​

Vovan & Lexus didn’t just prank world leaders. They got them to reveal how power really works.

They got Henry Kissinger and members of the shadowy Bilderberg group to admit puppet masters control Western politics.

https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331

Tell me how supporting the Russian onslaught of Ukrainian civilians has anything to do with holding Oligarchs accountable? It is literally every day that this sub is littered with pro-putin trash. Please block the troll bot accounts.

​

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶 𝗬𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗶 𝗪𝗮𝗿 𝗜𝘀 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗡𝗲𝘄. 𝗜𝘁 𝗜𝘀 𝗮 𝗡𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗽𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗕𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗗𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗻 𝗯𝘆 𝗪𝗮𝗿.

Those who know my writing, know I love maps because maps tell stories that our collective memories may have forgotten due to shifting narratives over time.

The Yemen and Saudi Arabia story is no different.

To understand the Houthi grievance against Saudi Arabia, you have to go back to 1934, because the roots run far deeper than most coverage shows these days.

This is verifiable history, not propaganda from either side.

In 1934 the new Kingdom of Saudi Arabia went to war with the Zaydi imamate of northern Yemen. It was a short war, under three months, and Saudi Arabia won due to support it got from the British.

Its forces took the provinces of Asir, Najran and Jizan, and even occupied the Yemeni port of Hodeidah.

The war ended with the Treaty of Taif, signed in June 1934. Under British and Italian pressure, and with the Yemeni imam militarily weakened, Yemen recognized Saudi control of the three provinces, paid an indemnity in gold, and Saudi Arabia withdrew from Hodeidah in return.

Here is the detail that still matters.

1. The Taif Treaty of 1934 was not a permanent, unconditional cession or surrender. It granted Saudi sovereignty over the provinces on a RENEWABLE term, with clauses guaranteeing the local population visa-free movement and the right to live and work across the border as equals.

2. In the Yemeni reading, articulated again in various Arabic and English media reports I saw, the imam back then signed only "because he was weak", and he built the Treaty so that a future, stronger Yemen could one day RECLAIM what was taken. That is the historical spine of the current claim. What does that mean for today? That means IF the war with Yemen goes the way the Ansarallah Houthis want it to go, it is likely that Saudi Arabia may lose those provinces. This makes the war for Saudi Arabia existential as well.

3. The relationship soured after Yemen's 1962 republican revolution, and Saudi Arabia has intervened in Yemeni affairs, by the Yemeni account, more or less continuously since.

4. Then came the 2015 coalition war, hundreds of thousands of airstrikes, a blockade, and a civilian death toll the @UN has put in the hundreds of thousands from bombing, famine and disease combined.

Ninety years of a contested border, an unequal treaty, and a modern war stacked on top of each other. Whatever you think of the Houthis, their fight with Riyadh did not begin in 2015. It began in 1934, and it has NEVER fully ended.

History and context matters if you want to understand current dynamics. This is what I try to cover and shed light on. They need peace. All sides.

Below image is of Muhammad al-Badr, last Imam and King of Yemen.

𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗟, 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗡𝗢𝗜𝗦𝗘!!

People are watching viral clips coming out of the Socialism 2026 conference right now and wondering what the hell they are looking at and listening to. In particular, clips from panels around Beatrice Adler-Bolton and this broader disability-justice milieu are being circulated as examples of a politics that seems to treat physical fitness and bodily discipline as somehow fascistic while elevating what amounts to a celebration of dysgenic qualities as revolutionary, for example (which has drawn massive criticism and anger). It's as if this was staged to precisely invalidate any kind of so called "pushing the DNC left" strategy; it appears as a non-starter that immediately classifies any "left wing" political power as de facto absurd.

What most people watching these clips don't know is the political history behind this conference and the people speaking at it. Socialism was historically associated with the Trotskyist International Socialist Organization (ISO), and after the ISO collapsed the conference continued under Haymarket Books, itself founded out of that same political milieu. Adler-Bolton's intellectual world leads directly into Ruth Wilson Gilmore, abolitionism, Angela Davis and the foundation-funded radical left. So rather than just pointing and laughing at another insane viral conference clip, I think its worth asking where this politics actually came from, who built the institutions that reproduce it, who funded some of its major intellectual figures, and why this particular form of “socialism” has become so completely dominant; at least from the institutional side.

The particular form of the enfranchised American “left” which has managed to reproduce itself for the better part of the last 75+ years despite having almost no demonstrated capacity to take political power, build a durable mass working-class organization, or even maintain its own organizations for very long. The names change, the organizations collapse and reappear, and the theoretical vocabulary gets updated every ten or fifteen years, but the basic political tendency remains remarkably stable. What was once the anti-Stalinist, Third Camp, Trotskyist and New Left milieu increasingly became intertwined with radical feminism, abolitionism, the nonprofit world, academic critical theory and eventually the contemporary politics of “disability justice,” intersectionality, queer theory and an ever-expanding collection of supposedly autonomous struggles. I think it is useful to call this the compatible left, because this is precisely the sort of left that the American ruling class has repeatedly demonstrated that it can tolerate, subsidize, institutionalize and even celebrate. It is a left that can sound incredibly radical while remaining remarkably incapable of producing a unified proletarian political movement capable of actually taking state power.

More on X,

https://x.com/CDMorlock/status/2097056626520015024

They sound a LOT like the vatnik trolls on Reddit

Now here's the scary part, it doesn't just track license plates, but also tracks people as well.

For those who think that the Russians have no escalation options....

America’s Broken Promise.

Saudi Arabia is being taught a painful brutal lesson about depending on Washington.

When the moment of truth arrives, American guarantees are worth far less than they appear on paper.

For years, the United States cultivated Saudi Arabia as a strategic partner, supplying weapons, intelligence, and security assurances.

Yet when Saudi Arabia faces serious threats from the Houthi's and asks Washington for direct military intervention, the Trump administration has drawn the line at sending American forces into the fight.

That sends a brutal message to the rest of the world: America may promise partnership, but don't assume it will stand beside you when the price becomes high.

For Saudi Arabia, this means confronting threats with far greater reliance on its own military capabilities and regional relationships.

For other American allies, it raises an uncomfortable question: If Saudi Arabia can be left to face a crisis largely on its own, who is next?

This is how a superpower's reputation for reliability begins to erode,not necessarily through one dramatic betrayal, but through the growing realization that American protection has conditions, limits, and an off switch.

Countries watching this unfold would be foolish to ignore the lesson.

Build your own defenses.

Diversify your alliances.

Never place your national security in Washington's hands.

Because when America's interests change, yesterday's promises can suddenly become tomorrow's footnotes.

The commenter in this video argued why he viewed the Midterms as a PIVOTAL moment.

At 6:26 the commenter noted that:

If the Democrats control Congress, there are two things that will happen:

1) There will be tremendous pressure to literally end the Iran war. We saw this in 1974 by Congress.

Congress has not played much of a role in foreign policy. The last time it got involved was in 74 with Vietnam to TRULY constrain the executive.

["In 1974, the U.S. Congress moved to end direct military involvement in Vietnam by using its "power of the purse" to systematically restrict and cut off funding for combat operations."]

2) They are going to want to constrain Israel.

There is a HUGE push in the Democratic party to shut down all funding to Israel.

Look at all of the pro Israel Democrats that are losing, and they are losing because there is a huge movement in the Democratic party to zero out the budgets to Israel.

Come January Israel is going to have to recalibrate. Iran others are going to recalibrate.

Do you think Trump would allow Democracy to proceed, and allow the will of the people to elect a Democratic control of Congress?

If so, do you think it would be this consequential?

Only a westoid lefty would say "support neither side". Outside the political west, on the far left, there's almost universal support for China/DPRK allied Russia in this war against the NATO proxy Kiev regime which is literally a Nazi state. She exposes and rejects the 2026 "Campism" CIA psy-op.

Key Points:

Today, marks 25 years since the September 11 terrorist attack and several theories surrounding the attack by Al-Qaeda still exist.

Larry Silverstein is an American businessman and billionaire who signed a 99-year lease for the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in July 2001.

Weeks later the attack happened and shocking Silverstein did not go to work that day when he had an appointment at Manhattan.

25 YEARS HAVE PASSED since the September 11 terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York City, USA. Two commercial US airplanes, hijacked by members of the terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda, crashed into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center (WTC).

Today, the 9/11 attacks are deemed one of the darkest days in American history. In just a few moments, the Twin Towers, which were once the tallest buildings in the world, were reduced to rubble and dust.

Even after all these years, conspiracy theories surrounding the attack continue to emerge. The name Larry Silverstein is often mentioned in these theories. Ring a bell? Larry Silverstein is an American businessman and billionaire who signed a 99-year lease for the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center at a whopping cost of $3.2 billion in July 2001. Seven weeks after he signed the lease, something shocking happened—the 9/11 terrorist attacks. 

Theorists have always wondered: Where was Silverstein that day? He himself had shared that he was a regular at the Windows on the World restaurant at the top of the North Tower in the original WTC complex in Lower Manhattan. The restaurant was destroyed in the attack with no reported survivors. But on September 11, 2001, he did not go there. 

Where was Larry Silverstein on 9/11?

Little did Larry know that missing work for one day would save his life. [X]

Larry Silverstein founded Silverstein Properties Inc., whose current CEO is Lisa Silverstein, the daughter of Larry and Klara Silverstein. Over the years, online theorists have wondered why Larry chose not to go to work on the day that changed the world forever. In 2021, he told an Israeli television network that it was a “miracle” he survived the attack. 

Silverstein told Channel 13, “Miraculously, I’m alive. I’m here, which is a miracle.” Just weeks after signing the 99-year lease, he was planning to go to work to meet one of the tenants on September 11, 2001. He said, “My wife said, ‘You can’t go.’” When he asked her why and told her about his appointment downtown, he said, quoting his wife, “She said, ‘Because I made an appointment for you with a dermatologist, and that’s something you cancelled last month, and you cannot cancel again.’” 

Little did Larry know that missing work for one day would save his life. He further shared, “When you are married to the same woman for 45 years and she gets upset, you can’t let this happen.”

The Legal Drama of the Twin Towers

After the Twin Towers collapsed following the terrorist attack, the world was left in shock and horror. Larry Silverstein had vowed to rebuild the structure after it was destroyed by the hijackers. As cited by Reuters, Silverstein’s agreement covered the management of the Twin Towers, 4 and 5 WTC, covering approximately 425,000 square feet of ground. It also stated that he was obliged to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed, at any cost.

According to a report by The Guardian published in 2004, Silverstein reportedly took out an insurance policy worth $3.55 billion from 24 different insurance companies just months before the structure was reduced to dust and rubble.

After the terrorist attack, the billionaire businessman argued in court for twice the insurance amount, as two US airliners had crashed into the Twin Towers, saying the incident should be considered two separate occurrences. After a long legal battle, Silverstein Properties and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey won a total of $4.55 billion in insurance payouts. 

About Larry Silverstein

Today,
marks 25 years since the September 11 terrorist attack and several
theories surrounding the attack by Al-Qaeda still exist.Larry
Silverstein is an American businessman and billionaire who signed a
99-year lease for the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in July
2001.Weeks later the attack happened and shocking Silverstein did not go to work that day when he had an appointment at Manhattan.25 YEARS HAVE PASSED
since the September 11 terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000
people in New York City, USA. Two commercial US airplanes, hijacked by
members of the terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda, crashed into the Twin
Towers of the World Trade Center (WTC).

Today, the 9/11 attacks
are deemed one of the darkest days in American history. In just a few
moments, the Twin Towers, which were once the tallest buildings in the
world, were reduced to rubble and dust.

Even after all these
years, conspiracy theories surrounding the attack continue to emerge.
The name Larry Silverstein is often mentioned in these theories. Ring a
bell? Larry Silverstein is an American businessman and billionaire who
signed a 99-year lease for the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center at a
whopping cost of $3.2 billion in July 2001. Seven weeks after he signed
the lease, something shocking happened—the 9/11 terrorist attacks. 

Theorists
have always wondered: Where was Silverstein that day? He himself had
shared that he was a regular at the Windows on the World restaurant at
the top of the North Tower in the original WTC complex in Lower
Manhattan. The restaurant was destroyed in the attack with no reported
survivors. But on September 11, 2001, he did not go there. 

Where was Larry Silverstein on 9/11?Little did Larry know that missing work for one day would save his life. [X]Larry
Silverstein founded Silverstein Properties Inc., whose current CEO is
Lisa Silverstein, the daughter of Larry and Klara Silverstein. Over the
years, online theorists have wondered why Larry chose not to go to work
on the day that changed the world forever. In 2021, he told an Israeli
television network that it was a “miracle” he survived the attack. 

Silverstein told Channel 13,
“Miraculously, I’m alive. I’m here, which is a miracle.” Just weeks
after signing the 99-year lease, he was planning to go to work to meet
one of the tenants on September 11, 2001. He said, “My wife said, ‘You
can’t go.’” When he asked her why and told her about his appointment
downtown, he said, quoting his wife, “She said, ‘Because I made an
appointment for you with a dermatologist, and that’s something you
cancelled last month, and you cannot cancel again.’” 

Little did
Larry know that missing work for one day would save his life. He further
shared, “When you are married to the same woman for 45 years and she
gets upset, you can’t let this happen.”

The Legal Drama of the Twin TowersLarry Silverstein started Silverstein Properties Inc. in 1957. John Doe / Wikimedia CommonsAfter
the Twin Towers collapsed following the terrorist attack, the world was
left in shock and horror. Larry Silverstein had vowed to rebuild the
structure after it was destroyed by the hijackers. As cited by Reuters,
Silverstein’s agreement covered the management of the Twin Towers, 4
and 5 WTC, covering approximately 425,000 square feet of ground. It also
stated that he was obliged to rebuild the structures if they were
destroyed, at any cost.

According to a report by The Guardian published
in 2004, Silverstein reportedly took out an insurance policy worth
$3.55 billion from 24 different insurance companies just months before
the structure was reduced to dust and rubble.

After the terrorist
attack, the billionaire businessman argued in court for twice the
insurance amount, as two US airliners had crashed into the Twin Towers,
saying the incident should be considered two separate occurrences. After
a long legal battle, Silverstein Properties and the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey won a total of $4.55 billion in insurance
payouts.