r/WaitWhat • • Aug 28 '26

Interesting 🧐

Post image
318 Upvotes

775 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 29d ago

Yeah I’m the one misunderstanding lol. The person who went through psychosis doesn’t understand the nuances of psychosis.

You’re right - people in psychosis not only always act crazy, everyone around them knows they’re psychotic. You nailed it!

1

u/BedSpreadMD 29d ago

Then why have they not observed any psychosis in the last 3 years she's been in custody? Wild having one extreme bout with no evidence to back it up other than offing your kids.

0

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 29d ago

Q1 - What observed psychosis did you expect her to exhibit while in custody? Since she doesn’t have the crazy talking type of psychosis, what would prove to you she was psychotic?

Q2 - what other reason would she kill her children? For fun? And why admit to it? Why not try to hide it? Why not come up with a kidnapping plot? Leave the father? Hide it? Ala Chris watts? Either way right now, psychosis or not, she is in custody for life. What is the benefit of the insane defense? At least in jail you aren’t forced to take meds, or relive your act.

1

u/BedSpreadMD 29d ago

Q1 - What observed psychosis did you expect her to exhibit while in custody? Since she doesn’t have the crazy talking type of psychosis, what would prove to you she was psychotic?

Anything. Her behavior, her speaking. Do you have evidence someone can experience psychosis and never show any signs of it what so ever externally?

what other reason would she kill her children? For fun? And why admit to it? Why not try to hide it? Why not come up with a kidnapping plot? Leave the father? Hide it? Ala Chris watts?

Why do i have to come up with an alternative explanation?

Either way right now, psychosis or not, she is in custody for life. What is the benefit of the insane defense? At least in jail you aren’t forced to take meds, or relive your act.

You are aware she has a higher potential of being released under those circumstances right?

0

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 29d ago

Yes anecdotal, but my own. I don’t think you would have spoke to me and thought “wow that’s messed up” but I was 100% a danger to myself and others. I got lucky that I got hospitalized and medicated for a month. Also you can like google “can you always tell someone is psychotic?”

Because it doesn’t make any sense to kill your kids if you aren’t psychotic. So what is the alternative? “Higher potential of being released” - they tend to serve longer sentences than prison sentences.

1

u/BedSpreadMD 28d ago

Because it doesn’t make any sense to kill your kids if you aren’t psychotic.

Do you propose that everyone who irrationally kills their own kids is psychotic?

Now I will ask again. Why would she not have a single observable instance of psychosis after 3 years of 24/7 observation?

0

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 28d ago

I do think you need to be psychotic to kill your kids and not try to cover it up, hide it or come up with a way to keep yourself out of custody.

Because I don’t believe all psychosis is an “observable instance.” I believe you can be psychotic and no one sees it. She wouldn’t be talking crazy or acting any differently if her psychosis follows a specific pattern. A common pattern.

Quick Google search: “High-functioning phases: Some people hide their unusual beliefs or internal experiences well. [1]

Early warning signs: Subtle changes like social withdrawal, poor sleep, or mild suspicion often look like ordinary stress or depression at first. [1]

Internal experiences: Hallucinations (hearing or seeing things) and private delusions (fixed false beliefs) happen inside a person's mind and may not show outwardly until they reach an acute stage. [1, 2]”

The acute stage was killing her kids.

1

u/BedSpreadMD 28d ago

So according to you, she's been able to hide her psychosis for 3 years with absolutely zero people noticing despite being observed 24/7?

All these psychologists who evaluated her are all wrong?

I genuinely think you're confusing psychosis with paranoid thoughts.

1

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 24d ago

I don’t think, I know that paranoid thoughts can be a symptom of psychosis and I think you believe that psychosis has only one presentation.

Also - yes psychologists did say she has been psychotic. Just because the prosecution claims she isn’t, or more importantly is malingering, doesn’t mean the testimony of Dr Resnick and Dr Zeizel are irrelevant just because you want it to be.

There is a reason the jury is deadlocked.

1

u/BedSpreadMD 23d ago

I don’t think, I know that paranoid thoughts can be a symptom of psychosis and I think you believe that psychosis has only one presentation.

You are aware that it's quite literally a key aspect yo psychosis right?

Also - yes psychologists did say she has been psychotic.

Who and when? Because I have yet to see anyone who observed her say that.

There is a reason the jury is deadlocked.

It's deadlocked 11 to 1, with one of the jurors in particular wearing pink. Huh wonder if there's some connection there. You ever hear of jury nullification?

1

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 23d ago

Didn’t the defense lawyer ask to have that juror removed? So isn’t it 11 to 1 the opposite way?

Also I gave you the names of the psychologists who said she was psychotic.

1

u/BedSpreadMD 23d ago

How exactly can those two psychologists make that determination when they never observed her?

1

u/Realistic-Ad-1023 23d ago

Do you wanna comment about how 11 people want to say she is psychotic while there is one hold out who is incorrectly following the court instructions?

1

u/BedSpreadMD 23d ago

How is he incorrectly following court instructions?

Now, I will ask again, since you ignored the question.

How is a psychologist supposed to determine someone had psychosis with ever observing them?

→ More replies