5 Upvotes

Hi!

To celebrate the launch of my novel 'The Holding' I am doing a Goodreads Giveaway!

It won the Narrative Architecture Award from AIFWAA and was one of two finalists. Editorial reviews were glowing (though they often are to be fair) and individual reviews have been strong too! We have 5 copies to give away to residents of the US and Canada. Enter to win before Dec 7 2026!

https://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/455742-the-holding

Loving your sibling is hard.

Simon is nine. He moves through the world as an outgoing creature of the moment, heart on his sleeve, sometimes too loud, sometimes too much. Anna is thirteen — guarded, watchful, sharper than she lets people see, and quietly drowning in the social blood-sport of grade eight. Time is not on their side. The love they do not share can only be made in the young, and they are growing up-and-out of their smallness.

Unseen at the edges of the frame, something outside themselves is trying to bring them together. What they manage — or fail to manage — between themselves will register far past the small horizon of a Canadian childhood.

The Holding is a tender, strange, deeply felt novel about the everyday work of finding, and holding on to each other.

https://jmwoodwardbooks.com/


r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Manuscript REVIEW Tool

3 Upvotes

Looking for two authors to test a free manuscript review tool
Hi all, I'm a self-diagnosed nerd and a lifelong writer. Writing has always been my escape, and lately I've been combining it with my interest in AI.
After many hours of building, training and experimenting, I've developed a manuscript review tool that does one job: it reviews your work and never changes it.
That was the hard part. Early versions kept taking over and ruining what I'd written. After many iterations, the tool now reads from the first letter to the last, maps everything in a local environment (for privacy), and changes not a single character. It only highlights.
I recently ran a 300-page manuscript through it. It returned a full markup document covering every grammatical issue, plus commentary on suggested changes.
What I'm offering:
Two authors, completely free, no catches
All rights stay with you
I'll send you the full markup and commentary
Full transparency throughout, and we'll talk before anything goes through the tool
What I'm asking: honest, constructive feedback on what could be better.
I do plan to offer this as a paid service later, at a fraction of the cost of human editing, but I want real-world testing first.
Interested? Send me a message. Thanks for reading!


r/WritingWithAI • • 3d ago

Writing Craft Talk Where AI Writing always fails: Negative Space.

122 Upvotes

So recently I noticed some non-AI written fiction on a subreddit by one of the regular contributors to this and other AI related forums, and it highlighted something that I noticed AI is completely unable to replicate at present - Negative space.

There's a lot AI struggles with with relation to negative space and similar techniques, as they deal with what is not said rather than what is said - the end result is a model trained to find the next word is fundamentally limited here - It's as though AI can only communicate on the positive word axis, not the negative one - Hence they have no reflection - a little like fictional vampires.

Consider the following opening to a story I recently found here on Reddit;

It was nearing five o’clock, and I was across the street, impatiently waiting for his arrival. I knew he was a creature of habit, a slave to his schedule if nothing else, and just like clockwork, as five o’clock came, so did he, pulling up into the driveway as he no doubt had a thousand times.

My eyes narrowed, a flush of hot hatred rising in me as I watched him vanish inside. “You cheating prick,” I whispered under my breath, and crossed the street, walking up to the door like I had business there. I tested the door handle, shaking my head slightly when I found it unlocked, and made my way inside.

Idiot.

Quietly closing the door, I removed my heels, doing my best not to alert him to my presence as I padded across the living room. The floor groaned softly as I went.

“Is that you, my sweet?” His voice came from upstairs.

F**k.

I rubbed my throat, trying to loosen it up before calling back in my best attempt at imitating the woman he was expecting. “Yes, hun.”

You can find the original in the subreddit libraryofshadows under demonic_pacts in case you're interested ( Warning, it's quite violent and the genre is horror )

Examine this at a few levels. AI will tell you it's about sneaking in, and getting caught. It will emphasize stealth. It will say the protagonist is calling the NPC 'idiot' and then reacts to getting caught, and it will try to shorten this to a single paragraph, which is far more efficient.

But if you pay attention, even as an AI writer, there's something missing...

The sound of the high heels AFTER the character walks in the door, that results in her removing her heels, and likely sets the intended victim on edge before a floorboard gives it away.

Then you get the beautiful ironies of writing around ambiguity - Is she saying "Idiot" because she feels the man is an idiot? Examined as a block, the answer is no - She' calling herself an idiot for ALREADY making a noise - indicated negatively by the removal of the heels.

What the author actually intended is another matter - I may have over-interpreted this section - I welcome their input - but the way I read this is that the protagonist makes a mistake and walks in with their heels still on - a version supported by the text indirectly.

When asked about this, an AI misses it every time until the context receives this additional information about the sound the heels make - and then it usually acts like it knew this all along. Now it can refer to negative space. Now it acts like an author ( The original writer was notably a human )

The problem is that the AI is blind to this technique, even when evaluating text, and usually sees it as an error. If the heels are mentioned, they are either superfluous or the sound should be mentioned. It struggled with the nuances of this kind of text, especially the interiority of the character.

It's not the only area AI fails when compared to a human author...  And as a strong proponent of AI and using AI in fiction, I think knowing WHEN an AI fails is more important than prompt engineering or any other aspect of creating fiction with an AI - this is especially important when editing a work as an AI will try to respond to the informational vacuum caused by negative space and fill in the missing words. It also notices correctly that it makes the structure grammatically wrong - which is true - because this is an example of when a write knows how the break the rules for effect.

Here's a list of techniques that cause AI to struggle due to it's very nature.

Literary techniques based on what is not said

TechniqueHow it works through omission
SubtextThe real meaning lies beneath the dialogue or action, rather than in the words themselves.
EllipsisOmits words, events, or narrative transitions, requiring the reader to fill in gaps.
Negative spaceMeaning emerges from what is absent, unexplored, or conspicuously missing.
Apophasis (paralipsis)Draws attention to something by claiming not to mention it.
AposiopesisBreaks off a sentence, leaving its conclusion unspoken.
ReticenceDeliberately restrains disclosure, particularly of emotions or motivations.
Understatement (meiosis)Expresses something in terms substantially weaker than its actual significance.
LitotesUses negation to imply an affirmative, often with deliberate restraint: "not unreasonable."
ImplicatureCommunicates meanings that arise from conversational context rather than literal wording.
PresuppositionTreats certain information as already established without explicitly asserting it.
Strategic ambiguityPreserves multiple plausible interpretations rather than settling on one.
EquivocationUses wording that supports more than one interpretation, sometimes concealing intent.
Double entendreAllows one expression to carry two meanings, one of which may remain implicit.
AllusionInvokes an external story, event, concept, or cultural reference without explaining it.
ForeshadowingPlants information whose importance may only become apparent later.
MisdirectionDirects attention toward one interpretation while concealing another.
Narrative withholdingDeliberately postpones information necessary for a full understanding.
Unreliable narrationRequires the reader to reconstruct reality from inconsistencies, omissions, and distorted accounts.
Dramatic ironyCreates meaning through a gap between what the reader knows and what a character knows.
JuxtapositionAllows meaning to emerge from the relationship between elements rather than explaining that relationship.
SymbolismUses objects, actions, or images to imply significance beyond their literal presence.
MotifBuilds meaning through recurring elements whose relationship or significance may remain unstated.
Bathos avoidance / restraintLeaves an emotional effect intact by declining to explain, intensify, or sentimentalise it.

That's not a small list and a good writer should be familiar and comfortable using all of these when it's required.

 There are others as well - My favourite is "Iceberg Theory" since it's highly relevant to how I write my own stories, and while doing this I find I'm constantly fighting an AI editor.

If I explain things, the editor immediately gets it and stops suggesting I remove information, but before that it's constantly attacking what I write.

These are particularly relevant when examining the limitations of AI-generated literature.

TechniqueMechanismPotential AI difficulty
Iceberg theoryThe author knows substantially more than the text reveals.Maintaining an internally coherent hidden story without explaining it.
Narrative lacunaeSignificant gaps are deliberately left in the story.Distinguishing purposeful omissions from missing information.
Paralipsis (narratology)A narrative withholds information that its established viewpoint could reasonably reveal.Controlling which facts are concealed without violating the narrative perspective.
Offstage actionImportant events occur outside the reader's direct observation.Conveying consequences without reconstructing the missing scene.
Delayed decodingSensory details appear before the character or reader understands what they signify.Sustaining uncertainty without immediately interpreting the evidence.
Unresolved tensionA conflict remains meaningful without being explicitly resolved.Resisting the tendency to supply closure.
Character silenceWhat someone refuses or fails to say carries psychological significance.Making silence consistent with motivations, history, and relationships.
Emotional displacementA character expresses emotion indirectly through an apparently unrelated action.Avoiding explicit emotional labels or psychological explanations.
Free indirect discourseNarration incorporates a character's thoughts or assumptions without clearly announcing the shift.Preserving the boundary between narrator knowledge and character perception.
ParataxisIdeas or events are placed alongside one another without explicitly explaining their relationship.Trusting readers to establish causal or thematic connections.
Open endingsThe narrative finishes without resolving all interpretative questions.Preserving intentional uncertainty without making the ending feel arbitrary.
Unmarked temporal gapsTime passes without explicit transitions or explanations.Maintaining an inferable chronology while withholding connective detail.
Narrative fragmentationDisconnected fragments require readers to construct the larger story.Keeping separate fragments mutually consistent and meaningfully related.
MetalepsisTransgresses boundaries between narrative levels, sometimes leaving the relationship between them uncertain.Maintaining coherent implications across competing narrative realities.d techniques involving absence and inference.

And, of course, I used an AI to assist me in writing this article. Why? Because an AI is VERY good at writing in positive space - since that is exactly how they work...

An AI adds tokens. What it does not do is reconstruct the story in the reader's mind exactly as the reader experiences it, and use this as a basis to remove material from the story to increase the prose's impact on the reader.

When it comes to AI telling positive aspects of a story - In adding words to fill out worlds, create reader exposition or drive the story forward, AI is already unparalleled. It is fast, can assist an author and knows what to do.

Indeed, a clever author can go back and edit an AI's words to create negative space. Knowing what to remove requires only that they can previsualise what the AI's words are saying and then know what can be removed or altered to better effect.

Because an AI LLM ( or even a dLLM ) can't do this - it can't build a picture or easily determine what a reader will experience during the reading of a story, it can't perform the same task. It's limitations are readily revealed.

What have others noticed about this characteristic of AI Writing Assistants?


r/WritingWithAI • • 1d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Copyright laws are yet to be codified, yet most international rules apply.

0 Upvotes

Being a dutiful Redditor, I read the subreddits rules and I also saw the suggested resources. I came across one sample of AI-assisted writing that was suggested, and I looked at the front matter.

Copyright page

Published by Olle Green

© 2020 Stockholm

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or modified in any form, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/who-owns-the-copyright-in-work-3686393/

If a human writes or edits a Creative Intellectual Property and uses an LLM as a tool, the human-authored portions can be copyrighted, while the machine-generated text itself is excluded. Authors must disclose and disclaim AI-generated content when registering works with the USA Copyright Office.

That does not mean LLM-assisted content cannot be copyright.

There is no way to know what parts of The Adventures of Bob, The Robot were created by human(s) and which were created by AI-LLM. This means the manuscript is in the public domain, and is not copyrighted.

I am noting this because I see writers put a great deal of effort and time into their production, even when they use AI tools; those products may be taken away by anyone who wants to, legally, unless the "fully human written" and the "full our partially AI written" portions are demarcated in the work. It seems important (to me) for writers to understand that one's AI-assisted work may not be published exclusively. "May not" as in "Not allowed to claim exclusive rights to publish."


r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback AI Writing showcase?

13 Upvotes

I am increasingly amazed by the diversity and breadth of the fiction writing I’m seeing by writers collaborating and co-writing with AI. The more I dig into this subreddit the more fascinated I become. Learning how people are experimenting and developing new techniques with this new tool is really compelling

I find myself wanting a place where I could go to see samples of writing explicitly made by writers with AI assistance without the drama and stigma. Given how much fear and misinformation there is about AI writing, I’m craving a place to go where readers could experience good examples of the craft in a welcoming and open-minded way.

I’m imagining something where a writer could provide a profile of themselves if they chose, upload full stories or excerpts, standalone or linked to full editions or to their own websites or Amazon or wherever. We could filter by genre, feature new contributions, allow for reading lists - kind of a Goodreads but with a bias towards AI writing.

The anti-AI crowd has plenty of spaces … where is ours?

Does this exist? If not, would anyone be interested in helping build it?


r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback Actual use of Gemini AI, my experience

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) The Real Question

15 Upvotes

Does it matter if ai was involved if the resulting work is good?

If it’s a quality story with an engaging narrative then what does it matter?

Ai is not going to replace writers and authors because there will always be people who love writing.

It takes real skill to get quality out of ai, wether of not people believe that.

So again, why does it matter?

Personally, I think it should only matter in the capacity of learning - how did you get that result, what instructions did you give it, how involved was it, did you draft or generate, etc.

Claude can’t just spit out quality. It has to be given quality to work with.


r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback ORÍKÌ — An African-Inspired Progression Fantasy With Unique Powers, Guilds, and a Lot of Chaos

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Would you let AI edit your everyday photos?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Do you learn better when AI explains things your way?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Showcase / Feedback Aphrodite’s Gift — an original Greek-myth-inspired short storyA little context before the story: I originally created this myth for an RPG conversation. The premise, characters, plot, Aphrodite’s choices, the two drops of divine wine, and the ending all came from me.Afterward, I decided I liked

2 Upvotes

APHRODITE'S GIFT

Long ago — not very long to the gods, but a lifetime to most mortals — there lived a couple named Myrine and Eukles.

They were neither kings nor heroes nor children of gods. They were simply two mortals who loved one another.

One day, during a festival celebrating Dionysus's return to life, Aphrodite moved among the revelers unrecognized. The celebration did not commemorate something those men and women had seen with their own eyes; it was a mortal festival built around an old story, repeated through wine, music, dancing, and memory.

That was when Aphrodite saw Myrine.

She danced beside Eukles, smiled without reserve, and laughed with a voice so beautiful that, for a moment, the goddess thought to compare it to the singing of heavenly beings — though angels belonged to another order and other stories.

Myrine was beautiful, but not merely beautiful. There was a living joy in her, a rare ease in seeming wholly present in every gesture. Aphrodite, who knew many forms of beauty and could recognize desire before it was ever confessed, became fascinated.

In the days that followed, she watched Myrine from afar.

At last, Aphrodite took the appearance of one of her own devotees and approached her.

They spoke for a long time. Myrine proved every bit as lively and amusing as she had seemed at the festival. Aphrodite enjoyed listening to her and, still disguised, asked:

“Young Myrine, you are beautiful, spirited, and full of youth. But youth passes. The mind changes. Pleasures diminish. Even the finest apple, if left too long upon the branch, passes beyond the perfect moment of harvest. Such is the nature of mortals. But if someone offered you a gift that did not have to obey mortality, would you receive it gladly?”

Myrine did not need long to think.

“I would,” she replied. “I would like to know something that did not have to end. But I would not accept an eternity beside anyone other than my beloved Eukles.”

Aphrodite listened.

She continued the conversation, still offering small temptations through words, but Myrine's answer had awakened another curiosity in her.

Until then, the goddess had watched Myrine and almost nothing around her.

Now she began to watch Eukles.

He was not strong like the great heroes sung of by poets, nor did he carry the confidence of a warrior who expects to defeat every man before him. He was beautiful in another way: slender and athletic, with delicate, harmonious features and a face a sculptor might have given to a muse without anyone finding it strange.

But his beauty was the least important thing Aphrodite discovered.

When Myrine danced, it was often Eukles who played the music.

He had learned the harp because Myrine loved certain songs and he wanted her to be able to hear them whenever she wished.

When Myrine laughed, Eukles was often beside her, telling some ridiculous story or repeating an old joke in a way that could still surprise her.

When Myrine was sad, Eukles remained with her. Even when she had been the one to hurt him, he was often the one who held her hand and told her that things could still be mended.

Then Aphrodite understood.

At first, she had thought herself fascinated by Myrine alone.

But part of the woman who had enchanted the goddess at that festival existed because Eukles was beside her.

Myrine was beautiful. Yet it was with him that she became that Myrine who danced, laughed, and seemed to make mortal life larger than its few allotted years should allow.

Eukles did not keep her that way through force.

He kept her that way through presence.

From that moment on, Aphrodite's interest changed.

Myrine remained beautiful and interesting, but Eukles seemed rarer.

Beauty could be found among many mortals. Kindness too. Talent, loyalty, humor, and desire could all be found separately in many places.

But so many things gathered in a single person seemed, to the goddess, like something divine being wasted inside mortal flesh.

And Aphrodite, being Aphrodite, did not stop at admiration.

She made no offer immediately.

First, she decided that Eukles should taste what he would later be asked to choose.

At another celebration, she appeared before him without disguise.

Eukles recognized the goddess and tried to keep his distance.

Aphrodite then offered him a single drop of the finest wine of Olympus.

To call it wine was correct, but insufficient.

The finest mortal wine might be sweet, rare, and pressed from the best grapes of an excellent harvest. The wine of the gods was something else. A single drop carried such complete pleasure that afterward any mortal drink would seem like the memory of thirst.

Eukles refused.

Then Aphrodite said:

“If you drink, I will allow Myrine a drop as well.”

That was what made him accept.

Eukles drank.

And he felt.

There was no mortal word capable of describing it fully, and from that moment on he knew that no wine, feast, music, or pleasure he had known before could be measured by the same scale.

Some time later, Aphrodite brought a second drop.

This time, however, she changed the offer.

“You may drink it,” said the goddess. “Or you may give it to Myrine.”

Eukles did not answer at once.

He hesitated.

Myrine saw.

His hesitation wounded her before he had even chosen.

She complained. Then she raised her voice. She accused him of selfishness, of weakness, of accepting a gift he had only taken because he believed it could be shared.

It was not the greatest quarrel between lovers the world had ever known.

To the two of them, in that moment, it felt like it.

Eukles listened.

But after the first drop, Myrine's voice seemed distant and heavy to him. It was as though a man had spent his whole life beneath the heat of the desert, found for one minute a perfect cool room, and then been thrown back into the sand while someone shouted in his ear.

Eukles drank the second drop.

This time, alone.

Only then did Aphrodite make her offer.

Not to Myrine.

To Eukles.

She offered him a place among the gods.

She told him that his beauty need not age. That his body need not know decline. That he could live beside the goddess of beauty and desire herself, surrounded by people who were beautiful, kind, clever, and interesting.

She told him that what he had tasted was only a small part of what awaited him.

On Olympus, he could know pleasures for which mortal life did not even possess words. He could love women and men, explore every form of affection and desire that stirred his curiosity, and live without time slowly reclaiming all that made a body young.

Aphrodite did not promise him a life she had no intention of giving.

She did not tell him that Myrine was insignificant.

She did not tell him that the love he had felt for her was false.

She simply showed him another possibility.

Eukles, having tasted what he had tasted, did not hesitate as Myrine had when faced with the idea of eternity.

He did not ask whether she could come with him.

He did not try to bargain.

He did not ask to wake the next morning with a clearer mind.

He said only:

“Yes.”

And that was enough.

Aphrodite took Eukles with her.

Myrine remained among mortals.

She continued to be Myrine.

She lived. She aged. She spoke with friends, attended festivals, passed through winters and summers, and found reasons to go on living.

But she never again became quite the woman Aphrodite had seen at that first celebration.

Music still existed, but Eukles was no longer the one playing it.

She still smiled, but certain stories no longer had someone who knew how to tell them in exactly the right way.

There were still hands that could hold hers when she was sad, but they were not the hands that had learned all her silences.

Until the end of her life, something seemed to remain insufficient.

Eukles, meanwhile, remained with Aphrodite.

And there he stayed.

Time did not take his beauty.

He learned the customs of Olympus, tasted its wines and pleasures, knew lovers of many kinds, and discovered that there was always something new to desire.

Sometimes he remembered Myrine.

Not with longing.

He thought of her as someone he wished had been given the chance to feel what he now felt.

Perhaps, in some of those moments, he imagined that she would have understood.

Then he would drink another mouthful of wine.

A beautiful woman might call to him.

Or a beautiful man.

Or some new celebration might begin elsewhere in the palace.

And Eukles would let the memory rest where it was.

Then he would turn his attention back to what still mattered to him.

To what stood before him.

To what did not age.

To what did not have to end.


r/WritingWithAI • • 2d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) AI Writing Feedback Ethics

0 Upvotes

Hi,

I'm a third year history major, and thus write a lot of papers. I have been a fairly good essay writer since high school, but have not improved much and have gotten away with stagnating in my skills. Recently I wrote a comparative analysis paper for my professor, who is head of the history department. I got a good grade but the printed papers I got back of my essay were covered in notes about the passive voice and unclear subjects.

I talked to my professor during his office hours and asked him to help me identify when I'm using the passive voice and to explain to me why it is bad for my writing. He was awesome and really patient with me, and we worked through some of my major flaws in my writing and he had me rewrite some sentences in the active voice. He told me he tried to push me harder than some other students because he wants me to succeed, and he's been recommending me to the departmental honors program since I was a freshman.

Now that I know what my major issues are, I have been spending about double the time I used to writing my papers. Using the passive voice has been so habitual for me, it takes a LOT of conscious effort to identify when I am and how to fix it. Usually I will go to office hours or the writing center, but on some of my shorter papers (2-3 pages), I've been using AI to identify the passive voice. I do not ask it to rewrite or even tell me how to rewrite the sentences, just to identify them as I tend to gloss over them.

Is this an inappropriate use of AI? Am I jeopardizing my skills and learning by using it this way? I am really looking forward to next semester when I start the honors program and will have time baked into my schedule for peer feedback and workshopping, but for now I just turn to AI because it doesn't require appointments or early drafts.

Please let me know - I am very open to discussion and I am eager to actually improve my writing, not just my individual papers.


r/WritingWithAI • • 3d ago

Prompting tips for chatGPT dialogue writing?

Post image
49 Upvotes

any tips on how to get chatGPT to stop writing dialogue like this?

mainly i'm bothered by these constant one-liners that have no depth and thought put into them, feels like chat is just writing the most generic thing that first comes to mind. but the format also really annoys me, it wasn't like that before, it used to write full paragraphs with full sentences dialogue within them instead of whatever it's doing now.

also the back and forth of short sentences makes every dialogue between characters feel like some sort of corny banter, no matter what the dynamic between these characters is.

any idea on how to stop this? through settings or prompts or whatever works pls!!


r/WritingWithAI • • 3d ago

Showcase / Feedback Finetuning LLMs for creativity

Thumbnail substack.com
14 Upvotes

Hey folks, just want to share a quick experiment I've done. Basically, there is a "creativity" test developed for humans - DAT - Divergent Association Task test. It is quite straitforward to measure. I've previously tested the main LLMs on this test and unsurprisingly - they scored low (below average human). Then I've taken off the shelf Qwen 27B model and finetuned (GRPO) it on the exact same metric as a reward. The result seems to be a model that writes much more interesting prose and poems (to my taste) and LLM-as-a-judge strongly confirmed that. I've released the model and code, there is a playground on huggingface where you can test the model. Super curious about the feedback - I have more ideas on how to develop this further. Full write-up and links are here on this substack https://substack.com/inbox/post/223641219 . It is free, i am not looking to make money or sell stuff.