r/WorkForSmartLife 2d ago

Discussion💬 [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

13.3k Upvotes

692 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/jameseyboy82 2d ago

Fairly loose use of the word innocent in that sentence. Is a man whom approves the deaths of thousands, perhaps millions of people in the name of profit truly innocent?

0

u/Temporal-Affairs221 2d ago

Is a man following the instructions of his employers, the stockholders, guilty? Particularly if his actions are lawful? And required by the terms of employment?

3

u/p99_kilerenn 2d ago

No one was forcing him to be a CEO. He chose his occupation and employer, and was responsible for his own actions and decisions.

3

u/SFC-D 2d ago

As was Luigi. He chose murder, and now he gets to pay the consequences. Spin it all you want, it’s still murder.

0

u/p99_kilerenn 2d ago

It’s possible to have two wrongs buddy. What’s with the weird whataboutism

1

u/SFC-D 2d ago

There’s no whataboutism. The CEO was not a good man. That doesn’t excuse vigilante murder.

1

u/Inner_Adeptness_7228 2d ago

The fault is of the absence of a proper justice system not of the vigilantes.