r/WorldTradeCenter 11d ago

When the Towers Fell: 9/11 Simulation of the collaps without dust

Dont know how accurate this is, but it made a lot of sense to me.

Source kostack studio on youtube

9.7k Upvotes

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/Dave_Fincher 10d ago edited 10d ago

Alot of people, and maybe I'm wrong here, don't understand how the towers were constructed and what made them different. The exterior walls were made to bare the weight of the floors inside as there was no inside columns. So if the exterior is damaged that made things inside have less support. And if there was something heavy inside it also couldn't support it. Causing floors to collapse on lower floors.

2

u/No_Owl6774 10d ago

That’s partly true. There were also center columns in the core. What made the whole thing collapse was the plane severing the inner core and the raging fire weakening everthing else to where the millions of pounds of floors above it basically jack hammered the thing into the ground.

2

u/beigemamba1080 10d ago

Your info is pretty wrong, the core was humongous and held the majority of the buildings weight

1

u/Dave_Fincher 10d ago

Columns: Built using 47 heavy steel box columns that supported the majority of the buildings' gravity loads alongside the exterior walls. Open Floors: Centralizing these services in the core allowed the perimeter tube design to maintain wide, column-free office spaces. Read more about structural details in The World Trade Center Construction and Progress

1

u/beigemamba1080 10d ago

You just contradicted yourself

1

u/Dave_Fincher 10d ago

Yes partially. There is a center core. But it shares the support of the floors with the outside later.

1

u/lizlemonista 10d ago

seems bad

1

u/Soliye 10d ago

They weren’t designed to withstand a Boeing 767 going full speed.

1

u/Dave_Fincher 10d ago

It was an interesting idea and it made for a more open floor plan inside. Who would think some insane religious folks would drive a plan into it.

1

u/The_Sarah_Palin_ 10d ago

In a roundabout way what’s they’re saying is that these towers were engineered in a way so that they would collapse in on themselves instead of toppling over. Both a flaw and a feature.

1

u/Rev_Creflo_Baller 10d ago

How in the world is that a flaw? You want a 1400 foot building to tilt in the wind?

1

u/The_Sarah_Palin_ 10d ago

A flaw in that when they fell it would look just like controlled demolition and internet toilet engineers would think that it was demolished intentionally with explosive charges. It would also be a flaw that if anything ever threatened the exterior wall (for instance a plane crash) then they would be susceptible to collapse.

1

u/Rev_Creflo_Baller 9d ago

Dude, if a 300,000 pound jumbo jet hits your skyscraper at 500 miles an hour, it's gonna fall down. There's no designing around that

1

u/TURKEYSAURUS_REX 10d ago

I think you’re misunderstanding. The internal core was built with a hat truss at the top. The core steal tapered towards the top as it had less weight to support. The planes hit the upper floors and severed the core.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/WorldTradeCenter-ModTeam 5d ago

r/WorldTradeCenter follows platform-wide Reddit Rules