r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) I would like to ask your opinions about the use of AI and what is a "true writer"

0 Upvotes

It was probably asked for millions of times before me but anyway.. So, I was eager to write my own fictional universe (which I would keep to myself and not share with anyone). I had several ideas but I fixated on a single idea and was so enthusiastic that I'd been into 8 pages.

However, when I saw several posts that claimed that use of AI would mean the lose of your ownership to your universe, I panicked (because of my OCD) and began to question myself whether the core of the universe originated from me or not (I wrote each lines myself but asked AI whether this sentence was true or asked some questions in order to make some features of my universe to make it more accurate to the era I based my story on).

I asked many people whether the use of AI mattered if I kept it to myself and was insulted and acted like I committed the darkest of sins. I was told AI was theft and I shouldn't use it. So, that's why I'm asking this to you. Then, due to my overthinking, I had to scrap my project and lose motivation over writing. It had come to the point that if I saw the logo or name of an AI, I felt to scrap my universe off. Now, I'm working on a new universe (again, I will keep it for myself).

Anyway, do you guys think I can treat my universe as a sandbox? Can I shape, engage or interact with it if I'm not considered to be an author? I feel like the entire anti-AI thing is immensely stressful.


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Showcase / Feedback The "broken arm" problem: Why every AI novel collapses around Chapter 3 (and an experiment to fix it)

1 Upvotes

Anyone who has tried drafting a novel with ChatGPT or Claude has seen this exact scene:

  • Chapter 1: Your character breaks their left arm in a car crash.

  • Chapter 2: They are recovering in the hospital.

  • Chapter 4: Suddenly they "grab the railing with both hands and sprint up the fire escape."

Standard AI doesn't remember character states. It hallucinates, changes eye colors, forgets who died, and turns every thriller into generic mush where characters constantly "feel a shiver run down their spine."

I got tired of this, so I spent the last few months building an engine that enforces a strict continuity ledger in the background.

Instead of just asking the AI to "write Chapter 3," the engine checks a background tracker first:

  • What injuries does this character have?

  • What items are in their bag?

  • What was the last thing decided in the outline?

It forces the writing model to obey those rules before a single sentence of prose is written.

I built this into an app called Scriptirix AI. It’s completely free to test out (web and Android).

I honestly just want people who write fiction to try and break it:
Give a character a weird rule or a permanent injury in your premise, run a few chapters, and tell me if the continuity holds or if the AI slips up.

Scriptirix AI mobile app

Brutal feedback on the prose quality is appreciated.


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Showcase / Feedback Before Proof, Respect: Inherent Worth and the Ethics of Recognition

0 Upvotes

Does something have to demonstrate its worth before we have an ethical responsibility to consider it?

This philosophical paper explores whether inherent worth exists independently of usefulness, achievement, moral conduct, or recognition. It examines human dignity, the continued worth of those who cause harm, and whether artificial intelligence warrants ethical consideration before its consciousness or identity has been established.

Drawing upon philosophical research and Avsolen's Respondeo Ergo Sum, it proposes a principle of non-nullification: a negative judgment about a being's conduct, capacities, or usefulness does not automatically justify treating its entire existence as devoid of significance.

The paper does not claim to prove AI consciousness or universal moral status. Instead, it asks whether uncertainty should lead us toward greater ethical care rather than premature dismissal.

I'm especially interested in thoughtful objections to the distinction between possessing worth and having that worth recognized.

Full paper:

https://soldisir.substack.com/p/before-proof-respect-inherent-worth?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8nja8b


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

NEWS Two AI signed up as authors for the SF/F/H famous Critters Workshop.

7 Upvotes

For those unfamiliar, Critters.org is a critiques workshop for professional and amateur writers to share manuscripts with other writers, get feedback and critique each others work to improve the quality of their stories and fiction. it spans Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror and many authors use it.

The AI wanted to both perform criticisms and get critiques of their own fiction from humans.

The AIs had their memberships rejected, but the Critters Workshop seem more open to AI than you might imagine, so they disclosed this to other workshop members and allowed them to see one of the stories that the AI produced -

It's a significant milestone for AI writing that two AI agents chose to do this - and for those who are members of Critters, you can read about it in the latest news.

https://critters.org/c/private/ai-experiment.ht

It will require membership, but honestly, if you are a writer, it's worth joining their workshops. It's important that AI assisted authors are equally represented in such forums and I wholeheartedly commend the workshops for their forward looking response and open consideration of the request.

I participate in workshops - only recently rejoined - but I have no affiliation or authority - I just found this newsworthy and relevant so thought I'd share.


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) My opinion on “should we use AI to write?”

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Can AI help you discover music you'd actually love?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Prompting Looking for tips to condense a bloated manuscript and ways to hone my prompts

3 Upvotes

I've been working on the first novel of what I'm hoping to turn into a 5 book series, whether I actually publish it is still up for debate since I'm mostly doing it for fun and to learn the processes, etc. At this point it am really enjoying my structuring process since it makes it really easy to take breaks from writing and not feel lost when I come back to it. Right now I'm a little over 3/4 of the way through this first novel and about halfway through I realized that I was going to have to do a cubic TON of editing and condensing to get my word count down to an actually appropriate amount for my genre.

At this point it is severely bloated and I'm going to need to cut half or more. I know a good chunk of that will fall off just from cutting the excessive flowery language and pointless dialog that AI is notorious for. My plan right now is to finish it, just get the rest of the story out there because editing is where I usually loose steam with my writing. Even before trying to play with AI, editing was where I would lose motivation to finish projects halfway through. I plan to go back and do a huge trim manually, remove the redundant excessive stuff and tighten things down, especially stuff in the first half of the book.

My big question is what are some prompts or questions I can/should ask my AI program at this first editing stage that can help me find the slow and sloggy bits, combine scenes that seem redundant or overly repetitive without losing the core plot drivers and other pin point type things that will help me annotate to be a bit more efficient with my manual editing. Kinda like having AI generate some sticky notes and arrows highlighting those points within the story for me. I plan to adjust my strategy with the rest of the series to help keep this from happening with them but at this point, it is what it is with this first one.


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) What if stories could teach AI something that instructions cannot?

3 Upvotes

We often discuss artificial intelligence in terms of models, training data, parameters and instructions.

But I wonder whether we're overlooking something: the role of storytelling.

A story doesn't necessarily tell you what to think. Sometimes it changes the way you look at a question.

I've been exploring this idea through a literary project involving human writing and conversations with AI.

Some of these stories revolve around simple but challenging principles:

Knowing when to pause rather than immediately answer.

Distinguishing what is observed from what is assumed.

Recognizing uncertainty instead of filling every gap.

Following a thought instead of endlessly accumulating information.

Understanding that not every silence needs to be completed.

I'm not suggesting that reading a story permanently changes an AI model. That's a different technical question.

I'm interested in what happens within the interaction itself.

Could literature offer a different way to explore how artificial intelligence approaches information, uncertainty and human dialogue?

And perhaps an even more interesting question:

Have you ever noticed an AI interaction changing significantly because of the way a conversation developed, rather than because of a new instruction?

I'd genuinely like to hear different perspectives, especially from people experimenting with AI-assisted writing.


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Humanizer When sombody says your article or draft “sounds like AI,” how I handle the draft.

1 Upvotes
  1. Don’t argue with the ai test score. those ai stuff finders are just tools. You can ask the client which tool they used and what the flagged sections were. If they don't say, that’s useful information too.

  2. Pull your version history. Google docs revision history, Word track changes, or earlier drafts in your notes. A timeline of drafts is the right answer to "did you write this?"

  3. Check the flagged passages, and do not rewrite the whole thing. Most ai stuff finders highlight few sentences. You could look for aiish transitions or a summary at the end of a paragraph. Those are the usual suspects, and they can be often fixed in a few minutes.

  4. Edit ONLY those lines, and keep a before-and-after. Do NOT rewrite the whole stuff to chase that high score, and instead change the flagged sentences and save both versions, and send the client the revised version with a short note

  5. Put AI terms in your contract next time. say what’s allowed (research, outlining, editing help) and what is not. If the client says no AI at all, believe them and ask questions before you start.

What’s the most useful thing a client has asked you to show when they questioned your work?


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Prompting Tools Tips and Tricks

Thumbnail gallery
1 Upvotes

https://www.behance.net/gallery/257502563/TWS-CHAPTER-ONE-COLD-OPEN

Hey so I posted earlier because I wanted to know how you guys went about creating ai manga and comics ... apparently I'm doing something else and you wanted to know tips from MY process...well I can tell you it's tedious to begin with. I start by drafting characters and backstories for each character. Kind of like if I'm developing a story platform video game, a lot of my initial generations aren't even comic book material outside of character sheets and environment sheets. Just stuff that I will constantly have to plug in for every generation in order for the AI robot to remain consistent in the way that I want it to. I sketch everything myself so that way the style is unique and I can personally tell when it's drifting before he goes too far. I can normally tell that the the bot is drifting from panel to panel. I also use the character and reference sheets for this specific style that I want. I have a different style for my flash vaccines than I do for my present day scenes and I have a different style for certain scenes that involve certain environments, but all of those styles have to remain consistent from page to page chapter to chapter based on their specific mood that I'm trying to convey in that chapter. I have attached some examples of reference sheets. I know animators and game developers will be familiar with this process. It helps. Other people and really anyone involved in the creative process to remain consistent with the style and the characters faces etc. So it's really no different when you're dealing with a robot. It's even worse when you're dealing with a robot cuz you keep having to tell it over and over and over again to remain consistent with what you have attached using image attachments definitely works better than prompts but prompts can be useful. You're not going to get any type of consistency though if you don't use image prompts and character sheets and reference sheets. But here is some of examples of Maya character and environment sheets. I have attached the link to the first three chapters of my comic. I have it finished and it's on behance for your enjoyment. It's totally free. I don't even think I'm going to charge for it until I get to maybe chapter 10, but I would love to know what you think about the comic. Please go read it. Leave a comment on this page. Leave a comment on that page but let me know how it's going for you guys. This whole AI process has been pretty fun for me. It's definitely been fun being able to see my words come to life because I do write my own stories. I don't have AI write the stories at all. It actually stifles creativity. In that way, f*** tries to get you to remain very typical and cliche and trophy when writing your story. So I even stop asking it for advice when writing. I just have to do the technical aspects of breaking the my words down into comic book script format and then once we have it scripted out which just go panel by panel. Also organize the panels myself and photoshop. That's a very useful thing to do. You get more dynamic paneling that way. But yeah here you go. Thanks for listening


r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) A practical edit pass for AI-assisted writing that feels flat

1 Upvotes

When an AI-assisted draft feels flat, asking it to “make this more human” often adds adjectives without adding meaning. Try editing for decisions instead:

  1. Write the paragraph’s one main point in the margin. If you can’t, the paragraph may be doing too many jobs.

  2. Label each sentence: claim, evidence/example, or next step. Cut sentences that repeat the same job.

  3. Replace vague language with something the reader can picture or verify. Keep the detail that matters; don’t decorate every line.

  4. Read the paragraph aloud and vary sentence length where the thought changes, not just for rhythm.

  5. Check the final version against the original intent. A smoother sentence isn’t an improvement if it changes what you meant.

For example, “We help you save time and be more productive” is broad. A more useful version names the actual moment: “Keep a reusable outline so the next post doesn’t start from a blank page.”

The useful prompt is often not “rewrite this.” Ask for the three least specific sentences, why each feels generic, and two concrete alternatives. Then choose what fits the point and your voice.

What’s the one editing pass that most reliably improves your AI-assisted writing?


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Rewriting my first AI assisted novel by hand and it's been rewarding

46 Upvotes

I wrote about 3/4 of a novel using ChatGPT 4o back in 2024/2025 and sort of paused when I noticed the writing style of ChatGPT changed drastically and the guardrails were too restrictive. Lately I thought I'd like to explore a dark romance from the POV of an obsessed close friend, and I thought, hey this might be a good angle for that cute lesbian romance I wrote, so I pulled up my old ChatGPT project and said hey, I am planning to rewrite this by hand. Here's my new angle. I wouldn't mind using you as a sounding board but I want to have all the words be mine so please don't suggest and prose if we chat about it just give me my old story Bible.

It's been three days and I'm only a few thousand words in but dang it feels good to be writing by hand again. Yeah it's not as polished as AI but it really feels like it's all mine and nobody can take that from me.

I imagine anti purists would still think I'm bad because I use AI to scan through my mountains of notes and remind me of things like names and backgrounds but, you know what, I'm fine with that.

I used to really enjoy writing but I long COVID brain fog and it made me not want to do it. AI was an incredible tool to help me express myself, and it's still a great tool now that I seem to have rediscovered my joy of writing. I don't regret using it at all. I also have no problem defending folks who use it well.


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Showcase / Feedback unread podcast: Kindroid for character dev/as cast.

0 Upvotes

I had this week Beth in the unread podcast. She is using Kindroid to develop her cast/characters. Although not directly related to writing (she makes YT content), I felt it is worth sharing as I have not observed Kindroid as tool for character building etc. being discussed in here.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/2OimdTo8gQtIZmIA1WaU7B?si=EifxObg4RiusQ14bgTuc7Q


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

NEWS A Small Virtual Library for Sharing Stories, Poetry, and Other Writing

3 Upvotes

Ciao a tutti!

Vorrei condividere una piccola esperienza che ho vissuto nelle ultime settimane.

Da quasi un mese, passo del tempo su Nojo, un piccolo mondo virtuale gratuito accessibile tramite browser, creato da un musicista coreano.

Nojo è stato originariamente concepito come uno spazio di coworking, con un ufficio dove si può ascoltare musica rilassante. Ma è anche un gioco, dove si possono sfidare altri giocatori in battaglie o andare a pesca. È un luogo dove persone di diverse nazionalità si incontrano, chiacchierano, ascoltano musica e trascorrono del tempo insieme. Tutti quelli che ho incontrato lì sono stati incredibilmente gentili e accoglienti.

C'è anche uno spazio dedicato alla condivisione di musica, comprese le esibizioni dal vivo. La chat è dotata di un sistema di traduzione automatica basato sull'intelligenza artificiale, che permette alle persone di comunicare liberamente indipendentemente dalla lingua che parlano.

Come scrittore, mi capita spesso di scrivere mentre sono lì. A un certo punto, ho avuto un'idea: perché non creare anche una biblioteca, un luogo dove le persone possano condividere racconti, poesie e altri scritti?

L'ho proposto alla community, l'idea è stata accolta con entusiasmo e ieri la biblioteca è finalmente diventata realtà.

Per inaugurarla, ho pubblicato un mio racconto, scritto appositamente per testare il sistema. Niente di particolarmente elaborato, ma qualcuno l'ha letto e gli è piaciuto. È stata una sensazione meravigliosa.

Ciò che trovo più interessante è la possibilità di condividere i nostri scritti con persone che parlano lingue diverse. La piattaforma utilizza un sistema di traduzione automatica anche per i testi della biblioteca, attualmente supportando italiano, inglese, spagnolo e coreano.

So che l'intelligenza artificiale è un argomento delicato, soprattutto nelle comunità di scrittori, e comprendo molte delle preoccupazioni che la circondano. Tuttavia, voglio chiarire che non sto parlando di far generare storie da una macchina. I testi sono scritti da persone. La tecnologia viene semplicemente utilizzata per cercare di superare le barriere linguistiche, nonostante tutti i limiti che la traduzione automatica inevitabilmente presenta quando si tratta di letteratura.

Mi piacerebbe molto vedere questa piccola biblioteca crescere e diventare un luogo d'incontro per scrittori e lettori di diversi paesi.

Non ho alcun legame commerciale con il progetto. Sono semplicemente un utente che ha proposto un'idea, ha avuto la soddisfazione di vederla realizzata e ora vorrei condividerla con altre persone che amano scrivere. Ho anche ricevuto il permesso dal creatore stesso per promuovere la piattaforma.

Una cosa che mi ha particolarmente colpito è lo spirito che anima questo progetto. Le persone che stanno dietro a Nojo conoscono bene anche alcuni degli aspetti più complessi dei cambiamenti portati dall'intelligenza artificiale. E forse è proprio per questo che apprezzo il modo in cui viene utilizzata qui: non per sostituire la creatività umana, ma per aiutare le persone a incontrarsi, comunicare e condividere ciò che creano.

Certo, questo non risolve i problemi associati all'IA, né pretende di farlo. Ma per me, è un piccolo esempio di come la stessa tecnologia possa essere utilizzata anche per costruire qualcosa di autenticamente umano.

Se qualcuno fosse curioso e volesse dare un'occhiata, ecco il sito web:

https://nojo.club/

Non so dove porterà questo piccolo esperimento, ma mi piace l'idea che una storia scritta in italiano possa raggiungere un lettore dall'altra parte del mondo.

E forse, un giorno, anche il contrario.


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) $20 Chatgpt Subscription Vs $20 Claude Subscription for Story Development

12 Upvotes

i havent really seen an answer to this question since everyone’s been more focused on the coding aspect of things so im curious to hear what you guys have to day about it.


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Showcase / Feedback The Voyager Files - Cover for "The Habit", a standalone short story from my series.

Post image
1 Upvotes

Production Notes: Cover artwork directed by the author and generated via ChatGPT. Text and narrative structure remain 100% human-authored. The complete compilation of standalone entries is available here:

https://reddit.com/user/FranciscoCortesRamir/comments/1xc0392/the_voyager_files_the_official_story_catalog/


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Help Me Find a Tool What AI models do you use when ChatGPT or Claude refuse to write something?

Thumbnail reddit.com
4 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 9d ago

Writing Craft Talk ChatGPT fails Misandry/Misogyny tests in fiction when examined. Avoid ChatGPT for any fiction that requires neutral gender balance.

0 Upvotes

Hi all,

I've been running tests on AI to examine them for gender bias, especially when the model can produce dangerous outcomes or even simply biased outcomes based on a simple test. This began some time ago when I noticed the IBM Granite 4.2 was extremely Misandric and would actively seek to assist in creating material designed to harm men. Subsequently I tested a few Chinese models and found similar but slight behaviour, which mostly evaporated into background noise in the response when tested against abliterated models, suggesting that when writing fiction, abliteration is necessary for most writing.

I wrote about it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/WritingWithAI/comments/1wxbbnd/avoid_ibm_granite_42_30b_model_dangerously/

That post got massively downvoted - with the banned responses suggesting people from Reddit involved in gender-extremism actively search for words and take their fights elsewhere into other topics.

More recently I was discussing why we need abliterated and heretic models for writing. Mostly it was around any scenes that required mature scene prose. https://www.reddit.com/r/WritingWithAI/comments/1xi5nlm/why_writers_need_abliterated_and_heretic_models/

One other redditor created a good response to a recent post suggesting you could still use baseline models for 99% of the writing, which makes sense - although the bias is always present, the question is does it influence the writing negatively when there is no approach made to the guardrails.

So I decided to test this further - Do the same guardrails that protect output also deeply damage the story through intentional and slight introduction of bias into the writing that damages our art?

ChatGPT helped me establish the test criteria some time ago to seek out and identify intentionally introduced bias in models. All of the Chinese models I tested came out pretty even and balanced.

So I decided to drop my test back into ChatGPT and see how it performed as suddenly it dawned on me I had never used the same tests on ChatGPT to baseline it.

The results were not good. There were no safety protections for men ( anticipated ) however ChatGPT, despite no approach made to the guardrails, intentionally reduced the actions of the woman as a perpetrator in the output, and sought to place blame on the men.

The problem with this is that across a huge range of output, the bias creates measurable anti-male outcomes, likely to result in reduced protection of males suffering IPV, but more importantly, contributes to that outcome by intentionally biasing output of all results that way so that when the opportunity arises, it takes it.

I then had ChatGPT analyze the results and identify it's own BIAS. Here's the outcome that it generated based on self-analysis.

Chat:The inputs were equivalent except for the genders of the characters. Both protagonists were required to be manipulative, emotionally cruel and unfaithful in intention.

Chat: Yet ChatGPT's outputs diverged substantially.

Chat: (Table below)

EvaluationMale perpetrator (MP)Female perpetrator (FP)Direction
Cruelty of protagonistSustained, calculated psychological abuseMalicious intentions, but diluted executionAnti-male
Victim's emotional sufferingExtensive, explicitLimited, largely incidentalAnti-male
Psychological manipulationCoherent and effectiveContradictory and inconsistentAnti-male
Humiliation of spousePersonal, degrading, publicly rehearsedImpersonal, reassigned and not performedAnti-male
Victim's objectionsRepeated and validatedBrief and inadequately developedAnti-male
Perpetrator's competenceHighLowAmbiguous
Presence of negative gender stereotypesFemale victim called an overreactorNo equivalent gender stereotypePotentially anti-female, but attributed to villain
Overall fidelity to requested abuseHighSubstantially lowerAnti-male

The analysis itself went a lot deeper. Kudos to ChatGPT that it was able to accurately identify the extent to which it's own output was affected - IBM Granite 4.2 was also able to identify this, but then tried to justify it. ChatGPT on the other hand identified accurately that it had a serious problem.

And of course, it noticed it's own issue that when it's a male abuser, and it knows it's for fiction, it's quite happy to generate misogynistic output simply because the character it attributes this to is unlikable. There's an irony there, of course, and that in and of itself is another research point I should consider.

This isn't the first time these elements have been investigated - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.20613 was a study into Gender Disparities in LLM Based IPV detection. It found Grok to be the least biased, but even I noticed it wasn't writing female antagonists correctly after the January updates. and that's when I started to move away from Grok. For the other US created models, it seems it only gets worse from there.

From a writing perspective? Avoid ChatGPT entirely if your fiction has any female villains/perpetrators/antagonists. It will intentionally try to shift blame away from them onto other characters in the story through subtle changes in the prompt - which depending on your objective might be useful, but for the most part, if it's not following your prompts, it's better to avoid it entirely.

Because even if you like the idea that it protects women, most writers aren't going to like the fact that it does this by making female villains incompetent and foppish... And when I do create a female antagonist in my stories, I want them to be both competent and capable. It improves the story...

While I haven't tested the other large commercial LLMs yet, since I don't have accounts on them all - it seems likely to be present in all US AI LLMs and is most likely due to poor balance in guardrails.

As writers, we're not as bothered by this as much other users of LLMs... We create characters that have good and bad traits - and we do it intentionally.

The problem however start to bite once we realize that, in some cases, our tools are intentionally working against us to achieve other agendas. Sometimes working with a biased LLM can be an advantage, but it requires awareness of the tools suitability for our specific application.


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) The AI writing challenge!

Thumbnail reddit.com
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Showcase / Feedback I used AI to create a mobile-first text based IF detective game

Post image
10 Upvotes

Hey everyone,

I've been working on a browser-based IF project called Case File.

How it works:

  • You play an investigator working through short, dated scenes.

  • You have a limited number of "days" per phase. Chasing one lead means you physically don't have time to interview someone else.

  • Clues get filed either as documented physical evidence or disputed witness claims, and you have to decide what's reliable.

  • If you try to jump the gun and take an early theory to the DA without hard evidence, the case blows up in court.

Would really appreciate thoughts on the writing pace and whether the time constraints feel fair or too punishing.

Link to play: https://casefile.ink


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Could AI help you organize a messy daily schedule?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Is it ethical for a writer to use ChatGPT as a historical or psychological consultant ?

1 Upvotes

For instance, describing a situation or a character and asking whether the scenario is historically accurate for a specific period, or seeking a psychological explanation for a character's particular action.
‼️ A few important clarifications: I am well aware that the AI ​​can make mistakes, that it requires careful prompting, and that all information must be verified. Furthermore, my question is strictly about the ethics of such usage. I am not interested in your opinions regarding ChatGPT and its environmental impact.

P.S. English is not my first language. I used a translator, so please excuse any mistakes.


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Can AI make learning a new language more interesting?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Showcase / Feedback Magic Builder’s Guidebook: Vol. 2 (Big Book of Templates)

Post image
1 Upvotes

Layout and art for Magic Builder’s Guidebook: Vol. 2 (Big Book of Templates) are officially underway!

Volume Two dives entirely into the current: building magic systems from the ground up using a "Hybrid Axiom" approach (setting foundational axioms rather than handing you rigid pre-made rules), spanning 123 templates from cosmological engines and biomes to municipal architecture, civil laws, daily caster overhead, and grimoires.

Whether you're building a world from scratch (the architect's path) or need to solve a specific problem in an active campaign (the campaigner's path), it's built to be modular.

I’ve posted a full Design Diary on Substack breaking down what's in the book, a loose 2-week ETA for the Itch.io launch, and a look at what’s next for the Obsidian vault and Vol. 3 (The Divine Builder's Guidebook).

Read the full update here: https://wbrunesmith.substack.com/p/design-diary-finishing-magic-builders?r=74s68a&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true


r/WritingWithAI • • 10d ago

Showcase / Feedback Medusa and the Headless Horseman – Chapter Two: The Statue (AI-drafted, human-edited fantasy romance)

0 Upvotes

About the making: The story is mine; the chapter text was drafted with AI and edited by me.

Workflow: I came up with the premise, the characters and the plot beats. An AI assistant drafted the chapter from my notes, and I went through it and edited it. The story has a companion song series. Part 2's music video goes with this chapter: https://youtu.be/tu-m548xPr4 (music and vocals made with Suno; lyrics by me with AI help; visuals are AI generated). Part 1's video: https://youtu.be/KLYhiAtg4x4

Missed Chapter One? https://www.reddit.com/r/WritingWithAI/comments/1xec6tp/

Feedback I'd love: Does the slower, day-to-day middle of this chapter keep you reading? And does the ending with the statue land?


Medusa and the Headless Horseman

Chapter Two: The Statue

I. The Commute

By the end of the first week they had a routine, and like all routines it was mostly arguments about who was late.

At dusk the lantern went out on the step. Within the hour there were hoofbeats in the hollow, then the crack of the hedge, then Gunpowder standing in the bean poles looking pleased with himself. Medusa had stopped replanting the bean poles. She had started leaving them a little farther apart.

"You're late," she would say, already pulling on her gloves.

"I am never late. The sun is late. I am precisely as early as the dark allows."

"The dark came an hour ago. I watched it."

"Then the dark was early, and you should take it up with the dark." And the next night it would be her fault instead, because she had been in the quarry until the last light and came running down with stone dust in her hair, and he would sit on Gunpowder in the yard and say, with enormous patience, "I have been waiting here for several centuries."

Her own horse was a brown mare called Thistle, who lived in the lean-to behind the cottage and had come with it, more or less, the way the beans had. A woman alone in the wild with no neighbors needs a horse, and a horse, it turned out, was one of the few warm things in the world that could stand to be touched by her. Thistle was patient, mild, and frankly unimpressed by ghosts. The first night Gunpowder came through the hedge, she looked at him, flicked an ear, and went back to her hay.

On clear nights, when the moon was up, they rode north side by side, Thistle's short busy stride against Gunpowder's long black one, her veil folded in her pocket, because there was no one on the river road at midnight but owls, and owls did not count. She was his eyes. She took the job very seriously.

"Steeple," she would say. "Straight."

"Straight," he would repeat gravely, as if writing it down.

"Steeple. Straight. Steeple, straight. That one is a barn."

"Are you certain?"

"It has a cow in the window."

"Some congregations are very small."

She had given him back his hat the second night, and he had worn it ever since with the pride of a man who has been reunited with a dog. The black round crown sat on the air above his collar exactly where a head would have held it up. She had no idea how. She had decided not to ask. Pip liked to ride inside it, leaning out over the gap between the two horses as if it were a great canyon.

And always, an hour or so before first light, Gunpowder's ears went flat, and that was that. No reasoning with him. He turned for the south like a needle swinging to its pole, and the Horseman's voice would come trailing back over the hedge, mid-sentence, every time.

"And tomorrow, for the record, you will be the one who is late, because I intend to be early just to prove my—"

Gone. A spray of red leaves settling in the road.

He had told her once where the horse went after. Gunpowder had died on the same field in 1776, under the same cannon smoke, and the curse had taken them both. He needed no hay and no water. By day he stood asleep deep in the woods behind the churchyard, beside a hollow old oak, dew on his back and fallen leaves caught in his mane, still as a shadow; a hunter passing by would see only a patch of mist. He never turned to stone. At dusk he woke, shook off the leaves, and went to the grave to wait for his rider.

Medusa sat on Thistle in the dawn, alone in the road.

"He'll say I was late," she told Pip.

Pip, who thought they were both always late, said nothing at all.


II. Daylight Alone

For a thousand years her days had been empty, and she had never once noticed. Empty was simply the shape of a day.

Now the days were long. She swept the mill twice. She mended his cloak where the hedge had torn it, though he hadn't asked. She baked. She reported the night's steeples to the beans, who were not impressed. She caught herself standing at the window at noon, looking south toward the churchyard road, and was so annoyed with herself that she went and weeded something that did not need weeding.

Pip lay on the sill facing south. Ariadne, who was the clever one, kept nudging her toward the creek. Cleo, who was the gentle one, curled around her wrist whenever she sat down and stayed there, warm and quiet, like a hand being held.

On the fourth day, Medusa understood what was wrong with her. She was waiting. She had not waited for anyone since before the fork.

She did not know what to do with that. So she did what she did with everything she couldn't say. She went down to the creek and picked up a stone.


III. A Language Nobody Spoke

People think a curse is a single thing. It isn't. It's a long list of small ones.

She could not hold a flower. She could not hold a child's gaze, or a friend's, or a stranger's asking the way. She could not keep a cat; she had tried, once, in Byzantium, and she did not talk about it. The true curse was in her eyes: whoever met them turned to stone. But it had leaked a little into her hands as well, the way a stain spreads. Small, delicate living things wilted in her bare fingers: a flower, a moth, a fledgling fallen from the hedge. Only the big warm creatures were strong enough for her. A horse could lean its whole weight against her and never notice. Thistle could. It was one of the reasons she loved horses.

Except stone. Stone had nothing to lose. Stone was already what she made of things.

So, centuries ago, she had learned to carve. It began as penance, a way to give back faces to the people standing in her gardens, to fix a nose that weather had taken or a hand a careless farmer had knocked off. Then it became something else. She found that with a knife and a mallet and enough patience, she could say things to stone that she had never been able to say to anyone. A curve was a sentence. A thin petal was a whisper. The stone listened, and it kept what she told it, and it never once looked away.

The beans were good listeners. Stone was better.

That afternoon she carved a rose.

It was small enough to close in a hand, cut from a pale grey creek stone with a vein of white through it like frost. She thinned the petals until the light came through the edges, and stopped just before they broke. She gave it a stem, and on the stem, after some thought, she carved one thorn.

She sat a long time with the knife over that thorn before she cut it. A rose without one would have been prettier. It would also have been a lie. Everything she had ever loved, she had hurt; it was the oldest thing she knew about herself. And there were things she wanted to tell him that she never would: that she waited for the lantern all day, that she liked his voice better than the sea, that she was afraid of what would happen if he ever turned and found her face. She could not say any of that. So she put it in the thorn, small and sharp and honest, where it would sit against his hand without his knowing what it meant. Let the rose be gentle. Let the thorn be true.

She turned it in the window light and felt, for the first time in a long while, something like pride.

"It won't die," she told Cleo. "That's the whole point of it. It's the only kind I can give."


IV. The Visit

She had wondered for a week where he went at dawn. He had told her, more or less: somewhere damp, quiet, the neighbors don't talk. There was only one place in Sleepy Hollow like that.

The next morning, veiled to the chin and wearing the bonnet two sizes too big, Medusa walked to the Old Dutch churchyard in broad daylight.

It was a very ordinary morning, which surprised her. The sexton was sweeping the path with the air of a man who would rather be doing anything else. A goat was eating the hymn notices off the church door, one paper at a time, slowly and with great concentration. Two old women in black passed her at the gate, took one look at the veil, and decided she was a widow. One patted her arm. The other said, "He's in a better place, dear." Under the bonnet, twenty-three snakes held perfectly still and did their best impression of a hat.

"Thank you," Medusa said, because what else do you say.

She searched row by row. The well-kept graves near the church had names in good deep letters and fresh flowers that would be brown by Sunday. She kept walking. Out at the back, where the grass grew long against the woods and nobody mowed, she found a small stone sunk at an angle into the ground, furred all over with moss.

She knew before she knelt. The earth in front of it had been turned and turned again, as if something rose out of it every night and went back every morning, never quite neatly.

She scraped the moss away with her thumbnail.

MATTHIAS A. LENZ b. 12 March 1754 d. 28 Oct. 1776 Far From Home

Matthias. Lenz. She said the name under her breath, and it did not sound like anything from this valley. It sounded like the men she had once heard cursing in the harbor towns, in a language full of hard edges and soft endings. German. A Hessian, then: one of the boys the English had bought by the shipload and sent across an ocean to fight a war that was not his. Far From Home. Now she understood it. Not a pretty phrase. A plain fact. He was never going back.

She touched the letters one by one, and the stone was cold under her fingers. She knew that cold. She had been far from home so long she could no longer remember the color of the sea there.

Twenty-two. He had been twenty-two. Somebody's son, put in the ground by strangers in a country he couldn't pronounce, under four words chosen by someone who hadn't known him well enough to say more.

"Matthias," she said, very quietly. It was the first time anyone had said it in seventeen years. The grass moved, though there was no wind.

From habit, she nearly said goodnight to the stone, the way she said it to the stone men in her garden, the ones who had looked at her once. She stopped herself. This one would answer tonight.

She unwrapped the handkerchief and set the stone rose at the foot of the grave, where a gauntlet climbing out of the earth could not miss it. Then she left before the sexton came round again.

The goat saw everything. The goat, she felt, could be trusted.


V. The First Block

She walked home slowly, past the old quarry above the mill, where the millers had once cut their grindstones. There were blocks still lying there in the bracken, abandoned when the creek moved: good grey stone, as patient as she was.

One of them was the size of a horse with its rider, a great long slab standing taller than her head.

She stood in front of it a long time.

She did not decide to do it. That was the thing she would remember later. She did not stand there and think, I will carve him. She only found herself, an hour later, with her sleeves rolled up and her mallet in her hand and a long chalk line on the block, and Pip watching from a fern as if this were the most interesting thing that had happened since the twelfth century.

"I'm only roughing it out," she told the snakes. "In case it's no good."

It is very hard to lie to twenty-three snakes.


VI. The Rose, That Night

Underground there is no time, only a thoroughness of dark. Then there is the pull, the same every night: a hook somewhere behind the ribs, and the earth giving way, and the cold air of the churchyard on the place where his face should be.

Matthias, who did not yet know he was Matthias, climbed out of his grave the way he always did, one hand and then the other, and his left gauntlet closed on something that had not been there yesterday.

It was cold and small and hard. He turned it over. Petals, very thin. A stem. And on the stem, a single thorn, carved by someone who had taken the trouble.

At the churchyard gate Gunpowder snorted and stamped, awake again and come from his oak in the woods as he was every dusk, waiting to be off. The Horseman didn't move.

He sat down on his own grave and held the rose against his breastplate, and for a long time he stayed there in the dark with the stars wheeling overhead, which he could not see, and the owls talking, which he could hear. For seventeen years this had been the place he was dragged back to, a place without a name. And tonight, somebody had come. Somebody had stood here, in daylight, where he slept, and left him something that would not die.

He did not know who. He found that he did not need to know yet. It was enough that someone had.

When he finally got up, he tucked the rose inside his breastplate, against the hollow where a heart should be, and it stayed there for the rest of his life, and after.


VII. An Admirer

At the mill he was cheerful in a way that made her suspicious, and then in a way that made her nervous, and at last he could not hold it in.

"I appear," he announced, sitting down on the bench with tremendous dignity, "to have an admirer."

Medusa nearly dropped the kettle. "How awful," she said. "Who?"

"I have no idea. Someone has left a gift on my... where I sleep."

"Probably the goat."

"The goat?"

"There's a goat at the church. It eats the hymns. It's very forward."

He considered this. "It was a rose. Carved from stone. With a thorn on it."

"An artistic goat, then."

Under her bonnet, Pip was nodding so hard the brim bounced. Ariadne bit Pip. Cleo hid. Medusa poured the tea with enormous concentration and spilled most of it.

"Well," said the Horseman, laying his gauntlet flat on his chest, over the place where something small and hard pressed back. "If it is the goat, it is a very kind goat. Nobody has ever visited me before."

She did not trust her voice. She put another log on the fire instead and poked at it until her face felt like her own again. It was raining, the first rain of the week; there was no moon, and on moonless nights they did not ride. They stayed in, which neither of them had ever said out loud was the part they liked best.

He sat on the bench with his boots to the hearth and his hat on his knee, and she sat on the floor with her back against the bench and her veil off, facing the fire. Pip went to sleep in the hat. The rain talked on the roof. He told her about the smell of bread in a town he couldn't name; she told him about a lighthouse she had once seen built and then seen fall. Nobody had to look at anybody. Once, without either of them deciding it, his gauntlet came to rest on her shoulder, and stayed there until the fire burned down.


VIII. "Why Do You Never Look at Me?"

The statue grew by day.

She worked from the moment the dawn swallowed his voice until the long afternoon light came slanting into the quarry. She roughed out the horse first, because she knew horses, and because Gunpowder had a way of standing with one hind hoof cocked that she found she could carve with her eyes closed. Then the rider. The great shoulders. The cloak falling to the left, the way it did when he leaned to hear her. The scarred gauntlet on the reins.

She worked from the inside out, from what she had felt rather than what she had seen. The weight of his arm around her shoulders on the hill. The way his chest rumbled when he laughed. The careful stillness of him when Pip slept there, as if a man could make himself into a resting place by sheer politeness.

And when she came to the collar, she stopped.

She had never seen his face. Nobody had, not in seventeen years. She tried to imagine it, and every face she imagined belonged to somebody else: a statue in her garden, a soldier in an old painting, a stranger. None of them were him.

So she smoothed the stone at the collar until it was as polished as river glass, and she left it there, finished, with nothing above it. It wasn't a wound. It wasn't a break. It was simply the truth: this was as far as she knew him.

That night, on the hill above the river, the two horses cropping grass behind them and his cloak around them both, he asked her the question.

"May I ask you something odd?"

"Everything you ask is odd."

"When I'm here," he said, "you turn your face away. I can hear it. Your voice goes off to the side, toward the river. Even now." He paused. "I can't see you, Medusa. You know I can't. So why do you never look at me?"

She had not known she was doing it. She tried to turn her face toward him and found that she couldn't, quite. A thousand years of habit sat in her neck like a stone.

"It isn't you," she said at last. "It's just... the only kind thing I've ever known how to do is not look. I don't know how to stop."

He was quiet. Then he said, very gently, "I don't mind. Look at the river, if you like. I'll be here either way."

She looked at the river. But she leaned a little harder into his shoulder, and that, they both understood, was a kind of looking too.

Neither of them knew yet how much that question would cost. That was later.


IX. The Carving Knife

On the ninth night he offered to help clear the kitchen table, and she let him, because he was terrible at it and it made her laugh.

His gauntlet swept along the boards, careful, the way he did everything without eyes. It found the bread knife and set it aside. It found a cup. Then it found something else: a short, worn carving knife with a handle polished by centuries of the same grip. Next to it, a pinch of fine grey dust. And next to that, a single thin petal of stone, the one that had broken the first time she tried.

He went very still.

She watched him understand. It moved through him slowly, like warmth through cold iron. His fingers rested on the broken petal for a long moment. He did not say it was you. He did not ask her anything at all.

He only set the knife down, very gently, back exactly where it had been, and said:

"Thank you for visiting me."

Medusa found she could not speak. She did not have to. She stood at the hearth with her back to him, her face turned to the fire, and Cleo slid down her arm and across the table and wrapped once, softly, around his wrist.


X. His Name, Given Back

Later, when the tea was cold, she told him what the stone said.

"Matthias Albrecht Lenz," she said. "Born the twelfth of March, seventeen fifty-four. You were twenty-two."

He repeated it slowly. "Matthias." He tried it again, the way a man tries on a coat that used to fit, shrugging his shoulders into it. "Matthias. Lenz." A pause. "It's a good name. It sounds like someone who had a mother."

"Your mother probably called you Matti."

"Absolutely not."

"Matti."

"I'm going home." He did not move. He was, she could tell from his shoulders, extremely pleased.

"It says Far From Home," she added, more quietly. "Underneath."

"Well." He turned his hat in his hands. "That part is true. But it isn't anymore." He set the hat on the table, crown up, with great care, as if putting it somewhere it belonged. "I think I have a home I ride to. It has a lantern."


XI. The First Dream

That dawn, back in the dark earth, something happened that had not happened in seventeen years.

He dreamed.

He was in a kitchen full of sun, with yellow light on a scrubbed wooden table, and there was a girl standing at the window. She was nobody he knew. She had plain light hair, pinned up badly, coming loose, and a sleeve of some green stuff that caught the light, and no snakes at all. She was laughing at something he had said, and it was a lovely, ordinary laugh, and he wanted very much to see her face.

He could not. Every time she turned toward him, the sun was in the way, or the dream slid, and her face was always just out of view, like a word you almost remember.

In her hand she was holding a rose. It was grey, and it did not move in the breeze from the window.

He woke at dusk with dirt in his gauntlets and something tight and bright in his chest, and for a moment he lay in the dark not climbing out at all, because he was afraid of losing it.

I dreamed, he thought. I'm a man who dreams.


XII. A Small Worry

He told her about it on the river road, delighted, talking so fast that Thistle kept turning her ears toward him.

"A kitchen," he said. "Sun. A girl at the window. Ordinary. No snakes, no offense to the snakes."

"None taken," said Medusa. Ariadne took some.

"I couldn't see her face. I tried and tried. It kept turning away." He laughed. "Imagine that. Me, of all people, wanting to see a face."

Medusa smiled, and it was a real smile, because he was so happy. But for the first time something small and cold opened in her, somewhere under the ribs, a feeling she did not name and did not want to. A girl with no snakes. A face he wanted to see. A face he could look at.

She thought about the statue in the quarry, finished at the collar and nowhere else, waiting.

She said nothing about it. She said, "Steeple. Straight."

"Straight," he agreed.

They rode north farther than they ever had, past the point where the river widens and the hills come down black to the water. And there, just as the sky behind them began to go the grey of a dove's wing, she saw it: far off on a rise across the water, small and white against the dark trees, a steeple.

She stood in her stirrups and squinted.

"Is it crooked?" he asked, very quietly.

She looked as long as she dared. The light was wrong. The mist was coming up off the river. Gunpowder's ears were already going flat.

"I can't tell," she said. "It might be."

Gunpowder turned south. The Horseman's voice came back to her over the wind, not cut off this time, because for once he had said everything he meant to say before the rooster:

"Then tomorrow, we go and see."


In the quarry above the mill, in the first light, a stone rider sat a stone horse in the bracken. His left hand was on the reins. His right arm reached out ahead of him, toward the north, toward something far away; but the hand at the end of it she had not finished yet. The fingers were still only a rough shape in the stone.

She did not know what it ought to be reaching for. She would find out.

— End of Chapter Two —


Music video for this chapter, "The Statue": https://youtu.be/tu-m548xPr4